UNITED STATES
SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OR 12(G) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Date of event requiring this shell company report
For the transition period from to
Commission file number:
NOAH HOLDINGS LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Noah Holdings Limited
Phone: (
Facsimile: (86) 21
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
| Trading Symbol(s) |
| Name of exchange on which registered |
one Class A ordinary share, par value US$0.0005 per share Class A ordinary shares, par value US$0.0005 per share* |
|
(Title of Each Class and Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)
* Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the American depositary shares
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
NONE
(Title of Class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☒
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or (15) (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ☐ Yes ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Accelerated filer ☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
| Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ☐ |
| Other ☐ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow: ☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. ☐ Yes ☐ No
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
4 | ||
4 | ||
4 | ||
41 | ||
81 | ||
81 | ||
110 | ||
123 | ||
125 | ||
126 | ||
127 | ||
138 | ||
139 | ||
141 | ||
141 | ||
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | 141 | |
142 | ||
144 | ||
144 | ||
144 | ||
144 | ||
144 | ||
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers | 144 | |
145 | ||
145 | ||
145 | ||
145 | ||
145 | ||
145 | ||
145 |
i
INTRODUCTION
Unless otherwise indicated and except where the context otherwise requires, references in this annual report on Form 20-F to:
● | “active clients” for a given period refer to registered clients who obtain financial products distributed or provided by us during that given period, excluding clients in our lending and other businesses segment; |
● | “ADSs” refer to our American depositary shares, two of which represent one Class A ordinary share; |
● | “assets under management” or “AUM” refers to the amount of capital commitments made by investors to the funds we provide continuous management services without adjustment for any gain or loss from investment, for which we are entitled to receive recurring service fees or performance-based income, except for public securities investments. For pubic securities investments, the “assets under management” or “AUM” refers to the net asset value of the investments we manage, for which we are entitled to receive recurring service fees and performance-based income; |
● | “China” or the “PRC” refers to the People’s Republic of China, excluding, for the purpose of this annual report only, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan; |
● | “Class A ordinary shares” refer to our Class A ordinary shares, par value US$0.0005 per share; |
● | “Class B ordinary shares” refer to our Class B ordinary shares, par value US$0.0005 per share; |
● | “financial products” refer to products we distribute to clients, such as credit products, private equity products, public securities products and insurance products; |
● | “high net worth individuals” refer to individuals with investable financial assets of no less than RMB6 million; |
● | “mass affluent individuals” refer to the high end of the mass market, or individuals with RMB500,000 to RMB6 million of investable financial assets. |
● | “NYSE” refers to the New York Stock Exchange; |
● | “ordinary shares” refer to our ordinary shares, which include both Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, par value US$0.0005 per share; |
● | “private funds” refer to investment funds which raise capital through non-public offerings of funds targeting qualified investors; |
● | “registered clients” refer to clients who have finished our know-your-customer and anti-money laundering review process, but may or may not have purchased any products with us; |
● | “RMB” or “Renminbi” refers to the legal currency of China; |
● | “transaction value” refers to the aggregate value of the financial products we distribute through our wealth management business during a given period; |
● | “variable interest entity” or “VIE” refers to our variable interest entities in which we do not have equity interests but whose financial results have been consolidated into our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP as if they were our wholly-owned subsidiaries. |
2
Unless the context indicates otherwise, each of “we,” “us,” “our company,” “our,” and “Noah” refer to Noah Holdings Limited, its subsidiaries and variable interest entity and the variable interest entity’s subsidiaries. Unless otherwise noted, all translations from RMB to U.S. dollars (“USD” or “US$”) are made at a rate of RMB6.9618 to US$1.00, the effective noon buying rate for December 31, 2019 as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements. Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those listed under “Risk Factors,” may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
You can identify some of these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “likely to” or other similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements include:
● | our goals and strategies; |
● | our future business development, financial condition and results of operations; |
● | the expected growth of the industries in which we operate; |
● | our expectations regarding demand for and market acceptance of the products and services we distribute, manage or offer; |
● | our expectations regarding keeping and strengthening our relationships with product providers; |
● | relevant government policies and regulations relating to the industries in which we operate; |
● | our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; |
● | our ability to stay abreast of market trends and technological advances; |
● | our plans to invest in research and development to enhance our product choices and service offerings; |
● | competition in the industries in which we operate; |
● | general economic and business conditions in China and internationally; |
● | our ability to obtain certain licenses and permits necessary to operate and expand our businesses; and |
● | our ability to effectively protect our intellectual property rights and not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others. |
3
These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that our expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may later be found to be incorrect. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations. Other sections of this annual report include additional factors that could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should thoroughly read this annual report and the documents that we refer to herein with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from, or worse than, what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. | Selected Financial Data |
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial information for the periods and as of the dates indicated should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in this annual report.
Our selected consolidated financial data presented below for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 and our balance sheet data as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. Our audited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”). Our selected consolidated financial data presented below for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 and our balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 have been derived from our audited financial statements not included in this annual report.
4
Starting from the fourth quarter of 2015, we changed our reporting currency from the U.S. dollar to the Renminbi. Comparable data of prior periods have also been adjusted accordingly.
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| USD | |
| (in thousands except per share data) | |||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 2,232,696 |
| 2,561,636 |
| 2,846,006 |
| 3,310,062 |
| 3,413,176 |
| 490,272 | |
Less: business taxes and related surcharges | (112,769) |
| (48,064) |
| (19,098) |
| (20,454) |
| (21,364) |
| (3,069) | |
Net revenues | 2,119,927 |
| 2,513,572 |
| 2,826,908 |
| 3,289,608 |
| 3,391,812 |
| 487,203 | |
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Compensation and benefits | (1,164,492) |
| (1,300,405) |
| (1,407,372) |
| (1,564,192) |
| (1,610,770) |
| (231,373) | |
Selling expenses | (263,815) |
| (322,667) |
| (320,462) |
| (412,720) |
| (331,346) |
| (47,595) | |
General and administrative expenses | (170,761) |
| (234,672) |
| (246,785) |
| (280,075) |
| (296,492) |
| (42,589) | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | (168) | 184 | (2,093) | 688 | (130,723) | (18,777) | ||||||
Other operating expenses | (94,624) |
| (151,088) |
| (147,318) |
| (169,368) |
| (196,793) |
| (28,268) | |
Government subsidies | 132,709 |
| 162,365 |
| 74,156 |
| 62,583 |
| 89,278 |
| 12,824 | |
Total operating costs and expenses | (1,561,151) |
| (1,846,283) |
| (2,049,874) |
| (2,363,084) |
| (2,476,846) |
| (355,778) | |
Income from operations: | 558,776 |
| 667,289 |
| 777,034 |
| 926,524 |
| 914,966 |
| 131,425 | |
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest expenses | (16,050) |
| (19,289) |
| (24,128) |
| (10,028) |
| (430) |
| (62) | |
Interest income | 39,699 |
| 39,539 |
| 45,020 |
| 69,841 |
| 89,099 |
| 12,798 | |
Investment income (loss) | 51,955 |
| 48,537 |
| 67,343 |
| 48,616 |
| (28,620) |
| (4,111) | |
Other income (expense), net | 456 |
| (2,531) |
| 3,542 |
| (23,356) |
| (7,040) |
| (1,011) | |
Total other income | 76,060 |
| 66,256 |
| 91,777 |
| 85,073 |
| 53,009 |
| 7,614 | |
Income before taxes and income from equity in affiliates | 634,836 |
| 733,545 |
| 868,811 |
| 1,011,597 |
| 967,975 |
| 139,039 | |
Income tax expense | (129,887) |
| (157,997) |
| (199,085) |
| (222,320) |
| (220,025) |
| (31,605) | |
Income from equity in affiliates | 21,353 |
| 22,343 |
| 92,136 |
| 14,469 |
| 115,809 |
| 16,635 | |
Net income | 526,302 |
| 597,891 |
| 761,862 |
| 803,746 |
| 863,759 |
| 124,069 | |
Less: net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests | (9,523) |
| (40,602) |
| (13,745) |
| (7,551) |
| 34,608 |
| 4,971 | |
Less: (loss) income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary | — |
| (5,336) |
| 6,483 |
| — |
| — |
| — | |
Less: deemed dividend on non-controlling interest of a subsidiary | — |
| — |
| 6,201 |
| — |
| — |
| — | |
Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of Noah Holdings Limited | 535,825 |
| 643,829 |
| 762,923 |
| 811,297 |
| 829,151 |
| 119,098 | |
Net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic | 19.08 |
| 22.87 |
| 26.98 |
| 27.70 |
| 27.12 |
| 3.90 | |
Diluted | 18.31 |
| 22.08 |
| 25.90 |
| 26.67 |
| 26.84 |
| 3.86 | |
Net income per ADS(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic | 9.54 |
| 11.44 |
| 13.49 |
| 13.85 |
| 13.56 |
| 1.95 | |
Diluted | 9.15 |
| 11.04 |
| 12.95 |
| 13.33 |
| 13.42 |
| 1.93 | |
Weighted average number of shares used in computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic | 28,085,521 |
| 28,150,139 |
| 28,275,637 |
| 29,288,401 |
| 30,580,181 |
| 30,580,181 | |
Diluted | 30,145,976 |
| 30,036,763 |
| 30,233,823 |
| 30,710,540 |
| 30,924,095 |
| 30,924,095 | |
Dividends declared per share | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Note:
(1) | Two ADSs represent one Class A ordinary share. |
5
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| USD | |
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
| 2,132,924 |
| 2,982,510 |
| 1,906,753 |
| 2,704,091 |
| 4,387,345 | 630,203 | |
Total assets |
| 4,096,995 |
| 5,956,489 |
| 6,494,854 |
| 8,014,264 |
| 9,802,604 | 1,408,055 | |
Total current liabilities |
| 966,831 |
| 1,575,711 |
| 1,823,327 |
| 1,591,073 |
| 1,505,053 | 216,187 | |
Total liabilities |
| 1,562,999 |
| 2,234,553 |
| 1,987,108 |
| 1,838,887 |
| 1,927,644 | 276,888 | |
Redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| — |
| 330,664 |
| — |
| — |
| — | — | |
Total equity |
| 2,533,996 |
| 3,391,272 |
| 4,507,746 |
| 6,175,377 |
| 7,874,960 | 1,131,167 |
Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the income statement effects of all forms of share-based compensation expenses, fair value changes of equity securities (unrealized), adjustment for sale of equity securities and net of relevant tax impact. A reconciliation of adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders from net income attributable to Noah shareholders, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, can be obtained by subtracting expenses for share-based compensations and unrealized gain or loss from fair value changes of equity securities, with an add back of the gain or loss from sales of equity securities. All tax expense impact of such adjustments would be also considered. Beginning in 2018, we included gain or loss from fair value changes of equity securities (unrealized) as well as gain or loss from sales of equity securities in deriving the adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders after adopting Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01.
The non-GAAP financial measure disclosed by us should not be considered a substitute for financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. The financial results reported in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results should be carefully evaluated. The non-GAAP financial measure used by us may be prepared differently from and, therefore, may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other companies.
When evaluating our operating performance in the periods presented, management reviewed non-GAAP net income results reflecting adjustments to exclude the impact of share-based compensation, fair value changes of equity securities (unrealized), adjusting for sale of equity securities, and net of relevant tax impact. As such, we believe that the presentation of the non-GAAP adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders provides important supplemental information to investors regarding financial and business trends relating to our results of operations in a manner consistent with that used by management. Pursuant to GAAP, we recognized significant amounts of expenses for all forms of share-based compensation as well as unrealized gains and losses generated from fair value changes of equity securities (net of tax impact). To make our financial results comparable period by period, we utilize non-GAAP adjusted net income to better understand our historical business operations.
6
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Results (unaudited)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| USD | |
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to Noah shareholders |
| 535,825 |
| 643,829 |
| 762,923 |
| 811,297 |
| 829,151 |
| 119,098 |
Adjustment for share-based compensation related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share options |
| 33,912 |
| 39,008 |
| 51,054 |
| 45,973 |
| 40,533 |
| 5,822 |
Restricted shares |
| 33,760 |
| 40,163 |
| 42,581 |
| 66,790 |
| 54,364 |
| 7,809 |
Less: (gains) loss from fair value changes of equity securities (unrealized) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (39,557) |
| 15,628 |
| 2,245 |
Add: Gains from sales of equity securities |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 45,240 |
| 149,652 |
| 21,496 |
Less: Tax effect of adjustments |
| 13,424 |
| 15,870 |
| 19,185 |
| (1,966) |
| 19,845 |
| 2,851 |
Adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders (non-GAAP) |
| 590,073 |
| 707,130 |
| 837,373 |
| 1,010,823 |
| 1,038,227 |
| 149,129 |
B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness |
Not applicable.
C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
Not applicable.
D. | Risk Factors |
Risks Related to Our Business
We may not be able to continue to grow at our historical rate of growth, and if we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
We commenced our business in 2005 as a consulting services provider focusing on wealth management and have gradually transitioned to a comprehensive integrated financial services group with wealth management, asset management, and lending and other businesses. Over the last five years, we have experienced substantial growth, with our net revenues increasing at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 12.7% from 2015 to 2019. We cannot assure you that we will continue to grow at our historical rate of growth. While we seek to continuously develop new financial products and services, it is difficult to predict whether our new financial products and services will be attractive to our clients and prospective clients. In addition, our growth has placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our management, personnel, systems and resources. We may not manage our growth effectively and it makes the prediction of our future results of operations difficult. As a result, past results of operations achieved by us should not be taken as indicative of the rate of growth, if any, that can be expected in the future.
The financial products that we distribute or manage involve various risks and any failure to identify or fully appreciate such risks may negatively affect our reputation, client relationships, operations and prospects.
We distribute and manage a broad variety of financial products, including onshore and offshore credit products, private equity and venture capital products, public securities products, and insurance products. These products often have complex structures and involve various risks, including default risks, interest risks, liquidity risks, market risks, counterparty risks, fraud risks and other risks.
7
Our success in distributing, managing and offering our products and services depends, in part, on our ability to successfully identify the risks associated with such products and services, and failure to identify or fully appreciate such risks may negatively affect our reputation, client relationships, operations and prospects. Not only must we be cautious about these risks in the design and development of our products and services, we must also accurately describe the risks associated with our products and services to, and evaluate them for, our clients. Although we enforce and implement strict risk management policies and procedures, such risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating the risk exposure for all of our clients in all market environments or covering all types of risks.
If we fail to identify and fully appreciate the risks associated with the products and services we distribute, manage and offer, or fail to disclose such risks to our clients, or if our clients suffer financial losses or other damages resulting from the financial products or services we distribute, manage or offer, our reputation, client relationships, business and prospects will be materially and adversely affected.
Our reputation and brand recognition are crucial to our business. Any harm to our reputation or failure to enhance our brand recognition may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our reputation and brand recognition, which depend on earning and maintaining the trust and confidence of our clients or prospective clients, are critical to our business. Our reputation and brand recognition are vulnerable to threats that are difficult or impossible to control, and costly or impossible to remediate. Regulatory inquiries or investigations, lawsuits initiated by clients or other third parties, employee misconduct, perceptions of conflicts of interest and rumors, among other things, could substantially damage our reputation, even if they are baseless. Moreover, any misconduct or allegations of misconduct by managers of third-party funds we distribute could result in negative media publicity and affect our reputation and the confidence of our clients. Furthermore, any negative media coverage about the financial service industry in general or product/service quality problems in the industry, may also negatively impact our reputation and brand recognition. If we are unable to maintain a good reputation or further enhance our brand recognition, our ability to attract and retain clients, financial product providers and key employees could be harmed and, as a result, our business and revenues would be materially and adversely affected.
Poor investment portfolio performance may lead to a decrease in AUM and reduce revenues from and the profitability of our asset management business.
The determination of the investment portfolio under asset management and the investment amount varies by investment type and is based upon our periodic evaluation and assessment of inherent and known risks associated with the respective asset class. As a portion of the revenues of our asset management business comes from performance-based fees, which are typically based on how much the returns on our managed accounts exceed a certain threshold of return for each investor, we will not earn performance-based fees if our management’s judgment is incorrect and the investment portfolio does not generate cumulative performance that surpasses the relevant target thresholds or if a fund experiences losses. Poor investment portfolio performance, either as a result of downturns in the market or economic conditions, including but not limited to changes in interest rates, inflation, terrorism, political uncertainty, our investment style and the particular investments that we make, may result in a decline in our revenues and income by causing (i) the net asset value of the assets under our management to decrease, which would result in lower management fees to us, (ii) lower investment returns, resulting in a reduction of performance-based income to us, and (iii) increase in investor redemptions, which would in turn lead to fewer AUM and lower fees for us. To the extent our future investment performance is perceived to worsen in either relative or absolute terms, the revenues and profitability of our asset management business will likely decline and our ability to grow existing funds and raise new funds in the future will likely be impaired.
8
Because a significant portion of the one-time commissions and recurring service fees we earn on the distribution of financial products are based on commission and fee rates negotiated with financial product providers, any decrease in these commission and fee rates may have an adverse effect on our revenues, cash flow and results of operations.
While a portion of our revenues are derived from fees and commissions paid by our clients, we derive a significant portion of revenues from recurring fees and commissions paid by financial product providers, which are negotiated and vary from product to product. Recurring fees and commission rates can fluctuate based on the prevailing political, economic, regulatory, taxation and competitive factors that affect the product providers. These factors, which are not within our control, include the capacity of product providers to place new business, profits of product providers, client demand and preference for financial products, the availability of comparable products from other product providers at a lower cost, the availability of alternative financial products to clients and the tax deductibility of commissions and fees. In addition, the historical volume of financial products that we distributed or managed may have a significant impact on our bargaining power with product providers in relation to the commission and fee rates for future products. Because we can neither determine, nor predict, the timing or extent of commission and fee rate changes with respect to the financial products, it is difficult for us to assess the effect of any of these changes on our operations. Therefore, any decrease in commission and fee rates would adversely affect our revenues, cash flow and results of operations.
The financial products we distribute are supplied by a limited number of financial product providers; and the renegotiation or termination of our relationships with such financial product providers could significantly impact our business.
The financial products we distribute are supplied by a selected number of financial product providers, including private equity firms, real estate fund managers, securities investment fund managers, mutual fund management companies, and insurance companies. Although our wealth management business has a broad coverage of most major asset managers and product providers in the market, due to our stringent screening process and rigorous risk management standards, a significant portion of the products distributed by us are sourced from a limited number of product providers, and thus we rely on our relationships with those important product providers. In 2017, 2018 and 2019, our top three independent financial product providers accounted for approximately 36.1%, 44.5%, and 25.5% of the aggregate value of all the products we distributed through our wealth management business, respectively. Our relationships with financial product providers are governed by distribution agreements. These agreements establish, among other things, the scope of our responsibility and our commission rates with respect to the distribution of particular products. These agreements typically are entered into on a product by product basis and expire at the expiration date of the relevant financial product. For any new financial products, new agreements need to be negotiated and entered into. If financial product providers that in the aggregate account for a significant portion of our business decide not to enter into contracts with us for their financial products, or the terms of our contracts with them become less beneficial to us, our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
Some of our clients may redeem their investments from time to time, which could reduce our fee revenues.
Certain of our asset management fund agreements and financial product agreements permit investors to redeem their investments with us at quarterly or annual intervals, after an initial “lockup” period during which redemptions are restricted or penalized. If the return on the assets under our management does not meet investors’ expectations, investors may elect to redeem their investments and invest their assets elsewhere, including with our competitors. Our recurring service fee revenues correlate directly to the amount of our AUM; therefore, redemptions may cause our expected recurring service fee revenues to decrease. Similarly, our assets under advisory (“AUA”) could decrease due to redemptions as well and impact our fees from financial products. Investors may decide to reallocate their capital away from us and to other asset managers for a number of reasons, including poor relative investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates which make other investment options more attractive, changes in investor perception regarding our focus or alignment of interest, dissatisfaction with, changes in or a broadening of a fund’s investment strategy, changes in our reputation, and departures of, or changes in responsibilities of, key investment professionals. For these and other reasons, the pace of investor redemptions and the corresponding reduction in our AUM and AUA could accelerate. In addition, redemptions could ultimately require us to liquidate assets under unfavorable circumstances, which would further harm our reputation and results of operations.
9
Our lending services business is subject to credit risks, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
There are inherent risks associated with our lending services business operated by our subsidiary Noah Rongyitong (Wuhu) Microfinance Co., Ltd. (“Rongyitong”), including credit risk which is the risk that borrowers may not repay the outstanding loans balances. These borrowers are primarily individuals and generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities and may have fewer financial resources to weather a downturn in the economy. Moreover, since a portion of the loans made by Rongyitong are collateralized by real property, any decrease in real estate prices could adversely affect the values of these collaterals, which may in turn have a negative impact on the ability of borrowers to repay their loans and further adversely affect Rongyitong’s operating results and financial condition. Conditions such as inflation, employment levels, local policy changes and other factors beyond our control may increase our credit risks, which may result in material adverse effects on our business and financial conditions.
Our business involves relatively new business models which may not be successful.
Our business is comprised of various business lines, some of which are relatively new, such as our lending services and investor education services. Many elements of such business are relatively unproven, and the markets for these services in China are relatively new, rapidly developing and subject to significant challenges. Although we intend to devote additional resources to expanding these businesses and develop and offer more innovative products and services to our clients, we have limited experience with these businesses and cannot assure you of their future success. If we fail to address the needs of our clients, adapt to rapidly evolving market trends or continue to offer innovative products and services, there may not be significant market demand for them. In addition, our lending and other services business will continue to encounter risks and difficulties that early stage businesses frequently experience, including the potential failure to cost-effectively expand the size of our customer base, maintain adequate management of risks and expenses, implement our customer development strategies and adapt and modify them as needed, develop and maintain our competitive advantages and anticipate and adapt to changing conditions in China’s financing industry resulting from mergers and acquisitions involving our competitors or other significant changes in economic conditions, competitive landscape and market dynamics. If we are unable to successfully develop our lending and other services into profitable businesses, our business and revenues would be materially and adversely affected.
We face significant competition in our businesses. If we are unable to compete effectively with our existing and potential competitors, we could lose our market share and our results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.
The wealth management, asset management and lending and other services industries in China are all undergoing rapid changes and growth. We operate in an increasingly competitive environment and compete for clients on the basis of product offering and performance, client services, reputation and brand names. Our ability to compete in this environment is also affected by license requirements for the distribution of financial products, the provision of asset management and certain lending and other services imposed on businesses operating in such industries. Our future success in each of these areas will depend in part on our ability to continue to maintain the relevant licenses and anticipate and meet market needs on a timely and cost-effective basis. In distributing financial products, we face competition primarily from other wealth management companies, commercial banks and its wealth management subsidiary companies, private banks and securities firms. In our asset management business, we also face competition from other asset management service providers in the market, including managers of private equity funds, real estate funds and public securities funds. In addition, our lending and other services business segment faces competition from a range of financial service providers which offer similar services in China. As part of China’s reform and opening policy, the Chinese government has further liberalized the financial sector in recent years, including lifting certain restrictions on the business scope of financial institutions such as foreign banks, securities companies and fund management companies, reducing quantitative entry conditions for foreign investors to invest in banking and insurance institutions and carry out these businesses, relaxing the limits on foreign ownership of joint ventures in China’s financial sectors such as banking, securities investment fund management companies, securities and insurance companies. If such liberalization continues, we may face additional competition in the industries in which we operate and our market share might be threatened or taken by foreign competitors or their joint ventures operating in the Chinese financial market.
10
Many of our competitors have greater financial and marketing resources or broader customer relationships than we do. For example, the PRC commercial banks we compete with tend to enjoy significant competitive advantages due to their nationwide distribution networks, longer operating histories, broader client bases and settlement capabilities. Moreover, many financial product providers with whom we currently have relationships, such as private equity investment firms, are also engaged in, or may in the future engage in, the distribution of financial products and may benefit from the integration of financial products with their other product offerings.
Our failure to respond to rapid product innovation in the financial industry in a timely and cost-effective manner may have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
The financial industry is increasingly influenced by frequent new product and service introductions and evolving industry standards. We believe that our future success will depend on our ability to continue to anticipate product and service innovations and to offer additional products and services that meet evolving standards on a timely and cost-effective basis. There is a risk that we may not successfully identify new product and service opportunities or develop and introduce these opportunities in a timely and cost-effective manner. In addition, products and services that our competitors develop or introduce may render our products and services less competitive. As a result, our failure to respond to product and service innovation that may affect our industry in the future may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations or prevent fraud, and investor confidence and the market price of our ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.
As a public company in the United States, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, requires that we include a report from management on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2019. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures.” Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial report and has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in all material aspects.
However, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. If we fail to maintain an effective internal control system, our financial statements could contain material misstatements and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a decline in the trading price of our ADSs.
Our business is subject to the risks associated with international operations.
International expansion is an important component of our growth strategy, with revenues from countries and regions outside of China representing 27.7% of our total revenues in 2019. We started conducting business in Hong Kong in 2012, expanded our business to Taiwan in 2014 and launched offices in Silicon Valley in 2016, Vancouver, Melbourne and New York in 2017 and Singapore in 2018. Expanding our business internationally exposes us to a number of risks, including:
● | our ability to select the appropriate geographical regions for international expansion; |
● | difficulty in understanding local markets and culture and complying with unfamiliar laws and regulations; |
● | unexpected legal or regulatory changes in local markets; |
11
● | fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
● | difficulty in identifying appropriate partners and establishing and maintaining good cooperative relationships with them; |
● | difficulty in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel; |
● | potentially adverse tax consequences; and |
● | increased costs associated with doing business in foreign jurisdictions. |
We may face risks related to natural disasters, health epidemics and other outbreaks, which could significantly disrupt our operations.
Our business could be materially and adversely affected by natural disasters, health epidemics or other public safety concerns affecting the PRC. For example, the outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19), first reported in December 2019, has spread rapidly throughout the world, especially China, the United States and Europe. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak a “global pandemic”. Many businesses and social activities in China and other countries and regions have been seriously disrupted, including those of us, our suppliers, partners, clients and employees. The global outbreak has also caused market panic, which materially and negatively affected the global financial markets. Such disruption and the potential slowdown of China’s and the world’s economy arising therefrom could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In particular, we and our clients have experienced limitations to face-to-face meetings due to quarantine measures and travel bans adopted by governments to contain the spread of this outbreak, although a large portion of our transactions can be completed online or through courier services.
Our headquarter is located in Shanghai, where most of our management and employees currently reside. Our relationship managers are based in more than 80 cities in China, and various offices overseas. Consequently, if any natural disasters, health epidemics or other public safety concerns were to affect Shanghai and other locations where our offices reside in, our operation may experience material disruptions, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our business operation could also be disrupted if any of our employees are suspected of having contracted any contagious disease or condition, since it could require our employees to be quarantined or our offices to be closed down and disinfected. All of these would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition in the near terms. Additionally, if the outbreak persists or escalates, we may be subject to further negative impact on our business operations or financial condition.
Certain of the financial products we distribute or manage have real estate or real estate-related businesses as underlying assets. These products are subject to the risks inherent in the construction, development, ownership and operation of real estate, as well as risks associated with regulatory and policy changes affecting the real estate industry in China.
Certain financial products that we distribute or manage have real estate or real estate-related business in China as their underlying assets. In 2017, 2018 and 2019, the total value of financial products that we distributed with real estate or real estate-related businesses as the underlying assets accounted for 19.8%, 33.0% and 21.0% of the total value of all the products we distributed, respectively. Real estate investments as a percentage of our total AUM increased from 7.8% in 2017 to 9.9% in 2018, and further to 10.3% in 2019.
Such products are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets. These risks include those associated with the burdens of ownership of real property, general and local economic conditions, changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area, natural disasters, changes in government regulations, changes in real property tax rates, changes in interest rates, the reduced availability of mortgage funds, which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, and other factors that are beyond our control.
12
In particular, the PRC real estate industry is subject to extensive governmental regulation and policy changes. The PRC government exerts considerable direct and indirect influence on the development of the PRC real estate sector by imposing various industry policies and other economic measures. Specifically, in the past few years, PRC governments at both national and local levels have adopted numerous policies to slow down the surge of real estate prices and to curb speculative buying through more stringent implementation of residential price control measures, some of which were subsequently cancelled when the market turned softer. Such measures may adversely impact the real estate market, dissuade potential purchasers from making purchases, reduce transaction volume, cause a decline in selling prices, and prevent developers from raising capitals they need and increase developers’ costs to start new projects. In addition, we cannot assure you that the PRC government will not adopt new measures in the future that may result in lower growth rates in the real estate industry. Frequent changes in government policies may also create uncertainty that could discourage investment in the real estate sector.
In addition, the Asset Management Association of China (the “AMAC”) released the Rules on the Management of Private Asset Management Plan Filing by Securities and Futures Institutions No. 4, or the No. 4 Filing Rules, on February 13, 2017 to regulate investments in the real estate area by securities and futures institutions. According to the No. 4 Filing Rules, the AMAC will not accept the filing application of private asset management plans or private funds investing into ordinary residential properties in “popular cities,” including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Xiamen, Hefei, Nanjing, Suzhou, Wuxi, Hangzhou, Tianjin, Fuzhou, Wuhan, Zhengzhou, Jinan and Chengdu, by way of debt investment and other specific ways of investment which are identified in the No. 4 Filing Rules. Furthermore, according to the Notice for Private Fund Registration (“Private Fund Registration New Notice”) issued by AMAC on December 23, 2019, AMAC will not accept the filing application of private funds engaging in regular and commercial lending activities in form of entrustment loans, trust loans or other means. Thus, private funds are prohibited from investing in the real estate sector by way of pure debt investment. Although private funds are not prohibited from investing in the real estate sector by way of pure equity investment or combination of equity and debt investment yet, we cannot assure you, however, that the PRC government would promulgate other real estate related laws and policies that may adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.
If we breach our fiduciary duty as the general partner or fund managers of the funds, our results of operations will be adversely impacted.
Neither the principal nor the return of the products we distribute or manage is guaranteed by us. As such, we do not bear any liabilities for any loss to the capital of the products, provided that (i) the distribution and management of the concerned products are conducted in the ordinary course of business; (ii) we have no fraud or gross negligence during the course of distribution and management, and have no intentional misconduct which will harm the interests of either the fund or the limited partners, and (iii) we have not conducted any other acts which are deemed to breach our fiduciary duty. Because we serve as the general partner or manager for the funds, we have fiduciary duty to the limited partners or the investors. Our asset management business is subject to inherent risks if we are deemed to breach our fiduciary duty. If so, such as failing to establish or implement appropriate controls when handling and processing our clients’ cash investments, we may be exposed to risks and losses. We could also experience losses on our principal in a fund in the form of limited liability partnership for which we act as the general partner, as the general partner typically bears unlimited liabilities for the debts of a limited liability partnership. Furthermore, as PRC laws and regulations are silent on the legal segregation of losses or liabilities incurred by contract-based private funds and assets of the fund manager, it is unclear whether our assets will be subject to third-party claims arising from losses or liabilities incurred by contract-based private funds we manage and we cannot assure you that our assets will not be subject to such claims. If the assets managed by us is subject to such claims, our future growth may be materially and adversely affected.
13
Misconduct of our relationship managers or other employees, including potential misuse of client funds, could harm our reputation or lead to regulatory sanctions or litigation costs.
Misconduct of our relationship managers or other employees could result in violations of law, regulatory sanctions, litigation or serious reputational or financial harm, among other consequences. Misconduct may include but not limited to:
● | engaging in misrepresentation, negligence or fraudulent activities when distributing financial products or providing asset management, lending or other services to clients; |
● | improperly using or disclosing confidential information of our clients, financial product providers or other parties; |
● | concealing unauthorized or unsuccessful activities, resulting in unknown and unmanaged risks or losses; |
● | accessing and misusing client funds, especially those maintained in segregated accounts for our contract-based private funds; or |
● | other conducts not complying with laws and regulations or our internal policies or procedures. |
Although we have established an internal compliance system to supervise service quality and regulatory compliance, we cannot always deter misconduct of our relationship managers or other employees, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect misconduct may not be effective in all cases. Any of the abovementioned misconduct could impair our ability to attract, serve and retain clients and may lead to significant legal liability, reputational harm and material adverse effects on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our business is subject to risks related to lawsuits and other claims brought by our clients.
We are subject to lawsuits and other claims in the ordinary course of our business. In particular, we may face lawsuits, arbitrations or other claims brought by our clients who purchase financial products or services we distribute, offer or provide which turn out to be unsuitable for any reason, such as misconduct by the managers of third-party funds that we have recommended or made available to our clients, or change of legal requirements or regulatory environment. For example, in connection with certain credit funds managed by an affiliate of Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd., or Gopher Shanghai, providing supply chain financing involving companies related to Camsing International Holding Limited, which were later suspected to commit fraudulent activities, Gopher Shanghai has received notices from a court and an arbitration tribunal in 2020 concerning claims initiated by individual clients against Gopher Shanghai as the fund manager. Although Gopher Shanghai was not involved in any of these suspected fraudulent activities, there is no guarantee that such claim will not have any adverse effect on our reputation, business prospect or financial condition. See “Item 4 Information on the Company—Legal Proceedings” for more information.
In connection with our provision of lending services, we may encounter claims alleging breach of contract or potential usury claims in our ordinary course of business. We may also encounter claims alleging misrepresentation by our relationship managers or other employees with such requirements. Moreover, if any new regulatory requirements are issued by any compotent regulator which affect our business, we may not be able to comply in a timely manner or at all, we may also be subject to regulatory actions and may encounter additional lawsuits, arbitrations or other claims from our investors. These risks may be heightened during periods when credit, equity or other financial markets are deteriorating in value or are volatile, or when clients or investors are experiencing losses. Claims or actions brought against us may result in settlements, awards, injunctions, fines, claims and penalties or other results adverse to us, including harm to our reputation. Even if we are successful in defending against these actions, we may incur significant expenses. Predicting the outcome of such matters is inherently difficult, particularly where claimants seek substantial or unspecified damages, or when legal or other proceedings are at an early stage. A substantial judgment, award, settlement, fine, or penalty could be materially adverse to our operating results or cash flows for a particular future period, depending on our results for that period.
14
Any failure to ensure cyber security or protection of our clients’ personal data or privacy could lead to legal liabilities, adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our services involve the exchange of information, including personal and financial information related to our clients in a variety of electronic and non-electronic means.
We face risks inherent in handling large volumes of data and protecting such data. In particular, we face a number of data-related challenges concerning transactions and other activities that take place on our platform, including but not limited to:
● | protecting the data on our system, including against attacks on our system by outside parties or fraudulent behaviors by our employees; |
● | addressing concerns related to privacy and data-sharing, safety, security and other factors; and |
● | complying with applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to the collection, use, disclosure or security of personal information, including any requests from regulatory and government authorities relating to such data. |
There have been many media reports about different financial services companies, consumer-based companies, governmental agencies and other organizations invloving unauthorized disclosure of confidential information related to their clients or users in recent years, as well as cyber attacks involving the dissemination, theft and destruction of corporate information or other assets, which resulted in third party claims or actions against these companies. There have also been incidents where hackers have requested “ransom” payments in exchange for not disclosing customer information or for restoring access to information or systems.
We are occasionally the target of attempted cyber attacks, including denial-of-service attacks, and we continuously monitor and develop our systems to protect our technology infrastructure and data from misappropriation or corruption. We may face an increasing number of attempted cyber attacks as we expand our mobile- and other Internet-based products and services, as well as our usage of mobile technologies and as we provide more of these services to a greater number of individual clients. In addition, in collaberating with third-party vendors and their respective service providers, agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other financial institutions, we could be adversely impacted if any of them is subject to a successful cyber attack or other information security event. These effects could include the loss of access to information or services from the third party subject to the cyber attack or other information security event, which could, in turn, interrupt certain of our businesses.
Despite our efforts in enhancing the security of our systems and information, we may not be able to anticipate, detect or implement effective preventive measures against all cyber threats, especially because the techniques used are increasingly sophisticated, change frequently and are often not recognized until launched. Cyber attacks can originate from a variety of sources. Any systems failure or security breach or lapse that results in the leaking of user data could harm our reputation and brand and, consequently, our business, in addition to exposing us to potential legal liability. We rely on a complex network of process and software controls to protect the confidentiality of data provided to us or stored on our systems. If we do not maintain adequate internal controls or fail to implement new or improved controls as necessary, this data could be misappropriated or confidentiality could otherwise be breached. We could be subject to liability if we inappropriately disclose any client’s personal information, or if third parties are able to penetrate our network security or otherwise gain access to any client’s name, address, portfolio holdings, or other personal information stored by us. Any such event could subject us to claims for identity theft or other similar fraud claims or claims for other misuses of personal information, such as unauthorized marketing or unauthorized access to personal information. In addition, such events would cause our clients to lose their trust and confidence in us, which may result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
15
In addition, because we provide financial product distribution services for product providers, we may have to share certain personal information about investors with contracted product providers, such as names, addresses, phone numbers and transaction accounts. We have limited control or influence over the security policies or measures adopted by such product providers. Any compromise or failure of the information security measures of these product providers could also have a material and adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
The proper functioning of our technology platforms is essential to our business. Any significant failure in our information technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business and profitability.
Our business is highly dependent on the ability of our information technology systems to timely process a large amount of information relating to the financial products and services we provide to our clients. The proper functioning of our financial control, accounting, product database, client database, client service and other data processing systems, together with the communication systems between our various service centers and our headquarters in Shanghai, is critical to our business and to our ability to compete effectively. In particular, we rely on our online service platforms, including our website www.noah-fund.com and our mobile applications, such as Wei Nuo Ya and Fund Smile, to provide our clients with updated information about the products they purchased. Maintaining and improving our technology infrastructure requires significant levels of investment. Any failure to maintain satisfactory performance, reliability, security and availability of our network infrastructure could result in the unavailability or slowdown of our website or reduced order fulfillment performance and cause significant harm to our reputation and our ability to attract and maintain users. Server interruptions, breakdowns or system failures in the cities where we maintain our servers and system hardware, including failures that may be attributable to sustained power shutdowns, or other events within or outside our control that could result in a sustained shutdown of all or a material portion of our services, could reduce the volume of products sold and the attractiveness of product offerings on our platform. We maintain our backup system hardware and operate our back-end infrastructure, but such backup may not be effective in addressing any of the foregoing problems. Our network systems are also vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, fire, flood, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer hacking and similar events. Although we have not experienced system failures, we cannot assure you that our business activities would not be materially disrupted in the event of a partial or complete failure of any of these information technology or communication systems, which could be caused by, among other things, software malfunction, computer virus attacks or conversion errors due to system upgrading. Any such future occurrences could reduce customer satisfaction, damage our reputation and our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects, as well as our reputation, could be materially and adversely affected.
We may not be able to prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property, which could reduce demands for our products and services, adversely affect our revenues and harm our competitive position.
We rely primarily on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark and competition laws and contractual arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that the steps we have taken or will take in the future to protect our intellectual property rights will be sufficient. Implementation of intellectual property-related laws in China has historically been deemed weak, primarily due to the ambiguity in the PRC regulatory and enforcement environment. Accordingly, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protection in China may not be as effective as those in the United States or other countries. Current or potential competitors may use our intellectual property without authorization to develop products and services that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours, which could reduce demands for our solutions and services, adversely affecting our operational results and harm our competitive position. Even if we are able to discover evidence of infringement or misappropriation, our recourse against such competitors may be limited or we may have to pursue litigation, which could involve substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention from the operation of our business.
16
We may face intellectual property infringement claims against us, which could be time-consuming and costly to defend and may result in the loss of significant rights by us.
Intellectual property litigation is expensive and time-consuming and could divert resources and management attention from the operation of our business even if the claim is without merit. We cannot assure you that such infringement claims will not be asserted against us in the future. If there is a successful claim of infringement, we may be required to alter our services, cease certain activities, pay substantial royalties and damages to, and obtain one or more licenses from, third parties. We may not be able to obtain those licenses on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. Any of those consequences could cause us to lose revenues, impair our client relationships and harm our reputation.
Confidentiality agreements with employees, product providers and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information.
We require our employees, product providers and others to enter into confidentiality agreements in order to protect our trade secrets, other proprietary information and, most importantly, our client information. These agreements might not effectively prevent disclosure of our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information and might not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of such confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information, and in such cases we could not assert any trade secret rights against such parties. We may be subject to costly and time-consuming litigations to protect or defend ourselves in these incidents, which may materially and adversely affect our bussiness and financial condition.
Our future success depends on our continuing efforts to retain our existing management team and other key employees as well as to attract, integrate and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel, and our business may be disrupted if our efforts are unsuccessful.
Our future success depends heavily on the continued services of our current executive officers and senior management team. We also rely on the skills, experience and efforts of other key employees, including management, marketing, support, research and development, technical and services personnel. Qualified employees are in high demand across the financial service industries in China, and our future success depends on our ability to attract, train, motivate and retain highly skilled employees and the ability of our executive officers and other members of our senior management to work effectively as a team.
If one or more of our executive officers or other key employees are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to find replacements easily, which may disrupt our business operations. We do not have key personnel insurance in place. If any of our executive officers or other key employees joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose clients, know-how, key professionals and staff members. Each of our executive officers has entered into an employment agreement with us, which contains confidentiality and non-competition provisions. However, if any dispute arises between our executive officers and us, we cannot assure you of the extent to which any of these agreements could be enforced in China, where these executive officers reside, because of the uncertainties of China’s legal system.
17
If we fail to attract and retain qualified relationship managers, our business could suffer.
We rely heavily on our relationship managers to develop and maintain relationships with our clients for our wealth management business. Our relationship managers serve as our day-to-day contacts with our clients and carry out a substantial portion of the client services we deliver. Their professional competence and approachability are essential to establishing and maintaining our brand image. As we further grow our business and expand into new cities and regions, we have an increasing demand for high quality relationship managers. We have been actively recruiting and will continue to recruit qualified relationship managers to join our coverage network. However, there is no assurance that we can recruit and retain sufficient high quality relationship managers to support our further growth. In some of the regional centers where we have recently established or plan to establish service centers, the talent pool from which we can recruit relationship managers is smaller than in national economic centers such as Shanghai and Beijing. Even if we could recruit sufficient relationship managers, we may have to incur disproportional training and administrative expenses in order to prepare our local recruits for their job. If we are unable to attract, train and retain highly productive relationship managers, our business could be materially and adversely affected. Competition for relationship managers may also force us to increase the compensation of our relationship managers, which would increase operating cost and reduce our profitability.
We have limited insurance coverage.
Insurance companies in China currently do not offer as extensive an array of insurance products as insurance companies in more developed economies. For example, while we are able to obtain professional indemnity insurance in Hong Kong for our operations located there, such insurance offerings are rare in China. Other than casualty insurance on some of our assets, and directors, supervisors and senior executives liability insurance, we do not have commercial insurance coverage on our other assets and we do not have insurance to cover our business or interruption of our business, litigation or product liability. We have determined that the costs of insuring for these risks and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us to have such insurance. Any uninsured occurrence of loss or damage to property, litigation or business disruption may result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
A downgrade in our credit rating could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms of, current or future financings.
Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings (“S&P”) has given us an investment grade long-term credit rating. We cannot provide assurance that our current rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by S&P if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. Any decision by S&P to downgrade our rating in the future, particularly below investment grade, could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms and conditions of future financings. Specifically, if our rating is downgraded and we decide to conduct more financings, such as obtaining bank loans, our borrowing costs would increase. In addition, we may not be able to obtain favorable credit terms or lenders may require us to provide collateral, letters of credit, or other forms of security, which would increase our operating costs.
18
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our businesses in China do not comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.
The PRC government regulates telecommunications-related businesses through strict business licensing requirements and other government regulations. These laws and regulations also include limitations on foreign ownership of PRC companies that engage in telecommunications-related businesses. Specifically, foreign investors are not allowed to own more than 50% equity interests in any PRC company engaging in value-added telecommunications businesses, with certain exceptions relating to online retail and mobile commerce which does not apply to us. The primary foreign investor must also have experience and a good track record in providing value-added telecommunications services (“VATS”) overseas. In addition, we act as the general partner or investment manager of some funds which invest into other equity investment funds or companies. In order to comply with the PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in certain industries, the underlying fund manager or the company will usually require that investors shall not be foreign-invested entities or the foreign capital percentage shall be limited to a specified ceiling.
Because we are an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are classified as a foreign enterprise under PRC laws and regulations, and our wholly-owned PRC subsidiaries are foreign-invested enterprises (“FIEs”). To comply with PRC laws and regulations, we rely on contractual arrangements with our consolidated variable interest entity, Shanghai Noah Investment Management Co., Ltd. (“Noah Investment”), and its affiliates to operate a portion of our operations in China, including asset management business and certain other restricted services. Our contractual arrangements with Noah Investment and its shareholders enable us to (1) have power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of Noah Investment; (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits from Noah Investment in consideration for the services provided by Shanghai Noah Investment (Group) Co., Ltd. (“Noah Group”); and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in Noah Investment when and to the extent permitted by PRC law, or request any existing shareholder of Noah Investment to transfer any or part of the equity interests in Noah Investment to another PRC person or entity designated by us at any time at our discretion. Because of these contractual arrangements, we are the primary beneficiary of Noah Investment and hence treat it as our variable interest entity and consolidate its results of operations into ours. Our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and its subsidiaries generated RMB444.3 million, RMB714.5 million and RMB867.2 million (US$124.6 million) in net revenues in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, which contributed 15.7%, 21.7% and 25.6% of our total net revenues in the respective years. For further detail on these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.”
One of the shareholders of Noah Investment recently ceased to be a PRC citizen. We are in the process of transferring the equity owned by such shareholder and are working with the relevant regulators to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. According to the provisions of the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (Revised in 2009) (the “M&A Rules”) issued by the Ministry of Commerce (the “MOFCOM”) on June 22, 2009, the change of nationality of a shareholder of a domestic company who is a natural person will not cause the company to cease to be deemed a domestic company. However, if we fail to complete such transfer, then when the funds for which we act as the general partner or investment manager invest into other equity investment funds or companies in China, it is possible that these funds or investee companies may be recognized by PRC governmental authorities as having foreign ultimate beneficiaries if Noah Investment has a non-PRC citizen as a shareholder. This may limit our potential investment opportunities due to restrictions of foreign investments in certain industries in China, thus adversely affect our asset management business.
19
We believe that our corporate structure and contractual arrangements comply with the current applicable PRC laws and regulations. Our PRC legal counsel, based on its understanding of the relevant laws and regulations, is of the opinion that each of the contracts among our wholly-owned PRC subsidiary, our consolidated variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and its shareholders, is valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with its terms. However, we have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that as there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations, including with respect to the Foreign Investment Law discussed below, the M&A Rules, and the Telecommunications Regulations, the Provisions on the Regulation of Insurance Brokers and the relevant regulatory measures concerning the foreign investment restrictions and administrative licenses and permits related to various underlying industries, there can be no assurance that the PRC government authorities, such as the MOFCOM, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (the “MIIT”), China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”), the AMAC, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (the “CBIRC”, which resulted from the merger of the China Banking Regulatory and Commission (the “CBRC”) and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission (the “CIRC”) on April 9, 2018 as a result of commission reform) or other authorities that regulate the industries that our funds are directly or indirectly investing into, would agree that our corporate structure or any of the above contractual arrangements comply with PRC licensing, registration or other regulatory requirements, with existing policies or with requirements or policies that may be adopted in the future. PRC laws and regulations governing the validity and enforceability of these contractual arrangements are uncertain and the relevant government authorities have broad discretion in interpreting these laws and regulations.
If our corporate structure and contractual arrangements are deemed by relevant regulators having competent authority to be illegal, either in whole or in part, we may lose control of our consolidated variable interest entity and have to modify such structure to comply with regulatory requirements. However, there can be no assurance that we can achieve this without material disruption to our business. Further, if our corporate structure and contractual arrangements are found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, the relevant regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations, including:
● | revoking our business and operating licenses; |
● | levying fines on us; |
● | confiscating any of our income that they deem to be obtained through illegal operations; |
● | shutting down our services; |
● | discontinuing or restricting our operations in China; |
● | imposing conditions or requirements with which we may not be able to comply; |
● | requiring us to change our corporate structure and contractual arrangements; |
● | restricting or prohibiting our use of the proceeds from overseas offering to finance our variable interest entity’s business and operations; and |
● | taking other regulatory or enforcement actions that could be harmful to our business. |
Furthermore, new PRC laws, rules and regulations may be introduced to impose additional requirements that may be applicable to our corporate structure and contractual arrangements. Occurrence of any of these events could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if the imposition of any of these penalties or requirement to restructure our corporate structure causes us to lose the rights to direct the activities of our consolidated variable interest entity or our right to receive its economic benefits, we would no longer be able to consolidate the financial results of our variable interest entity in our consolidated financial statements.
20
We rely on contractual arrangements with our variable interest entity and its shareholders for a portion of our China operations, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control.
As noted above, we rely on contractual arrangements with our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and its shareholders to operate a portion of our operations in China. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with control over our consolidated variable interest entity. If our consolidated variable interest entity or its shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under these contractual arrangements, our recourse to the assets held by our consolidated variable interest entity is indirect and we may have to incur substantial costs and expend significant resources to enforce such arrangements in reliance on legal remedies under PRC law. These remedies may not always be effective, particularly in light of uncertainties in the PRC legal system. Furthermore, in connection with litigation, arbitration or other judicial or dispute resolution proceedings, assets under the name of any of record holder of equity interests in our consolidated variable interest entity, including such equity interests, may be put under court custody. As a consequence, we cannot be certain that the equity interests will be disposed pursuant to the contractual arrangement or ownership by the record holder of the equity interests. All of these contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration in the PRC. Accordingly, these contracts would be interpreted in accordance with PRC law and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures. Under the current contractual arrangements, as a legal matter, if our variable interest entity or its shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under these contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which we cannot assure you will be effective. However, the legal environment in the PRC is not as developed as in other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements, which may make it difficult to exert effective control over our variable interest entity, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected.
Contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and Noah Investment’s shareholders may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities, who may determine that we or our PRC variable interest entity and its subsidiaries owe additional taxes, which could substantially reduce our consolidated net income and the value of your investment.
Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. We are not able to determine whether the contractual arrangements we have entered into among our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and Noah Investment’s shareholders will be regarded by the PRC tax authorities as arm’s length transactions. We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and Noah Investment’s shareholders were not entered into on an arm’s length basis or resulted in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and adjust Noah Investment’s income in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction, for PRC tax purposes, of expense deductions recorded by Noah Investment, which could in turn increase its respective tax liabilities. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may impose punitive interest on Noah Investment for the adjusted but unpaid taxes at the rate of 5% over the basic Renminbi lending rate published by the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”) according to applicable regulations. Although Noah Group did not generate any revenues from providing services to Noah Investment in the past, if there are such revenues in the future and the PRC tax authorities decide to make transfer pricing adjustments on Noah Investment’s net income, our consolidated net income may be adversely affected.
21
Because certain shareholders of our variable interest entity are our directors and executive officers, their fiduciary duties to us may conflict with their respective roles in the variable interest entity. If any of the shareholders of our variable interest entity fails to act in the best interests of our company or our shareholders, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Certain shareholders of Noah Investment, our variable interest entity, are our directors and executive officers, including Ms. Jingbo Wang, our chairwoman and chief executive officer, Mr. Zhe Yin, our director and chief executive officer of Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd., and Mr. Boquan He, our independent director. Conflicts of interest may arise between the dual roles of those individuals who are both our directors or executive officers and shareholders of our variable interest entity. The fiduciary duties owed by these directors and officers to our company under Cayman Islands law, including their duties to act honestly, in good faith and in our best interests, may conflict with their roles as shareholders of our variable interest entity, as what is in the best interest of our variable interest entity may not be in the best interests of our company. In addition, these individuals may breach or cause Noah Investment and its subsidiaries to breach or refuse to renew the existing contractual arrangements with us. We do not have existing arrangements to address such potential conflicts of interest, other than to replace the current directors of our variable interest entity, either by exercising our option under the exclusive option agreement with Noah Investment’s shareholders to cause them to transfer all of their equity ownership in Noah Investment to a PRC entity or individual designated by us, and this new shareholder of Noah Investment could then appoint new directors of Noah Investment to replace the current directors, or cause our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, in the capacity of the attorney-in-fact of Noah Investment’s shareholders to directly appoint new directors of Noah Investment to replace these individuals.
We rely on Noah Investment’s shareholders to comply with PRC law, which protects contracts and provides that directors and executive officers owe a duty of loyalty to our company and require them to avoid conflicts of interest and not to take advantage of their positions for personal gains. Although our independent directors or disinterested officers may take measures to prevent the parties with dual roles from making decisions that may favor themselves as shareholders of the variable interest entity, we cannot assure you that these measures would be effective in all instances and that when conflicts arise, those individuals will act in the best interest of our company or that conflicts will be resolved in our favor. The legal frameworks of China and the Cayman Islands do not provide guidance on resolving conflicts in the event of a conflict with another corporate governance regime. If we cannot resolve any conflicts of interest or disputes between us and those individuals, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which may materially disrupt our business. There is also substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceeding.
We rely to a large extent on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.
We are a holding company, and we may rely to a large extent on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders and any debt we may incur. If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to adjust our taxable income under the contractual arrangements Noah Group currently has in place with our variable interest entity in a manner that would materially and adversely affect its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us.
In addition, our PRC subsidiaries and variable interest entity and its subsidiaries are required to maintain certain statutory reserves and may also allocate a portion of their after-tax profits to staff welfare and bonus funds, which in each case are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of liquidation. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.
22
Our current corporate structure and business operations may be affected by the newly enacted Foreign Investment Law.
On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which took effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the previous laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the PRC Equity Joint Venture Law, the PRC Cooperative Joint Venture Law and the Wholly Foreign-owned Enterprise Law (the “Old FIE Laws”) together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations on Foreign Investment.”
The “variable interest entity” structure has been adopted by many PRC-based companies, including us, to obtain necessary licenses and permits in industries that are currently subject to foreign investment restrictions in China. However, substantial uncertainties still exist in relation to the interpretation and implementation of current and future PRC laws and regulations, including the Foreign Investment Law, especially in regard to the permissibility of variable interest entity’s contractual arrangements. While the Foreign Investment Law does not comment on the concept of “de facto control” and does not define contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment explicitly, it has a catch-all provision under the definition of “foreign investment” to include investments made by foreign investors in China through means stipulated by laws or administrative regulations or provisions to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. We cannot assure you that future laws and regulations will not provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. Therefore, there can be no assurance that our control over our variable interest entity through contractual arrangements will not be deemed as foreign investment in the future. In the event that any possible implementing regulations of the Foreign Investment Law or any other future laws, administrative regulations or provisions deem contractual arrangements as a type of foreign investment, when the funds that we act as the general partner invest into other equity investment funds or companies in China (either directly or through the investments in other equity investment funds), there could be a risk that such funds or companies may be deemed as having foreign investment in their shareholding structure when governmental authorities review such funds or investee companies’ applications for certain approvals or licenses in industries that are subject to foreign investment restrictions. Any such future changes in applicable laws or regulations could reduce the investment opportunities available to us.
PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of conversion of foreign currencies into Renminbi may delay or prevent us from using any offshore cash we may have to make loans to our PRC subsidiaries and variable interest entity or to make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.
We are an offshore holding company conducting our operations in China through our PRC subsidiaries and variable interest entity. We may make loans to our PRC subsidiaries and variable interest entity, or we may make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries.
23
Any loans to our PRC subsidiaries, which are treated as FIEs under PRC law, are subject to PRC regulations and foreign exchange loan registrations. For example, loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries to finance their activities cannot exceed statutory limits, i.e., the difference between its total amount of investment and its registered capital, or certain amount calculated based on elements including capital or net assets and the cross-border financing leverage ratio (“Macro-prudential Management Mode”) under relevant PRC laws and the loans must be registered with the local counterpart of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”), or filed with SAFE in its information system. We may also provide loans to our consolidated affiliated entities or other domestic PRC entities under the Macro-prudential Management Mode. According to the Circular of the People’s Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Adjusting the Macro-prudent Adjustment Parameter for Cross-border Financing issued on March 11, 2020, the limit for the total amount of foreign debt under the Macro-prudential Management Mode is increased to two and a half times from two times of their respective net assets. Moreover, any medium or long-term loan to be provided by us to our consolidated affiliated entities or other domestic PRC entities must also be registered with the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”). We may also decide to finance our PRC subsidiaries by means of capital contributions. These capital contributions must be recorded with the competent administration for market regulation.
On March 30, 2015, SAFE issued the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Administrative Approach Regarding the Settlement of the Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises (“SAFE Circular 19”) which took effect and replaced previous regulations from June 1, 2015. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 19, up to 100% of foreign currency capital of a FIE may be converted into RMB capital according to the actual operation, and within the business scope, of the enterprise in its discretion. Although SAFE Circular 19 allows for the use of RMB converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital for equity investments in the PRC, the restrictions continue to apply as to FIEs’ use of the converted RMB for purposes beyond the business scope, for entrusted loans or for inter-company RMB loans. SAFE promulgated the Circular Regarding Further Promotion of the Facilitation of Cross-Border Trade and Investment on October 23, 2019, or SAFE Circular 28, pursuant to which all foreign-invested enterprises can make equity investments in the PRC with their capital funds in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. As the SAFE Circular 28 is newly issued and the relevant government authorities have broad discretion in interpreting the regulation, it is unclear whether SAFE will permit such capital funds to be used for equity investments in the PRC in actual practice.
In light of the various requirements imposed by PRC regulations on loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary government registrations or the record-filings on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries or our variable interest entity or with respect to future capital contributions by us to our PRC subsidiaries. If we fail to complete such registrations or record-filings, our ability to use any offshore cash we may have, including the proceeds we receive from any future offshore offering of equity or debt securities, and to capitalize or otherwise fund our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.
Risks Related to Doing Business in China
The laws and regulations governing the wealth management, asset management, lending and other services industries in China are developing and subject to further changes.
The relevant regulatory authorities, including AMAC, have released various laws and regulations governing the wealth management, asset management, lending and other services, industries in China, including regulations over private equity products, private securities investment funds, asset management plans managed by securities companies or mutual fund management companies, trust products and insurance products. However, these laws and regulations are subject to further changes and the PRC government has not yet adopted a unified regulatory framework yet.
24
As for our asset management business, as a result of a governmental reorganization in June 2013, the CSRC is now in charge of the supervision and regulation of private funds, including, without limitation, private equity funds, venture capital funds, private securities investment funds and other forms of private funds. AMAC has promulgated a series of rules and measures regulating the registration of private funds, qualified investor standards, fund raising, investment advice service provided by third parties, structured asset management plan and private asset management plans investing into real estate development enterprises or projects and etc. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Private Funds.” In addition, the CSRC and AMAC may adopt further detailed regulations and implementing policies that govern private funds and private fund managers. Since fund management business is a significant part of our asset management business, our asset management business is subject to such regulations on private funds and related implementation rules thereof.
As the regulators of the wealth management and asset management industries in China are enhancing their supervision over the industry, applicable laws and regulations may be adopted to address new issues that arise from time to time or to require additional licenses and permits other than those we currently have obtained. For example, on April 27, 2018, PBOC, CBIRC, CSRC and SAFE jointly released the Guidance Opinions on Regulating the Asset Management Business of Financial Institutions (the “Guidance Opinions on Asset Management”), which provides that specific laws and regulations relating to private investment funds will be applied to private investment funds. But if there are no such laws and regulations addressing particular topics, then the Guidance Opinions on Asset Management will be applied. On July 20, 2018, PBOC issued the Circular on Further Clarifying Matters concerning the Guidance Opinions on Regulating the Asset Management Business of Financial Institutions. On October 22, 2018, CSRC issued the Administrative Measures on Private Asset Management Business of Securities and Futures Institutions. CBIRC has also issued specific implementation rules in the industries subject to its regulations. To date, ten subsidiaries of our PRC variable interest entity, Noah Investment, have successfully completed the private fund manager registration with AMAC. As we develop our business, the products we manage or distribute might be subject to detailed regulations and implementing policies to be issued by CSRC or AMAC in the future and we cannot assure you that our asset management or wealth management business will not be materially and adversely affected if any supervisory authority enhances its regulation over asset management plans.
25
In addition, our subsidiaries or variable interest entity may need to obtain necessary licenses to carry out financial services from the central and/or local government, the governing rules of which are developing and might conflict with each other. For example, our lending service subsidiary, Rongyitong, has been granted a permit to carry out such business by the local government of Anhui Province. The Guidance on the Pilot Establishment of Small Loan Companies (“Small Loan Guidance”), jointly promulgated by the CBRC and the PBOC, requires that the capital contribution from one individual, entity or other association (including the capital from affiliates) to a company in this business may not exceed 10% of the company’s total registered capital. The Anhui local rule provides, however, that the shareholding percentage of the founding shareholder shall not exceed 20% in principle unless approved by the local financial bureau. As the Anhui financial bureau has granted us approval of our shareholding structure, Noah Group is a founding shareholder of Rongyitong and holds 35% equity interests in it. For the shareholding structure of Rongyitong, see “Item 4 Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure”. Under the Notice on Regulation and Renovation of the Cash Loan Business promulgated on December 1, 2017, the local government is required to examine and review small loan companies with respect to their business and capital contributions. We cannot be certain whether we will be required to transfer a portion of our equity interests in Rongyitong to third parties to comply with the Small Loan Guidance. If that were to occur, such transfer could affect our overall control of Rongyitong. Furthermore, the Opinions on Several Issues Concerning Handling Illegal Lending Criminal Cases (the “Opinions on Illegal Lending”), jointly promulgated by the SPC, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Justice on July 23, 2019, provides rules on supervision of and punishment for illegal lending, such as excessive interest rate (exceeds 36%) and debt-collection by means of violence. We cannot assure you whether the introducer or loan collection agencies we cooperate with charge extra fees from the borrower or conduct other behaviors in violation of the provisions of the Opinions on Illegal Lending. The local authorities have broad discretion in implementing and enforcing the applicable laws, rules, regulations and governmental policies, such as capital reserve ratio, the maximum amount of a single loan, limitation on operating territory, restrictions on financing and methods of debt collection. As a result, there are uncertainties in the interpretation and implementation of such laws, rules, regulations and governmental policies, and occasionally, we have to depend on verbal clarifications from local government authorities. Therefore, if the local regulatory authorities make unfavorable interpretation against our small loan business model, or modify the local regulatory policies on small loan in the future, our small loan business operation might be restricted and Rongyitong may not be able to continue to grow at its historical rate of growth.
The laws and regulations governing the Internet financial service industry in China are developing and subject to changes.
Due to the relatively short history of the Internet financial service industry in China, the PRC government has not adopted a comprehensive regulatory framework governing the industry although an increasing number of new policies and guidelines are being adopted by the PRC government in this area. As the Internet financial service business in China is new and rapidly evolving, new laws and regulations may be adopted from time to time and we may be required to obtain additional licenses and permits beyond those we currently hold or are applying for. Currently, there are ad hoc laws and regulations applicable to elements of Internet financial service-related businesses, such as laws and regulations governing payment related business and VATS. While our subsidiary Shanghai Noah Yijie Internet Technology Co. Ltd. has successfully obtained the required Internet content provider license, there is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain all requisite licenses for our online wealth management services business.
26
In addition, in July 2015, the PBOC, together with nine other PRC regulatory agencies, jointly issued a series of policy measures applicable to the Internet financial service industry titled the Guidelines on Promoting the Healthy Development of Internet Finance (the “Guidelines”). The Guidelines formally introduced the regulatory framework and basic principles for the Internet financial service industry in China, including but not limited to Internet payment, online lending, equity crowd-funding, Internet fund sales, Internet insurance, Internet trust and Internet consumer finance. Relevant regulators have issued rules and regulations addressing different issues in the Internet financial service industry. While we have taken measures to comply with the applicable laws and regulations and obtain the licensing and permits that are applicable to our business operations, these laws, rules and regulations are issued by different central, provincial and local governments and enforced by different local authorities with broad discretion in implementing and enforcing them. As a result, there are uncertainties in the interpretation and implementation of such laws, rules, regulations and governmental policies, and occasionally, we have to depend on verbal clarifications from local government authorities. As such, we cannot assure you that our online wealth management services business would not be deemed to violate any applicable PRC laws or regulations, that our online wealth management services business will comply with the applicable regulatory regime or that we will be able to maintain our existing licenses and permits, renew any of them when their current term expires. If we fail to comply with any such laws or regulations, or if we otherwise become subject to enforcement actions under such laws or regulations, we may face significant monetary, reputational or other harm to our business, including fines, restrictions on our activities or revocation of our licenses.
The audit reports included in this annual report are prepared by auditors who are not inspected by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, as such, you are deprived of the benefits of such inspection.
The independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit reports included in our annual reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as auditors of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), is subject to laws of the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. Because our auditors are located in the PRC, a jurisdiction where the PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the Chinese authorities, our auditors are not currently inspected by the PCAOB.
In May 2013, the PCAOB announced that it had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on Enforcement Cooperation with the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or CSRC, and the PRC Ministry of Finance, which establishes a cooperative framework between the parties for the production and exchange of audit documents relevant to investigations undertaken by the PCAOB, the CSRC or the PRC Ministry of Finance in the United States and the PRC, respectively. The PCAOB continued to be in discussions with the CSRC and the PRC Ministry of Finance to permit joint inspections in the PRC of audit firms that are registered with PCAOB and audit Chinese companies that trade on U.S. exchanges.
On December 7, 2018, the SEC and the PCAOB issued a joint statement highlighting continued challenged faced by the U.S. regulators in their oversight or financial statement audits of U.S.-listed companies with significant operations in China. However, it remains unclear what further actions, if any, the SEC and the PCAOB will take to address the problem.
Inspections of other firms that the PCAOB has conducted outside China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. This lack of PCAOB inspections in China prevents the PCAOB from regularly evaluating our auditor’s audits and its quality control procedures. As a result, investors may be deprived of the benefits of PCAOB inspections.
The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to PCAOB inspections. Investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information and procedures and the quality of our financial statements, which may have a material adverse effect on our ADS price.
27
As part of a continued regulatory focus in the United States on access to audit and other information currently protected by national law, in particular China’s, in June 2019, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced bills in both houses of Congress that would require the SEC to maintain a list of issuers for which the PCAOB is not able to inspect or investigate an auditor report issued by a foreign public accounting firm. The Ensuring Quality Information and Transparency for Abroad-Based Listings on our Exchanges (EQUITABLE) Act prescribes increased disclosure requirements for such issuers and, beginning in 2025, the delisting from national securities exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange of issuers included for three consecutive years on the SEC’s list. Enactment of this legislation or other efforts to increase US regulatory access to audit information could cause investor uncertainty for affected issuers, including us, and the market price of our ADSs could be adversely affected. It is unclear if this proposed legislation would be enacted. Furthermore, there has been recent media reports on deliberation were to materialize, the resulting legislation may have material and adverse impact on the stock performance of China-based issuers listed in the United States.
If additional remedial measures are imposed on the “big four” PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, in administrative proceedings brought by the SEC alleging the firms’ failure to meet specific criteria set by the SEC, with respect to requests for the production of documents, we could be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Starting in 2011, the Chinese affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms (including our independent registered public accounting firm) were affected by a conflict between U.S. and Chinese law. Specifically, for certain U.S. listed companies operating and audited in mainland China, the SEC and the PCAOB sought to obtain from the Chinese firms access to their audit work papers and related documents. The firms were, however, advised and directed that under Chinese law they could not respond directly to the U.S. regulators on those requests, and that requests by foreign regulators for access to such papers in China had to be channeled through CSRC.
In late 2012, this impasse led the SEC to commence administrative proceedings under Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice and also under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 against the Chinese accounting firms (including our independent registered public accounting firm). A first instance trial of the proceedings in July 2013 in the SEC’s internal administrative court resulted in an adverse judgment against the firms. The administrative law judge proposed penalties on the firms including a temporary suspension of their right to practice before the SEC, although that proposed penalty did not take effect pending review by the Commissioners of the SEC. On February 6, 2015, before a review by the Commissioner had taken place, the firms reached a settlement with the SEC. Under the settlement, the SEC accepts that future requests by the SEC for the production of documents will normally be made to CSRC. The firms will receive matching Section 106 requests, and are required to abide by a detailed set of procedures with respect to such requests, which in substance require them to facilitate production via CSRC. If they fail to meet specified criteria, the SEC retains authority to impose a variety of additional remedial measures on the firms depending on the nature of the failure. Under the terms of the settlement, the underlying proceedings against the “big four” PRC-based accounting firms were deemed dismissed with prejudice at the end of four years starting from the settlement date, which was February 6, 2019. We cannot predict if the SEC will further challenge the “big four” PRC-based accounting firms’ compliance with U.S. law in connection with U.S. regulatory requests for audit work papers or if the results of such a challenge would result in the SEC imposing penalties such as suspensions. If additional challenges are imposed on the Chinese affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms, it is possible that we will be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.
In the event that the SEC restarts the administrative proceedings, depending upon the final outcome, listed companies in the United States with major PRC operations such as us may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in the PRC, which could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Securities Exchange Act”), including possible delisting or deregistration. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against these audit firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding PRC-based, U.S.-listed companies and the market price of our ADSs may be adversely affected.
28
If our independent registered public accounting firm were denied, even temporarily, the ability to practice before the SEC and we were unable to timely find another registered public accounting firm to audit and issue an opinion on our financial statements, our financial statements could be determined not to be in compliance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act as amended. Such a determination could ultimately lead to the delisting of our ADSs from the NYSE or deregistration from the SEC, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our ADSs in the United States.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect the value of your investment.
The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by changes in China’s political and economic conditions and by China’s foreign exchange policies, among other things. In June 2010, the PRC government allowed the Renminbi to appreciate slowly against the U.S. dollar. However, starting from June 2015, the trend of appreciation changed and the Renminbi started to depreciate against the U.S. dollar gradually. In recent years, the exchange rate between Renminbi and U.S. dollar has fluctuated. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.
The majority of our sales contracts were denominated in Renminbi and majority of our costs and expenses are denominated in Renminbi, while a portion of our financial assets are denominated in U.S. dollars. Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, and we have not used any forward contracts or currency borrowings to hedge our exposure to foreign currency risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency. As a result, any significant revaluation of the Renminbi or the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our cash flows, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our ADSs. For example, an appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would make any new RMB-denominated investments or expenditures more costly to us, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for such purposes. An appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would also result in foreign currency translation losses for financial reporting purposes when we translate our U.S. dollar-denominated financial assets into Renminbi, our reporting currency. Conversely, if we decide to convert Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs, for payment of interest expenses, for strategic acquisitions or investments or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on us.
PRC foreign exchange control regulations restricting the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies may limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.
The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive the majority of our revenues in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, we may rely on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange control regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. Therefore, our PRC subsidiaries are currently able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to us without prior approval from SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities or designated banks is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses, such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders, including holders of our ADSs.
29
Our business is sensitive to global economic conditions. A severe or prolonged downturn in the global or Chinese economy could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any prolonged slowdown in the global or Chinese economy may have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, and continued turbulence in the international markets may adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets to meet potential liquidity needs.
Economic conditions in China are sensitive to global economic conditions. Since we derive the majority of our revenues from our operations in China, our business and prospects may be affected by economic conditions or changes in the financial markets in China. Our revenues ultimately depend on the appetite of high net worth individuals to invest in the financial products we distribute or manage, which in turn depend on their level of disposable income, perceived future earnings and willingness to invest. As there are still substantial uncertainties in the current and future conditions in the global and PRC economies, our clients may reduce or delay their investment in the financial markets in general, and defer or forgo the purchase of products we distribute or manage. We may have difficulty expanding our client base fast enough, or at all, to offset the impact of decreased investment by our existing clients. Additionally, we earn recurring service fees on certain financial products over a period of time after the initial sale. Clients may redeem or terminate these products, ending these recurring revenues. Moreover, insolvencies associated with an economic downturn could adversely affect our business through the loss of financial product providers or clients or by hampering our ability to place business. Any prolonged slowdown in the global or China’s economy may lead to reduced investment in the products we distribute or manage, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, our small to medium enterprises owners and entrepreneur clients who face pressures in business operations and cash flow because of the COVID-19 outbreak might reduce their transaction volumes with us.
Moreover, a slowdown in the global or Chinese economy or the recurrence of any financial disruptions may have a material and adverse impact on financings available to us. The weakness in the economy could erode investors’ confidence, which constitutes the basis of the equity markets. Any financial turmoil affecting the financial markets and banking system may significantly restrict our ability to obtain financing in the capital markets or from financial institutions on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Although we are uncertain about the extent to which any global financial and economic crisis and slowdown of the PRC economy may impact our business, there is a risk that our business, results of operations and prospects may be materially and adversely affected by any global economic downturn and the slowdown of the PRC economy.
PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiaries to liability or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to increase its registered capital or distribute profits to us, or may otherwise adversely affect us.
SAFE has promulgated several rules and regulations that require PRC residents and PRC corporate entities to register with and obtain approval from local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct or indirect offshore investment activities. According to the circular promulgated by SAFE which took effect on June 1, 2015, qualified banks possess the authority to register all PRC residents’ direct or indirect offshore investment activities in special purpose vehicles, except that those PRC residents who have failed to register or obtain approval will remain to fall into the jurisdiction of the local SAFE branch and must make their supplementary registration application with the local SAFE branch. These regulations apply to our shareholders who are PRC residents and may apply to any offshore acquisitions that we make in the future.
Under these foreign exchange rules and regulations, PRC residents are required to complete SAFE registration before contributing their legally owned onshore or offshore assets or equity interests into any special purpose vehicle (“SPV”) directly established, or indirectly controlled, by them for the purpose of investment or financing. Such foreign exchange regulations and rules further require that when there is (a) any change to the basic information of the SPV, such as any change relating to its individual PRC resident shareholders, name or operation period or (b) any material change, such as increase or decrease in the share capital held by its individual PRC resident shareholders, a share transfer or exchange of the shares in the SPV, or a merger or split of the SPV, the PRC resident must register such changes on a timely basis.
30
However, as there is uncertainty concerning the reconciliation of these foreign exchange regulations with other approval requirements, it is unclear how these regulations, and any future regulation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted, amended and implemented by the relevant government authorities. We cannot predict how these regulations will affect our business operations or future strategy. For example, we may be subject to a more stringent review and approval process with respect to our foreign exchange activities, such as remittance of dividends and foreign-currency-denominated borrowings, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we decide to acquire a PRC domestic company, we cannot assure you that we or the owners of such company, as the case may be, will be able to obtain the necessary approvals or complete the necessary filings and registrations required by the foreign exchange regulations. This may restrict our ability to implement our acquisition strategy and could adversely affect our business and prospects.
We have requested PRC residents holding direct or indirect interests in our company to our knowledge to make the necessary applications, filings and amendments as required by these foreign exchange regulations. We believe that such shareholders and beneficial owners have completed the required registrations. We cannot assure you, however, that the shareholders will complete any necessary amendment registrations and filings with the local SAFE branch in a timely manner. In addition, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents holding direct or indirect interests in our company, and we cannot provide any assurances that all of our shareholders and beneficial owners who are PRC residents will make, obtain or update any applicable registrations or approvals required by these foreign exchange regulations. The failure or inability of our PRC resident shareholders to comply with the registration procedures set forth in these regulations may subject us to fines and legal sanctions, restrict our cross-border investment activities, or limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to, or obtain foreign-exchange-dominated loans from, our company, or prevent us from being able to make distributions or pay dividends, as a result of which our business operations and our ability to distribute profits to you could be materially adversely affected.
Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration of share options held by our employees who are “domestic individuals” may subject such employee or us to fines and legal or administrative sanctions.
In January 2007, SAFE issued Implementing Rules for the Administrative Measures of Foreign Exchange Matters for Individuals (the “Individual Foreign Exchange Rule”), which, among other things, specified approval requirements for certain capital account transactions such as a PRC citizen’s participation in the employee stock ownership plans or stock option plans of an overseas publicly-listed company. On February 15, 2012, SAFE issued the Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company (the “Stock Incentive Plan Rules”), pursuant to which “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in the PRC for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) participating in any stock incentive plan of an overseas-listed company are required, through qualified PRC agents (which could be the PRC subsidiary of such overseas-listed company), to register with SAFE and complete certain other procedures related to the stock incentive plan.
31
We and our employees who are “domestic individuals” and have been granted share options (the “PRC optionees”), became subject to the Stock Incentive Plan Rules when our company became an overseas-listed company upon the completion of our initial public offering. We and our PRC optionees have completed the registration requirement under the Stock Incentive Plan Rules and intend to continue making such registration on an on-going basis as new awards are granted. If we or our PRC optionees fail to comply with the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, we and/or our PRC optionees may be subject to fines and other legal sanctions. We may also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional option plans for our directors and employees under PRC law. In addition, the State Administration of Taxation (the “SAT”) has issued a few circulars concerning employee stock options. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Our PRC subsidiaries have obligations to file documents related to employee stock options with relevant tax authorities and withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their stock options. If our employees fail to pay and we fail to withhold their income taxes, we may face sanctions imposed by tax authorities or any other PRC government authorities. However, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and the Stock Incentive Plan Rules. We cannot guarantee that our current practices will comply with future interpretations of the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and the Stock Incentive Plan Rule, and any failure to comply could subject us to fines and other legal sanctions.
The dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries may be subject to PRC tax under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.
Pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law (the “EIT Law”), dividends generated after January 1, 2008 and payable by a FIE in China to its foreign investors are subject to a 10% withholding tax, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. We are a Cayman Islands holding company and the majority of our income may come from dividends we receive, directly or indirectly, from our wholly foreign-owned PRC subsidiaries. Since there is currently no such tax treaty between China and the Cayman Islands, dividends we directly receive from our wholly foreign-owned PRC subsidiaries will generally be subject to a 10% withholding tax.
In addition, under the Arrangement between the Mainland of China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income, where a Hong Kong resident enterprise, which is considered a non-PRC tax resident enterprise, directly holds at least 25% of the equity interests in a PRC enterprise, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by such PRC enterprise to such Hong Kong resident enterprise is reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%, subject to approval of the PRC local tax authority. Accordingly, our Hong Kong subsidiaries, such as Noah Insurance (Hong Kong) Limited (“Noah Insurance”), are able to enjoy the 5% withholding tax rate for the dividends they receive from their PRC subsidiaries in which they hold a more than 25% of the equity interests if they satisfy the conditions prescribed in relevant tax rules and regulations and obtain the approvals as required. However, if Noah Insurance is considered to be a non-beneficial owner for purposes of the tax arrangement, any dividends paid to it by our wholly foreign-owned PRC subsidiaries directly would not qualify for the preferential dividend withholding tax rate of 5%, but rather would be subject to a rate of 10%.
32
Furthermore, under the EIT Law and the Implementation Rules to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law (“EIT Implementation Rules”), an enterprise established outside of the PRC with its “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a PRC resident enterprise and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Tax—PRC Enterprise Income Tax.” We do not believe that Noah Holdings Limited or any of its subsidiaries outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for the year ended December 31, 2019, because neither we nor they are controlled by a PRC enterprise or PRC enterprise group, and because our records and their records (including the resolutions of the respective boards of directors and the resolutions of shareholders) are maintained outside the PRC. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If the PRC tax authorities determine that Noah Holdings Limited or any of its subsidiaries outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes, they would be subject to a 25% PRC enterprise income tax on their global income. In addition, if Noah Holdings Limited is considered a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes, we may be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-PRC resident enterprises, including the holders of our ADSs. Furthermore, non-PRC resident enterprise shareholders (including our ADS holders) may be subject to a 10% PRC tax on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, if such income is treated as sourced from within the PRC. It is unclear whether our non-PRC individual shareholders (including our ADS holders) would be subject to any PRC tax on dividends or gains obtained by such non-PRC individual shareholders in the event we are determined to be a PRC resident enterprise. If any PRC tax were to apply to such dividends or gains, it would generally apply at a rate of 20% unless a reduced rate is available under an applicable tax treaty. However, it is also unclear whether our non-PRC shareholders would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaty between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are considered as a PRC resident enterprise. If we are required to withhold such PRC income tax under the EIT Law, your investment in our Class A ordinary shares or ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.
We face uncertainties with respect to the application of the Circular on Strengthening the Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises.
The SAT has issued several rules and notices to tighten the scrutiny over acquisition transactions in recent years, including the Notice on Certain Corporate Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises issued in February 2015 (“SAT Circular 7”). Pursuant to these rules and notices, if a non-PRC resident enterprise indirectly transfers PRC taxable properties, referring to properties of an establishment or a place in the PRC, real estate properties in the PRC or equity investments in a PRC tax resident enterprise, by disposition of equity interests in an overseas non-public holding company, without a reasonable commercial purpose and resulting in the avoidance of PRC enterprise income tax, such indirect transfer should be deemed as a direct transfer of PRC taxable properties and gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to the PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%. SAT Circular 7 has listed several factors to be taken into consideration by the tax authorities in determining whether an indirect transfer has a reasonable commercial purpose. However, in spite of these factors, an indirect transfer satisfying all the following criteria shall be deemed to lack reasonable commercial purpose and be taxable under the PRC laws: (i) 75% or more of the equity value of the overseas enterprise being transferred is derived directly or indirectly from the PRC taxable properties; (ii) at any time during the one-year period before the indirect transfer, 90% or more of the asset value of the overseas enterprise (excluding cash) is comprised directly or indirectly of investments in the PRC, or 90% or more of its income is derived directly or indirectly from the PRC; (iii) the functions performed and risks assumed by the overseas enterprise and any of its subsidiaries that directly or indirectly hold the PRC taxable properties are limited and are insufficient to prove their economic substance; and (iv) the foreign tax payable on the gain derived from the indirect transfer of the PRC taxable properties is lower than the potential PRC tax on the direct transfer of such assets. Nevertheless, an indirect transfer falling into the scope of certain safe harbors under SAT Circular 7 may not be subject to PRC tax. Such safe harbors include qualified group restructuring, secondary market equity trading and tax treaty exemptions.
33
On October 17, 2017, the SAT released the Public Notice Regarding Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or SAT Public Notice 37, effect from December 1, 2018. SAT Public Notice 37 replaced a series of circulars and revised the rules governing the administration of withholding tax on China-source income derived by nonresident enterprises. SAT Public Notice 37 provided certain key changes to the current withholding regime including, such as (i) the withholding obligation for a non-resident enterprise which is declaring a dividend arises on the day the payment is actually made rather than on the day of the resolution to declare the dividends; and (ii) the provision that a non-resident enterprise must self-report tax within seven days if its withholding agents fail to withhold or is removed.
Under SAT Circular 7 and SAT Public Notice 37, the entities or individuals obligated to pay the transfer price to the transferor shall be withholding agents and shall withhold the PRC tax from the transfer price. If a withholding agent fails to do so, the transferor shall report to and pay the PRC tax to the PRC tax authorities. In case neither a withholding agent nor the transferor complies with the obligations under SAT Circular 7 and SAT Public Notice 37, other than imposing penalties such as late payment interest on the transferors, the tax authority may also hold a withholding agent liable and impose a penalty of 50% to 300% of the unpaid tax on the withholding agent, provided that such penalty imposed on the withholding agent may be reduced or waived if the withholding agent has submitted the relevant materials in connection with the indirect transfer to the PRC tax authorities in accordance with SAT Circular 7 and SAT Public Notice 37.
However, as there is a lack of clear statutory interpretation on the implementation of these rules and notices, there is no assurance that the tax authorities will not apply, SAT Circular 7 and SAT Public Notice 37 to previous investments by non-PRC resident investors in our company or our pre-listing restructuring, if any of such transactions were determined by the tax authorities to lack reasonable commercial purpose. As a result, we and our existing non-PRC resident investors may be at risk of being taxed under these rules and notices and may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with or to establish that we should not be taxed under such rules and notices, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations or such non-PRC resident investors’ investments in us. We have conducted and may conduct acquisitions involving corporate structures, and historically our shares were transferred by certain then shareholders to our current shareholders. We cannot assure you that the PRC tax authorities will not, at their discretion, adjust any capital gains and impose tax return filing obligations on us or require us to provide assistance for the investigation of PRC tax authorities with respect thereto. Any PRC tax imposed on a transfer of our shares or any adjustment of such gains would cause us to incur additional costs and may have a negative impact on the value of your investment in us.
The enforcement of the Labor Contract Law, Social Insurance Law and other labor-related regulations in the PRC may adversely affect our business and our results of operations.
In June 2007, the National People’s Congress of China enacted the Labor Contract Law, which became effective in January 2008 and was subsequently amended in July 2013. The Labor Contract Law establishes more restrictions on and increases costs for employers to dismiss employees, including specific provisions related to fixed-term employment contracts, temporary employment, probation, consultation with the labor union and employee assembly, employment without a contract, dismissal of employees, compensation upon termination and overtime work and collective bargaining. According to the Labor Contract Law, an employer is obliged to sign a labor contract with unlimited term with an employee if the employer continues to hire the employee after the expiration of two consecutive fixed-term labor contracts, subject to certain conditions, or after the employee has worked for the employer for ten consecutive years. The employer is also required to pay compensation to an employee if the employer terminates an unlimited-term labor contract. Such compensation is also required when the employer refuses to renew a labor contract that has expired, unless it is the employee who refuses to extend the expired contract. In addition, under the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees, which became effective in January 2008 if we decide to lay off a large number of employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, the Labor Contract Law may also limit our ability to effect these changes in a manner that we believe to be cost-effective or desirable, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
34
We cannot assure you that our employment practices do not or will not violate these labor-related laws and regulations. If we are deemed to have been non-compliant with any such laws and regulations or to have failed to make adequate contributions to any social insurance schemes, we may be subject to penalties and negative publicity, and our business, results of operations and prospects may be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to our ADSs
The market price for our ADSs may continue to be volatile.
The trading prices of our ADSs have been, and are likely to continue to be, volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. The trading prices of our ADSs ranged from US$26.75 to US$59.75 in 2019. In addition, securities markets may from time to time experience significant price and volume fluctuations that may or may not relate to our operating performance, which may have a material and adverse effect on the market price of our ADSs. In particular, volatility in the PRC stock markets in the last few years has resulted in some volatility in the trading prices of most PRC-based companies whose shares are traded in the United States. The market price for our ADSs is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors including the following:
● | regulatory developments in our target markets affecting us, our clients or our competitors; |
● | announcements of studies and reports relating to the quality of our products and services or those of our competitors; |
● | changes in the performance or market valuations of other companies in the industries in which we operate; |
● | actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations and changes or revisions of our expected results; |
● | changes in financial estimates by securities research analysts; |
● | conditions in the industries in which we operate; |
● | announcements by us or our competitors of new services, acquisitions, strategic relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
● | addition or departure of our senior management; |
● | fluctuations of exchange rates between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar; |
● | release or expiry of transfer restrictions on our outstanding ordinary shares or ADSs; and |
● | sales or perceived potential sales of additional ordinary shares or ADSs. |
35
Our dual-class voting structure will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial
Our co-founders, Ms. Jingbo Wang and Mr. Zhe Yin, have considerable influence over important corporate matters. Our ordinary shares are divided into Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. Each Class A ordinary share is entitled to one vote and each Class B ordinary share is entitled to four votes on all matters that are subject to shareholder vote. Each Class B ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by the holder thereof, while Class A ordinary shares are not convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances. Due to the disparate voting powers associated with our two classes of ordinary shares, as of March 31, 2020, Ms. Jingbo Wang and Mr. Zhe Yin beneficially owned 27.7% of our share capital and controlled 60.1% of the aggregate voting power of our company. As a result, Ms. Jingbo Wang and Mr. Zhe Yin have considerable influence over matters such as electing directors and approving material mergers, acquisitions or other business combination transactions, and they may take actions that are not in the best interest of us or our other shareholders. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could also discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions, which could have the effect of depriving the holders of our Class A ordinary shares and our ADSs of the opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over the prevailing market price and could result in a reduction in the price of our ADSs.
The dual-class structure of our ordinary shares may adversely affect the trading market for our ADSs.
S&P Dow Jones and FTSE Russell have changed their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain indices, including the S&P 500, to exclude companies with multiple classes of shares and companies whose public shareholders hold no more than 5% of total voting power from being added to such indices. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structures. As a result, the dual class structure of our ordinary shares may prevent the inclusion of our ADSs representing Class A ordinary shares in such indices and may cause shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure. Any such exclusion from indices could result in a less active trading market for our ADSs. Any actions or publications by shareholder advisory firms critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could also adversely affect the value of our ADSs.
Our board of directors, which has complete discretion as whether to distribute dividends, does not currently plan to pay any dividends. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in our ADSs as a source of future dividend income.
Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to our articles of association and Cayman Islands law. In addition, our shareholders by ordinary resolution may declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend on its shares out of either profit or share premium amount, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in our company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Although we declared an annual cash dividend for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012, we may not declare any dividend in the future, and even if we do so, any future dividend may be less than those declared in 2011 and 2012. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in our ADSs as a source of future dividend income. Accordingly, the return on your investment in our ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of our ADSs. There is no guarantee that our ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain their current price.
36
Substantial future sales or perceived potential sales of our ADSs in the public market could cause the price of our ADSs to decline.
Additional sales of our ADSs or Class A ordinary shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our ADSs to decline. As of March 31, 2020, we had 22,502,640 Class A ordinary shares outstanding, including 18,022,420 Class A ordinary shares represented by ADSs. Except for the restricted ADSs representing 1,851,335 Class A ordinary shares held by our affiliates, the rest of our ADSs are freely transferable without restriction or additional registration under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The remaining Class A ordinary shares outstanding are available for sale, subject to volume and other restrictions as applicable under Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act.
Certain holders of our Class A ordinary shares have the right to cause us to register under the Securities Act the sale of their shares. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would result in ADSs representing these shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration. Sales of these registered shares in the form of ADSs in the public market could cause the price of our ADSs to decline.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our ADSs, the market price for our ADSs and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our ADSs will be influenced by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade our ADSs, the market price for our ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price or trading volume for our ADSs to decline.
Our memorandum and articles of association contain provisions that could discourage a third party from seeking to obtain control of our company, which could adversely affect the interests of holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs by limiting their opportunities to sell them at a premium.
Our memorandum and articles of association contain certain provisions that could limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company, including provisions that created a class of super-voting stock in the form of Class B ordinary shares and grant to our board of directors the authority to establish and issue from time to time one or more series of preferred shares, and to designate the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such preferred shares, without any further vote or action by our shareholders and to determine, with respect to any series of preferred shares, the terms and rights of that series which may be greater than the rights of our Class A ordinary shares. The provisions could have the effect of depriving holders of our Class A ordinary shares or ADSs of the opportunity to sell their shares or ADSs at a premium over the prevailing market price by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transactions.
You may not have the same voting rights as the holders of our Class A ordinary shares and may not receive voting materials in time to be able to exercise your right to vote.
Except as described in this annual report and in the deposit agreement, holders of our ADSs will not be able to exercise voting rights attaching to the shares represented by our ADSs on an individual basis. Holders of our ADSs will appoint the depositary or its nominee as their representative to exercise the voting rights attaching to the shares represented by the ADSs. You may not receive voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote, and it is possible that you, or persons who hold their ADSs through brokers, dealers or other third parties, will not have the opportunity to exercise a right to vote.
37
Your right to participate in any future rights offerings may be limited, which may cause dilution to your holdings and you may not receive cash dividends if it is impractical to make them available to you.
We may from time to time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make rights available to you in the United States unless we register both the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not make rights available to you unless both the rights and the underlying securities to be distributed to ADS holders are either registered under the Securities Act or exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or securities or to endeavor to cause such a registration statement to be declared effective and we may not be able to establish a necessary exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Accordingly, you may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution in your holdings.
The depositary of our ADSs has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on our Class A ordinary shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of Class A ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary may, at its discretion, decide that it is inequitable or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, the depositary may determine that it is not practicable to distribute certain property through the mail, or that the value of certain distributions may be less than the cost of mailing them. In these cases, the depositary may decide not to distribute such property to you.
You may be subject to limitations on transfer of your ADSs.
Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. In addition, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary deems it advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.
You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law, we conduct the majority of our operations in China and all of our directors and officers reside outside the United States.
We are incorporated in the Cayman Islands, and conduct the majority of our operations in China through our PRC subsidiaries and variable interest entity. All of our directors and officers reside outside the United States and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the United States federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers. We have been advised by Maples and Calder (Hong Kong) LLP, our counsel as to Cayman Islands law, that although there is no statutory recognition in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will, at common law, recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without reexamination of the merits underlying the dispute based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the liquidated sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign money judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be (i) in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty or similar fiscal or revenue obligations, (ii) inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, (iii) impeachable on the grounds of fraud or (iv) obtained in a manner, nor be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
38
Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time, and by the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take legal action against us and our directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, which provides persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States and provides significantly less protection to investors. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in U.S. federal courts.
In addition, as a company primarily operating in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles for U.S. authorities to obtaining information needed for investigations or litigations. Similar limitations apply to the pursuit of actions against individuals, including officers, directors and individual gatekeeps, who may have engaged in fraud or other wrongdoing. Moreover, local authorities often are constrained in their ability to assist U.S. authorities and overseas investors more generally.
As a result, our public shareholders and holders of our ADSs may have more difficulty in protecting their interests through actions against us, our management, our directors or our major shareholders and limited remedies than would shareholders and limites remedies of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States.
We may be a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders of our ADSs or ordinary shares.
We will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of our gross income for such year is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the value of our assets (generally based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income.
Although the application of these rules is unclear in many important respects and the required calculations yield results very close to the line, based on the market price of our ADSs, the value of our assets, and the composition of our income and assets for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019, we believe that we were not a PFIC for that year, but there can be no assurances in this regard. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) does not issue rulings with respect to PFIC status, and we cannot assure you that the IRS, or a court, will agree with any determination we make. For example, because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules, it is possible that the IRS may successfully challenge our classification of certain income and assets as non-passive, which may result in our being a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019.
We must make a separate determination after the close of each taxable year as to whether we were a PFIC for that year. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will not be or become a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year. The determination of whether we will be a PFIC for any taxable year may depend in part upon the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles not reflected on our balance sheet (which may depend upon the market price of the ADSs or ordinary shares from time to time, which may fluctuate significantly) and also may be affected by how, and how quickly, we spend our liquid assets and the cash we generate from our operations and raise in any offering. Under circumstances where we determine not to deploy significant amounts of cash for active purposes or where the market price of our ADSs or ordinary shares declines, our risk of being or becoming a PFIC may substantially increase because our liquid assets and cash (which are for this purpose considered assets that produce passive income) may then represent a greater percentage of our overall assets. In addition, changes in the composition of our income or assets may cause us to be or become a PFIC for the current or future taxable years.
39
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”) holds our ADSs or ordinary shares, such U.S. Holder may be subject to certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and related reporting requirements. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
The Common Reporting Standard could subject us to certain new information reporting and withholding requirements.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”) has developed a Common Reporting Standard (the “CRS”) and model competent authority agreement to enable the multilateral and automatic exchange of financial account information, which were adopted by many jurisdictions. Effective on January 1, 2017, CRS and its implementing legislations in China and Hong Kong require financial institutions to identify and report the tax residency and account details of non-resident customers to the relevant authorities in jurisdictions adhering to CRS. On September 6, 2018, the arrangements for the multilateral and automatic exchange of financial account information between China and Hong Kong officially came into effect. Hong Kong and China conducted the first automatic exchange of financial account information in September 2018, and many jurisdictions (including Hong Kong) have promised to implement the multilateral and automatic exchange of financial account information. While CRS was modeled on the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (the “FATCA”), the scope, coverage and volume under CRS are significantly greater than that under FATCA, which requires non-U.S. institutions to report to the IRS if U.S. tax payers have an account with the non-U.S. financial institution and have met the standard of the overseas financial assets. As the reporting requirement under CRS is burdensome, we cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected by the information reporting and withholding requirements imposed by CRS and its implementing legislations in China, Hong Kong and other jurisdictions subject to CRS in which we conduct or may conduct business in the future.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and anti-corruption laws in other applicable jurisdictions.
As an NYSE listed company with operations in various countries, we are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”) and other anti-corruption laws and regulations in applicable jurisdictions. The FCPA generally prohibits companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Companies subject to the FCPA may be held liable for actions taken by partners or representatives. We may be subject to these and similar anti-corruption laws in other applicable jurisdictions. Failure to comply with legal requirements could expose us to civil and/or criminal penalties, including fines, prosecution and significant reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations, including our relationships with our clients, and our financial results. Compliance with the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws and related regulations and policies imposes potentially significant costs and operational burdens on us. Moreover, the compliance and monitoring mechanisms that we have in place, including our Code of Ethics and our anti-bribery and anti-corruption policy, may not adequately prevent or detect all possible violations under applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption legislation.
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.
Because we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:
● | the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K with the SEC; |
● | the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents, or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; |
40
● | the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and |
● | the selective disclosure rules by issuers of material nonpublic information under Regulation FD. |
We will be required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information, which would be made available to you, were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.
As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards.
As a Cayman Islands company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, we are subject to New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. However, the New York Stock Exchange rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under our articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. To the extent we choose to follow home country practice with respect to corporate governance matters, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.
Item 4. Information on the Company
A. | History and Development of the Company |
We are a leading wealth and asset management service provider in China with a focus on global investment and asset allocation services for high net worth individuals and enterprises. We provide comprehensive financial services to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, with capabilities in wealth management, asset management, and other value-added businesses.
We are an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands with subsidiaries and affiliated entities primarily in China. In August 2005, our founders started our business when Noah Investment was incorporated. We exercise effective control over Noah Investment and its subsidiaries through contractual arrangements. In 2007, Sequoia Capital China, a well-known venture capital firm based in China, invested in our business. In November 2010, we were listed on the New York Stock Exchange as the first independent wealth management company from China.
41
We commenced our asset management business in 2010 when Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Gopher Asset Management” or “Gopher”) were established. The business scope of Gopher covers private equity and venture capital investment, real estate investment, public securities investment, and multi-strategy investment. In 2012, Noah Upright Fund Distribution Co., Ltd. (“Noah Upright”, formerly known as Noah Upright (Shanghai) Fund Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.), a wholly owned subsidiary of Noah, obtained the “No. 001” fund distribution license issued by the CSRC in China.
We officially launched our overseas business expansion in February 2012. We first established Noah Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited (“Noah HK”) and obtained Type 1 (Dealing in Securities), Type 4 (Advising on Securities), and Type 9 (Asset Management) licenses from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“Hong Kong SFC” or the “SFC”), as well as an insurance broker license in Hong Kong. Subsequently, we further expanded our overseas presence by launching offices in Taiwan, Silicon Valley, New York, Vancouver, Melbourne and Singapore. We have obtained and maintained family trust licenses in Hong Kong and Jersey Island, insurance brokerage licenses in the United States and Canada, money lender license in Hong Kong, and the investment fund manager license, exempt market dealer license, and portfolio manager license in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada, as well as Capital Market Services license in Singapore.
Our principal executive offices are located at Building 2, 1687 Changyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China and Building F, 32 Qinhuangdao Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China. Our telephone number is (86) 21 8035-9221. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at the offices of Maples Corporate Services Limited, PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands.
Significant Developments in 2019
Adjusted Product Mix and Diversified Revenue Sources
Starting from the third quarter in 2019, we ceased the offering of single counterparty private debt products, which are credit products, in response to the changing regulatory and market environment in China. We believe that the shift to offering more standardized public securities and focusing on asset allocation is necessary, as the whole market is believed to move towards a more modernized and international direction. Our transaction value for all financial products was RMB78.5 billion (US$11.3 billion) for the year ended December 31, 2019, among which the transaction value for public securities was RMB26.4 billion (US$3.8 billion) increased by 94.1% year-over-year, demonstrating our strong distribution capability in line with the product offering shift. In particular, the transaction value of our mutual funds products reached a record high of RMB16.4 billion (US$2.4 billion) for the year ended December 31, 2019. The AUM of our asset management business was RMB170.2 billion (US$24.5 billion) as of December 31, 2019. Gopher’s largest asset class, private equity investments, reached an AUM of RMB104.9 billion (US$15.1 billion), representing 61.6% of the total AUM of our financial products as of December 31, 2019. The AUM of standardized products reached RMB9.3 billion (US$1.3 billion) as of December 31, 2019, up 50.4% from RMB6.2 billion as of December 31, 2018.
We provide a diversified range of financial products, especially in the alternative investment area. We believe this will continue to enhance our resilience to economic cycles and enable us to cater to high net worth clients’ demands after our product offering shift. We continued to distribute long-term investment products which generated recurring service fees. As a result, the contribution of our recurring service fees remained stable at 54.1% for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared with 53.7% for the year ended December 31, 2018. As we provide more value-added services to our clients, other service fees contributed to 15.3% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, up from 10.9% in 2018, indicating our deepened comprehensive service offerings.
42
Client Segmentation and Comprehensive Service System
While China’s macro economy environment was challenging in 2019 and financial markets remained volatile, high net worth individual investors in China have become more sophisticated after years of client education and communications. Our relationship managers continued to capture demands from high net worth clients for asset allocation services and comprehensive financial services. We typically classify our high net worth clients into four categories - gold, platinum, diamond, and black card, with black card being the highest level. The number of black card clients continued to grow in 2019, increasing from 748 as of December 31, 2018 to 883 as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the total AUM for black card clients exceeded RMB80.2 billion (US$11.5 billion).
We continued to provide high-quality value-added services to high net worth clients, including, among others, family trust planning, global insurance planning, and tax planning. These long-term efforts and services have enabled us to gain a deeper understanding of our clients and their families’ wealth management requirements and maintain a close relationship with them. In particular, our insurance services grew rapidly in 2019, which revenues grew 44.2% from 2018, primarily driven by increased transaction volume from our Hong Kong and US offices.
At the same time, Fund Smile, our online mutual fund transaction platform, attracted 8,656 new registered users in 2019. As a result, its total registered users reached 15,928 as of December 31, 2019.
Overseas licenses and growth momentum
We are a company with global offices providing comprehensive financial services to high net worth individuals. For the year ended December 31, 2019, revenues from our overseas offices grew 25.4% year-over-year to RMB945.8 million (US$135.9 million), accounting for 27.9% of our total revenues, compared with 22.9% for the year ended December 31, 2018. Overseas offices other than Hong Kong reported revenues of RMB212.7 million (US$30.6 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing a significant growth compared with RMB3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The AUM of overseas offices accounted for 14.6% of our total AUM as of December 31, 2019.
Moreover, our overseas offices have been working with an increasing number of business counterparties and clients in different locations after they obtained various financial services licenses.
B. | Business Overview |
Founded in 2005, we are a leading wealth and asset management service provider in China with a focus on global investment and asset allocation services for high net worth individuals and enterprises. Substantially all our RMB-denominated financial products are managed and distributed in China, and most of our foreign currency denominated products are managed and distributed through our Hong Kong subsidiary, Noah HK, which serves as our offshore booking center.
With over 14 years of operating experience, we continue to distribute and manage financial products and provide comprehensive financial services to our high net worth and ultra high net worth clients globally, while at the same time constantly optimizing and improving our risk and asset management procedures to strengthen our core competitiveness.
43
Business Segments
Wealth Management
We provide diversified financial products and customized asset allocation and value-added services to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients inside and outside of China for our wealth management business. In particular, ultra high net worth clients are served by our VIP Center. We rigorously screen and select products and services from a wide array of providers suitable to our clients. Our high net worth individual clients benefit from our comprehensive services, expertise and capacities, including, among others, wealth planning, trust services, corporate services and insurance services. As of December 31, 2019, we served our clients through a network of 1,288 relationship managers across 292 service centers in 82 cities in China. Furthermore, to meet our clients’ needs for global investment opportunities, we have established offices in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Silicon Valley, New York, Vancouver, Melbourne and Singapore, with Type 1 (Dealing in Securities), Type 4 (Advising on Securities), Type 9 (Asset management) licenses in Hong Kong, family trust licenses in Hong Kong and Jersey Island, insurance brokerage licenses in the United States and Canada, money lender license in Hong Kong, and the investment fund manager license, exempt market dealer license, and portfolio manager license in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada, as well as capital market services license in Singapore.
As a pioneer in China’s independent wealth management industry, we continue to upgrade our product and service offerings to satisfy the evolving demands of the high net worth and ultra high net worth population in China. As the wealth management industry in China is still evolving, the number of high net worth clients and the amount of investable financial assets held by them are expected to increase in the foreseeable future. We believe that with our dedication in the wealth management industry, in-depth understanding of clients’ demands and long-term relationship strategies, our wealth management business will continue to remain the leading position in the market.
Financial Products Offerings
In 2019, we distributed a wide spectrum of financial products for our wealth management business, including credit products, private equity products, public securities products, and other products. Noah Upright, our distribution channel, is the first independent financial service company in China which has obtained the fund distribution license from the CSRC. Our dedicated relationship managers work with clients to build an asset allocation objective and a dynamic investment portfolio for each of them with the diversified financial products we offer, aiming to meet our clients’ financial planning needs, minimizing their risks while generating attractive returns.
Through our rigorous product selection and risk management processes, we have established long-term relationships with top tier fund managers in various asset categories. CV Info, one of China’s leading third-party private equity information providers, published its 2019 Annual List of Chinese Venture Capital Investment Institutions (“CV Info’s 2019 Annual List”) in October 2019, and we have cooperated with 17 out of the top 20 venture capital fund managers named on that list. In terms of public securities, we also selectively work with leading fund managers in the market using strict selection criteria. From 2005 to 2019, our accumulative transaction value of financial products amounted to RMB686.7 billion (US$98.6 billion).
44
Comprehensive Services
In addition to the financial products we provide to our clients, we develop and provide customized value-added financial and related services to our clients to better serve their needs, including investor education, trust services, corporate services and insurance services:
● | Investor Education: We primarily provide our investor education services through our subsidiary Enoch Education Training (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“Enoch Education”), which offers various types of training programs to high net worth individuals and their families. These programs include wealth planning, market insights, and overseas tours and entrepreneurship camps. We charge attendees fees for these events which depend primarily on the length and location of each program. We collaborate with reputable universities for these programs, including Shanghai University of Finance and Economics in China, Oxford University in U.K., and the University of Pennsylvania in the U.S.. |
Since its establishment in 2013, Enoch Education has organized more than 200 training sessions, which have attracted more than 12,000 investors, and 96 overseas study trips attended by more than 2,400 investors and relationship managers. In 2019, Enoch Education attracted approximately 8,600 registered clients through these activities. We believe that Enoch Education is an important tool for building our business as it increases the financial sophistication of our clients, enables us to deepen our relationships with them, and broadens the investor knowledge, all of which are believed to further enhance their loyalty and willingness to invest with us in return.
● | Trust Services: Founded in 2014, Ark Trust (Hong Kong) Limited (“Ark Trust HK”) is believed to be one of the first family trust service companies registered overseas among the independent wealth management companies in great China. Ark Trust HK provides a full range of services to high net worth individual clients and enterprises, including family trust and fiduciary services, employee stock ownership plans, charitable trust services, offshore corporate services, and wealth planning services. |
In April 2016, we established Ark Trust Jersey in the Island of Jersey with a trust license obtained from the Jersey Financial Services Commission. Jersey is a major center for offshore trust services, and Ark Trust Jersey works with one of Jersey’s largest professional services organizations to provide a full range of trust services to our clients, including setting up and managing Jersey companies, private trusts, and private foundations.
● | Corporate Services: We provide corporate services to assist our clients’ businesses on various aspects such as government registration, tax planning and back office leasing. We believe that through these corporate services, we are able to further expand the range of our services and deepen the relationship with our existing clients. |
● | Insurance Services: We provide insurance services to our high net worth clients, including life insurance, critical illness insurance, commercial medical insurance, annuity insurance, corporate employee benefits insurance as well as risk management consulting and claims assistance services. We have obtained insurance broker licenses in China and Hong Kong, and life insurance broker licenses in several states in the United States and British Columbia, Canada, aiming to serve Chinese high net worth clients in both onshore and overseas markets. |
Online wealth management service platform
We operate an online wealth management service platform named “Fund Smile” (former Cai Fu Pai) which we launched in 2014. The platform acts as an information and technology provider for standardized financial products and serves mass affluent individuals in China. In addition, since the second half of 2018, we have been developing a new online financial advisory platform called “Pilot Whale” which aims to connect retail investors to financial experts including licensed relationship managers and provide independent and professional paid services. This platform was launched in April 2019.
45
Revenue Model
For our wealth management business, we generate revenues primarily from the offering of financial products and services to our clients in four ways: (1) one-time commissions paid by clients or product providers when clients purchase financial products offered by us, (2) recurring service fees paid by our product providers and clients, (3) sharing of a portion of the performance-based income earned by fund managers who manage the funds and products, and (4) revenues from comprehensive wealth services we provide, especially the revenues from our investor education subsidiary, Enoch Education. We do not bear any loss from our clients’ investments nor do we provide guarantees of return with respect to the products we distribute.
Clients and Coverage Network
Our wealth management business focuses on distributing financial products and providing services to high net worth clients in China and overseas. As of December 31, 2019, we had 293,760 registered clients, an increase of 12.9% compared with December 31, 2018, and active clients who purchased financial products provided or distributed by us reached 14,538 during the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of 6.7% compared with the corresponding period of 2018. The average transaction value per active client for the year ended December 31, 2019 reached RMB5.4 million (US$0.8 million), maintaining our industry leading position. Counting in mutual funds clients, the number of clients who transacted with us in 2019 were 35,213, compared with 27,573 in 2018.
Headquartered in Shanghai, our sales network includes 292 service centers strategically located in 82 cities in China, covering multiple developed regions where the country’s high net worth population is concentrated, including the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, the Bohai Rim and other regions. Our strategy is to open service centers at locations with concentrated high net worth population and strong regional economies. The cities where we have opened service centers cover tier one and tier two cities and key provincial capitals in China. We have also expanded our overseas wealth management presence with offices in Hong Kong, Taiwan, U.S., Canada, Australia and Singapore.
Relationship Managers
Our relationship managers serve a selected number of high net worth clients to help them achieve their financial goals with a high level of services, resources and market insights. Relationship managers primarily focus on tailoring an investment strategy based on a deep understanding of each client’s financial position and objectives, utilizing our specialty in asset allocation and manager selection and the wide range of multi-asset class investments which we offer. Our holistic approach incorporates comprehensive strategic and tactical asset allocation, trust services, insurance solutions, cash management and personalized estate and financial planning, including wealth inheritance strategies and family office services like philanthropy management, family governance and wealth education.
We place a significant emphasis on recruiting, training and motivating our relationship managers, with the goal of enabling them to deliver thoughtful advice and investment solutions tailored for each client. Our relationship managers are all full-time employees who typically receive a base salary, transaction-based commissions, and a year-end performance-based bonus. We also provide a comprehensive training system for relationship managers in different career stages, helping them to understand the asset allocation theory promoted by Noah and investment philosophy within different asset categories. In 2019, we organized 36 online courses on our “Noah University” platform for relationship managers. Our relationship managers took an average of 99.1 hours of training courses in 2019, including 31.7 hours of in person courses and 67.4 hours of online courses. We optimized and condensed our sales force in 2019, and as a result the total number of relationship managers decreased to 1,288 as of December 31, 2019, compared to 1,583 as of December 31, 2018 and 1,335 as of December 31, 2017.
46
We identify our best performing relationship managers as “elite relationship managers”, and this core sales team contributed to 79.0% of our total transaction value in 2019 for our wealth management business. As of December 31, 2019, we had 597 elite relationship managers. In 2019, the turnover rate for elite relationship managers was merely 4.1%. In addition, since 2017 we have been collaborating with Shanghai University of Finance and Economics for a three-year “Noah Private Banker Project” attended by some of our top-performing relationship managers focusing on financial knowledge and education. These specialized training opportunities enhance the skills of our top relationship managers and also serve as an important motivational tool for all of our relationship managers as they compete to attend these events.
Business Environment & Competition
Business Environment
Traditionally, Chinese investors were accustomed to making their own financial investment decisions, such as trading stocks or purchasing bank time deposits. With the increasing complexity of the Chinese capital markets and increased choice of financial products, they are now gradually accepting the concept of diversified asset allocation and specialized asset management services. This trend of increased financial products, and the overall wealth creation in China, has driven the expansion of our business and our industry. According to the 2019 China Private Banking Report jointly issued by China Construction Bank and Boston Consulting Group, the investable financial assets of individuals in China reached RMB147 trillion by the end of 2018, and is expected to reach RMB243 trillion in 2023, representing an 11.0% compound annual growth rate. Also according to this report, the total number of Chinese high net worth individuals who own more than RMB6 million in investable financial assets has reached 1.67 million by the end of 2018 and is expected to reach 2.41 million by the end of 2023. Moreover, the penetration rate for professional services in China is substantially lower than that of developed countries, which we believe creates a strong potential for growth for China’s independent wealth management firms. In interacting with our clients, we have also observed that Chinese high net worth clients are becoming more and more sophisticated and accustomed to professional financial services. We anticipate that this will further increase the penetration rate of China’s wealth management industry to catch up with international standards.
Although still in its rapid expansion, the wealth management industry in China also continues to encounter challenges arising from the volatility in Chinese and global financial markets and stringent regulations. Despite of factors such as Sino-US trade tensions, turbulence in Hong Kong, deterioration of economy, and the market trend favouring standardized products, we believe our long-standing client relationships and the first-mover advantage will enable us to be well positioned to design and distribute a wide range of multi-asset product offerings, which will help us maintain our leading position in the market and capture potential industry consolidation opportunities. We believe that our deep experience in distributing a wide range of multi-asset product offerings, combined with our strict internal controls and compliance procedures, will facilitate us to effectively handle economic fluctuations and regulatory changes.
As part of China’s reform and opening policy, the Chinese government has further liberalized the financial industry in 2019, including lifting certain restrictions on the business scope of financial institutions such as foreign banks, securities companies and fund management companies, reducing quantitative entry conditions for foreign investors to invest in banking and insurance institutions and carry out these businesses, relaxing the limits on foreign ownership of joint ventures in China’s financial sectors such as banking, securities investment fund management companies, securities and insurance companies. We believe this will have a long-term impact on the competitive landscape of China’s financial industry, and we will actively seek new cooperation opportunities with these foreign financial institutions in different aspects despite the potential competition.
47
Competitors
Major financial institutions in China are developing their own wealth management businesses, and international financial institutions have also been expanding to the market in China in recent years, all targeting high net worth individuals. We compete with the private banking or wealth management departments of domestic and global banks, insurance companies and securities firms.
● | Commercial Banks. We compete with state-owned banks and commercial banks. |
● | Global private banks. Many global banks have private banking businesses serving high net worth individuals in China. |
● | Trust companies. Trust companies are also providing clients with wealth management services including offering trust products and tailor-made trust planning. |
● | Independent wealth management service providers. A number of independent wealth management service providers have emerged in China in recent years and some of them also rely on their in-house asset management arms. |
● | Insurance companies. Many insurance companies in China maintain their own wealth management teams and sales forces to distribute their products. |
● | Securities firms. We also compete with leading securities firms which have entered the wealth management business in recent years. |
● | Wealth management subsidiaries of commercial banks. More than 20 banks in China have announced their applications to CIBRC for the establishment of wealth management subsidiaries, following Administrative Measures on Wealth Management Subsidiaries of Commercial Banks. |
Competitive Advantages
Through our multi-asset product offering and rigorous risk control capabilities, we have focused on meeting clients’ evolving needs by selecting high quality products and building a comprehensive financial services platform while expanding globally.
● | Multi-asset product offering. We have well-established operations in China and more recently in key financial centers internationally. Through our procedures for identifying, researching, screening and distributing financial products, we are able to offer our clients a wide range of investment options including private equity and venture capital, public securities, and insurance products denominated in RMB, USD and other currencies. The diversification of our financial product offerings distinguishes us from many of our competitors in China, who typically offer only one or two types of asset categories and only have RMB-denominated product offerings. |
● | Rigorous product screening process. We are a pioneer in asset allocation in the Chinese market, and we utilize our rigorous screening process of products to minimize our clients’ risks. Our research team provides a top-down review on our overall tactical asset allocation strategy at least semi-annually, based on which our product team develops strategies in each asset class. Each financial product offered to our clients is screened through our multi-step procedures which are described below. See “—Risk Management Procedures” for more information. |
48
● | Tailor-made client services. We focus on maintaining long-term relationships with our clients, and our relationship managers continuously review and analyze the investments of each client, tailor the advice and select products best suited to them as well as discuss and analyze market trends with them regularly. Through this regular, personalized interaction by our highly trained relationship managers, we are able to effectively build trust with our clients and enhance and sustain their loyalty. We also believe that the various other value-added services we offer to our clients, such as tax planning, investor education services and trust planning, further enhance the loyalty of clients to the company. |
● | Global strategy. With over a decade of operating experience, we have developed a deep understanding of the financial planning and investment needs of Chinese high net worth individuals. With this understanding, we believe our international expansion to serve the needs of high net worth Chinese individuals is a natural and organic extension of our Company’s business, which helps us broaden both our product base and client base. Currently, we have overseas offices in Hong Kong, Taiwan, U.S., Canada, Australia and Singapore and will continue to expand these offices and establish new ones in key financial centers or where high net worth clients are concentrated. |
● | Reputation. We have strong brand recognition in the market and have won numerous awards and recognitions, including: “Best Boutique Wealth Manager-China” for 2019 awarded by The Asian Banker; “Wealth Management Firm of the Year& Best Wealth Manager for Fund of Funds” for 2019; “Top 5 most competitive wealth management institutions” and the “Top 5 Wealth Management Firms that GPs Highly Regard” in CV Info’s 2019 Annual List both for the third consecutive year in 2019; “2019 integrated financial services company” on 21st Century Asia Competitiveness by 21st Century Business Herald; “Golden Tripod” award for annual integrated wealth management institute by Daily Economic News. We believe that these awards demonstrate the strength of our reputation and market recognition of our leading position in the wealth management industry. |
Risk Management Procedures
A rigorous risk management and product screening process is key to our business. In light of the tightened regulatory environment in China in recent years, we have been further enhancing our comprehensive risk management system covering our wealth management business and the products we offer.
49
Our product development team focuses on meeting the evolving demands of clients by balancing the investment return, investment risk, and liquidity of the products we offer. Each product offered to our wealth management clients must go through a strictly implemented product screening procedure as indicated in the diagram below:
Our product selection process involves three key stages: project screening, project evaluation and risk control. In-house experts and professionals, including high-level management team members from our legal department, risk control department, compliance department and product department will gather periodically to carefully screen and evaluate each product we distribute.
In the project screening stage, our professionals review our internal due diligence findings to determine whether the product may be suitable for distribution to our clients. A prospective product needs to be approved by at least a majority of the members before passed to the next stage for screening.
In the project evaluation stage, our professionals analyze in more depth the legal structure, financial statistics and other aspects of the product and evaluate the potential returns to our clients and the risks of the investment.
In the risk control stage, our core management team participates in the meetings to fully evaluate the risk of the product and determine whether appropriate risk management is in place for the distribution of the product. After approved by the risk control meeting, the product will be reviewed by our in-house risk analysts before officially launched.
We have also established a complete risk management system for our daily operations. On the product supplier side, we have policies and procedures regarding, among other things, periodically reviewed product ratings, anti-bribery control, as well as post investment monitor and alert system. On the client side, we have strict Know-Your-Client (“KYC”) process and internal procedures for client risk evaluation and risk warning for every product purchased by clients, and regular information disclosure to clients throughout the life cycle of products.
50
Marketing and Brand Promotion
Word-of-mouth is one of the most effective marketing tools for our business. Although we employ a variety of methods to promote our brand, we believe the reputation and high level of awareness of our brand in China and, increasingly, abroad and references from clients is our best and most cost-efficient marketing channel.
Offline: Investor Seminars and Annual Wealth Management Forum
In order to attract new clients and develop customer loyalty, we organize targeted client events on a regular basis, such as high-profile investor seminars and workshops, industry conferences and other investor education and social events, where we present our market outlook and highlight our product selections. Our investor seminars are held across the PRC with different themes, and we invite experts or authorities in the industry to share the latest market trends, newly promulgated laws and regulations, and other updates with our clients.
In 2019, we organized 10 large-scale investor forums held in 10 different first-tier cities in the world which were attended by 8,618 clients and watched by over 70,000 people online.
Aside from investment-related events and forums, we also invited well-known psychologists and writers to give speeches in 2019, which were attended by 1,720 of our clients and had over 600,000 online viewers in total.
Online: Mobile and Web-based Customer Service Channels
To improve the efficiency of relationship managers and better serve our expanding client base, we connect with our client community through multiple online channels including social networks such as WeChat, dedicated mobile applications and web-based services.
Our core client application “Wei Nuo Ya” (“micro Noah”) provides personalized industry news and research, live broadcasts on expert discussions and product roadshows, which is an effective community management portal and investor education tool for our relationship managers.
In 2019, we continued to expand online audio/video recording and facial recognition functions in our client applications to enhance compliance and KYC capabilities, and enabled full-scope online transaction functions whereby our clients can execute transactions and monitor their investments from initial capital commitment through the liquidation of the investment. These mobile and web-based customer service channels allow us to keep close relationships with our high net worth clients and provide a convenient and efficient platform for these clients to get access to the products and services offered by us. Underlying these online channels, proprietary databases on a broad range of financial products and customer online behaviors are maintained by our Internet development team. We also cooperate with online information providers, including Baidu, Toutiao and Himalaya FM, as part of our online branding campaigns.
Research
Noah Research is the brand name of our research team. With analysts and experts in different asset classes, our Noah Research team has fully integrated into our business operations. They collect materials both internally and externally and conduct researches on various topics of different industries to provide the sales and investment team with the most recent market reports and a complete knowledge structure.
In 2019, our Noah Research team published 13 investment strategy reports and industry white papers as well as over 1,000 professional research reports and in-depth articles.
51
Noah Research plays an active role throughout the marketing process of the financial products. It supports our sales team and product sourcing team in different stages. In the product screening stage, the Noah Research team helps evaluate the counterparty and conduct product due diligence. In the product launch stage, the Noah Research team cooperates with the sales team and financial product managers to jointly determine the marketing strategies and provides sell-side reports regarding the industry, the fund manager and the product itself. In the post-investment stage, the Noah Research team supports the sales team with ongoing monitoring and tracking of products and fund managers, and helps answer questions raised by relationship managers.
Asset Management
To better meet our clients’ asset allocation needs and as a complementary service to our high net worth clients, we started our asset management business in 2010 under the brand name Gopher Asset Management. As a leading alternative asset manager in China, Gopher Asset Management manages investments with underlying assets in China and overseas denominated in both Renminbi and other currencies. Gopher Asset Management’s AUM increased slightly from RMB169.2 billion as of December 31, 2018 to RMB170.2 billion (US$24.5 billion) as of December 31, 2019, with 61.6% of AUM in private equity strategies.
As a multi-asset management service provider, Gopher Asset Management invests in different categories of assets, including:
● | Private equity investments, including investments in the leading private equity funds in China and overseas through funds of funds and secondary funds, as well as direct investments in companies in new economy sectors. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Gopher Asset Management’s private equity arm raised 5.3 billion RMB, co-invested or directly invested in 99 companies with a total investment amount of RMB10.0 billion (US$1.4 billion). |
● | Credit investments, including funds investing in consumer financing, supply chain financing, auto-financing, and other alternative credit related underlying products. Starting from the third quarter in 2019, we ceased investing in single counterparty provide debts products. |
● | Real estate investments, including funds investing in residential as well as commercial real estate properties such as office buildings and shopping malls, in the form of both credit and equity investments. Gopher Asset Management has been diversifying the real estate-related products offered in recent years, gradually shifting away from residential to commercial real estate products, and promoting core and value-added funds. As of December 31, 2019, we hold three office buildings in Shanghai through direct equity investment, including Gopher Center. |
● | Public securities investments, mainly including private secondary market equity funds of funds and manager-of-manager investments which are sub-advised by outside fund managers, as well as direct investments in listed companies. We have innovative products such as Gopher Rayliant quantitative fundamentals A-Share strategy fund, which was the first fund to bring “smart beta” index enhancement strategy into China’s A-share market to capture excess return. Since its establishment in April 2018 till end of 2019, the fund had generated positive return for all clients. Gopher also launched bond funds in 2019. |
● | Other investments include multi-strategy funds and other assets that cannot be classified into any of the aforementioned categories. We use asset allocation principles to build multi-asset portfolios and multi or single family office accounts. As of December 31, 2019, the total AUM related to our multi-strategy and family office businesses had increased by 31.3% year-over-year, to RMB8.8 billion (US$1.3 billion). |
52
Being an innovator in the industry, Gopher Asset Management is China’s first market-oriented fund of fund catering to the diversification demands of high net worth individuals, the first fund of hedge fund, and the first secondary private equity fund of fund in China. Its investment philosophy focuses on identifying and capturing opportunities from emerging trends in the market, evaluating a wide range of assets and investment opportunities from numerous product providers, and constructing investment portfolios through vigorous due diligence process. As of December 31, 2019, Gopher Asset Management had invested in more than 210 funds managed by third parties, and directly or indirectly through these funds, invested in more than 4,900 underlying companies, many of which had achieved substantial growth. We have built a proprietary system that tracks the profiles and performance of all invested funds and underlying projects and consolidates such information in our internal database. This enables us to understand investment trends and develop the corresponding strategies in an innovative way.
Our asset management business has historically focused primarily on investments in funds of funds, whereby we established a fund vehicle, acting as the general partner or manager and investing a small amount of capital (as is customary in the industry), and raising capital from third party investors. We then direct that fund vehicle to invest in one or more underlying funds which are managed by third parties. In recent years, we have focused on developing our co-investment (whereby we invest in assets alongside the underlying funds) and direct investment capabilities, and we expect such investments to increase in the future. Our direct investment and co-investment projects are comprised of onshore and offshore investments in diversified areas including the following sectors: TMT, financial services, healthcare and industries focusing on Chinese consumers upgrading their lifestyles.
In 2019, Gopher also won the bid for an angel FOF project, also named “Gopher Xiangjiang Project” out of seven bidders. The Xiangjiang New District in Hunan province in China is expected to contribute a total of RMB1 billion (RMB 100 million in the first phase) to build up the Xiangjiang New District. Total fund size is expected to be RMB 2.5 billion to RMB3 billion.
In response to our clients’ increasing demands for overseas investment opportunities, we have cooperated with more overseas partners and increased the number of non-RMB-denominated funds of funds offered. We have built a global Gopher platform to identify and source non-RMB-denominated financial products for onshore and offshore Chinese high net worth individuals, with our Hong Kong office focusing on global investments, Silicon Valley office focusing on technology-related venture capital funds and direct investment opportunities, and New York office focusing on US real estate investments. As of December 31, 2019, the offshore AUM of Gopher Asset Management reached RMB24.8 billion (US$3.6 billion), representing 14.6% of the total AUM for our asset management.
Historically, the majority of the funds managed by Gopher Asset Management were distributed through our wealth management business. Over the years, Gopher Asset Management has been building its own fund raising team targeting institutional investors and family offices, while expanding its distribution channel to other financial institutions such as banks and securities firms.
Revenue Model
We generate revenues from our asset management business primarily in the form of (1) recurring service fees mainly consisting of management fees paid by clients and (2) performance-based income from funds for which we serve as the fund managers.
Given that over 60% of Gopher Asset Management’s AUM as of December 31, 2019 came from private equity investments which generally have a long duration with no redemption requirement, we believe that the recurring service fees we earn are relatively predictable and sustainable. We are also entitled to receive performance-based income for these investments and most of the performance-based income is typically calculated and distributed when the cumulative return of the fund can be determined. Such income will not be recognized as revenue until (a) it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur, or (b) the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
53
Business Environment & Competition
Business Environment
China has experienced a dramatic boost in the asset management industry in terms of scale and client sophistication driven by both institutional and individual clients. According to the AMAC statistics, the size of China’s asset management industry has experienced a CAGR of 15% from 2007 to 2018. According to the China Financial Stability Report of 2019 published by the PBOC, as of March 31, 2019, the total AUM of the asset management industry in China had exceeded RMB79.3 trillion (assets which are held through multiple tiers of asset managers are counted only once), which was comprised of products managed by banks (RMB21.4 trillion), trust companies (RMB19.0 trillion), mutual fund companies (RMB13.9 trillion), securities companies (RMB21.1 trillion), insurance companies (RMB2.6 trillion), and other fund companies (RMB1.3 trillion). We estimate that our current market share is less than 1%, and we expect to remain as a leading asset manager in this market with multi-asset classes under management and strong asset allocation capabilities.
Competitors
The asset management business is intensely competitive, and a number of private and mutual fund management companies, securities companies and other fund managers have emerged in the asset management market in China in recent years. We expect that competition will continue to intensify and believe that we are well positioned for industry consolidation.
Our main competitors include domestic asset management firms, private equity and venture capital fund managers, securities firms, mutual funds, as well as global asset management firms with wide-ranging capabilities and distribution channels. Competitiveness in the asset management industry mainly depends on the following factors: the capability to recruit investment talent, deal sourcing capabilities and fund-raising capabilities.
Competitive Advantages
The competitive advantages of our asset management business include the following:
● | Outstanding performance. Gopher Asset Management has achieved strong performance since its inception. For the private equity investments, amongst all the companies that we invested in directly or indirectly, over 214 companies have successfully become listed companies and approximately 90 are believed to have grown into unicorn companies with a valuation over US$1.0 billion. For the secondary market equity investments, Gopher Asset Management’s fund-of-funds products have also been favored by institutional investors for their steady return and lower drawdown, with its leading FOF fund’s annualized return outperforming benchmarks by 3.9%, its MOM fund’s annualized return outperforming the CSI 300 Index by 10.1%, and the Quantitative FOF’s annualized return outperforming benchmark by 6.7% as of December 31, 2019. |
● | Diversified investments strategies. Gopher Asset Management has been a leading fund-of-fund manager in multi-asset classes in China. With deep expertise in directly or indirectly investing in private equity/venture capital, real estate, public securities, credit, and other areas denominated in RMB, USD and other currencies, we are dedicated to understanding and serving the demands of high net worth individuals and families, and help them with asset allocation and wealth appreciation. Moreover, we seek to minimize volatility of the performance of our investments by investing in a wide range of asset classes and investment structures which enhances our ability to achieve a more sustainable revenue stream under various economic circumstances. |
54
● | Long-term relationships with leading fund managers. As one of the largest market-oriented funds of funds managers in China, we monitor the performance of and cooperate closely with most of the high-profile private fund managers in China. Since inception, Gopher Asset Management has invested in over 210 funds and over 4,900 companies directly or indirectly through fund-of-fund vehicles. Gopher Asset Management has established a systematic screening system for both fund managers and portfolio investments, including rigorous financial, legal and market due diligence and analysis, as well as post-investment monitoring to track the performance of funds we manage and to establish a long-term relationship with the fund managers whose funds we invested in. We have also accumulated a broad database of investment areas identified for further exploitation, including seeding emerging funds established by ex-partners of well-known funds and searching potential co-investment and direct investment opportunities. In response to our clients’ increasing demand for overseas investment opportunities, we have been increasing the collaborations with overseas partners and the number of overseas funds and funds-of-funds we offer. |
● | Inter-disciplinary, seasoned investment team. Since its inception, Gopher Asset Management has focused on assembling a highly seasoned team of investment professionals with extensive experience in private equity, real estate, quantitative hedging, cross-border investment and family office management. This team has a strong academic and work background, with average work experience in the asset management industry of more than eight years. More than 98% of its employees had a bachelor degree, and 59% of employees had a master degree or above as of December 31, 2019. This team provides us with a key competitive strength in the industry. |
● | Reputation. Gopher Asset Management received numerous awards in 2019, including Best Wealth Manager in China, Discretionary and Segregated Portfolio Management awards by Asian Private Banker, the Best Wealth Manager for FOFs award by Asiamoney, China Multi-asset Strategy (three years) and Global Multi-asset Strategy (three years) in Professional Investment 2019 by Insights and Mandate. It was also on CV Info’s 2019 Annual Lists in three categories: the Top 20 Chinese FoFs that GPs Highly Regard, the Best Chinese FoFs, and Top 20 Chinese LPs for VCs. |
Lending and other businesses
In addition to our wealth management and asset management businesses, we also provide lending and other services. Starting from 2019, this segment mainly includes lending services.
Lending services
Started in August 2013, our lending services subsidiary, Rongyitong, utilizes an advanced risk-management system to assess and facilitate short-term loans to high quality borrowers often with collateral such as financial products distributed by Noah or physical assets, with a typical loan-to-value ratio of below 70%. After loan origination, most of the loan assets will be securitized and transferred, and Rongyitong, as the service agent, does not assume any credit risk. During the year ended December 31, 2019, Rongyitong originated RMB6.8 billion (US$1.0 billion) in loans, with an average loan size of over RMB1.5 million (US$0.2 million) and average loan duration of nine months.
It has established an online SAAS (Software as a Service) platform and independent risk management system to provide risk assessments based on a borrower’s credit rating as well as the ongoing management of collateralized assets. The lending service serves as a value-added service that we provide to our high net worth clients to broaden and deepen client relationships.
Revenue Model
We generate revenues primarily from our lending services.
55
Product Providers
We have established extensive business relationships with reputable third-party private fund product providers and mutual funds product providers both in China and globally, in connection with our distribution of financial products. Product providers as typically the issuers of financial products. The product providers with which we partner encompass a variety of institutions and companies, mainly including private equity/venture capital firms and public securities fund managers, real estate fund managers/developers, and securities investment fund managers. We also distribute our own funds, funds of funds and other investment products which are originated, developed and managed by us. Gopher Asset Management serves as the general partner or manager of these funds.
We enter into service agreements with the product providers for the majority of the products we distribute through our wealth management business. These service agreements usually expire upon the expiration of the underlying financial products. Under these agreements, we typically undertake to provide the counterparty with services relating to our clients’ purchase of the relevant products. Such services typically include providing our clients with information on the relevant products, evaluating the financial condition and risk profiles of those clients who desire to purchase the relevant products, educating them on the documentation involved in the purchase as well as furnishing other assistance to facilitate their transactions with the product providers.
Under our services agreements with respect to our fund products, we also undertake to assist the product providers to maintain investor relationships by providing our clients who have purchased the relevant products with various post-purchase services, including relationship maintenance assistance on fund payment procedures.
Environment, Social and Corporate Governance
We pay close attention to environmental, social and corporate governance (“ESG”) matters and taken actions in our day-to-day operations and investment services. Since 2014, we have been voluntarily releasing a Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) Report on an annual basis.
We actively work to promote our growth and operations in a sustainable and responsible manner and aim to become a company built on sustainable development and responsible strategies, aligned with our core corporate values—client-centricity, integrity, professionalism, embracing changes, self-improvement, and passion. We updated our corporate mission in 2018 as “enriching life with wealth and wisdom” and envision ourselves to become a trustworthy partner by developing a deep understanding of clients through the pursuit of professionalism and excellence. We have been continuously investing in training and education programs, developing specific programs like Noah Momentum and E-learning courses for employees and clients.
Our 2018-2019 Noah Holdings Limited Sustainability Report was released in June 2019, prepared in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Core Option and Standard AA1000 (2008). The Report highlighted our efforts in ESG matters during the period, including environmental protection, pollution reduction, caring for employees’ physical and psychological wellness, enhancement of professional skills, risk management, anti-money laundry integrity education, green innovation, investor education, sustainable management and other ESG matters. We hope our efforts will help create a healthy ecosystem in our business operations and promote sustainable development in the industry.
As of December 31, 2019, we, our employees and clients had donated 500,000 saxaul trees that have been planted in Tengger Desert in China, and organized 193 series of Noah Care courses covering topic of happiness, well-being, and psychological health, which have been attended by more than 20,000 people, and indirectly read or viewed by 100,000 people. A social program we launched has helped thousands of beneficiaries including children in underdeveloped villages in China to receive education and community non-resident children to receive healthcare, as well as providing training sessions for children with infantile autism.
To help combat COVID-19, our employees and clients have donated over 40,000 facial masks, RMB1 million, over 900 kilograms of disinfector and some protective suits for hospitals in Hubei, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Sichuan, Jiangsu and Zhejiang, China through a number of non-profit organizations.
56
We are also committed to reduce the carbon emission in daily office operations. There are also breastfeeding rooms in our office buildings.
In addition, our senior management members’ KPIs have incorporated environment, social and governance indicators.
We are working on building up a dedicated Noah ESG website and liaising with more financial institutions in China utilizing our extensive network and leadership vision to promote ESG awareness and efforts in the industry.
IT Infrastructure
We have developed our integrated IT infrastructure that provides technology support to all aspects of our business, covering market research, portfolio management, product lifecycle management, sales planning, and marketing strategies. In addition, we provide technology-oriented client service solutions which help us offer advanced customer support and interactive services for our clients. As data is the core of the financial services industry, we focus on the research and development of technologies to collect and utilize big data. For risk management, we have integrated technology that analyzes tens of millions of data points monthly in order to assess and manage risks in our business. We coordinate cross-company data analysis to create a complete customer profile to help relationship managers better understand the behavior and demands of their clients. We have also invested in ChatBot, a software tool that enhances verbal and textual conversations with our client and relationship managers, for our call center to provide better services for our clients 7x24. In the area of investment strategies and client retention, we are exploring artificial intelligence empowered algorithms to better exploit the market opportunities and client behaviors, and it has been producing promising results.
Intellectual Property
We believe the protection of our brand, trade names, domain names, trademarks, trade secrets, patents, and other intellectual property rights is critical to our business. It also distinguishes the products we distribute and the services we provide from those of our competitors and contributes to our competitive advantage in both wealth management and asset management industries. We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark and competition laws and contractual arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. We enter into confidentiality agreements and non-compete covenants with all of our employees and our third-party financial product providers. As of December 31, 2019, we had 495 registered trademarks (429 registered trademarks in mainland China and 66 registered trademarks in Hong Kong, Taiwan, U.S., Europe, Singapore, Canada, India and Australia), 79 registered top level domain names, and 137 issued patents in China. “”, our company’s name “Noah Wealth Management” in Chinese, and “”, our asset management subsidiary’s name “Gopher” in Chinese, have both been recognized as well-known trademarks in China by the Trademark Office under the State Administration for Industry and Commerce in 2018.
Insurance
We participate in government sponsored social security programs including pension insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance and housing funds. We also maintain a director and officer liability insurance policy for our board directors, executives and employees. In Hong Kong, we maintain investment structure insurance as required by the Hong Kong SFC. We do not maintain business interruption insurance or key-man life insurance. We consider our insurance coverage to be in line with that of other wealth management companies of similar size in China.
57
Legal Proceedings
In connection with certain credit funds managed by an affiliate of Gopher Shanghai, providing supply chain financing involving companies related to Camsing International Holding Limited, which were later suspected to commit fraudulent activities, Gopher Shanghai has received notices from a court and an arbitration tribunal in 2020 concerning claims initiated by individual clients against Gopher Shanghai as the fund manager.
Although Gopher Shanghai was not involved in any of the suspected fraudulent activities, we have been proactively assessing the potential legal risks and implications associated with this claim, which is currently at a preliminary stage, and other potential legal proceedings, to protect the best interests of us and our shareholders.
Other than the matters mentioned above, we are currently not a party to, and we are not aware of any threat of, any judicial, arbitration or administrative proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, are likely to have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may from time to time be involved in litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of our business. Our businesses are also subject to extensive regulations, which may result in regulatory proceedings against us, See “Item 3D. Risk Factors” above.
Regulations
We mainly conduct our wealth management, asset management, and lending and other services and businesses in China, Hong Kong and United States. In China, we are subject to relevant regulations enforced by the CSRC, AMAC, PBOC, MOFCOM and other regulators. Our Hong Kong subsidiaries’ operations are under the supervision of the Hong Kong SFC and the Insurance Authority. Our US subsidiaries’ operations are subject to US federal and state law and supervision by, among others, the SEC.
The laws and regulations in the PRC that have material effects on our business can be categorized as follows:
● | Regulations on foreign investment; |
● | Regulations on private funds and fund distribution; |
● | Regulations on lending and other services and businesses, including small loans, financial services, insurance brokerage, financial leasing and factoring; |
● | Regulations with regard to daily operation, including VATS, cyber security, Internet privacy, tax, labor issues, foreign exchange control; and |
● | Regulations relating to our current corporate structure, including dividend distribution, offshore investment by PRC residents and stock incentive plans. |
This section sets forth a summary of the significant rules and regulations that affect our business activities in China and Hong Kong as well as certain newly enacted laws that may have material impact on our business including those in other legal jurisdiction.
58
Regulation on Foreign Investment
Investment activities in the PRC by foreign investors were principally governed by the Catalog for the Guidance of Foreign Investment Industry (the “Guidance Catalog”), which was promulgated and is amended from time to time by the MOFCOM and the NDRC, the Old FIE Laws, and their respective implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Guidance Catalog lays out the basic framework for foreign investment in China, classifying businesses into three categories with regard to foreign investment: “encouraged,” “restricted” and “prohibited” Industries not listed in the Guidance Catalogue are generally deemed as falling into a fourth category “permitted” unless specifically restricted by other PRC laws. Under the Guidance Catalog, certain ownership requirements, requirements for senior executives and other special management measures shall apply to foreign investors with regard to the access of foreign investments in certain restricted categories, and foreign investors shall not engage in any business falls into the prohibited categories.
On June 30, 2019, the MOFCOM and the NDRC released the Catalogue of Industries for Encouraging Foreign Investment (2019 Version) and the Special Management Measures (Negative List) for the Access of Foreign Investment (2019), or the 2019 Negative List, which became effective on July 30, 2019, to amend and supplement the Guidance Catalog and replace the previous negative list thereunder. Under the 2019 Negative List, foreign investment in companies providing value-added telecommunications services, excluding e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, data collection and transmission services and call centers, should not exceed 50% of the total equity interests. Any foreign investor having investment in a value-added telecommunication service provider in China must have experience in providing VATS overseas and maintain a good track record. We act as the general partners of some funds which invest into other equity investment funds or companies. In order to comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in certain industries, the underlying fund manager or company will usually require that investors shall not be foreign-invested entities, or the foreign capital percentage shall be limited to a specific percentage ceiling.
On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the Old FIE Laws. The Foreign Investment Law, by means of legislation, establishes the basic framework for the access, promotion, protection and administration of foreign investment in view of investment protection and fair competition.
According to the Foreign Investment Law, a foreign invested entity shall be treated no different than a domestic company, except for those foreign invested entities that operate in industries deemed to be either “restricted” or “prohibited” in the “negative list”. The Foreign Investment Law provides that foreign invested entities operating in the “restricted” or “prohibited” industries will require clearance and other approvals before they can operate in such industries. However, it is unclear whether the “negative list” referenced in the Foreign Investment Law will differ from the 2019 Negative List.
The Foreign Investment Law also provides several protective rules and principles for foreign investors and their investments in the PRC, including, among others, that foreign investors’ funds can be freely transferred out and into the territory of PRC, which run through the entire life cycle from the entry to the exit of foreign investment, and that a comprehensive system to guarantee fair competition among foreign-invested enterprises and domestic enterprises is to be established. If these protective rules and principles are so implemented via specific rules and regulations, it could mean that the restrictions on the injection of our funds into our PRC subsidiary and the distribution of the PRC subsidiary’s profits and dividends to us may further loosen. In addition, foreign investors and foreign-invested enterprises are subject to legal liabilities for failing to report their investment information in accordance with the requirements of the information reporting system to be further established. Furthermore, the Foreign Investment Law provides that foreign invested enterprises established according to the existing laws regulating foreign investment may maintain their structure and corporate governance within five years after the implementing of the Foreign Investment Law, which means that after the five-year grace period, foreign invested enterprises may be required to adjust their structure and corporate governance in accordance with the then current PRC Company Law and other laws and regulations governing the corporate governance.
59
On December 26, 2019, the State Council promulgated the Implementation Rules to the Foreign Investment Law, which became effective on January 1, 2020. The implementation rules further clarified that the state encourages and promotes foreign investment, protects the lawful rights and interests of foreign investors, regulates foreign investment administration, continues to optimize foreign investment environment, and advances a higher-level opening.
On December 30, 2019, the MOFCOM and State Administration for Market Regulation, or SAMR, jointly promulgated the Measures for Information Reporting on Foreign Investment, which became effective on January 1, 2020. Pursuant to the Measures for Information Reporting on Foreign Investment, where a foreign investor carries out investment activities in China directly or indirectly, the foreign investor or the foreign-invested enterprise shall submit the investment information to the competent commerce department.
We conduct our asset management business and our online wealth management service platform, which is considered value-added telecommunication services, in China principally through contractual arrangements among Noah Group, our PRC subsidiary, and Noah Investment, our variable interest entity in the PRC, and Noah Investment’s shareholders. In the opinion of Zhong Lun Law Firm, our PRC legal counsel:
● | the ownership structures of our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, and Noah Holdings Limited, comply with all PRC laws and regulations currently in effect; and |
● | the contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and its shareholders governed by PRC laws are valid, binding and enforceable, and will not result in a violation of PRC laws or regulations currently in effect. |
We have further been advised by our PRC legal counsel, however, that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws and regulations, including the Foreign Investment Law, which became effective on January 1, 2020, and accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may in the future take a view that is contrary to the above opinion of our PRC legal counsel. For example, the Foreign Investment Law does not comment on the concept of “de facto control” or contractual arrangements with variable interest entity. Rather, it has a catch-all provision under the definition of “foreign investment” to include investments made by foreign investors in China through means stipulated by laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. Therefore, it still leaves room for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—Our current corporate structure and business operations may be affected by the newly enacted Foreign Investment Law.” It is uncertain whether any other new PRC laws or regulations relating to variable interest entity structures will be adopted or if adopted, what they would provide.
60
Regulations on Private Funds
As a result of regulatory reform in June 2013, instead of the NDRC, the CSRC is now in charge of the supervision and regulation of private funds, including but not limited to private securities funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds and other forms of private funds. On August 21, 2014, CSRC promulgated Interim Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Private Investment Funds (the “Interim Measures”) which became effective on the same date. According to the Interim Measures, private funds refer to the investment funds established by way of raising capitals from qualified investors in a non-public manner within the territory of the PRC. The qualified investors shall be (i) institutional investors with net assets of no less than RMB10 million, (ii) individual investors with financial assets of no less than RMB3 million or the average annual income of no less than RMB500,000 for the past three years, and (iii) other types of investors that has been prescribed in the Interim Measures. The Interim Measures mainly cover the following five aspects: specifying the registration of fund manager and record-filing of private funds of all type, setting up a qualified investor system, specifying the fund raising regulations of private funds, presenting the investment operations and introducing industry self-regulation and supervision and administration measures for private funds. Apart from the Interim Measures, other laws or regulations apply to private funds shall still apply, including the Companies Law of the PRC, which applies to fund manager or private fund taking the form of limited liability company or company limited by shares and the Partnership Law of the PRC, which applies to fund manager or private fund taking the form of limited liability partnership or general partnership. Unlike general partnerships, limited partnerships allow investors to join as partners with their liability for the partnership’s debts limited by the amount of their capital commitment. A limited partnership must consist of no more than 49 limited partners and at least one general partner, who will be responsible for the operation of the partnership and bear unlimited liability for the partnership’s debts.
According to the Interim Measures, the establishment of management institutions of private funds and the formation of private funds are not subject to administrative examination and approvals. All types of fund managers are allowed to set up private funds to a cumulative number of investors not exceeding the number specified by laws. Managers of private funds of all types are, however, required to register with the AMAC and apply with the AMAC for record filing after the fund raising of a private fund of any type is completed. Accordingly, the AMAC formulated the Measures for the Registration of Private Investment Fund Managers and Filling of Private Investment Funds (for Trial Implementation) which became effective as of February 7, 2014, setting forth the procedures and requirements for the registration of private fund managers and record filing of private funds to perform self-regulatory administration of private funds.
Since late 2015, AMAC promulgated a series of detailed measures and guidance to enhance the supervision in the private fund industry, including the Administration of Information Disclosure of Private Investment Funds, the Notice to Further Regulate Several Issues on the Registration of Private Funds Managers, Rules on the Management of Private Asset Management Plan Filing by Securities and Futures Institutions No. 1 – 4. These regulations have the effect of (i) expanding the self-discipline rules regarding the private fund industry, (ii) intensifying the registration of private fund manager and record-filing of private funds, (iii) establishing the qualification censorship of fund manager by attorney and (iv) strengthening the practice qualifications of management.
In December 2018, AMAC updated the Asset Management Association of China Notice for Private Fund Manager Registration (“Private Fund Manager Registration New Notice”), which set further requirements for the registration and ongoing compliance matters for private fund managers. Among others, the Private Fund Manager Registration New Notice mentioned that: (i) if a new entity under the common control with a private fund manager intends to file a new application for private fund manager registration with AMAC, it shall be stated in its application the purpose and rationale of setting up multiple private fund managers, the difference in the business of such private fund managers, how horizontal competition among such private fund managers can be avoided, and the de facto control person of such private fund managers shall undertake in writing that it shall bear the joint and several liability for any violations of such private fund manages during their operations; and (ii) except for its legal representative, other senior officers of a private fund manager shall not have any other part-time jobs, and in the event that such senior officers have any part-time job in addition to the position in such private fund manager, the fund manager shall provide relevant documentations for the rationale for such additional part-time job, and the number of the senior officers who have such additional part-time jobs shall not exceed 50% of the total number of the senior officers of the private fund manager.
61
On November 9, 2017, the State Council promulgated the Notice of Implementation Measures to Transfer a Portion of State-owned Capital to Social Security Fund (the “State-owned Capital Transfer Notice”) which amended the previous mechanism of state-owned capital transfer. In the past, if the portion of state-owned capital of an entity is more than 50% or otherwise considered as significant by competent authorities (State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Committee, Ministry of Finance or CSRC in different occasions), the entity shall voluntarily transfer a portion of shares to the Social Security Fund in its initial public offering. In practice, before the State-owned Capital Transfer Notice, the limited partners with state-owned capital had the liberty to determine the portion and status of state-owned capital in its own shareholding/equity structure, which will eventually impact the state-owned capital percentage of the private fund the limited partner invested in. In addition, before the State-owned Capital Transfer Notice, when a private fund, as well as its invested enterprise, is considered to be in fact controlled by state-owned capital, the invested enterprise will likely have to transfer the relevant shares in its first public offering. Pursuant to the State-owned Capital Transfer Notice, only the prescribed type of entities shall transfer the shares to Social Security Fund and unless otherwise clarified by the State Council, a private fund is not a prescribed type entity.
On April 27, 2018, PBOC, CBIRC, CSRC and SAFE jointly released the Guidance Opinions on Regulating the Asset Management Business of Financial Institutions (the “Guidance Opinions on Asset Management”), which provides that specific laws and regulations relating to private investment funds will be applied to private investment funds. However, if there are no such laws and regulations addressing particular topics, then the Guidance Opinions on Asset Management applies. On July 20, 2018, PBOC issued the Circular on Further Clarifying Matters concerning the Guidance Opinions on Regulating the Asset Management Business of Financial Institutions. On October 22, 2018, CSRC issued the Administrative Measures on Private Asset Management Business of Securities and Futures Institutions. CBIRC has also issued specific implementation rules in the industries subject to its regulation. On October 19, 2019, NDRC, PBOC, the Ministry of Finance, CBIRC, CSRC and SAFE jointly released the Notice on Further Clarifying the Matters Concerning Regulating Asset Management Products for Financial Institutions to Invest in Venture Capital Funds and Government-funded Industry Investment Funds, specifying how Guidance Opinions on Asset Management applies to venture capital funds and government-funded industry investment funds. On December 23, 2019, AMAC updated the Notice for Private Fund Registration (“Private Fund Registration New Notice”), which has reflected certain provisions set forth in the Guidance Opinions on Asset Management, such as the prohibition of establishment of multiple private funds in order to contravene in disguise restrictions on the number of investors or other regulatory requirements and the requirement for leverage ratios in respect of the private funds.
On February 14, 2020, CSRC released the Decision on the Revision to the Administrative Measures for the Offering of Securities by Listed Companies, the Decision on the Revision to the Interim Measures for the Administration of the Offering of Securities by Companies Listed on ChiNext, the Decision on the Revision to the Implementing Rules for Private Placement of Shares by Listed Companies and the Supervision Q&A for Offering - Supervision Requirements for Guiding and Regulating Financing Acts of List Companies (the abovementioned rules, collectively, the “New Refinancing Rules”), relaxing the supervision requirements for refinancing by PRC listed companies and participation in private placement by investors. According to the New Refinancing Rules, the CSRC (i) shortens the lock period for transfer of the newly subscribed shares held by the subscribers; and (2) increases the offering price discount and the maximum amount of shares for private placement etc.. Private funds managed by Gopher investing in private placement of shares by listed companies might have more opportunities to participate in the private placement market and easier ways for exit.
Regulations on Fund Distribution
According to the Administrative Measures on Securities Investment Fund Distribution (the “Fund Distribution Administrative Measures”), fund distribution institutions refer to the fund managers and other institutions registered with the CSRC or its branches. Other institutions, including commercial banks, securities companies, futures companies, insurance institutions, securities investment consulting institutions and independent institutions, to carry out fund distribution service, they are required to register with the local CSRC branch and obtain the relevant fund distribution license. Distribution services regulated under the Fund Distribution Administrative Measures refer to marketing and promotion, sales and distribution, subscription and redemption services of mutual funds in particular. With the fund distribution license, the distributor can also distribute the asset management plans under the CSRC regime.
62
The AMAC issued the Measures for the Administration of the Fund Raising Conducts of the Private Investment Funds (the “Fund Raising Measures”) on April 15, 2016 and the Implementation Guidance of the Management of Investor Suitability for Fund Raising Institutions (the “Investor Suitability Management Guidance”) on June 28, 2017 in consistent with the Administrative Measures of the Securities and Futures Investor Suitability by the CSRC, which both made significant changes to the fund raising procedures and sales institutions. According to the Fund Raising Measures, only two kinds of institutions are qualified to conduct the fund raising of private investment funds: (a) private fund managers which have registered with the AMAC (only applicable when raising fund for the funds established and managed by themselves); and (b) the fund distributors which have obtained the fund distribution license and also become members of the AMAC. In addition, the Fund Raising Measures set forth detailed procedures for conducting fund raising business and introduced new process such as “cooling-off period” and the “re-visit.”
The Investor Suitability Management Guidance categorized fund investors into two types: common investors and sophisticated investors. Sophisticated investors include (i) financial institutions approved by relevant financial bureaus and the products they distribute, (ii) entities with net asset of no less than RMB20 million or financial asset of no less than RMB10 million, and (iii) individuals with financial asset of no less than RMB5 million or average annual income of no less than RMB500,000 for the past three years. The investors other than the sophisticated investors are common investors, who are further divided into 5 categories according to their risk tolerance level. The Investor Suitability Management Guidance listed the requirements and steps for identifying the risk tolerance and category of each investor, which shall be the first step to take in a fund-raising process and determine the product with corresponding risk level that such investor can subscribe to.
Noah Upright obtained the fund distribution license from the CSRC Shanghai branch since February 2012 and is a member of AMAC. By holding the fund distribution license, Noah Upright is able to distribute the mutual funds managed by mutual fund management companies and private funds managed by private fund managers.
On February 22, 2019, CSRC released the Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Agencies Engaged in the Sale of Publicly-offered Securities Investment Funds (Draft for Comment) (the “Draft Distribution Measure”), which provides that, among others, fund distribution institutions may engage in the distribution of other asset management products regulated by state financial and administrative authorities by obtaining approval or acknowledgement from such state financial regulatory and administrative authorities, and the independent fund distribution institutions shall not engage in distributions of asset management products other than funds and private asset management schemes of securities and futures operators in violation of laws and regulations, and such independent fund distribution institutions shall not engage in other businesses without the approval of CSRC. If the Draft Distribution Measure were enacted as proposed, it might have certain impact on Noah Upright’s distribution of private funds, public securities products such as standardized NAV-based bond funds, mutual funds, etc.. However, Gopher Asset Management’s direct distribution of the private funds under its management should not be affected by the Draft Distribution Measure if it were enacted as proposed.
On November 8, 2019, Supreme People's Court of the PRC (“SPC”) issued the Notice by the Supreme People's Court of Issuing the Minutes of the National Courts' Civil and Commercial Trial Work Conference (the “Conference Minutes”), which identifies the liability of sellers of financial products in respect of the trial of cases relating to disputes over protection of the rights and interests of financial consumers. According to the Conference Minutes, where an issuer or seller of a financial product fails to perform its suitability obligations, causing damages to any financial consumer in the course of purchasing the financial product, the financial consumer is entitled to compensations from either the issuer or the seller of the financial product, or, in accordance with Article 167 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law, from both the issuer and the seller. Further, the Conference Minutes also clearly states that if a financial service provider fails to follow the suitability principle, that is, to sell suitable products to suitable customers, causing damages to any financial consumer in participating in high-risk investment activities after providing its financial services, the financial consumer may request the financial service provider to assume its liability for compensations.
63
Regulations on Small Loan Business
The Guidance on the Pilot Establishment of Small Loan Companies, jointly promulgated by the CBRC and the PBOC in 2008, allows provincial governments to approve the establishment of small loan companies on a trial basis. This guidance set the basic principles and requirements to set up a small loan company, which requires that the registered capital shall be fully paid in and the capital from one individual, entity or other association (including the capital from affiliates) shall not exceed 10% of the total registered capital. Based on this guidance, many provincial governments in China, including that of Anhui Province, where Rongyitong is located, promulgated local implementing rules on the administration of small loan companies.
On October 10, 2008, People’s Government of Anhui Province promulgated the Pilot Administrative Measures (for Trial implementation) on Small Loan Company in Anhui, and on May 18, 2009, the Anhui Government promulgated the Interim Regulations on Small Loan Business of Anhui Province, and afterwards, the Finance Office of Anhui Province issued Opinions on Promoting the Standardized Development of Small Loan Companies across Anhui Province (collectively, the “Regulations on Small Loan Companies in Anhui”). According to the Regulations on Small Loan Companies in Anhui, it is not allowed for a small loan company to accept public deposits. The major sources of funds of a small loan company shall be the capital paid in by shareholders, donated capital and the capital borrowed from a maximum of two banking financial institutions. The balance of the capital borrowed from banking financial institutions shall not exceed 50% of the net capital. When applying for the establishment of a small loan company, the shareholding percentage of the founding shareholder shall not exceed 20% in principle, and the capital contribution from one individual, entity or other association (including the capital from affiliates) to a company in this business may not exceed 10% of the company’s total registered capital. In addition, the total amount of loans of the same borrower shall not exceed 5% of the registered capital of the small loan company. On October 24, 2011, Anhui Province government published Notice on Further Promoting the Regulation on Small Loan Company Development, which explicitly states that small loan companies cannot raise money through authorized loans, and cannot receives public deposits. On December 1, 2017, the Notice on Regulation and Renovation of the Cash Loan Business was promulgated and on December 8, 2017, the Implementation Plan for Renovation of the Risk of Online Small Loan Business for Small Loan Company was issued. The Notice on Regulation and Renovation of the Cash Loan Business and the Implementation Plan for Renovation of the Risk of Online Small Loan Business for Small Loan Company (collectively, the “Small Loan Renovation Plan”) set forth the requirements for cash loan or online loan making. The previous practice such as loan without prescribed usage, extensive borrowing from third party or public deposits to carry out lending business, transfer or sell of the credit assets through online platform or local exchange is expressly prohibited. In addition, the Notice on Regulation and Renovation of the Cash Loan Business prescribed that engaging credit asset transfer or ABS business through Internet finance is prohibited. Further, it provides that the capital from credit asset transfer or ABS business shall be counted together with capital from other financing methods of small loan company, and the total amount of capital shall not exceed the prescribed percentage of a small loan company’s net asset in the Small Loan Renovation Plan. On July 23, 2019, the Opinions on Illegal Lending, jointly promulgated by the SPC, the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Justice, provides rules on the supervision of and punishment for illegal lending, including (i) regularly granting loans to the public for profits in violation of the provisions issued by the state, without the approval of the regulatory authorities, or beyond the scope of business, (ii) granting illegal loans as stipulated in (i) under circumstances where the annual interest rate of the loan exceeds 36%; and (iii) debt-collection by means of violence.
Regulations on Internet Financial Services
Due to the relatively short history of the Internet financial service industry in China, the PRC government has not adopted a clear regulatory framework governing the industry. There are ad hoc laws and regulations applicable to elements of Internet financial service-related businesses, such as laws and regulations governing value-added telecommunication services.
64
On July 18, 2015 the PBOC together with nine other PRC regulatory agencies jointly issued a series of policy measures applicable to Internet financial services titled the Guidelines on Promoting the Healthy Development of Internet Finance (the “Guidelines”). On April 12, 2016 the General Office of PRC State Council issued the Implementation Plan for Special Rectification of Internet Financial Risks (the “Rectification Implementation Plan”). The Guidelines introduced formally for the first time the regulatory framework and basic principles for Internet financial services industry in China as “law-abiding regulation, appropriate regulation, classified regulation, collaborative regulation and innovative regulation.” The Guidelines further stated the definitions and basic principles for Internet financial services in the areas of Internet payment, Internet fund distribution and others.
The Guidelines also specified several basic rules for Internet financial services industry administration, such as: (1) any organization or individual that intends to set up a website to provide Internet financial services shall, in addition to going through relevant financial regulatory procedures as required, also undergo website record-filing procedures with telecommunications authorities pursuant to the law; (2) unless otherwise specified, an industry player shall select qualified banking financial institutions as fund depository institutions to manage and oversee client funds, and achieve the management of client funds and its proprietary funds under separate accounts; and (3) basic rules of information disclosure, risk reminder and qualified investors, information security and anti-money laundering. The Rectification Implementation Plan further provides that: (1) the regulators will adopt the see-through way of supervision; and (2) the non-financial institutions, or the enterprises which do not carry out financial business, shall not use the wordings, such as “exchange,” “finance,” “asset management,” “wealth management,” “fund,” “fund management,” “investment management,” “equity investment fund,” “online lending,” “peer-to-peer,” “equity crowd-funding,” “Internet insurance,” “payment” and the like, as their enterprise name or registered business. If the enterprise chooses to use the aforementioned word/words, the Administration of Industry and Commerce will inform the financial regulators.
Regulation on Insurance Brokerage
The primary regulation governing the insurance intermediaries is the PRC Insurance Law enacted in 1995 as further amended in 2002, 2009, 2014 and 2015. The principal regulation governing insurance brokerages is the Provisions on the Regulation of Insurance Brokers (the “Insurance Broker Provisions”), promulgated by the CIRC on February 1, 2018. According to the Insurance Law and the Insurance Broker Provisions, insurance brokerage companies in China shall satisfy the criteria stipulated by CIRC and obtain the permit for insurance brokerage business. An insurance brokerage company may operate all or part of the following businesses: (1) drafting insurance plans for policyholders, selecting insurance companies and process insurance application formalities; (2) assisting insured parties or beneficiaries in making claims; (3) carrying out reinsurance brokerage businesses; (4) providing disaster prevention or loss prevention or risk evaluation and risk management advisory services to entrusting parties; and/or (5) any other insurance brokerage-related businesses approved by the CIRC. Insurance brokerage businesses undertaken by an insurance brokerage company shall not exceed the scope of business and geographical region for business of the underwriting insurance company.
Regulations on Financial Leasing
On September 18, 2013, the MOFCOM issued the Administrative Measures on the Supervision of the Financial Leasing Enterprises, which requires that financial leasing enterprises shall be equipped with corresponding assets and risk control ability. Additional requirements apply for a foreign entity to establish a company in this area. While the financial leasing industry does not belong to the negative list as prescribed by the MOFCOM in the Foreign Investment Industry Guidance Catalogue, a financial leasing enterprise established inside Shanghai Free Trade Zone can enjoy special preferential treatments as prescribed in the Overall Plan for Shanghai Free Trade Zone published by the State Council on September 27, 2013 and the subsequent detailed rules. A financial leasing enterprise inside Shanghai Free Trade Zone can also carry out commercial factoring business relevant with its financial leasing business, open cross-border RMB account to receive offshore loans and enjoy other foreign exchange preferential treatment.
65
According to the Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Commerce on Matters Concerning Adjustments to the Responsibility to Regulate Financial Leasing Companies, Commercial Factoring Companies and Pawn Shops, the MOFCOM has allocated the responsibility of regulation of financial leasing, factoring and pawnbroking to the CBIRC. As of the date of this annual report, there has been no specific law or rule put forward by CBIRC relating to financial leasing.
Regulations on Factoring
On June 27, 2012, the MOFCOM issued the Notice of the Ministry of Commerce on the Pilot Launch of Commercial Factoring (the “Commercial Factoring Notice”) to the Tianjin Commission of Commerce and Shanghai Municipal Commission of Commerce. The Commercial Factoring Notice provides that duly established commercial factoring companies are allowed to provide enterprises with trade financing, management of sales ledgers, investigation and assessment of client credit standings, management and collection of accounts receivable, credit risk guarantee and other services.
On November 11, 2013, the General Office of Tianjin People’s Government revised the Measures on the Administration of the Pilot Program of Commercial Factoring in Tianjin (the “revised Tianjin Commercial Factoring Measures”). According to the revised Tianjin Commercial Factoring Measures, commercial factoring shall refer to the process when the distributor (creditor) transfers its accounts receivables resulting from the sale of goods or services with the buyer (obligor) to commercial factoring companies, and commercial factoring companies provide the creditor with comprehensive business and trade services, including trade financing, management and collection of account receivable. The revised Tianjin Commercial Factoring Measures lay out the process to establish commercial factoring companies and the business scope of such kind of companies. Since it is a pilot program in Tianjin, such companies are also entitled to incentive policies.
One of Noah Group’s subsidiary, a duly established commercial factoring company with its registered office in Tianjin, has obtained the authorization to conduct factoring business and has conducted relevant business in accordance with laws and regulations.
Regulations on the Operation of Value-Added Telecom Services
The Telecommunications Regulations promulgated by the State Council and its related implementation rules, including the Catalog of Classification of Telecommunications Business issued by the MIIT, categorize various types of telecommunications and telecommunications-related activities into basic or VATS, and Internet information services (“ICP service”) are classified as value-added telecommunications businesses. Under the Telecommunications Regulations, commercial operators of VATS must first obtain a value-added telecommunications business license (“VAT License”) from the MIIT or its provincial level counterparts. In 2000, the State Council also issued the Administrative Measures on Internet Information Services, which was amended in 2011 and 2016. According to these measures, a commercial ICP service operator must obtain an ICP License, one class of VAT licenses, from the relevant government authorities before engaging in any commercial ICP service in China. When the ICP service involves areas such as news, publication, education, medical treatment, health, pharmaceuticals and medical equipment, and if required by other law or relevant regulations, specific approval from the respective regulatory authorities must be obtained prior to applying for the ICP License from the MIIT or its provincial level counterpart. In 2017, the MIIT promulgated the new Administrative Measures on Telecommunications Business Operating Licenses, which set forth further specific provisions regarding the types of licenses required to operate VATS, the qualifications and procedures for obtaining such licenses and the administration and supervision of such licenses.
66
Regulations Relating to Cyber Security
On November 7, 2016, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (the “SCNPC”) promulgated the Cyber Security Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “Cyber Security Law”), effective June 1, 2017, to protect cyberspace security and order. Pursuant to the Cyber Security Law, any individual or organization using the network must comply with the PRC constitution and the applicable laws, follow the public order, respect social moralities, and must not endanger cyber security, or engage in activities by making use of the network that endanger the national security, honor and interests, or infringe on the fame, privacy, intellectual property and other legitimate rights and interests of others. The Cyber Security Law sets forth various security protection obligations for network operators, which are defined as “owners and administrators of networks and network service providers,” including, among other obligations, complying with a series of requirements of tiered cyber protection systems, verifying users’ real identities, localizing the personal information and important data gathered and produced by key information infrastructure operators during operations within the PRC and providing assistance and support to government authorities where necessary for protecting national security and investigating crimes.
Regulations Relating to Internet Privacy
In recent years, PRC government authorities have enacted laws and regulations on Internet use to protect personal information from any unauthorized disclosure. The Administrative Measures on Internet Information Services prohibit ICP service operators from insulting or slandering a third party or infringing upon the lawful rights and interests of a third party. Under the Several Provisions on Regulating the Market Order of Internet Information Services, issued by the MIIT in 2011, an ICP service operator may not collect any user personal information or provide any such information to third parties without the consent of a user. An ICP service operator must expressly inform the users of the method, content and purpose of the collection and processing of such user personal information and may only collect such information necessary for the provision of its services. An ICP service operator is also required to properly keep the user personal information, and in the case of any leak or likely leak of the user personal information, the ICP service operator must take immediate remedial measures and, in severe circumstances, to make an immediate report to the telecommunications regulatory authority. In addition, pursuant to the Decision on Strengthening the Protection of Online Information issued by the SCNPC in December 2012 and the Order for the Protection of Telecommunication and Internet User Personal Information issued by the MIIT in July 2013, any collection and use of user personal information must be subject to the consent of the user, abide by the principles of legality, rationality and necessity and be within the specified purposes, methods and scopes. An ICP service operator must also keep such information strictly confidential, and is further prohibited from divulging, tampering or destroying of any such information, or selling or proving such information to other parties. Any violation of the above decision or order may subject the ICP service operator to warnings, fines, confiscation of illegal gains, revocation of licenses, cancelation of filings, closedown of websites or even criminal liabilities. Furthermore, in June 2016, the State Internet Information Office issued the Administrative Provisions on Mobile Internet Applications Information Services, which became effective on August 1, 2016, to further strengthen the regulation of the mobile application information services. Pursuant to these provisions, owners or operators of mobile Internet applications that provide information services are required to be responsible for information security management, establish and improve the protective mechanism for user information, observe the principles of legality, rightfulness and necessity, and expressly state the purpose, method and scope of, and obtain user consent to, the collection and use of users’ personal information. In addition, the new Cyber Security Law also requires network operators to strictly keep users’ personal information that they have collected confidential and to establish and improve their user information protective mechanisms. On November 28, 2019, the Secretary Bureau of the CAC, the General Office of the MIIT, the General Office of the Ministry of Public Security and the General Office of the SAMR promulgated the Identification Method of Illegal Collection and Use of Personal Information Through App, which provides guidance for the regulatory authorities to identify the illegal collection and use of personal information through mobile apps, and for the app operators to conduct self-examination and self-correction and for other participants to voluntarily monitor compliance.
We established and published a corporate information security policy, and provide periodical training to our employees to ensure the compliance of the policy. Moreover, our IT security department has established systematic process management and software controls and privacy policy to protect the confidentiality of data provided to us or stored in our systems.
67
Regulations on Labor Protection
On June 29, 2007, the SCNPC promulgated the Labor Contract Law, as amended on December 28, 2012, which formalizes employees’ rights concerning employment contracts, overtime hours, layoffs and the role of trade unions and provides for specific standards and procedure for the termination of an employment contract. In addition, the Labor Contract Law requires the payment of a statutory severance pay upon the termination of an employment contract in most cases, including in cases of the expiration of a fixed-term employment contract. In addition, under the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees and its implementation rules, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and on September 18, 2008 respectively, employees are entitled to a paid vacation ranging from 5 to 15 days, depending on their length of service and to enjoy compensation of three times their regular salaries for each such vacation day in case such employees are deprived of such vacation time by employers, unless the employees waive such vacation days in writing. Although we are currently in compliance with the relevant legal requirements for terminating employment contracts with employees in our business operation, in the event that we decide to lay off a large number of employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, provisions of the Labor Contract Law may limit our ability to effect these changes in a manner that we believe to be cost-effective or desirable, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Enterprises in China are required by PRC laws and regulations to participate in certain employee benefit plans, including social insurance funds, namely a pension plan, a medical insurance plan, an unemployment insurance plan, a work-related injury insurance plan and a maternity insurance plan, and a housing provident fund, and contribute to the plans or funds in amounts equal to certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of the employees as specified by the local government from time to time at locations where they operate their businesses or where they are located. According to the Social Insurance Law, an employer that fails to make social insurance contributions may be ordered to pay the required contributions within a stipulated deadline and be subject to a late fee of 0.05% of the amount overdue per day from the original due date by the relevant authority. If the employer still fails to rectify the failure to make social insurance contributions within such stipulated deadline, it may be subject to a fine ranging from one to three times the amount overdue. According to Regulations on Management of Housing Fund, an enterprise that fails to make housing fund contributions may be ordered to rectify the noncompliance and pay the required contributions within a stipulated deadline; otherwise, an application may be made to a local court for compulsory enforcement.
On April 1, 2019, the General Office of the State Council issued the Circular of the General Office of the State Council on Issuing the Comprehensive Plan for Reducing the Social Insurance Contribution Rates, pursuant to which the Chinese government intends to reduce the social insurance contribution rates and reduce the burden on enterprises. Specifically, effective from May 1, 2019, the endowment insurance in each province at a rate of contribution higher than 16% may be lowered to 16%, and for provinces already adopting a rate below 16%, a transition plan shall be introduced. In addition, effective from May 1, 2019, the period for temporary reduction of the unemployment insurance contribution rate for provinces with an aggregate unemployment insurance rate of 1% will be extended to April 30, 2020. Moreover, the calculation standard for the average salary of employees shall also be adjusted so as to adjust the social insurance contribution base.
Regulations on Tax
PRC Enterprise Income Tax
The PRC enterprise income tax is calculated based on the taxable income determined under the PRC laws and accounting standards. On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of China enacted the EIT Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and was revised on February 24, 2017 and December 29, 2018. On December 6, 2007, the State Council promulgated the EIT Implementation Rules which also became effective on January 1, 2008 and was further amended on April 23, 2019. The EIT Law imposes a uniform enterprise income tax rate of 25% on all domestic enterprises, including FIEs unless they qualify for certain exceptions, and terminates most of the tax exemptions, reductions and preferential treatments available under previous tax laws and regulations.
68
Moreover, under the EIT Law, enterprises organized under the laws of jurisdictions outside China with their “de facto management bodies” located within China may be considered PRC resident enterprises and therefore subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide income. The EIT Implementation Rules define the term “de facto management body” as the management body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In addition, the Circular Related to Relevant Issues on the Identification of a Chinese holding Company Incorporated Overseas as a Residential Enterprise under the Criterion of De Facto Management Bodies Recognizing issued by the SAT on April 22, 2009 provides that a foreign enterprise controlled by a PRC company or a PRC company group will be classified as a “resident enterprise” with its “de facto management bodies” located within China if the following requirements are satisfied: (i) the senior management and core management departments in charge of its daily operations function mainly in the PRC; (ii) its financial and human resources decisions are subject to determination or approval by persons or bodies in the PRC; (iii) its major assets, accounting books, company seals and minutes and files of its board and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in the PRC; and (iv) more than half of the enterprise’s directors or senior management with voting rights reside in the PRC. Although the circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises and not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the determining criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the SAT’s general position on how the “de facto management body” test should be applied in determining the tax resident status of offshore enterprises, regardless of whether they are controlled by PRC enterprises, individuals or foreigners.
We do not believe Noah Holdings Limited or any of its subsidiaries outside of China was a PRC resident enterprise for the year ended December 31, 2019, but we cannot predict whether such entities may be considered as a PRC resident enterprise for any subsequent taxable year. Although our company is not controlled by any PRC company or company group, substantial uncertainty exists as to whether we will be deemed a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. In the event that we are considered a PRC resident enterprise, we would be subject to the PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on our worldwide income, but the dividends that we receive from our PRC subsidiaries would be exempt from the PRC withholding tax since such income is exempted under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law for a PRC resident enterprise recipient. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—The dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries may be subject to PRC tax under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.”
Value-added Tax
On March 23, 2016, the Ministry of Finance and the SAT jointly issued the Circular on the Pilot Program for Overall Implementation of the Collection of Value Added Tax Instead of Business Tax (“Circular 36”) which took effect on May 1, 2016. Pursuant to Circular 36, all companies operating in construction industry, real estate industry, finance industry, modern service industry or other industries which were required to pay business tax are required to pay VAT, in lieu of business tax. The applicable VAT tax rates are 3%, 6%, 11%, and 17%, according to Circular 36.
On December 21, 2016, the Notice on Clarification of Value-Added Tax Policies for Finance, Real Estate Development, Education Support Services (“Notice No. 140”) was issued to explain the application of the Circular 36. According to Notice No. 140, for activities subject to value-added tax occurring in the course of asset management services, the manager of the asset management investment shall be the taxpayer. On December 30, the Tax Policy Division of the Ministry of Finance and the Goods and Services Tax Division of the SAT further explain several provisions in the Notice No. 140, stating that the asset management investments refer to the fund products, trust plans, financial products managed by asset management service provider.
69
On June 30, 2017, the Ministry of Finance and the SAT jointly issued the Notice on Relevant Issues Regarding the Value Added Tax of the Asset Management Products (“Notice No.56”), which clarifies the rate that shall apply to the asset management product. Notice No.56 further states that the tax for the taxable act before January 1, 2018 shall not be required to pay and the notice itself has become effective since January 1, 2018. Circular 36, Notice No.140 and Notice No.56 will influence the investment return of the investors of the asset management products. But the regulator has not clarified the detailed operation for the structured products and the influence on these products is hard to value at current stage.
In addition, on November 19, 2017, the State Council promulgated The Decisions on Abolishing the Provisional Regulations of the PRC on Business Tax and Amending the Provisional Regulations of the PRC on Value-added Tax, or Order 691. According to the VAT Law and Order 691, all enterprises and individuals engaged in the sale of goods, the provision of processing, repair and replacement services, sales of services, intangible assets, real property and the importation of goods within the territory of the PRC are the taxpayers of VAT. The VAT tax rates generally applicable are simplified as 17%, 11%, 6% and 0%, and the VAT tax rate applicable to the small-scale taxpayers is 3%. On April 4, 2018, the Ministry of Finance and the SAT jointly issued the Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on the Adjustment to VAT Rates and the Circular on Unifying the Criteria for Small-scale Value-added Tax Payers, which became effective on May 1, 2018. Pursuant to these circulars, the deduction rates of 17% and 11% applicable to the taxpayers who have VAT taxable sales activities or imported goods were adjusted to 16% and 10%, respectively. In addition, the small-scale VAT taxpayer are now defined as those whose annual sales are less than RMB5 million.
On November 7, 2018, the Ministry of Finance and the SAT jointly issued the Circular on Policies on Enterprise Income Tax and Value-added Tax for Overseas Institutions Investing in the Domestic Bond Market (“Circular 108”). Pursuant to Circular 108, with effect from November 7, 2018 to November 6, 2021, enterprise income tax and VAT shall be temporarily exempted on income from bond interests derived by overseas institutions from investments in domestic bond market. The scope of the aforesaid temporary exemption of enterprise income tax shall exclude bond interests derived by the institutions established within China by overseas institutions that are connected to their affiliated Chinese institutions. On March 20, 2019, Ministry of Finance, SAT and General Administration of Customs issued the Announcement on Relevant Policies for Deepening Value-Added Tax Reform (“Circular 39”), which became effective on April 1, 2019. Under Circular 39, among others, (i) the applicable VAT rate of 16% for taxable sales or imported goods of a VAT general taxpayer, is adjusted to 13%, and the applicable VAT rate of 10% is adjusted to 9%; and (ii) the range for VAT input deduction is expanded by adding the domestic transport services, the applicable deduction rate for airline and railway tickets is 9% of ticket value, and 3% for the waterway and highway tickets; (iii) taxpayers of manufacturing and living service industries shall be allowed to add an extra 10% based on the offsettable input VAT for the current period for deduction of the tax payable from April 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021.
Dividend Withholding Tax
Pursuant to the EIT Law and the EIT Implementation Rules, dividends generated after January 1, 2008 and payable by a foreign-invested enterprise in China to its foreign investors are subject to a 10% withholding tax, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. We are a Cayman Islands holding company and the majority of our income may come from dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries directly or indirectly. Since there is no such tax treaty between China and the Cayman Islands, dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries will generally be subject to a 10% withholding tax. We have evaluated whether Noah Holdings Limited is a PRC resident enterprise and we believe that Noah Holdings Limited was not a PRC resident enterprise for the year ended December 31, 2019. However, as there remains uncertainty regarding the interpretation and implementation of the EIT Law and the EIT Implementation Rules, it is uncertain whether, if Noah Holdings Limited will be deemed a PRC resident enterprise for the future years, any dividends distributed by Noah Holdings Limited to our non-PRC shareholders and ADS holders would be subject to any PRC withholding tax. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—The dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries may be subject to PRC tax under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.”
70
Pursuant to the Arrangement between the Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income (the “Tax Arrangement”) where a Hong Kong resident enterprise which is considered a non-PRC tax resident enterprise directly holds at least 25% equity interests in a PRC enterprise, the withholding tax rate in respect of the payment of dividends by such PRC enterprise to such Hong Kong resident enterprise is reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%, subject to approval of the PRC local tax authority. Pursuant to the Notice of the SAT on the Issues concerning the Application of the Dividend Clauses of Tax Agreements (“SAT Circular 81”), a resident enterprise of the counter-party to such Tax Arrangement should meet the following conditions, among others, in order to enjoy the reduced withholding tax under the Tax Arrangement: (i) it must directly own the required percentage of equity interests and voting rights in such PRC resident enterprise; and (ii) it should directly own such percentage in the PRC resident enterprise anytime in the 12 months prior to receiving the dividends. There are also other conditions for enjoying such reduced withholding tax rate according to other relevant tax rules and regulations. Pursuant to the Administrative Measures for Non-Resident Taxpayer to Enjoy Treatments under Tax Treaties issued by the SAT (“SAT Circular 60”) on August 28, 2015, which became effective on November 1, 2015, any non-resident taxpayer may be entitled to such reduced withholding tax rate automatically if such non-resident taxpayer satisfies the conditions prescribed in the relevant tax rules and regulations, and obtains the approvals required under the administrative measures described in the preceding sentence. The SAT issued the Announcement of State Taxation Administration on Promulgation of the Administrative Measures on Non-resident Taxpayers Enjoying Treaty Benefits (“SAT Circular 35”) on October 14, 2019, which became effective on January 1, 2020. The SAT Circular 35 further simplified the procedures for enjoying treaty benefits and replaced the SAT Circular 60. According to the SAT Circular 35, no approvals from the tax authorities are required for a non-resident taxpayer to enjoy treaty benefits, where a non-resident taxpayer self-assesses and concludes that it satisfies the criteria for claiming treaty benefits, it may enjoy treaty benefits at the time of tax declaration or at the time of withholding through the withholding agent, but it shall gather and retain the relevant materials as required for future inspection, and accept follow-up administration by the tax authorities. Accordingly, Noah Insurance may be able to enjoy the 5% withholding tax rate for the dividends it receives from Shanghai Rongyao Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Kunshan Noah Xingguang Investment Management Co., Ltd. respectively, if they satisfy the conditions prescribed under SAT Circular 81 and other relevant tax rules and regulations. However, according to SAT Circular 81, if the relevant tax authorities consider the transactions or arrangements we have are for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax in the future.
On February 3, 2018, the SAT issued Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues concerning the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties, which clarifies the interpretation of the beneficial ownership requirement in the dividends, interest and royalty articles of Chinese double tax agreements and provides a more flexible guidance to determine whether the applicant engages in substantive business activities.
On September 29, 2018, the Ministry of Finance, SAT, NDRC and MOFCOM jointly released the Notice on Expanding the Application Scope of Withholding Tax Deferral Treatment on Direct Reinvestments Made by Foreign Investors (“Circular 102”) to further encourage foreign investments in China. According to Circular 102, when certain conditions are met, increase of paid-in capital/capital reserve in the existing investee company by its foreign investor using its attributable/distributable profits is considered a direct equity investment and withholding tax deferral treatment may apply.
71
U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
The United States has passed FATCA, which imposes a reporting regime and a 30% withholding tax on certain U.S.-source payments made to certain non-U.S. entities. In general, the 30% withholding tax applies to certain payments made to a non-U.S. financial institution unless such institution is treated as deemed compliant or enters into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury to report, on an annual basis, information with respect to certain interests in, and accounts maintained by, the institution to the extent such interests or accounts are held by certain U.S. persons and by certain non-U.S. entities that are wholly or partially owned by certain U.S. persons and to withhold on certain payments. The 30% withholding tax also generally applies to certain payments made to a non-financial non-U.S. entity that does not qualify under certain exemptions unless such entity either (i) certifies that such entity does not have any “substantial United States owners” or (ii) provides certain information regarding the entity’s “substantial United States owners.” An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and another country may also modify these requirements. The Cayman Islands has entered into a Model 1 intergovernmental agreement with the United States, which gives effect to the automatic tax information exchange requirements of FATCA, and a similar intergovernmental agreement with the United Kingdom. We will be required to comply with the Cayman Islands Tax Information Authority Law (2014 Revision) (as amended) together with regulations and guidance notes made pursuant to such law that give effect to the intergovernmental agreements with the United States and the United Kingdom. We do not believe FATCA will have a material impact on our business or operations, but because FATCA is particularly complex and the intergovernmental agreement with the PRC, though agreed to in substance, has not been published, and PRC regulations or guidance notes have not been published, we cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected by this legislation in the future.
Common Reporting Standard
Similarly, the OECD has developed the CRS and modeled competent authority agreement to enable the multilateral and automatic exchange of financial account information, which has been adopted by many jurisdictions. CRS and its implementing legislations in China and Hong Kong requires financial institutions to identify and report the tax residency and account details of non-resident customers to the relevant authorities in jurisdictions adhering to CRS.
On May 9, 2017, SAT, Ministry of Finance, the PBOC, CBRC, CSRC, CIRC promulgated the Administrative Measures on Due Diligence Checks on Tax-related Information of Non-residents’ Financial Accounts (the “CRS Due Diligence Measures”), which requires that financial institutions shall register with the SAT official website and report the information in a timely manner. As the CRS Due Diligence Measures requires, the private fund in the form of limited partnership or limited liability company and its fund manager are defined as the qualified financial institution; the foregoing private funds and fund managers and other qualified financial institutions prescribed in the CRS Due Diligence Measures shall comply with their obligations thereunder. Several subsidiaries of our company, as well as the private funds under our management, have complied with the CRS Due Diligence Measures and reported to the SAT as required. On September 6, 2018, the arrangements for the multilateral and automatic exchange of financial account information between China and Hong Kong became effective. Hong Kong and China conducted the first automatic exchange of financial account information in September 2018, and many jurisdictions (including Hong Kong) have promised to implement the multilateral and automatic exchange of financial account information.
Regulations on Foreign Exchange
Foreign exchange regulations in China are primarily governed by the following rules:
● | Foreign Exchange Administration Rules (1996), as amended (the “Exchange Rules”); and |
● | Administration Rules of the Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange (1996) (the “Administration Rules”). |
72
Under the Exchange Rules, the Renminbi is convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest and royalty payments, trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of Renminbi for capital account items, such as direct investment, loan, securities investment and repatriation of investment, however, is still subject to the approval of SAFE.
Under the Administration Rules, FIEs may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents required and, in the case of capital account item transactions, obtaining approval from SAFE. Capital investments by FIEs outside of China are also subject to limitations, including approval by regulatory government bodies like the MOFCOM, SAFE and the NDRC or their local counterparts.
On May 10, 2013, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Printing and Distributing the Provisions on Foreign Exchange Administration over Domestic Direct Investment by Foreign Investors and the Supporting Documents, which specifies that the administration by SAFE or its local branches over direct investment by foreign investors in the PRC shall be conducted by way of registration. Institutions and individuals shall register with SAFE and/or its branches for their direct investment in the PRC. Banks shall process foreign exchange business relating to the direct investment in the PRC based on the registration information provided by SAFE and its branches.
On March 30, 2015, SAFE issued SAFE Circular 19, which took effect and replaced previous regulations from June 1, 2015. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 19, up to 100% of foreign currency capital of a foreign-invested enterprise may be converted into RMB capital according to the actual operation of the enterprise within the business scope at its will and the RMB capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise may be used for equity investments within the PRC provided that such usage shall fall into the business scope of the foreign-invested enterprise, which will be regarded as the reinvestment of foreign-invested enterprise. Although SAFE Circular 19 allows for the use of RMB converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital for equity investments in the PRC, the restrictions continue to apply as to foreign- invested enterprises’ use of the converted RMB for purposes beyond the business scope, for entrusted loans or for inter-company RMB loans. If our variable interest entity requires financial support from us or our wholly owned subsidiary in the future and we find it necessary to use foreign currency-denominated capital to provide such financial support, our ability to fund our variable interest entity’s operations will be subject to statutory limits and restrictions, including those described above. On June 9, 2016, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Foreign Exchange Settlement Management Policy of Capital Account, or SAFE Circular 16, which reiterates some of the rules set forth in Circular 19, but changes the prohibition against using RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company to issue RMB entrusted loans to a prohibition against using such capital to issue loans to non-affiliated enterprises. In addition, SAFE promulgated the Circular Regarding Further Promotion of the Facilitation of Cross-Border Trade and Investment on October 23, 2019, or SAFE Circular 28, pursuant to which all foreign-invested enterprises can make equity investments in the PRC with their capital funds in accordance with laws and regulations.
On February 13, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Simplifying and Improving the Foreign Exchange Administration Policies on Direct Investments (“SAFE Circular 13”) which took effect on June 1, 2015. SAFE Circular 13 specifies that the administrative examination and approval procedures with SAFE or its local branches relating to the foreign exchange registration approval for domestic direct investments as well as overseas direct investments have been canceled, and qualified banks are delegated the power to directly conduct such foreign exchange registrations under the supervision of SAFE or its local branches.
Regulations on Dividend Distribution
As the Foreign Investment Law came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the Old FIE Laws. the principal regulations governing dividend distributions of wholly foreign-owned companies include the Company Law, the EIT Law, and its implementation rules.
73
Under the current regulatory regime in the PRC, foreign-invested enterprises in the PRC may pay dividends only out of their retained earnings, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. A PRC company is required to set aside as statutory reserve funds at least 10% of its after-tax profit, until the cumulative amount of such reserve funds reaches 50% of its registered capital unless laws regarding foreign investment provide otherwise. A PRC company shall not distribute any profits until any losses from prior fiscal years have been offset. Profits retained from prior fiscal years may be distributed together with distributable profits from the current fiscal year.
Regulations on Offshore Investment by PRC Residents
On July 4, 2014, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Several Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration of Domestic Residents Engaging in Overseas Investment, Financing and Round-Trip Investment via Special Purpose Vehicles (“SAFE Circular 37”) which terminated the SAFE’s Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for PRC Residents to Engage in Financing and Inbound Investment via Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles (“SAFE Circular 75”) and became effective on the same date. SAFE Circular 37 and its detailed guidelines require PRC residents to register with the local branch of SAFE before contributing their legally owned onshore or offshore assets or equity interests into any SPV directly established, or indirectly controlled, by them for the purpose of investment or financing; and when there is (a) any change to the basic information of the SPV, such as any change relating to its individual PRC resident shareholders, name or operation period or (b) any material change, such as increase or decrease in the share capital held by its individual PRC resident shareholders, a share transfer or exchange of the shares in the SPV, or a merger or split of the SPV, the PRC resident must register such changes with the local branch of SAFE on a timely basis.
On February 13, 2015, the SAFE further enacted SAFE Circular 13 which took effect on June 1, 2015 and was further amended on December 30, 2019. SAFE Circular 13 has delegated to the qualified banks the authority to register all PRC residents or entities’ investment and financing in Special Purpose Vehicles pursuant to SAFE Circular 37, except that those PRC residents who have failed to comply with SAFE Circular 37 will remain to fall into the jurisdiction of the local SAFE branch and must make their supplementary registration application with the local SAFE branch. In the event that a PRC shareholder holding interests in a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicle may be prohibited from distributing profits to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities. In addition, the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiary. Moreover, failure to comply with various SAFE registration requirements described above would result in liability for foreign exchange evasion under PRC laws. We believe our management or shareholders who are PRC residents has fully complied with the obligation under SAFE Circular 37 and has completed the relevant registration. And the aforementioned regulations may apply to any offshore acquisitions and share transfer that we make in the future if our shares are issued to PRC residents.
Regulations on Stock Incentive Plans
In December 2006, the PBOC promulgated the Administrative Measures of Foreign Exchange Matters for Individuals, setting forth the respective requirements for foreign exchange transactions by individuals (both PRC or non-PRC citizens) under either the current account or the capital account. In January 2007, SAFE issued the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule, which, among other things, specified approval requirements for certain capital account transactions such as a PRC citizen’s participation in the employee stock ownership plans or stock option plans of an overseas publicly-listed company. On February 15, 2012, SAFE issued the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, which terminated the Application Procedures of Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Employee Stock Ownership Plan or Stock Option Plan of Overseas Listed Company issued by SAFE on March 28, 2007. The purpose of the Stock Incentive Plan Rules is to regulate foreign exchange administration of PRC domestic individuals who participate in employee stock holding plans and stock option plans of overseas listed companies.
74
According to the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, if PRC “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in the PRC for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding the foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas listed company, a PRC domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC subsidiary of such overseas listed company, shall, among others things, file, on behalf of such individual, an application with SAFE to conduct the SAFE registration with respect to such stock incentive plan, and obtain approval for an annual allowance with respect to the purchase of foreign exchange in connection with stock holding or stock option exercises. With the SAFE registration certificate for stock incentive plan, the PRC domestic qualified agent shall open a special foreign exchange account at a PRC domestic bank to hold the funds required in connection with the stock purchase or option exercise, any returned principal or profits upon sales of stock, any dividends issued upon the stock and any other income or expenditures approved by SAFE. Such PRC individuals’ foreign exchange income received from the sale of stock and dividends distributed by the overseas listed company and any other income shall be fully remitted into a special foreign currency account opened and managed by the PRC domestic qualified agent before distribution to such individuals.
Many issues regarding the Stock Incentive Plan Rules require further interpretation. We and our PRC optionees were subject to the Stock Incentive Plan Rules when our company became an overseas listed company. We have a PRC domestic qualified agent filed for all the optionees under our stock incentive plan currently in effect. However, we cannot assure you that each of the above optionees will fully comply with the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and Stock Incentive Plan Rules. If we or our PRC employees fail to comply with the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, we and our PRC employees may be subject to fines and other legal sanctions. In addition, the State Administration of Taxation has issued a few circulars concerning employee stock options. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Our PRC subsidiaries have obligations to file documents related to employee stock options with relevant tax authorities and withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their stock options. If our employees fail to pay and we fail to withhold their income taxes, we may face sanctions imposed by tax authorities or any other PRC government authorities. We currently obey the stock incentive plan rules and updated the information with foreign exchange commission each year.
Regulations in Hong Kong
Type 1, 4, 9 Regulations
Licensed entities that conduct regulated activities in Hong Kong are regulated by the Hong Kong SFC, a statutory body independent from the government of Hong Kong to regulate Hong Kong’s securities and futures markets. It is funded mainly by transaction levies and licensing fees.
Under the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance (“SFO”) regime, any corporation carrying on one or more regulated activities must apply to the SFC for a license in respect of the regulated activities that they plan to carry on, and any individual who carries on one or more regulated activities on behalf of a licensed corporation is also required to apply for approval as a “licensed representative” accredited to that corporation.
Noah HK, our wholly owned subsidiary, was licensed with the SFC on January 4, 2012 to carry out type 1 regulated activity on dealing in securities; type 4 regulated activity on advising on securities and type 9 regulated activity on asset management. Noah HK serves as an offshore product and service center which offers wealth management and asset management services to professional investors as defined in the SFO. With the aforementioned licenses in place, Noah HK is able to provide investment advisory services and distribute, offer and manage investment products for our clients in Hong Kong.
75
Licensed entities are required to comply with the SFO, its sub-legislations and other relevant codes and guidelines including the (i) Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Hong Kong SFC (“Code of Conduct”), (ii) Guideline on Anti-Money Laundering (“Guideline on AML”), (iii) Management, Supervision and Internal Control Guidelines for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission (“Internal Control Guideline”), (iv) Suggested Control Techniques and Procedures for Enhancing a Firm’s Ability to Comply with the Securities and Futures (Client Securities) Rules and the Securities and Futures (Client Money) Rules (“Client Securities/Money Rules”), (v) the Fund Manager Code of Conduct (“FM Code of Conduct”), and (vi) suitability circular/FAQ and other relevant regulatory requirements.
Noah HK’s type 1 license is primarily concerned with the protection of clients’ assets, KYC and AML, which are governed by Client Securities/Money Rules, Code of Conduct and the Guideline on AML. The Client Securities/Money Rules provide guidelines on the treatment of client assets and how they should be properly safeguarded. The Code of Conduct sets out the general conduct requirements for licensed persons and other regulatory expectations on topics such as KYC, diligence, responsibility of senior management and conflicts of interest. The Guideline on AML provides a general background on the subjects of money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CTF) and practical guidance to assist licensed persons and their senior management in designing and implementing policies, procedures and controls in the relevant operational areas, taking into consideration their special circumstances so as to meet the relevant AML/CTF statutory and regulatory requirements.
Noah HK’s type 4 license is primarily concerned with the suitability of investment recommendations provided to clients. When providing investment recommendations, licensed persons should ensure that such advice is suitable to that client having considered the client’s overall circumstances. The suitability circular/FAQ outlines the general requirements and factors to be considered when providing investment advices to client.
Noah HK’s type 9 license is primarily concerned with the conduct for fund managers which is governed by the FM Code of Conduct. This Code sets out conduct requirements for licensed persons whose business involves the discretionary management of collective investment schemes.
HK Insurance Regulations
Noah Insurance is an authorized insurance broker registered with the Hong Kong Confederation of Insurance Brokers since 2014 (a self-regulatory organization for insurance brokers approved by the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance and subsequently replaced by Insurance Authority (“IA”) in June 2017). Noah Insurance is permitted to carry on the business of: (i) negotiating or arranging contracts of Long Term (excluding linked long term) Insurance in or from Hong Kong as the agent of the policy holder or potential policy holder or (ii) advising on matters related to insurance. As an insurance broker, Noah Insurance must comply with the minimum requirements specified in the guideline issued pursuant to the Insurance Ordinance by IA.
76
C. | Organizational Structure |
We are an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands with major subsidiaries and affiliated entities in China, Hong Kong, the United States and other jurisdictions. We mainly operate our business through the following significant subsidiaries and significant affiliated PRC entities and certain of their subsidiaries:
|
|
| Percentage |
| |||
Place of | of |
| |||||
| Date of Incorporation |
| Incorporation |
| Ownership |
| |
Noah Upright Fund Distribution Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Noah Upright (Shanghai) Fund Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.) | November 18, 2003 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Shanghai Noah Investment (Group) Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Shanghai Noah Rongyao Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.) | August 24, 2007 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Shanghai Noah Financial Services Corp. | April 18, 2008 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Noah Insurance (Hong Kong) Limited | January 3, 2011 |
| Hong Kong |
| 100 | % | |
Shanghai Rongyao Information Technology Co., Ltd. | March 2, 2011 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Kunshan Noah Xingguang Investment Management Co., Ltd. | August 12, 2011 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Noah Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited | September 1, 2011 |
| Hong Kong |
| 100 | % | |
Gopher Capital GP Limited | May 11, 2012 |
| Cayman Islands |
| 100 | % | |
Zigong Noah Financial Service Co., Ltd. | October 22, 2012 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Noah Rongyitong (Wuhu) Microfinance Co., Ltd. | August 13, 2013 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
ARK Trust (Hong Kong) Limited | September 15, 2014 |
| Hong Kong |
| 100 | % | |
Noah (Shanghai) Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. | December 20, 2014 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Noah International (Hong Kong) Limited | January 7, 2015 |
| Hong Kong |
| 100 | % | |
Gopher CCM Limited | August 17, 2015 | Cayman Islands | 100 | % | |||
Kunshan Noah Rongyao Investment Management Co., Ltd. | December 2, 2015 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Shanghai Noah Chuangying Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. | December 14, 2015 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Gopher International Investment Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. | November 14, 2016 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Noah Insurance Services LLC | February 10, 2017 |
| USA |
| 100 | % | |
Wuhu Noah Financial Services Co., Ltd. | July 26, 2017 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Joy Triple Star Holdings Limited | January 12, 2018 |
| British Virgin Islands |
| 100 | % | |
Elivisa Consulting Pte Limited | April 9, 2019 |
| Singapore |
| 100 | % |
Shanghai Noah Investment Management Co., Ltd. (“Noah Investment”) is a consolidated variable interest entity of us. Its significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 include the following:
|
|
| Percentage |
| |||
Date of | Place of | of |
| ||||
| Incorporation |
| Incorporation |
| Ownership |
| |
Tianjin Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. | March 18, 2010 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. | February 9, 2012 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Wuhu Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. | October 10, 2012 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Shanghai Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. | December 14, 2012 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Gopher Nuobao (Shanghai) Asset Management Co., Ltd. | April 10, 2013 |
| PRC |
| 100 | % | |
Shanghai Mengkuan Asset Management Co., Ltd. | Mar 24, 2015 | PRC | 100 | % |
77
Our corporate structure, for the purpose of reflecting Noah Holdings Limited and its relationship with its significant subsidiaries, as that term is defined under Section 1-02 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act, as well as certain significant variable interest entity, is as follows:
78
Note:
(1) | Unless otherwise stated, the significant subsidiaries in the chart are 100% owned by the Company. This table includes only our significant operating subsidiaries and omits certain intermediate holding companies. |
(2) | The shareholders of Noah Investment include Jingbo Wang, Zhe Yin, Xinjun Zhang, Yan Wei, Boquan He and Qianghua Yan. |
(3) | Noah Rongyitong (Wuhu) Microfinance Co., Ltd is 35% owned by Shanghai Noah Investment (Group) Co., Ltd. and the remaining equity interest is owned by other Noah subsidiaries. |
79
Contractual Arrangements
Exclusive Option Agreement. The shareholders of Noah Investment have entered into an exclusive option agreement with Noah Group in September 2007, under which the shareholders granted Noah Group or its third-party designee an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase their equity interests in Noah Investment when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. The purchase price shall be the higher of the minimum amount required by PRC law and an amount determined by Noah Group. Noah Group may exercise such option at any time and from time to time until it has acquired all equity interests of Noah Investment. The term of this exclusive option agreement is ten years and will automatically extend for another ten years upon expiry if no party objects. During the term of this agreement, the shareholders of Noah Investment are prohibited from transferring their equity interests to any third party, and Noah Investment is prohibited from declaring and paying any dividend without Noah Group’s prior consent.
Exclusive Support Service Agreement. Under the exclusive support service agreement entered into between Noah Investment and Noah Group in September 2007, Noah Investment engages Noah Group as its exclusive technical and operational consultant and under which Noah Group agrees to assist in arranging financing necessary to conduct Noah Investment’s operational activities. Noah Group will provide certain support services to Noah Investment, including client management, technical and operational support and other services, for which Noah Investment shall pay to Noah Group service fees determined based on actual services provided. Noah Group is also obligated to grant Noah Investment licenses to use certain intellectual property rights, for which Noah Investment shall pay license fees at the rates set by Noah Group. As of the date of this filing, Noah Group has not received any service fees from Noah Investment because Noah Group has not provided any service to Noah Investment yet. This agreement has a term of ten years, which will automatically extend for another ten years upon expiry if neither party objects.
Share Pledge Agreement. All shareholders of Noah Investment have entered into a share pledge agreement with Noah Group in September 2007, under which the shareholders pledged all of their equity interests in Noah Investment to Noah Group as collateral to secure their obligations under the exclusive option agreement and Noah Investment’s obligations under the exclusive support service agreement. If Noah Investment or its shareholders violates any of their respective obligations under the exclusive support service agreement or the exclusive option agreement, Noah Group, as the pledgee, will be entitled to certain rights, including the right to sell the pledged share interests. The term of the share pledge is same as that of the exclusive option agreement
Powers of Attorney. Each shareholder of Noah Investment has executed a power of attorney to grant Noah Group or its designee the power of attorney to act on his or her behalf on all matters pertaining to Noah Investment and to exercise all of his or her rights as a shareholder of Noah Investment, including the right to attend shareholders meeting, appoint board members and senior management members, other voting rights and the right to transfer all or a part of his or her equity interests in Noah Investment.
In the opinion of Zhong Lun Law Firm, our PRC legal counsel:
● | the ownership structures of our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, and Noah Holdings Limited comply with all PRC laws and regulations currently in effect; and |
● | the contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiary, Noah Group, our variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and its shareholders governed by PRC laws are valid, binding and enforceable, and will not result in a violation of PRC laws or regulations currently in effect. |
80
We have been advised by our PRC legal counsel, however, that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws and regulations, and accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may in the future take a view that is contrary to the above opinion of our PRC legal counsel. For example, substantial uncertainties exist as to how the newly enacted Foreign Investment Law or its implementation rules may impact the viability of our current corporate structure in the future. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—Our current corporate structure and business operations may be affected by the newly enacted Foreign Investment Law.” It is uncertain whether any other new PRC laws or regulations relating to variable interest entity structures will be adopted or if adopted, what they would provide. We have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that as there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations, including the Foreign Investment Law, the M&A Rules and the Telecommunications Regulations, the Provisions on the Regulation of Insurance Brokers and the relevant regulatory measures concerning the foreign investment restrictions and administrative licenses and permits related to various underlying industries, there can be no assurance that the PRC government authorities, such as MOFCOM, MIIT, CSRC, AMAC, CBIRC or other authorities that regulate the industries that our funds are directly or indirectly investing into, would agree that our corporate structure or any of the relevant contractual arrangements comply with PRC licensing, registration or other regulatory requirements, with existing policies or with requirements or policies that may be adopted in the future. PRC laws and regulations governing the validity and enforceability of these contractual arrangements are uncertain and the relevant government authorities have broad discretion in interpreting these laws and regulations. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our businesses in China do not comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations”.
D. | Property, Plants and Equipment |
Our principal executive offices are located in leased office space at Building 2, 1687 Changyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai and Building C and F, 32 Qinhuangdao Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, which occupy approximately a total of 23,263 square meters. As of December 31, 2019, we also leased offices in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Silicon Valley, New York, Vancouver, Melbourne and Singapore, as well as leased offices for our 292 service centers across China. We own 2,193 square meters of a commercial building in Suzhou, Jiangsu for our Suzhou office. We consider these facilities to be suitable and adequate for current and anticipated management and operations of our business.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” or in other parts of this annual report on Form 20-F.
81
A. | Operating Results |
Overview
We derive revenues from three business segments: wealth management, asset management and lending and other businesses. We primarily generate four types of revenues: (i) one-time commissions derived from the distribution of financial products, paid by our clients and product providers, based on the value of the financial products purchased by our clients; (ii) recurring service fees paid by our product providers or clients, based on the value or net asset value of the financial products purchased by our clients; (iii) performance-based income from certain types of financial products, based on the performance or realized net returns of the financial products; and (iv) other service fees, primarily including (a) revenues from comprehensive financial services we provide, especially the revenues of our investor education subsidiary, Enoch Education; (b) revenues from lending and other businesses, especially our lending services business; and (c) other services including financial leasing, family trust and payment technology services.
Our revenues and profits have been growing steadily in recent years. Our net revenues increased from RMB2,826.9 million in 2017 to RMB3,289.6 million in 2018, and further to RMB3,391.8 million (US$487.2 million) in 2019. We recorded net income attributable to our shareholders of RMB762.9 million in 2017, RMB811.3 million in 2018 and RMB829.2 million (US$119.1 million) in 2019, respectively.
We recorded adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders, a non-GAAP financial measure, of RMB837.4 million in 2017, RMB1,010.8 million in 2018 and RMB1,038.2 million (US$149.1 million) in 2019, respectively. Adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders excludes the income statement effects of all forms of share-based compensation expenses and fair value changes of equity securities (unrealized), adjusting for sale of equity securities and net of relevant tax impact. The reconciliation of adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders from net income attributable to Noah shareholders amounted to RMB74.5 million in 2017, RMB199.5 million in 2018 and RMB209.1 million (US$30.0 million) in 2019, respectively. For a reconciliation of adjusted net income attributable to Noah shareholders to net income attributable to Noah shareholders, please see “Item 3. Key Information—A. Selected Financial Data—Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Results”.
Key Operating Metrics
We have benefited from the overall economic growth, the growing high net worth populations and the increasing demand for sophisticated and personalized wealth management solutions in China, all of which we anticipate will continue to increase for the foreseeable future. The overall growth of our business depends on the continuation of these trends. We are also focused on expanding our international operations, both to source investment products abroad and serve high net worth Chinese living overseas.
Our financial condition and results of operations are more directly affected by factors specific to our company, primarily including the following:
● | number of clients; |
● | transaction value; |
● | assets under management; and |
● | operating metrics of lending and other businesses. |
82
Number of Clients
Our revenue growth has been driven primarily by the increasing number of clients we serve and the average AUA of clients. For our wealth management business, we closely monitor the numbers of both our registered clients and active clients as key operating metrics. For our asset management business, the majority of the AUM is sourced from our wealth management distribution channel, so the number of clients will also have an influence on this segment.
As of December 31, 2019, we had 293,760 registered clients, compared with 260,285 registered clients as of December 31, 2018 and 186,918 registered clients as of December 31, 2017. We assign each of our registered clients a relationship manager, and the number of new clients we may acquire is affected by the breadth of our coverage network. Leveraging our broad coverage network, we expect to increase our capability to cultivate and serve new clients, which may result in an increase in the number of new registered and active clients.
Active clients for our wealth management business refer to our registered clients who have purchased financial products distributed or provided by us during a given period. The number of active clients in the year ended December 31, 2019 was 14,538, compared to 13,628 in the year ended December 31, 2018 and 12,720 in the year ended December 31, 2017. As we are shifting our product offering from single counterparty private debt products to standardized products, to accurately reflect the correlation of active clients and the total value of products we distribute, the number of mutual funds clients should also be counted in as a factor affecting our transaction volume and revenue growth. Including mutual funds clients, the total number of clients who made active transactions with us reached 35,213 in 2019, up 27.7% from 27,573 in 2018.
Although we do not generate revenue from registered clients who have never been active clients and mutual funds clients, the number of our registered clients is a key factor affecting our results of operations because with an increasing number of registered clients, we have an increased opportunity to convert more registered clients into active clients and mutual funds clients.
Transaction Value
Transaction value refers to the aggregate value of the financial products we distribute through our wealth management business in a given period, which in turn affects the amount of our revenues, primarily one-time commissions and recurring service fees. Our total transaction value in 2019 was RMB78.5 billion (US$11.3 billion), compared with RMB110.0 billion in 2018 and RMB117.4 billion in 2017.
For our wealth management businesses, we provide to our clients four types of products that are originated and distributed in and outside of the PRC:
● | Credit products, mainly including (i) consumer financing products, (ii) supply chain financing products, (iii) auto-financing products and (iv) other private credit products, including private corporate credit products, mezzanine financing products linked to corporate merger and acquisitions and buyouts, among others, all of which provide investors with prospective fixed rates of return, which is not guaranteed under PRC laws. We have, however, ceased the offering of single counterparty private credit products since the third quarter of 2019; |
● | Private equity and venture capital products, including investments in (i) various private equity and venture capital funds sponsored by third party domestic and international asset/fund management firms, (ii) real estate equity funds, and (iii) private equity and venture capital funds managed by Gopher Asset Management, including funds of funds, secondary funds and direct investment funds; |
● | Public securities products, the underlying assets of which are investments in publicly listed securities and bonds in the secondary market; and |
● | Other products, including insurance products and other products we distribute or provide or manage but cannot be classified into any of the aforementioned product categories. |
83
The product type determines whether we can receive one-time commissions, recurring service fees and/or performance-based income. For most insurance products, we are merely entitled to a one-time commission received upon the completion of the transaction; whereas for private equity and public securities funds, apart from one-time commissions, we are also entitled to recurring service fees shared by fund managers over the duration of the investment in the products, and, in some cases, performance-based income shared by fund managers when realized.
Assets under Management
Assets under management determine the recurring service fees and performance-based income that we are able to collect over the life cycle of the financial products managed by us. As of December 31, 2019, the AUM of our asset management business was RMB170.2 billion (US$24.5 billion), up 0.6% compared with RMB169.2 billion as of December 31, 2018 and RMB148.3 billion as of December 31, 2017.
For our asset management business, Gopher Asset Management develops and manages alternative investments with underlying assets in China and overseas, denominated in both Renminbi and foreign currencies. Historically it developed and managed principally funds of funds which invest in sub-funds managed by third parties; but it is also increasingly making direct investments in portfolio companies and co-investments with fund managers. Gopher Asset Management focuses on the following categories of investments across different types of asset classes:
● | Private equity and venture capital investments, including investments in the leading private equity and venture capital funds in China and overseas through funds of funds and secondary funds, as well as direct investments in companies and projects in the new economy sectors; |
● | Real estate investments, including funds investing in residential as well as commercial real estate properties such as office buildings and shopping malls, in the form of both credit and equity investments; |
● | Public securities, mainly including secondary market equity and bond funds of funds and manager-of-manager investments which are sub-advised by outside fund managers, as well as direct investments in listed companies; |
● | Credit investments, including funds investing in consumer financing, supply chain financing, auto-financing, and other alternative credit related underlying products, We have started to cease these investments since the third quarter in 2019; and |
● | Other investments, including multi-strategy funds and other assets that cannot be classified into any of the aforementioned categories. |
Gopher Asset Management is entitled to receive recurring service fees for all the funds and funds of funds it manages. As of December 31, 2019, 61.6% of our total AUM came from investments in private equity funds with relatively long durations, and the recurring service fees could last as long as 10 years for each investment. Also as of December 31, 2019, 60.0% of the AUM we managed was subject to performance-based fees.
Operating Metrics of Lending and Other Businesses
Our lending and other businesses segment is mainly operated through three subsidiaries with different business models, as mention in “Item 4. Information on the company—B. Business Overview—Business Segments—Lending and other Businesses”. Important operating metrics include the loan volume and the number of borrowers for our lending services business. Our lending and other businesses segment represented 8.5% of our total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.
84
Results of Operations
Wealth Management
Our wealth management business offers financial products and provides comprehensive financial services to high net worth clients in China and overseas. We primarily distribute credit products, private equity products, public securities products and insurance products. Through our rigorous product selection and risk management processes, we screen products and services from a wide array of providers. From our inception in 2005 to December 31, 2019, the transaction value of the financial products we distributed amounted to RMB686.7 billion (US$98.6 billion) in aggregate.
Transaction Value
The table below sets out the aggregate transaction value of the different types of financial products that we distributed during the periods indicated:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |||||||||||||
| RMB in |
|
| RMB in |
|
| RMB in |
| US$ in |
| |||||
| millions |
| % |
| millions |
| % |
| millions |
| millions |
| % | ||
Product type | |||||||||||||||
Credit products |
| 71,759 |
| 61.1 |
| 75,498 |
| 68.6 |
| 34,316 |
| 4,929 |
| 43.7 | % |
Private equity products |
| 34,261 |
| 29.2 |
| 18,864 |
| 17.1 |
| 14,279 |
| 2,051 |
| 18.2 | % |
Public securities products [1] |
| 10,754 |
| 9.2 |
| 13,605 |
| 12.4 |
| 26,378 |
| 3,789 |
| 33.6 | % |
Other products |
| 598 |
| 0.5 |
| 2,062 |
| 1.9 |
| 3,551 |
| 510 |
| 4.5 | % |
All products |
| 117,371 |
| 100.0 |
| 110,029 |
| 100.0 |
| 78,524 |
| 11,279 |
| 100.0 | % |
[1] | “Public securities products” refer to the financial products that are based on publicly traded securities, including stocks and bonds. This was previously referred to as “secondary market equity” financial products. Starting in January 2019, we counted the transaction value of mutual fund products in our total transaction value. |
Over the last three years, our product mix has evolved due to the economic and market cycles in China and changing risk appetite among our high net worth clients. For example, our clients’ interest in equity-related products, including private equity and secondary market equity products, were generally high in 2015 when China’s stock markets were performing strongly. Since 2016, the capital in China has remained volatile, and investment risks have increased sharply in all asset classes, thus the demand for credit products remained strong in 2016, 2017 and 2018. From the third quarter of 2019, we have ceased the offering of single counterparty credit products to standardized products in response to changing regulatory and market environment. As a multi-asset allocator for alternative investments, we provide our clients with tailor-made investment solutions and opportunities catering to their risk-return profiles for these different market environments.
85
Number of Active Clients and Average Transaction Value per Active Client
The table below sets forth the number of active clients who have purchased financial products during the periods indicated and the average transaction value per active client calculated by dividing the total transaction value by the number of active clients for the periods indicated:
Average | ||||||||
Number of | Number of | Total | Transaction | |||||
Mutual Funds | Active | Transaction | Value per Active | |||||
Clients for | Clients for | Value for Years | Client for Years | |||||
Year Ended | Year Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||
| December 31, | December 31, |
| December 31, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| (RMB in millions) |
| (RMB in millions) | ||||
2017 |
| — | 12,720 |
| 117,371 |
| 9.23 | |
2018 |
| 13,945 | 13,628 |
| 110,029 |
| 8.07 | |
2019 |
| 20,675 | 14,538 |
| 78,524 |
| 5.40 |
The number of active clients has grown steadily over the last three years due to our consistent client management endeavors. Counting in mutual funds clients, the total number of clients who made active transactions with us reached 35,213 in 2019, up 27.7% from 27,573 in 2018. Average transaction value per active client decreased in 2019 primarily due to the fact that we ceased the offering of single-counterparty non-standardized private credit products. As we strive to manage more of our clients’ total investable assets, at the same time, we continue to convert more registered clients into active clients in order to maintain our leading market position.
Coverage Network
As of December 31, 2019, our extensive coverage network consisted of 292 service centers covering 82 cities in China, which receive operational support from 11 regional centers and our headquarters in Shanghai. Our branch network covers the most developed metropolitan regions as well as cities experiencing rapid development with a strong private sector in China, where high net worth populations and private companies looking for investment opportunities are typically concentrated. We have also expanded our overseas wealth management business with offices now in Hong Kong, Taiwan, U.S., Canada, Australia and Singapore.
We have relied on, and expect to continue to rely on our broad coverage network. We believe our corporate culture is one of our competitive strengths, and in order to preserve this, our relationship managers are recruited as full-time employees rather than external agents. Our relationship managers act as asset allocation financial advisors and maintain relationships with clients through both in-person meetings and our various self-developed mobile applications, as well as customized client events we organize each year. We place a significant emphasis on recruiting, training and motivating our relationship managers. As of December 31, 2019, we had 1,288 relationship managers nationwide, compared with 1,583 as of December 31, 2018 and 1,335 as of December 31, 2017, as a result of the mechanism of survival of the fittest in an effort to upgrade the sales force. The turnover ratio of our elite relationship managers (relationship managers who have a completed transaction value of over RMB50 million per quarter or over RMB200 million per annum) has been kept low over the years, and was 4.1% in 2019, compared with 4.6% in 2018 and 3.6% in 2017.
Asset Management
Our asset management business is conducted through Gopher Asset Management, a leading alternative multi-asset manager in China. Gopher Asset Management’s AUM has been growing steadily over the past three years, increasing from RMB148.3 billion as of December 31, 2017 to RMB169.2 billion as of December 31, 2018 and further to RMB170.2 billion (US$24.5 billion) as of December 31, 2019. Moreover, long-duration private equity investments are representing an increasing portion of the total AUM, which we expect to help us receive more consistent revenues from recurring service fees. In addition, around 60% of our AUM can generate performance-based income depending on investment returns, which can be booked when underlying investments are exited and monetized.
86
The table below summarizes the roll-forward of our AUM and typical management fee rates chargeable by asset management segment for the last three years:
| Typical |
| As of |
|
|
| As of |
| |||||||
Management | December 31, | Funds | Funds | December 31, |
| ||||||||||
| fee rates |
| 2018 |
| Inflow |
| Outflow |
| 2019 |
| |||||
| RMB in billions, except percentages |
| |||||||||||||
Product type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Private equity investments |
| 0.6%-2.0% | 100.2 |
| 59 | % | 10.3 |
| 5.6 |
| 104.9 |
| 62 | % | |
Real estate investments |
| 0.2%-2.3% | 16.7 |
| 10 | % | 7.2 |
| 6.3 |
| 17.6 |
| 10 | % | |
Public securities investments |
| 0.4%-1.9% | 6.2 |
| 4 | % | 5.5 |
| 2.4 |
| 9.3 |
| 6 | % | |
Credit investment |
| 0.2%-1.4% | 39.4 |
| 23 | % | 10.2 |
| 20.0 |
| 29.6 |
| 17 | % | |
Multi-strategies investments [1] |
| 0.5%-1.1% | 6.7 |
| 4 | % | 3.4 |
| 1.3 |
| 8.8 |
| 5 | % | |
All products |
|
|
| 169.2 |
| 100 | % | 36.6 |
| 35.6 |
| 170.2 |
| 100 | % |
[1] | “Multi-strategies investments” were referred to as “other investments” prior to 2019. |
| Typical |
| As of |
|
|
| As of |
| |||||||
Management | December 31, | Funds | Funds | December 31, |
| ||||||||||
| fee rates |
| 2017 |
| Inflow |
| Outflow |
| 2018 |
| |||||
| RMB in billions, except percentages |
| |||||||||||||
Product type | |||||||||||||||
Private equity investments |
| 0.7%-2.0% | 86.9 |
| 59 | % | 15.8 |
| 2.4 |
| 100.2 |
| 59 | % | |
Real estate investments |
| 0.2%-2.2% | 11.6 |
| 8 | % | 11.8 |
| 6.7 |
| 16.7 |
| 10 | % | |
Secondary market equity investments |
| 0.5%-1.7% | 6.2 |
| 4 | % | 3.7 |
| 3.7 |
| 6.2 |
| 4 | % | |
Credit investments |
| 0.2%-1.5% | 40.0 |
| 27 | % | 27.4 |
| 28.0 |
| 39.4 |
| 23 | % | |
Other investments |
| 0.9%-1.1% | 3.6 |
| 2 | % | 3.1 |
| 0.1 |
| 6.7 |
| 4 | % | |
All products |
|
|
| 148.3 |
| 100 | % | 61.8 |
| 58.6 |
| 169.2 |
| 100 | % |
| Typical |
| As of |
|
|
| As of |
| |||||||
Management | December 31, | Funds | Funds | December 31, |
| ||||||||||
| fee rates |
| 2016 |
| Inflow |
| Outflow |
| 2017 |
| |||||
| RMB in billions, except percentages |
| |||||||||||||
Product type | |||||||||||||||
Private equity investments |
| 0.7%-1.8% | 58.0 |
| 48 | % | 30.3 |
| 1.4 |
| 86.9 |
| 59 | % | |
Real estate investments |
| 0.2%-1.3% | 23.2 |
| 19 | % | 14.5 |
| 26.1 |
| 11.6 |
| 8 | % | |
Secondary market equity investments |
| 0.5%-1.7% | 8.3 |
| 7 | % | 0.5 |
| 2.7 |
| 6.2 |
| 4 | % | |
Credit investments |
| 0.2%-1.5% | 27.8 |
| 23 | % | 40.6 |
| 28.4 |
| 40.0 |
| 27 | % | |
Other investments |
| 0.7%-1.8% | 3.6 |
| 3 | % | 0.1 |
| 0.1 |
| 3.6 |
| 2 | % | |
All products |
|
|
| 120.9 |
| 100 | % | 86.0 |
| 40.9 |
| 148.3 |
| 100 | % |
Except for secondary market equity investments, all AUMs are booked at cost basis, and reflect no mark-to-market effect during the periods indicated. The opening balance, funds outflow and closing balance of the movements above corresponding with secondary market equity investments include the effect of market appreciation or depreciation.
87
Private equity investments as a percentage of total AUM grew from 58.6% in 2017 to 59.2% in 2018, and further to 61.6% in 2019, primarily due to the increasing demand for private equity investments as well as the accumulation effect for this strategy of fund investments with a long duration. We have also been focusing on developing our co-investment and direct investment capabilities in recent years and expect such investments to increase in the future, further increasing the fee rate we could charge from clients. For real estate investments, we have been strategically changing our investment strategy over the past few years, gradually shifting from residential real estate to commercial real estate, due to the evolving risks and reward profile of these investments. For example, Gopher raised a fund in 2014 to invest in a Grade A office building in Shanghai core area and named it as Gopher Center. The construction of the project was completed in 2016, and our own operating team has been handling property services and leasing for this building, with the latest occupancy rate exceeding 90%. We plan to further continue expanding our commercial real estate investments through equity investment and core and value-added funds strategies, and expect the AUM of our real estate investments to grow for the foreseeable future. From the third quarter of 2019, we ceased the offering of single-counterparty non-standardized credit products and transited to offer more standardized public securities, therefore there was a decrease of the percentage of credit products in our total AUM from 23.3% in 2018 to 17.4% in 2019, compared with 27.0% in 2017. Also, in response to client demands for more overseas investment opportunities, we are cooperating with more overseas partners in various asset classes and increased the amount of overseas investment. The AUM in investments denominated in non-RMB currencies amounted to RMB25.2 billion (US$3.6 billion) as of December 31, 2019, representing 14.8% of the total AUM, compared with RMB24.4 billion as of December 31, 2018.
Performance-based Income
We also generate performance-based income from the products we manage and offer to our asset management clients. The following table sets out the AUM with performance-based income for each of our product categories as of December 31, 2018 and 2019:
| As of December 31, | |||||
| 2018 |
| 2019 | |||
| RMB in billions |
| RMB in billions |
| US$ in billions | |
Product type | ||||||
Private equity investments | 76.5 | 75.6 |
| 10.9 | ||
Real estate investments | 7.0 | 9.3 |
| 1.3 | ||
Public securities investments | 3.7 | 4.8 |
| 0.7 | ||
Credit investments | 5.3 | 4.8 |
| 0.7 | ||
Multi-strategies investments | 4.9 | 7.6 |
| 1.1 | ||
Total | 97.4 | 102.1 |
| 14.7 |
As of December 31, 2019, the total AUM with performance-based income grew 2.1% compared with the end of 2018, which accounted for 60.0% of the total AUM of Gopher Asset Management. The growth of AUM with performance-based income was mainly due to the growth in the AUM of our public securities investments and real estate investments.
We are entitled to receive performance-based income relating to our private equity investments, which typically equals to 3%-5% of the fund of fund investment gains or 10-20% of the co-investment and direct investment gains exceeding certain performance-based thresholds. A typical performance-based threshold for our private equity investments is an annual return of 8%. We do not accrue unrealized performance-based income for private equity investments based on net asset value. Performance-based income will not be recognized as revenue until (a) it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur, or (b) the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
We are also entitled to receive performance-based income relating to our real estate equity investments, which typically equals to 10-20% of the investment gains when certain performance-based thresholds are exceeded.
88
The typical performance-based threshold for our real estate investments is set at an annual return of 8%. We do not accrue unrealized performance-based income for real estate investments based on net asset value. Performance-based income will not be recognized as revenue until (a) it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur, or (b) the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
We are entitled to receive performance-based income of our public securities investments when the relevant investee funds are open for redemption, make dividend payments or when the funds mature. We are typically entitled to share 4-5% of the investment gains exceeding certain performance-based thresholds, which is typically a 6% annual return of the principal or when the net asset value exceeds the previous highest net asset value. Performance-based income is recognized when performance-based income can be charged according to the relevant fund agreements, which is generally on a quarterly or semi-annual basis, based on the change of net asset value. Such performance-based income is not subject to clawback and therefore subsequent net asset value fluctuations have no impact on such income.
We are generally not entitled to receive performance-based income of our real estate credit investments and credit investments due to their nature. However, we have managed some net asset value-based credit portfolio funds in the asset class of credit investments, which provide active management of diversified underlying credit assets over a 2-8 year duration. As the manager of these credit portfolio funds, we are typically entitled to share 10-20% of the investment gains when the funds exceed a performance-based threshold of 6-8% annual returns.
We are entitled to receive performance-based income of multi-strategies investments. We are typically entitled to share 10% of the investment gains when certain performance-based thresholds are exceeded. A typical performance-based threshold is an annual return of 8%. Performance-based income is recognized after a three-year lock-up period, based on the change of net asset value of the fund, which is generally valued on an annual basis.
The following tables summarize the AUM with performance-based income for each of our product type and their liquidation dates as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 (on a historical basis):
| AUM with |
| ||||||||
performance- |
| Expected liquidation date is | ||||||||
| based income | during the year |
| |||||||
| as of | ended | after | |||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | January 1, | |||||||
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2021 |
| 2022 |
| 2022 | |
| RMB in billions | |||||||||
Product type | ||||||||||
Private equity investments |
| 75.6 |
| 9.7 |
| 5.1 |
| 7.8 |
| 53.0 |
Real estate investments |
| 9.3 |
| 2.0 |
| 0.2 |
| 4.3 |
| 2.8 |
Credit investments |
| 4.8 |
| 2.4 |
| 0.1 |
| 1.2 |
| 1.1 |
Multi-strategies investments |
| 7.6 |
| 0.1 |
| — |
| 0.2 |
| 7.3 |
Total |
| 97.3 |
| 14.2 |
| 5.4 |
| 13.5 |
| 64.2 |
| AUM with |
| ||||||||
performance- |
| Expected liquidation date is | ||||||||
based income | during the year | |||||||||
| as of | ended | after | |||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | January 1, | |||||||
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2021 |
| 2022 | |
| RMB in billions | |||||||||
Product type | ||||||||||
Private equity investments |
| 76.5 |
| 4.6 |
| 6.7 |
| 5.1 |
| 60.2 |
Real estate investments |
| 7.0 |
| 0.5 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.2 |
| 5.2 |
Credit investments |
| 5.3 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.4 |
| 0.5 |
| 2.3 |
Multi-strategies investments |
| 4.9 |
| 0.1 |
| 0.1 |
| — |
| 4.8 |
Total |
| 93.7 |
| 6.2 |
| 9.2 |
| 5.8 |
| 72.5 |
89
We usually do not liquidate a fund prior to maturity. We will generally only liquidate a fund prior to maturity if (1) the underlying projects or investments end prior to liquidation, or (2) it is in the best interest of the fund investors to liquidate such fund prior to maturity.
Our public securities funds generating performance-based income are periodically available for redemption. The following table summarizes the different periods that our public securities funds opened for redemptions on fair value basis:
As of December 31, | ||||||
2018 | 2019 | |||||
| RMB in billions |
| RMB in billions |
| US$ in billions | |
Daily |
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 |
| — |
Monthly |
| 1.4 |
| 2.5 |
| 0.3 |
Quarterly |
| 0.9 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.2 |
Semi-annually |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Annually |
| — |
| — |
| — |
As of maturity |
| 1.2 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.2 |
Total |
| 3.7 |
| 4.8 |
| 0.7 |
Lending and Other Businesses
The total amount of loans facilitated by our lending services subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2019 was RMB6.8 billion (US$1.0 billion), as compared with RMB13.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, representing a year-over-year decrease of 50%. The number of borrowers for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 4,446, decreasing 50.5% from 8,984 for the corresponding period in 2018.
Key Financial Indicators
Revenues
We derive revenues from three business segments: wealth management, asset management and lending and other services. We generate revenues primarily from:
One-time commissions
● | for wealth management: we receive one-time commissions paid by our clients and product providers upon the establishment of a financial product; |
Recurring service fees
● | for wealth management: we receive recurring service fees over the life cycle of the private equity products, public securities products, and certain credit products previously distributed by us to our clients, which are paid by our clients or product providers depending on the particular product; |
● | for asset management: includes management fees over the life cycle of the funds managed by us, which are paid on a periodic basis and typically calculated as a percentage of the total investment amount or net asset value (for public securities funds) in the underlying funds; |
90
Performance-based income represents revenues generated from financial products distributed, raised and/or managed by us, which are paid by our clients and/or product providers depending on the particular product;
Other service fees are derived from comprehensive financial services we provide and lending and other services segment:
● | for wealth management: revenues generated from Enoch Education, our investor education business, and other comprehensive financial services we provide; |
● | for lending and other services: service fees paid by clients for the lending services and other services we provide. |
Operating Costs and Expenses
Our financial condition and operating results are directly affected by our operating cost and expenses, primarily consisting of (i) compensation and benefits, including salaries and commissions for our relationship managers, share-based compensation expenses, performance-based bonuses, and other employee salaries and bonuses, (ii) selling expenses, (iii) general and administrative expenses and (iv) other operating expenses, which are partially offset by the receipt of government subsidies. Our operating costs and expenses are primarily affected by several factors, including the number of our employees, rental expenses and certain non-cash charges.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits mainly include salaries and commissions for our relationship managers, salaries and bonuses for investment professionals and back-office employees, share-based compensation expenses for our employees and directors, and bonuses related to performance-based income. The number of our employees was 2,969, 3,441 and 2,992 as of December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. In 2019, we took efforts to streamline our operational human resources to improve efficiency, which caused the headcounts decreased compared with 2018. We plan to closely monitor our headcounts to keep our operation efficiency. Meanwhile we will keep taking efforts to strengthen our investment capabilities.
Relationship Managers Compensation
In 2017, 2018 and 2019, we incurred relationship managers compensation of RMB616.1 million, RMB633.6 million and RMB625.0 million (US$89.8 million), respectively, representing 21.8%, 19.3% and 18.4% of our net revenues in the same periods, respectively. We anticipate that the compensation and benefits of our relationship managers will continue to be a significant portion of our costs and expenses as we continue to rely on our relationship managers for our existing and new service centers and distribute more financial products.
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expenses include grants and vesting of stock options and restricted shares to our employees and directors. We adopted two share incentive plans in 2008 and 2010, and replaced both with a new share incentive plan in 2017. We expect to incur additional share-based compensation expenses relating to share options or restricted shares in the future as we plan to continue to grant share options or restricted shares to our employees and directors.
91
Share-based compensation expenses were included in compensation and benefits for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019. The following table sets forth our share-based compensation expenses both in absolute amounts and as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 | |||||||
| RMB’000 |
| % |
| RMB’000 |
| % |
| RMB’000 |
| % | |
Share options | 51,054 |
| 1.8 | 45,973 |
| 1.4 | 40,533 |
| 1.2 | |||
Restricted shares | 42,581 |
| 1.5 | 66,790 |
| 2.0 | 54,364 |
| 1.6 | |||
Total share-based compensation | 93,635 |
| 3.3 | 112,763 |
| 3.4 | 94,897 |
| 2.8 |
Selling Expenses
Our selling expenses primarily include expenses associated with the operations of service centers, such as rental expenses, and expenses attributable to marketing activities. The number of our service centers in China was 237, 313 and 292 as of December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses primarily include rental and related expenses of our leased office spaces and professional service fees. The main items include rental expenses for our group and regional headquarters and offices, depreciation expenses and consulting expenses, among others.
Other Operating Expenses
Our other operating expenses mainly include costs incurred directly in relation to our revenues.
Government Subsidies
Government subsidies are cash subsidies received in the PRC from local governments as incentives for investing and operating in certain local districts. Such subsidies are used by us for general corporate purposes and are reflected as an offset to our operating costs and expenses.
Taxation
The Cayman Islands
We are an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Under the current laws of the Cayman Islands, we are not subject to income or capital gains tax. In addition, payments of capital or dividends in respect of our shares are not subject to withholding tax in the Cayman Islands. Gains derived from the disposal of our shares are not subject to Cayman Islands income or corporation tax. The Cayman Islands currently have no income, corporation or capital gains tax and no estate duty, inheritance tax or gift tax. There are no other taxes likely to be material to us levied by the government of the Cayman Islands except for stamp duties which may be applicable on instruments executed in, or brought within the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands.
Hong Kong
Under the current Hong Kong Inland Revenue Ordinance, our subsidiaries established in Hong Kong are subject to 16.5% income tax on their taxable income generated from operations in Hong Kong. Under the Hong Kong tax laws, it is exempted from the Hong Kong income tax on its foreign-derived income. In addition, payments of dividends from our Hong Kong subsidiaries to us are not subject to any Hong Kong withholding tax.
92
PRC
On March 23, 2016, the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation jointly issued the Circular on the Pilot Program for Overall Implementation of the Collection of Value Added Tax Instead of Business Tax, or Circular 36, which took effect on May 1, 2016. Pursuant to Circular 36, all companies operating in construction industry, real estate industry, finance industry, modern service industry or other industries which were required to pay business tax are required to pay value-added tax (“VAT”), in lieu of business tax.
Our PRC subsidiaries and our consolidated variable interest entity are subject to VAT and related surcharges including urban maintenance and construction tax (with 1%, 5%, or 7% of VAT based on different locations), education surtax (3% of VAT), local education surtax (2% of VAT) and river-way management fee (1% of VAT) on the services provided in the PRC. As VAT liability is excluded when calculating net revenues, our net revenues are total revenues, net only of VAT related surcharges, which range from 7% to 13% of VAT liabilities. The VAT and related surcharges in the amounts of RMB19.1 million, RMB20.5 million and RMB21.4 million (US$3.1 million) were deducted from our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
According to Circular 36, applicable VAT rates include 3%, 6%, 11%, and 17%, and the applicable value-added rate for our PRC subsidiaries and our variable interest entity is 6%. The VAT tax rates of 11% and 17% were reduced to 10% and 16%, respectively, from May 1, 2018 and to 9% and 13% from April 1, 2019.
In addition, our PRC subsidiaries and our variable interest entity are subject to PRC enterprise income tax on their taxable income in accordance with the relevant PRC income tax laws with a uniform 25% enterprise income tax rate to both foreign-invested enterprises and domestic enterprises since January 1, 2008, except where a special preferential rate applies.
Under the EIT Law, enterprises that are established under the laws of foreign countries or regions and whose “de facto management bodies” are located within the PRC territory are considered PRC resident enterprises, and will be subject to the PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide income. Under the EIT Implementation Rules, “de facto management bodies” are defined as the bodies that have full and substantial control and overall management over the manufacturing and business operations, personnel and human resources, finances and treasury, and acquisition and disposition of properties and other assets of an enterprise. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—The dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries may be subject to PRC tax under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.”
For more information on PRC tax regulations, see “Item 4. Information on the Business—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Tax.”
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities and the disclosure of our contingent assets and liabilities at the end of each fiscal period and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each fiscal period. We continually evaluate these judgments and estimates based on our own historical experience, knowledge and assessment of current business and other conditions, our expectations regarding the future based on available information and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, which together form our basis for making judgments about matters that are not readily apparent from other sources. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, our actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of our accounting policies require a higher degree of judgment than others in their application.
93
The selection of critical accounting policies, the judgments and other uncertainties affecting application of those policies and the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions are factors that should be considered when reviewing our financial statements. We believe the following accounting policies involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entity
Because we are an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are classified as a foreign enterprise under PRC laws and regulations, and our wholly-owned PRC subsidiaries are foreign-invested enterprises. To comply with PRC laws and regulations, we rely on contractual arrangements with our consolidated variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and its affiliates to operate a portion of our operations in China which are subject to restrictions on foreign investment, including asset management business and certain other services.
Since we do not have any equity interests in Noah Investment, in order to exercise effective control over its operations, through Noah Group, we entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Noah Investment and its shareholders, pursuant to which we are entitled to receive effectively all economic benefits generated from Noah Investment. The exclusive option agreement and power of attorney provide us effective control over Noah Investment and its subsidiaries, while the equity pledge agreements secure the equity owners’ obligations under the relevant agreements. Because we have both the power to direct the activities of Noah Investment that most significantly affect its economic performance and the right to receive substantially all of the benefits from Noah Investment, we are deemed the primary beneficiary of Noah Investment. Accordingly, we have consolidated the financial statements of Noah Investment since its inception. The aforementioned contractual agreements are effective agreements between a parent and a consolidated subsidiary, neither of which is accounted for in the consolidated financial statements (i.e., a call option on subsidiary shares under the exclusive option agreement or a guarantee of subsidiary performance under the share pledge agreement) or are ultimately eliminated upon consolidation (i.e., service fees under the exclusive support service agreement or loans payable/receivable under the loan agreement).
Based on advice of our legal counsel as to PRC law, we believe that our contractual arrangements with Noah Investment are in compliance with PRC law and are legally enforceable. However, we have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. The interests of the shareholders of Noah Investment may diverge from that of our company, which may potentially increase the risk that they would seek to act contrary to the contractual terms. For a discussion of the risks associated with these contractual arrangements, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure.”
We also make equity investments in entities that are considered variable interest entity and perform evaluation on an ongoing basis to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of any of these investments. See accounting policy for “investments in affiliates” below.
Investments in Affiliates
We serve as the general partner for our proprietary funds managed by Gopher Asset Management. For all the funds we serve as general partner in China, we are required by the limited partnership agreements to also hold equity interest in those funds. From time to time, we may also invest in those funds to the extent the risk and return profile is deemed acceptable by our investment policy. Our equity interests in each individual fund is normally less than 3%. Such investments are accounted for using equity method of accounting and reported in investment in affiliates on consolidated balance sheets.
94
Affiliated companies are entities over which we have significant influence, but which we do not control. We generally consider an ownership interest of 20% or higher to represent significant influence. Investments in affiliates are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Under this method, our share of the post-acquisition profits or losses of affiliated companies is recognized in the statements of operations and our shares of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income are recognized in other comprehensive income. Unrealized gains on transactions between us and our affiliated companies are eliminated to the extent of our interest in the affiliated companies; unrealized losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. When our share of losses in an affiliated company equals or exceeds its interest in the affiliated company, we do not recognize further losses, unless we have incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the affiliated company. An impairment loss is recorded when there has been a loss in value of the investment that is other than temporary. We have not recorded any impairment losses in any of the periods reported.
We also consider we have significant influence over the funds that we serve as general partner or fund manager. For funds that we are not deemed the primary beneficiary of these funds, the equity method of accounting is accordingly used for investments by us in these funds. In addition, the investee funds meet the definition of an Investment Company and are required to report their investment assets at fair value. We record our equity pick-up based on our percentage ownership of the investee funds’ operating result.
In evaluating whether the limited partnership investment funds which we managed as general partner are variable interest entity or not, we first assess whether a simple majority or lower threshold of limited partnership interests, excluding interests held by the general partner, parties under common control of the general partner, or parties acting on behalf of the general partner, have substantive kick-out rights or participating rights. If such rights exist, the limited partnership is not deemed a variable interest entity and no further analysis will be performed. If the limited partnership is assessed to be a variable interest entity, we further assess whether any interest it has constitutes a variable interest. We conclude that the service fees it earns, including carried interest earned in the capacity of general partner, are commensurate with the level of effort required to provide such services and are at arm’s length and therefore are not deemed as variable interests. Before 2015, all limited partnerships we managed as general partner had substantive kick-out rights exercisable by a simple majority of non-related limited partners and therefore were not deemed variable interest entity. Since 2015, some of the newly formed limited partnerships we manage as general partner do not have substantive kick-out rights exercisable by a simple majority of non-related limited partners and therefore constitute variable interest entity. As a result, such limited partnerships are deemed variable interest entity not consolidated by us due to the fact that the general partner interest to absorb losses or receive benefits is not potentially significant to the variable interest entity.
We determine whether we are a primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity when we initially involve with a variable interest entity and reconsider that conclusion when facts and circumstances change. As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, two investment funds were consolidated by us.
We also manage the contractual funds which we manage as fund manager and have earned a management fee and/or carried interest. The contractual funds are variable interest entity as the fund investors do not have substantive kick-out rights or participating rights. We sometimes invest in the contractual funds we manage for investment income. Such investments constitute variable interests to the contractual funds which are believed to be variable interest entity. We performed a qualitative analysis to determine if its interest could absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity and concluded we are not the primary beneficiary.
We account for investments in affiliates using the equity method of accounting due to the fact that we have significant influence on these investees. We recorded investments in affiliates of RMB1,375.1 million and RMB1,272.3 million (US$182.7 million) as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively, and income from equity in affiliates of RMB92.1 million, RMB14.5 million and RMB115.8 million (US$16.6 million) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
95
Revenue Recognition
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. Accordingly, revenue for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019 were presented under ASC 606, while comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for such period.
We derive revenue primarily from one-time commissions, recurring service fees and performance-based income paid by our clients and financial product providers.
Those types of revenues are accounted for as contracts with customers. Under the guidance for contracts with customers, we are required to (a) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (b) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (c) determine the transaction price, (d) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (e) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy its performance obligations. In determining the transaction price, we have included variable consideration only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized would not occur. Revenues are recorded net of sales related taxes and surcharges.
The adoption of ASC 606 did not significantly change (i) the timing and pattern of revenue recognition for all of our revenue streams, and (ii) the presentation of revenue as gross versus net. Therefore, the adoption of ASC 606 did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations, equity or cash flows as of the adoption date and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019.
One-time Commissions: We earn one-time commissions from fund raising services provided to clients or financial product providers. We enter into one-time commission agreements with financial product providers which specify the key terms and conditions of the arrangement. One-time commissions are separately negotiated for each transaction and generally do not include rights of return, credits or discounts, rebates, price protection or other similar privileges, and typically paid when or shortly after the transaction is completed. Upon establishment of a financial product, we earn a one-time commission from financial product providers, calculated as a percentage of the financial products purchased by our clients. We define the “establishment of a financial product” for its revenue recognition purpose as the time when both of the following two criteria are met: (1) our client has entered into a purchase or subscription contract with the relevant product provider and, if required, the client has transferred a deposit to an escrow account designated by the product provider and (2) the product provider has issued a formal notice to confirm the establishment of a financial product. After the contract is established, there are no significant judgments made when determining the one-time commission price. Therefore, one-time commissions are recorded at the point of time when the financial product is established. For certain contracts that require a portion of the payment be deferred until the end of the financial products’ life or other specified contingency, we evaluate each variable consideration and recognizes revenue only when we conclude that it is probable that changes in its estimate of such consideration will not result in significant reversals of revenue in subsequent periods.
We also earn one-time commissions from insurance companies by referring clients to purchase insurance products from them, and recognize revenues when the underlying insurance contracts become effective.
96
Recurring Service Fees: We also provide investment management services to investment funds and other vehicles in exchange for a recurring service fees. Recurring service fees are determined based on the types of financial products we distribute and/or manages and are calculated as either (i) a percentage of the total capital commitments of investments made by the investors or (ii) as a percentage of the fair value of the total investment in the financial products, calculated daily. These customer contracts require us to provide investment management services, which represents a performance obligation that we satisfies over time. After the financial product is established, there are no significant judgments made when determining the transaction price. As we provide these services throughout the contract term, for either method of calculation, revenue is calculated on a daily basis over the contract term. Recurring service agreements do not include rights of return, credits or discounts, rebates, price protection or other similar privileges. Payments of recurring service fees are typically made on a regular basis (typically quarterly, semi-annually or annually) and are not subject to clawback once determined.
Performance-based Income: In a typical arrangement in which we serve as fund manager, and in some cases in which we serve as distributor, except for secondary market equity fund products, we are entitled to a performance-based fee based on the extent by which the fund’s investment performance exceeds a certain threshold based on the contract term. Such performance-based fees earned based on the performance of the underlying fund are a form of variable consideration in its contracts with customers to provide investment management services. Such performance-based income is typically calculated and distributed when the cumulative return of the fund can be determined. Performance-based income will not be recognized as revenue until (a) it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur, or (b) the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. At each reporting date, we update our estimate of the transaction price and conclude that we cannot include our estimate of performance-based income in the transaction price if such performance-based income still has various possible consideration amounts and the experience that we have with similar contracts is of little predictive value in determining the future performance of the funds, which means that we cannot conclude that it is probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative amount of revenue recognized would not occur.
Other Service Fees: We mainly derived other service fees from lending services and investor education services. Revenue from lending services represents interest income from loan origination services, and is recognized monthly in accordance with our contractual terms and recorded as part of other service fees in the consolidated statement of operations. We do not charge prepayment penalties from our customers. We also provide investor education services, offering various types of training programs to high net worth individuals and their families. Such programs normally last several days. The service fees charged to the attendees are not refundable. The revenues are recognized at point of time when the service is completed.
97
Financial Results
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated. The information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. The operating results in any period are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any future period.
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from others[1]: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| 541,025 |
| 733,009 |
| 690,860 |
| 99,236 |
Recurring service fees |
| 605,092 |
| 593,856 |
| 524,692 |
| 75,367 |
Performance-based income |
| 86,494 |
| 43,101 |
| 23,437 |
| 3,367 |
Other service fees |
| 195,073 |
| 361,886 |
| 522,958 |
| 75,118 |
Total revenues from others |
| 1,427,684 |
| 1,731,852 |
| 1,761,947 |
| 253,088 |
Revenues from funds Gopher manages[1]: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| 561,059 |
| 294,984 |
| 240,808 |
| 34,590 |
Recurring service fees |
| 802,761 |
| 1,182,693 |
| 1,320,773 |
| 189,717 |
Performance-based income |
| 54,502 |
| 100,533 |
| 89,648 |
| 12,877 |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| 1,418,322 |
| 1,578,210 |
| 1,651,229 |
| 237,184 |
Total Revenues |
| 2,846,006 |
| 3,310,062 |
| 3,413,176 |
| 490,272 |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| (19,098) |
| (20,454) |
| (21,364) |
| (3,069) |
Net Revenues |
| 2,826,908 |
| 3,289,608 |
| 3,391,812 |
| 487,203 |
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
| (1,407,372) |
| (1,564,192) |
| (1,610,770) |
| (231,373) |
Selling expenses |
| (320,462) |
| (412,720) |
| (331,346) |
| (47,595) |
General and administrative expenses |
| (246,785) |
| (280,075) |
| (296,492) |
| (42,589) |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (2,093) | 688 | (130,723) | (18,777) | ||||
Other operating expenses |
| (147,318) |
| (169,368) |
| (196,793) |
| (28,268) |
Government subsidies |
| 74,156 |
| 62,583 |
| 89,278 |
| 12,824 |
Total operating costs and expenses |
| (2,049,874) |
| (2,363,084) |
| (2,476,846) |
| (355,778) |
Income from operations: |
| 777,034 |
| 926,524 |
| 914,966 |
| 131,425 |
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
| 45,020 |
| 69,841 |
| 89,099 |
| 12,798 |
Interest expenses |
| (24,128) |
| (10,028) |
| (430) |
| (62) |
Investment income (loss) |
| 67,343 |
| 48,616 |
| (28,620) |
| (4,111) |
Other income (expense) |
| 3,542 |
| (23,356) |
| (7,040) |
| (1,011) |
Total other income |
| 91,777 |
| 85,073 |
| 53,009 |
| 7,614 |
Income before taxes and income from equity in affiliates |
| 868,811 |
| 1,011,597 |
| 967,975 |
| 139,039 |
Income tax expense |
| (199,085) |
| (222,320) |
| (220,025) |
| (31,605) |
Income from equity in affiliates |
| 92,136 |
| 14,469 |
| 115,809 |
| 16,635 |
Net income |
| 761,862 |
| 803,746 |
| 863,759 |
| 124,069 |
Less: net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests |
| (13,745) |
| (7,551) |
| 34,608 |
| 4,971 |
Less: income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| 6,483 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Less: deemed dividend on non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| 6,201 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Net income attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders |
| 762,923 |
| 811,297 |
| 829,151 |
| 119,098 |
98
[1] | Starting from 2018, we have reported revenue streams in two categories—revenues from funds Gopher Asset Management manages and revenues from others, instead of the previous categories—third-party revenues and related party revenues, to provide more relevant and accurate information. We also revised the comparative period presentation to conform to current period classification. |
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net Revenues. Our net revenues increased by 3.1% from RMB3,289.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB3,391.8 million (US$487.2 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to increases in recurring service fees and other service fees partially offset by the decrease in one-time commissions.
Operating Costs and Expenses. Operating costs and expenses increased by 4.8% from RMB2,363.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB2,476.8 million (US$355.8 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in operating costs and expenses was primarily driven by increased expenses related to compensation and benefits, as well as marketing and general and administrative expenses.
Other Income. Other income decreased by 37.7% from RMB85.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB53.0 million (US$7.6 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in other income was primarily driven by a decrease in investment income due to changes in the fair value of equity securities.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased by 1.0% from RMB222.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB220.0 million (US$31.6 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to a decrease in taxable income offset in part by a higher effective tax rate.
Net Income Attributable to Noah Holdings Limited Shareholders. Net income attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders increased by 2.2% from RMB811.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB829.2 million (US$119.1 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net Revenues. Our net revenues increased by 16.4% from RMB2,826.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB3,289.6 million (US$478.5 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to increases in recurring service fees and other service fees.
Operating Costs and Expenses. Operating costs and expenses increased by 15.3% from RMB2,049.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB2,363.1 million (US$343.7 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in operating costs and expenses was primarily driven by increased expenses related to compensation and benefits, as well as marketing and client engagement events.
Other Income. Other income decreased by 7.3% from RMB91.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB85.1 million (US$12.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease in other income was primarily driven by a decrease in investment income due to changes in the fair value of equity securities.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased by 11.7% from RMB199.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB222.3 million (US$32.3 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to an increase in taxable income partially offset by a lower effective tax rate.
Net Income Attributable to Noah Holdings Limited Shareholders. Net income attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders increased by 6.3% from RMB762.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB811.3 million (US$118.0 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
99
Wealth Management
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
Revenues | ||||||||
Revenues from others: | ||||||||
One-time commissions |
| 539,938 |
| 731,424 |
| 688,652 |
| 98,919 |
Recurring service fees |
| 577,544 |
| 571,782 |
| 520,013 |
| 74,695 |
Performance-based income |
| 84,105 |
| 42,570 |
| 23,333 |
| 3,352 |
Other service fees |
| 70,390 |
| 113,570 |
| 222,912 |
| 32,019 |
Total revenues from others |
| 1,271,977 |
| 1,459,346 |
| 1,454,910 |
| 208,985 |
Revenues from funds Gopher manages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| 560,047 |
| 292,899 |
| 239,409 |
| 34,389 |
Recurring service fees |
| 300,352 |
| 564,228 |
| 635,437 |
| 91,275 |
Performance-based income |
| 9,019 |
| 1,739 |
| 97 |
| 14 |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| 869,418 |
| 858,886 |
| 874,943 |
| 125,678 |
Total Revenues |
| 2,141,395 |
| 2,318,212 |
| 2,329,853 |
| 334,663 |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| (15,128) |
| (12,206) |
| (10,574) |
| (1,519) |
Net Revenues |
| 2,126,267 |
| 2,306,006 |
| 2,319,279 |
| 333,144 |
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
| (1,074,920) |
| (1,165,750) |
| (1,232,380) |
| (177,020) |
Selling expenses |
| (295,798) |
| (367,589) |
| (287,541) |
| (41,303) |
General and administrative expenses |
| (146,122) |
| (164,802) |
| (194,908) |
| (27,997) |
Provision of doubtful accounts | — | — | (121,572) | (17,463) | ||||
Other operating expenses |
| (77,490) |
| (54,291) |
| (103,846) |
| (14,917) |
Government subsidies |
| 49,008 |
| 53,620 |
| 58,704 |
| 8,432 |
Total operating costs and expenses |
| (1,545,322) |
| (1,698,812) |
| (1,881,543) |
| (270,268) |
Income from operations: |
| 580,945 |
| 607,194 |
| 437,736 |
| 62,876 |
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net Revenues. For the wealth management business, our net revenues increased by 0.6% from RMB2,306.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB2,319.3 million (US$333.1 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019.
● | Net revenues from one-time commissions decreased by 9.3% from RMB1,018.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB923.8 million (US$132.7 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to a decline in the transaction value of financial products distributed. |
● | Net revenues from recurring service fees increased by 1.8% from RMB1,130.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB1,150.2 million (US$165.2 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily due to the cumulative effect of financial products with recurring service fees previously distributed by us. |
● | Net revenues from performance-based income decreased to RMB23.3 million (US$3.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019 from RMB44.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease in performance-based income from public securities products. |
● | Net revenues from other service fees increased by 96.4% from RMB113.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB221.9 million (US$31.9 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to the growth of various value-added services we offer to our high net worth clients. |
100
Operating Costs and Expenses. For the wealth management business, our operating costs and expenses increased by 10.8% from RMB1,698.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB1,881.5 million (US$270.3 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019.
● | Compensation and benefits include compensation for relationship managers and back office employees. Compensation and benefits increased by 5.7% from RMB1,165.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB1,232.4 million (US$177.0 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. In 2019, relationship manager compensation decreased by 1.0% from 2018, while other compensation increased by 13.7% from 2018. |
● | Selling expenses decreased by 21.8% from RMB367.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB287.5 million (US$41.3 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to a decrease in marketing initiatives. |
● | General and administrative expenses increased by 18.3% from RMB164.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB194.9 million (US$28.0 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increased legal expenses. |
● | Provision for doubtful accounts was RMB121.6 million (US$17.5 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared with nil for the year ended December 31, 2018. The majority of such provision were one-time write-off expense of receivables accounts related to certain credit fund product. |
● | Other operating expenses increased by 91.3% from RMB54.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB103.8 million (US$14.9 million), primarily due to higher cost related to our other services. |
● | Government subsidies increased by 9.5% from RMB53.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB58.7 million (US$8.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net Revenues. For the wealth management business, our net revenues increased by 8.5% from RMB2,126.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB2,306.0 million (US$335.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
● | Net revenues from one-time commissions decreased by 6.7% from RMB1,092.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB1,018.9 million (US$148.2 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a decline in the transaction value of financial products. |
● | Net revenues from recurring service fees increased by 29.6% from RMB871.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB1,130.0 million (US$164.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to the cumulative effect of financial products with recurring service fees previously distributed by us. |
● | Net revenues from performance-based income decreased to RMB44.1 million (US$6.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018 from RMB92.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in performance-based income from private equity products. |
● | Net revenues from other service fees increased by 61.6% from RMB69.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB113.0 million (US$16.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the growth of value-added financial services we provide. |
101
Operating Costs and Expenses. For the wealth management business, our operating costs and expenses increased by 9.9% from RMB1,545.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB1,698.8 million (US$247.1 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
● | Compensation and benefits include compensation for relationship managers and back-office employees. Compensation and benefits increased by 8.4% from RMB1,074.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB1,165.8 million (US$169.5 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018. In 2018, relationship manager compensation increased by 3.2% from 2017, while other compensation increased by 15.4% from 2017. |
● | Selling expenses increased by 24.3% from RMB295.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB367.6 million (US$53.5 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to an increase in marketing initiatives. |
● | General and administrative expenses increased by 12.8% from RMB146.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB164.8 million (US$24.0 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to increased rental and related expenses and depreciation. |
● | Other operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 were RMB54.3 million (US$7.9 million), a decrease of 29.9% from 2017. The decrease was primarily due to lower cost related to our factoring business. |
● | Government subsidies increased from RMB49.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB53.6 million (US$7.8 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018. |
102
Asset Management
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
Revenues | ||||||||
Revenues from others: | ||||||||
One-time commissions |
| 1,087 |
| 1,585 |
| 2,208 |
| 317 |
Recurring service fees |
| 27,548 |
| 22,074 |
| 4,679 |
| 672 |
Performance-based income |
| 2,389 |
| 531 |
| 104 |
| 15 |
Other service fees |
| 10,712 |
| 8,225 |
| 4,274 |
| 614 |
Total revenues from others |
| 41,736 |
| 32,415 |
| 11,265 |
| 1,618 |
Revenues from funds Gopher manages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One-time commissions |
| 1,012 |
| 2,085 |
| 1,399 |
| 201 |
Recurring service fees |
| 502,409 |
| 618,465 |
| 685,336 |
| 98,442 |
Performance-based income |
| 45,483 |
| 98,794 |
| 89,551 |
| 12,863 |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| 548,904 |
| 719,344 |
| 776,286 |
| 111,506 |
Total Revenues |
| 590,640 |
| 751,759 |
| 787,551 |
| 113,124 |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| (2,599) |
| (3,228) |
| (3,971) |
| (570) |
Net Revenues |
| 588,041 |
| 748,531 |
| 783,580 |
| 112,554 |
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Compensation and benefits |
| (201,327) |
| (273,098) |
| (279,895) |
| (40,204) |
Selling expenses |
| (9,271) |
| (22,200) |
| (26,661) |
| (3,830) |
General and administrative expenses |
| (70,618) |
| (80,873) |
| (71,805) |
| (10,314) |
Provision of doubtful accounts | — | — | (3,800) | (546) | ||||
Other operating expenses |
| (27,773) |
| (25,310) |
| (25,978) |
| (3,732) |
Government subsidies |
| 23,848 |
| 6,148 |
| 15,878 |
| 2,281 |
Total operating costs and expenses |
| (285,141) |
| (395,333) |
| (392,261) |
| (56,345) |
Income from operations: |
| 302,900 |
| 353,198 |
| 391,319 |
| 56,209 |
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net Revenues. For the asset management business, our net revenues increased by 4.7% from RMB748.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB783.6 million (US$112.6 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019.
● | Net revenues from recurring service fees increased by 7.6% from RMB637.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB686.5 million (US$98.6 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, mainly due to the increase in assets under management and service fees income generated from voluntary accelerated repayments of certain credit products in 2019. |
● | Net revenues from performance-based income decreased by 9.8% from RMB98.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB89.2 million (US$12.8 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to a decrease in performance-based income from public securities products. |
Operating Costs and Expenses. For the asset management business, our operating costs and expenses decreased by 0.8% from RMB395.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB392.3 million (US$56.2 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019.
● | Compensation and benefits include compensation of investment professionals and back-office employees. Compensation and benefits increased by 2.5% from RMB273.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB279.9 million (US$40.2 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
103
● | Selling expenses increased by 20.1% from RMB22.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB26.7 million (US$3.8 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increased marketing initiatives in 2019. |
● | General and administrative expenses decreased by 11.2% from RMB80.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to RMB71.8 million (US$10.3 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to our expenses controls imitated in 2019. |
● | Government subsidies increased from RMB6.1 million in 2018 to RMB15.9 million (US$2.3 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net Revenues. For the asset management business, our net revenues increased by 27.3% from RMB588.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB748.5 million (US$108.9 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
● | Net revenues from recurring service fees increased by 20.9% from RMB527.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB637.8 million (US$92.8 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, mainly due to the increase in assets under management. |
● | Net revenues from performance-based income increased by 107.5% from RMB47.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB98.9 million (US$14.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to an increase in performance-based income from real estate and secondary market equity funds. |
Operating Costs and Expenses. For the asset management business, our operating costs and expenses increased by 38.7% from RMB285.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB395.3 million (US$57.5 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
● | Compensation and benefits include compensation of investment professionals and back-office employees. Compensation and benefits increased by 35.6% from RMB201.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to RMB273.1 million (US$39.7 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to increases in number of employees. |
● | Selling expenses decreased by 42.7% from RMB16.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to RMB9.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in general marketing activities. |
● | General and administrative expenses decreased by 8.5% from RMB77.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to RMB70.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to decreased consulting fees. |
● | Government subsidies decreased from RMB83.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to RMB23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. |
104
Lending and other businesses
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
Revenues | ||||||||
Revenues from others: | ||||||||
Other service fees |
| 113,971 |
| 240,091 |
| 295,772 |
| 42,485 |
Total revenues from others |
| 113,971 |
| 240,091 |
| 295,772 |
| 42,485 |
Total Revenues |
| 113,971 |
| 240,091 |
| 295,772 |
| 42,485 |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| (1,371) |
| (5,020) |
| (6,819) |
| (979) |
Net Revenues |
| 112,600 |
| 235,071 |
| 288,953 |
| 41,506 |
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
| (131,125) |
| (125,344) |
| (98,495) |
| (14,148) |
Selling expenses |
| (15,393) |
| (22,931) |
| (17,144) |
| (2,463) |
General and administrative expenses |
| (30,045) |
| (34,400) |
| (29,779) |
| (4,277) |
Provision of doubtful accounts | (2,093) | 688 | (5,351) | (769) | ||||
Other operating expenses |
| (42,055) |
| (89,767) |
| (66,969) |
| (9,619) |
Government subsidies |
| 1,300 |
| 2,815 |
| 14,696 |
| 2,111 |
Total operating costs and expenses |
| (219,411) |
| (268,939) |
| (203,042) |
| (29,165) |
Income from operations: |
| (106,811) |
| (33,868) |
| 85,911 |
| 12,341 |
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net Revenues. For lending and other businesses, our net revenues were RMB289.0 million (US$41.5 million) for the year ended December 31, 2019, a 22.9% increase from RMB235.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, mainly due to cumulative effect of loan previously originated.
Operating Costs and Expenses. For lending and other businesses, our operating costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were RMB203.0 million (US$29.2 million), a 24.5% decrease from 2018, primarily due to the optimization of our employee structure starting from 2019. Operating costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily consisted of compensation and benefits of RMB98.5 million (US$14.1 million), selling expenses of RMB17.1 million (US$2.5 million), general and administrative expenses of RMB35.1 million (US$5.0 million) and other operating expenses of RMB67.0 million (US$9.6 million).
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net Revenues. For lending and other businesses, our net revenues were RMB235.1 million (US$34.2 million) for the year ended December 31, 2018, a 108.8% increase from RMB112.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, mainly due to the growth of the lending services business.
Operating Costs and Expenses. For lending and other businesses, our operating costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 were RMB268.9 million, an increase of 22.6% from the year ended December 31, 2017. Operating costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily consisted of compensation and benefits of RMB125.3 million, selling expenses of RMB22.9 million, general and administrative expenses of RMB33.7 million and other operating expenses of RMB89.8 million.
105
Inflation
Since our inception, inflation in China has not materially impacted our results of operations. According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the year-over-year percentage increase in the consumer price index for 2017, 2018 and 2019 was 2.5%, 2.1% and 2.9%, respectively. Although we have not been materially affected by inflation in the past, we cannot assure you that we will not be affected in the future by higher rates of inflation in China. For example, certain operating costs and expenses, such as personnel expenses, rental expenses, travel expenses and office operating expenses may increase as a result of higher inflation. Additionally, because a substantial portion of our assets consists of cash and cash equivalents, high inflation could significantly reduce the value and purchasing power of these assets. We are not able to hedge our exposure to higher inflation in China.
Foreign Currency
The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and RMB has increased from RMB6.8755 per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2018 to RMB6.9618 per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2019. We have not hedged exposures to exchange fluctuations using any hedging instruments. See also “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors – Risks Related to Doing Business in China – Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk – Foreign Exchange Risk.”
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Credit Losses, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which has subsequently been amended by ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05, ASU 2019-10. ASU 2019-11 and ASU 2020-03. This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today’s incurred loss approach with an expected loss model for instruments measured at amortized cost. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. This ASU is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. We will adopt the guidance on January 1, 2020 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 eliminate the requirements to disclose the amount and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements, and policy for timing of transfers between levels. ASU 2018-13 also provides clarification in the measurement uncertainty disclosure by explaining that the disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. In addition, ASU 2018-13 added the following requirements: changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period; and range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements. Finally, ASU 2018-13 updated language to further encourage entities to apply materiality when considering de minimus for disclosure requirements. The guidance will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with the exception of amendments to changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used for Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty which will be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We will adopt the guidance on January 1, 2020 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
106
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, a new accounting standard update to simplify the accounting for income taxes. The new guidance removes certain exceptions for recognizing deferred taxes for investments, performing intra period allocation and calculating income taxes in interim periods. It also adds guidance to reduce complexity in certain areas, including recognizing deferred taxes for tax goodwill and allocating taxes to members of a consolidated group. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2021. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
B. | Liquidity and Capital Resources |
We finance our operations primarily through cash generated from our operating activities. Our principal use of cash for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were for operating and investing activities. In addition, we used RMB31.3 million, nil and nil to repurchase our ADSs in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, we had RMB4,387.3 million (US$630.2 million) in cash and cash equivalents, consisting of cash on hand and demand deposits which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use. We believe that our current cash and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs, including our cash needs for at least the next 12 months. We may, however, need additional capital in the future due to unanticipated business condition or other future development, including any investments or acquisitions we may pursue.
In February 2015, we issued five-year convertible notes with US$80 million in aggregate principal at a rate of 3.5% per annum. The notes were convertible at the holders’ option with an initial conversion price of US$23.03 per ADS. As of the date of this annual report, all notes had been in exchange for 3,473,730 ADSs.
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| 628,383 |
| 1,029,386 |
| 1,288,233 |
| 185,042 |
Net cash used in investing activities |
| (833,857) |
| (395,677) |
| (182,012) |
| (26,144) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
| (791,789) |
| 109,825 |
| 543,311 |
| 78,042 |
Effect of exchange rate changes |
| (79,494) |
| 56,304 |
| 37,811 |
| 5,432 |
Net increases in cash and cash equivalents |
| (1,076,757) |
| 799,838 |
| 1,687,343 |
| 242,372 |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period |
| 2,983,510 |
| 1,906,753 |
| 2,706,591 |
| 388,777 |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period |
| 1,906,753 |
| 2,706,591 |
| 4,393,934 |
| 631,149 |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2019 was RMB1,288.2 million (US$185.0 million), primarily as a result of net income of RMB863.8 million (US$124.1 million), adjusted by changes in working capital in the amount of RMB15.6 million (US$2.2 million) and non-cash charges from operating activities of RMB313.3 million (US$45.0 million), which primarily included provision for loan losses and other receivables of RMB130.7 million (US$18.8 million), depreciation and amortization of RMB105.4 million (US$15.1 million), provision for investment losses of RMB104.4 million (US$15.0 million), share-based compensation expenses of RMB94.9 million (US$13.6 million) and noncash lease expenses of RMB85.4 million (US$12.3 million), partially offset by income from equity in affiliates of RMB115.8 million (US$16.6 million) and payment arising from operating leases in the amount of RMB84.1 million (US$12.1 million).
107
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2018 was RMB1,029.4 million, primarily as a result of net income of RMB803.7 million, adjusted by changes in working capital in the amount of RMB122.6 million and non-cash charges from operating activities of RMB103.0 million, which primarily included share-based compensation expenses of RMB112.8 million and depreciation and amortization of RMB92.3 million, partially offset by amortization of unearned income for financial lease of RMB62.3 million and income from the disposal of one subsidiary in the amount of RMB31.2 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2017 was RMB628.4 million, primarily as a result of net income of RMB761.9 million, adjusted by non-cash charges from operating activities of RMB74.0 million, which primarily included share-based compensation expenses of RMB93.7 million and depreciation and amortization of RMB82.0 million, partially offset by income from equity in affiliates of RMB92.1 million.
We typically receive most of our one-time commissions and recurring service fees within several months after they are accrued. Our accounts receivable amounted to RMB175.5 million, RMB282.4 million, RMB219.6 million (US$31.5 million) as of December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019, respectively. Our amounts due from related parties amounted to RMB515.5 million, RMB572.2 million and RMB548.7 million (US$78.8 million) as of December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The increase in amounts due from related parties was primarily due to increasing revenues from funds managed by Gopher Asset Management.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2019 was RMB182.0 million (US$26.1 million), primarily attributable to net purchase of investments held by our consolidated funds in the amount of RMB346.9 million (US$49.8 million), net loans disbursement to third parties in the amount of RMB93.0 million (US$13.4 million), purchase of held-to-maturity investments in the amount of RMB74.5 million (US$10.7 million) and RMB65.3 million (US$9.4 million) of purchases of property and equipment, which was partially offset by RMB231.2 million (US$33.2 million) proceeds from sale of other long-term investments, RMB115.2 million (US$16.6 million) proceeds from disposal of subsidiaries and RMB57.6 million (US$8.3 million) cash inflow for capital return from investments in affiliates.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2018 was RMB395.7 million, primarily attributable to RMB946.5 million of investment in affiliates, RMB197.2 million for purchase of long-term investment and RMB128.2 million of purchases of property and equipment, which was partially offset by RMB117.5 million net cash inflow from collection of loans originated to third parties, RMB135.0 million net cash inflow for held-to-maturity securities and RMB53.6 million net cash inflow for available-for-sale investment, and RMB605.6million cash inflow for capital gains from investment in affiliates.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2017 was RMB833.9 million, primarily attributable to a net RMB653.6 million in originated loans disbursement to third parties, RMB371.9 million for purchase of long-term investment, RMB342.0 million of investment in affiliates, and RMB152.7 million of purchases of property and equipment, which was partially offset by RMB500.0 million cash inflow by loan receivables from factoring business net of purchases and collections, RMB79.6 million net cash inflow for held-to-maturity securities, RMB58.0 million net cash inflow for available-for-sale investment, and RMB49.1million cash inflow for capital return from investment in affiliates.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was RMB543.3 million (US$78.0 million) in 2019 due to the net contributions from non-controlling interests of subsidiaries of RMB518.6 million (US$74.5 million), and proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares upon the exercise of stock options of RMB31.7 million (US$4.6 million).
Net cash provided by financing activities was RMB109.8 million (US$16.0 million) in 2018 due to the net contributions from non-controlling interests of subsidiaries of RMB63.9 million (US$9.3 million), and proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares upon the exercise of stock options of RMB45.9 million (US$6.7 million).
108
Net cash used in financing activities was RMB791.8 million in 2017 due to the net outflow related to the transfer of the right to factoring receivables of RMB500 million, repurchase of Sequoia’s investment in Gopher Asset Management of RMB343.3 million, share repurchase of RMB31.3 million and partly offset by net contributions from non-controlling interests of subsidiaries of RMB33.2 million, proceeds of prepayment from an investor of RMB30.0 million and proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted shares of RMB19.7 million.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures were RMB152.7 million, RMB128.2 million and RMB65.3 million (US$9.4 million) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. We currently do not have any commitment for capital expenditures or other cash requirements outside of our ordinary course of business.
Holding Company Structure
We are a holding company, and we may rely significantly on dividends and other distributions by our PRC subsidiaries for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders and pay any debt we may incur. If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to adjust our taxable income under the contractual arrangements Noah Group currently has in place with our variable interest entity in a manner that would materially and adversely affect its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us.
Our PRC subsidiaries are permitted to pay dividends to us only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC laws, each of our PRC subsidiaries and our variable interest entities are required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of its registered capital. Although the statutory reserves can be used, among other ways, to increase the registered capital and eliminate future losses in excess of retained earnings of the respective companies, the reserve funds are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of liquidation. As a result of these PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiaries are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets, including general reserve and registered capital, either in the form of dividends, loans or advances. Such restricted portion amounted to RMB1,773.4 million and RMB1,771.6 million (US$254.5 million) as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The restricted assets of our variable interest entity amounted to RMB627.6 million and RMB655.5 million (US$94.2 million) as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
Furthermore, cash transfers from our PRC subsidiaries to our subsidiaries outside of China are subject to PRC government control of currency conversion. Restrictions on the availability of foreign currency may affect the ability of our PRC subsidiaries and variable interest entity to remit sufficient foreign currency to pay dividends or other payments to us, or otherwise satisfy their foreign currency denominated obligations. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—PRC foreign exchange control regulations restricting the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies may limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.”
C. | Research and Development, Intellectual Property |
Research and Development
None.
Intellectual Property
See “Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Intellectual Property”.
109
D. | Trend Information |
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for the year 2019 that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our net revenues, income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that are reasonably likely to cause the disclosed financial information to be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial conditions.
E. | Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
We have not entered into any financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. In addition, we have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our own shares and classified as equity, or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. Moreover, we do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.
F. | Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations |
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||
More | ||||||||||
Less than | than 5 | |||||||||
Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years |
| years | |||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 | |
Operating Lease |
| 405,327 |
| 97,825 |
| 164,899 |
| 119,186 |
| 23,417 |
G. | Safe Harbor |
See “Forward-Looking Statements” on page 2 of this annual report.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. | Directors and Senior Management |
The following table sets forth information regarding our directors and executive officers as of the date of this annual report.
Directors and Executive Officers |
| Age |
| Position/Title |
Jingbo Wang |
| 47 |
| Co-founder, Chairwoman and chief executive officer |
Zhe Yin |
| 45 |
| Co-founder, director and chief executive officer of Gopher Asset Management |
Chia-Yue Chang |
| 59 |
| Director |
Neil Nanpeng Shen |
| 52 |
| Director |
Boquan He |
| 59 |
| Independent director |
May Yihong Wu |
| 52 |
| Independent director |
Tze-Kaing Yang |
| 65 |
| Independent director |
Jinbo Yao |
| 43 |
| Independent director |
Zhiwu Chen |
| 57 |
| Independent director |
Yi Zhao |
| 47 |
| President |
Qing Pan | 45 | Chief financial officer (from November 2019 to date) | ||
Shang Yan Chuang |
| 38 |
| Chief financial officer (until November 2019) |
Yang Gao |
| 40 |
| Chief operating officer |
110
Ms. Jingbo Wang is our co-founder and has been our Chairwoman of board of directors and chief executive officer since our inception. She won Top 30 Most Influential Business Woman in China award in 2019 by ICEO. In 2017, Ms. Wang was listed on Forbes’ China Top 100 Businesswomen and China Best Listed-Company Female CEOs. In 2018, she was recognized as an Outstanding Leader of the Year by Wealth APAC, and received International Women’s Entrepreneurial Challenge Award from IWEC Foundation. Ms. Wang has over twenty years of experience in wealth management and asset management industries. Prior to co-founding our company, from May 2000 to September 2005, Ms. Wang worked in several departments and affiliates of Xiangcai Securities, a securities firm in China. Ms. Wang served as head of private banking department at Xiangcai Securities from August 2003 to September 2005, where she established the securities firm’s wealth management business. Prior to that, she worked as deputy head of ABN AMRO Xiangcai Fund Management, a joint venture fund management company, from February 2002 to August 2003, and head of asset management department at Xiangcai Securities from May 2000 to February 2002. Ms. Wang was financial controller and general manager for the settlement center of Chengpu Group from September 1994 to December 1999. Ms. Wang received her master’s degree in management and her bachelor’s degree in economics from Sichuan University in China. Ms. Wang also graduated from Global CEO Program of China Europe International Business School in 2009. Since 2016, she has been studying in Hupan University, a non-profit business school co-founded by nine well-known Chinese entrepreneurs and scholars, with Jack Ma, Chairman of Alibaba Group (NYSE: BABA), as the first and current principal.
Mr. Zhe Yin is our co-founder and has been our director since our inception. He is also chief executive officer of Gopher Asset Management. Mr. Yin has over 16 years of experience in wealth management and asset management industries. Mr. Yin is Co-Chairman of China’s Fund of Funds Association, and has been named as one of the Top 30 Chinese Private Equity Investor 2018 by CV Info, one of the Top 50 Chinese Influential PE Investors by CVCRI, as well as “Top 10 Market Leaders in Chinese Fund of Fund Industry” by FOF Weekly. Prior to co-founding our company, Mr. Yin was the deputy general manager of the wealth management department at Xiangcai Securities from November 2003 to September 2005. Prior to that, he worked at Bank of Communications of China from July 1997 to November 2003. Mr. Yin received his bachelor’s degree in economics from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics in 1997, and graduated with an Executive MBA degree from China Europe International Business School in 2010.
Ms. Chia-Yue Chang has been our director since August 2007 and the general manager of Noah Upright since 2011. Ms. Chang has over 30 years of experience in asset management industry. Ms. Chang was chief executive officer for Greater China and South East Asia regions of Robeco Hong Kong Ltd. from October 2007 to June 2011. From 2004 to 2006, she served as China chief executive officer and senior vice president of ABN AMRO Asset Management Asia Ltd. During the same period, she was chairwoman of ABN AMRO Xiangcai Fund Management Co., Ltd. from 2004 to 2005, and then vice chairwoman of ABN AMRO TEDA Fund Management Co., Ltd from 2005 to 2006. From 2000 to 2004, she was president of ABN AMRO Asset Management in Taiwan. Prior to that, she worked at Kwang Hua Securities Investment & Trust Co., Ltd. and entities affiliated with Jardine Fleming Investment in Taiwan. Ms. Chang received her master degree in library science from University of California, Los Angeles and her bachelor’s degree in library science from National Taiwan University.
Mr. Neil Nanpeng Shen has been our director since January 2016. Mr. Shen is the founding managing partner of Sequoia Capital China. Prior to founding Sequoia Capital China, Mr. Shen co-founded Trip.com Group Ltd (Nasdaq: TCOM), formerly Ctrip.com International, Ltd. (Nasdaq: CTRP), or Ctrip, a leading travel service provider in China, in 1999. Mr. Shen served as Ctrip’s president from August 2003 to October 2005 and as chief financial officer from 2000 to October 2005. Mr. Shen also co-founded and served as non-executive Co-Chairman of Homeinns Hotel Group, a leading economy hotel chain in China, which commenced operations in July 2002. Currently, Mr. Shen also serves as a director of a number of public and private companies, including Ctrip, Pinduoduo Inc. (NASDAQ: PDD), Meituan Dianping (HKEx: 03690) and China Renaissance Holdings Limited (HKEx: 01911). Mr. Shen received his Bachelor’s degree from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and his Master’s degree from Yale University.
111
Mr. Boquan He has been our director since August 2007 and has served as our independent director since October 2011. Mr. He is the founder and chairman of the board of directors of Guangdong Nowaday Investment Co., Ltd., a private investment company specializing in greenfield investments in the Chinese retail and service industries. In 1989, he founded and, until 2002, served as the chief executive officer of Robust Group, a food and beverage company, which is now a member of Danone Group. He also serves as the chairman or vice chairman of the board of directors of several privately owned companies in China. Mr. He graduated from Guangdong Television Public University in China.
Ms. May Yihong Wu has served as our independent director since November 2010. Ms. Wu has served as the Board Adviser of Home Inns Hotel Group, a leading economy hotel operator in China and listed on the NASDAQ Global Market until April 2016, and now a subsidiary of BTG Home Inns Group, listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange. Ms. Wu is an independent director, and chairwoman of the audit committee of Swire Properties (1972.HK), a leading real estate developer and manager based in Hong Kong. She joined Swire Properties’ board in May 2017. Since January 2019, Ms. Wu has also served as a director of AAFE (Asian Americans for Equality), a non-profit organization dedicated to affordable housing and community development. From September 2010 to July 2013, she was an independent director, a member of the audit committee and the corporate governance and nomination committee of Country Style Cooking Restaurant Chain Co., Ltd., a NYSE listed company at that time. From August 2008 to April 2012, she was an independent director and chairwoman of the audit committee of E-House (China) Holdings Limited, a NYSE listed company at that time. Ms. Wu was the chief strategy officer of Home Inns from May 2010 to June 2019, and chief financial officer of Home Inns from July 2006 to April 2010. From January 2005 to March 2006, Ms. Wu was the first vice president at Schroder Investment Management North America Inc., and a vice president from January 2003 to December 2004, responsible for investment research and management of various funds specializing in the consumer and service sectors. Ms. Wu holds a bachelor’s degree from Fudan University in China, a master’s degree from Brooklyn College at the City University of New York and an MBA degree from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.
Mr. Tze-Kaing Yang has served as our independent director and the chairperson of our audit committee since May 2015. Mr. Yang is currently the Chairman and CEO of Yangtze Associates, a venture capital and private equity fund management company in Taiwan. He also serves as the director of ASUSTeK Computer, Pegatron, Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation, and the independent director of ASRock and DBS Bank (Taiwan). Mr. Yang was previously the Deputy Minister of Finance in Taiwan, managing director and acting chairman of Bank of Taiwan, president of China Development Industrial Bank. He was also the executive secretary of National Development Fund in Taiwan. Mr. Yang holds an MBA degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Ph.D. in Business Administration from National Chengchi University in Taiwan. Mr. Yang was an adjunct professor at the Guanghua School of Management in Peking University and now teaches investment banking and venture capital courses in the MBA Program at National Chengchi University in Taiwan.
Mr. Jinbo Yao has been our independent director since November 2014. Mr. Yao is the founder, chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of 58.com Inc., a leading Internet company in China listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 2013 (NYSE: WUBA), and the CEO of ganji.com, which is a leading online classifieds platform in China. Mr. Yao is a pioneer in China’s Internet industry. Prior to founding 58.com, in 2000 Mr. Yao founded domain.cn, a domain name transaction and value-added service website in China. After domain.cn was acquired by net.cn in September 2000, Mr. Yao served in various managerial roles at net.cn including vice president of sales until 2005. In 2001, Mr. Yao co-founded the education company Xueda Education Group, which went public on New York Stock Exchange in November 2010 (NYSE: XUE). Mr. Yao received his bachelor’s degrees in computer science and chemistry from Ocean University of China (formerly known as Ocean University of Qingdao) in 1999.
112
Professor Zhiwu Chen has served as our independent director since January 2014 and is a director of the Asia Global Institute, Chair Professor of Finance and the Victor and William Fung Professor in Economics at the University of Hong Kong. Professor Chen is a former professor of finance at Yale University from 1999 to 2017. He was also a special-term visiting professor at Peking University (School of Economics) and Tsinghua University (School of Social Sciences). Professor Chen has received research awards including the Graham and Dodd Award (2013), the Pacesetter Research Award (1999), the Merton Miller Prize (1994), and the Chicago Board Options Exchange Competitive Research Award (1994). In Burson-Marsteller’s 2012 “G20 Influencers” report, Professor Chen was listed as one of the top ten political influencers in China. Professor Chen is on the International Advisory Board of the CSRC. He was a board director at PetroChina (2011-17) and Bank of Communications (2010-18). He was a co-founder and partner of Zebra Capital Management from 2001 to 2011. Professor Chen received his Ph.D. in financial economics from Yale University in 1990; a master degree in systems engineering from Changsha Institute of Technology in 1986; and a bachelor’s degree in computer science from Central-South University in 1983.
Mr. Yi Zhao has been our president since March 2019. Prior to that, he led Noah’s wealth management business from 2013 and implemented a number of important strategies including enhancing management of our sales network and creating an elite relationship manager program. Mr. Zhao has more than twenty years of experience in financial services industry. . Before joining Noah, he worked for several insurance companies, including Ping An Insurance, AXA-Minmetals Assurance, and Great Wall Life Insurance. Mr. Zhao received his Bachelor’s Degree from Shenyang Sports University.
Mr. Shang Yan Chuang was our former chief financial officer from September 2016 to November 2019. Mr. Chuang has over 16 years of experience in financial services. In March 2011, he joined Noah as a Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Development. In 2012, he founded Noah Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited, one of our major businesses, and served as its executive director and chief executive officer until January 2016. Prior to joining Noah, Mr. Chuang worked at Bank of America Merrill Lynch in Investment Banking Division and Asia Private Equity Division from 2003 to 2011 based in Hong Kong. Mr. Chuang was listed as 2018 Top 10 CFO of Capital Operations in China by Renmin Business School and China CFO Development Center. Mr. Chuang graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Stern School of Business at New York University
Mr. Qing Pan has been our Chief Financial Officer since November 2019. Prior to taking this role, he spent two and a half years serving as the Chief Operating Officer of Gopher Asset Management, Noah’s wholly-owned asset management subsidiary, overseeing fund operations, and led several specialized teams including finance, due diligence, credit rating as well as valuation. As a veteran in the investment and finance community, Mr. Pan spent 17 years with Deloitte as an audit partner before joining Noah. He was also a former member of the accounting research division at Deloitte’s headquarter in the US. He led several Chinese companies’ US listings across various industries. Mr. Pan is certified in public accounting in the US, China, and Hong Kong. He holds a BA degree from Beijing Foreign Studies University in Beijing, China, and MS/MBA from Northeastern University in Boston, the US.
Ms. Yang Gao has been our chief operating officer since August 2018. Ms. Gao has more than 15 years of experience in financial and operating management. She joined Noah in June 2011 and served as the general manager of the public affairs department of the company. From 2015 to 2018, she was the chief operating officer of Noah’s wealth management business. Prior to joining Noah, she worked with the taxation management department of Shanda Group for seven years. Ms. Yang Gao received her bachelor’s degree from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics.
113
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our executive officers. We may terminate an executive officer’s employment for cause at any time without remuneration for certain acts of the officer, such as a crime resulting in a criminal conviction, willful misconduct or gross negligence to our detriment, a material breach of the employment agreement or of our corporate and business policies and procedures, or providing services for other entities without our consent. We may also terminate an executive officer’s employment by giving one month’s notice or by paying a one-time compensation fee equal to one month’s salary in lieu of such notice under certain circumstances, such as a failure by such officer to perform agreed-upon duties or the impracticability of the performance caused by a material change of circumstances. An executive officer may terminate his or her employment at any time by giving one month’s notice or immediately if we delay in the payment of remuneration, fail to pay social security fees, or fail to provide the necessary working conditions for such officer.
Each executive officer, under his or her employment agreement with us, has agreed to hold any trade secrets, proprietary information, inventions or technical secrets of our company in strict confidence during and after his or her employment. Each officer also agrees that we shall own all the intellectual property developed by such officer during his or her employment. If an officer breaches the above contractual obligations in relation with confidentiality and intellectual property, we are entitled to collect damages from such officer equal to two months’ salary for such officer as well as to seek compensation of our actual losses.
Each officer also agrees to refrain from competing with us, directly or indirectly, for two years after his or her termination of employment.
B. | Compensation |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we paid an aggregate of approximately RMB31.1 million (US$4.5 million) in cash to our directors and executive officers. We have not set aside or accrued any amount to provide pension, retirement or other similar benefits to our executive officers and directors. Our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs are required by law to make contributions equal to certain percentages of each employee’s salary for his or her pension insurance, medical insurance, unemployment insurance and other statutory benefits and a housing provident fund.
Share Incentive Plans
We currently grant share incentive awards pursuant to our 2017 Share Incentive Plan, or the 2017 Plan. We previously granted awards under our 2008 Share Incentive Plan, or the 2008 Plan, and 2010 Share Incentive Plan, or the 2010 Plan, until those plans were terminated upon the adoption of the 2017 Plan. The purpose of our share incentive plans is to attract and retain the best available personnel by linking the personal interests of the members of the board, officers, employees, and consultants to the success of our business and by providing such individuals with an incentive for outstanding performance to generate superior returns for our shareholders.
The 2017 Plan
Under the 2017 Plan, the maximum number of shares in respect of which options, restricted shares, or restricted share units and other forms of share awards may be granted is 2,800,000 Class A ordinary shares. As of March 31, 2020, there were 94,850 options to purchase Class A ordinary shares outstanding, and 92,218 restricted shares had been issued and were outstanding under the 2017 Plan .
Types of Awards. The following briefly describes the principal features of the various awards that may be granted under the 2017 Plan.
● | Options. Options provide for the right to purchase a specified number of our Class A ordinary shares at a specified price and usually will become exercisable at the discretion of our plan administrator in installments after the grant date. The option exercise price shall be paid in cash. |
114
● | Restricted Shares. A restricted share award is the grant of our Class A ordinary shares which are subject to certain restrictions and may be subject to risk of forfeiture. Unless otherwise determined by our plan administrator, a restricted share is nontransferable and may be forfeited or repurchased by us upon termination of employment or service during a restricted period. Our plan administrator may also impose other restrictions on the restricted shares, such as limitations on the right to vote or the right to receive dividends. |
● | Restricted Share Units. A restricted share unit is a grant valued in terms of our Class A ordinary shares, but shares are not issued at the time of the grant. After the recipient of a unit satisfies the vesting requirement, we will distribute shares or the cash equivalent of the number of shares used to value the unit, depending on the terms of the award. Vesting requirements are determined by our plan administrator. |
● | Share Appreciation Right. A share appreciation right is a right granted to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of a specified number of Class A ordinary shares on the date the award is exercised over the fair market value on the date the award was granted as set forth in the applicable award agreement. Vesting requirements are determined by our plan administrator. |
Plan Administration. The plan administrator is our board of directors, or a committee designated by our board of directors. The plan administrator will determine the provisions and terms and conditions of each grant.
Offer Letter. Options or restricted shares granted under the plan are evidenced by an offer letter that sets forth the terms, conditions, and limitations for each grant.
Option Exercise Price. The exercise price subject to an option shall be determined by the plan administrator and set forth in the offer letter.
Eligibility. We may grant awards to our directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisers or those of any related entities.
Term of the Awards. The term of each grant of option or restricted shares shall be determined by the plan administrator.
Vesting Schedule. In general, the plan administrator determines the vesting schedule, which is set forth in the offer letter.
Transfer Restrictions. Awards for options may not be transferred to any third party in any manner by the award holders and may be exercised only by such holders.
Termination. Unless terminated earlier, the 2017 Plan will terminate automatically on December 29, 2027. Our board of directors has the authority to amend or terminate the plan. However, no such action may adversely affect in any material way any awards previously granted unless agreed by the recipient.
115
The following table summarizes, as of Mach 31, 2020, the outstanding options granted to our executive officers, directors, and other individuals as a group under the 2017 plan.
| Class A |
|
|
| ||||
| Ordinary |
| ||||||
| Shares |
| Exercise | |||||
| Underlying |
| Price - | |||||
| Options | (US$/ | ||||||
Name |
| Awarded |
| Share) |
| Date of Grant |
| Date of Expiration |
Jingbo Wang |
| * |
| 37.63 | September 1, 2018 | September 1, 2028 | ||
Zhe Yin |
| * |
| 37.63 | September 1, 2018 | September 1, 2028 | ||
Chia-Yue Chang |
| * |
| 37.63 | September 1, 2018 | September 1, 2028 | ||
Qing Pan |
| * |
| 37.63 | September 1, 2018 | September 1, 2028 | ||
Yang Gao |
| * |
| 37.63 | September 1, 2018 | September 1, 2028 | ||
Yi Zhao |
| * |
| 37.63 | September 1, 2018 | September 1, 2028 | ||
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * |
| 37.63 | September 1, 2018 | September 1, 2028 |
Notes:
* | Less than 1% of our total outstanding share capital. |
The following table summarizes, as of March 31, 2020, the outstanding restricted shares issued to our executive officers, directors, and other individuals as a group under the 2017 plan.
Name |
| Restricted Shares |
| Date of Issuance |
Jingbo Wang |
| * | September 1, 2018 | |
Zhe Yin |
| * | September 1, 2018 | |
Chia-Yue Chang |
| * | September 1, 2018 | |
Yang Gao |
| * | September 1, 2018 | |
Yi Zhao |
| * | September 1, 2018 | |
Qing Pan |
| * | September 1, 2018 | |
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * | September 1, 2018 | |
Zhiwu Chen |
| * | December 14, 2017 | |
Jinbo Yao |
| * | October 11, 2018 | |
May Yihong Wu |
| * | November 16, 2018 | |
Tze-Kaing Yang | * | August 29, 2019 | ||
Zhiwu Chen | * | December 14, 2019 |
Notes:
* | Less than 1% of our total outstanding share capital. |
The 2010 Plan
Although the 2010 Plan has been terminated, the outstanding awards previously granted under that plan remain effective and will continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of the 2010 Plan. As of Mach 31, 2020, options to purchase an aggregate of 428,893 Class A ordinary shares have been granted and were outstanding and 28,888 restricted shares have been issued and were outstanding under the 2010 Plan.
116
The following table summarizes, as of Mach 31, 2020, the outstanding options granted to our executive officers, directors, and other individuals as a group under the 2010 plan.
Class A | ||||||||
Ordinary | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise | |||||||
Underlying | Price | |||||||
Options | (US$/ | |||||||
Name |
| Awarded |
| Share) |
| Date of Grant |
| Date of Expiration |
May Yihong Wu |
| * |
| 31.10 | February 25, 2014 | February 25, 2024 | ||
Jingbo Wang |
| * |
| 27.82 | April 15, 2014 | April 15, 2024 | ||
Yi Zhao |
| * |
| 27.82 | April 15, 2014 | April 15, 2024 | ||
May Yihong Wu |
| * |
| 26.86 | May 7, 2014 | May 7, 2024 | ||
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * |
| 27.82 | April 15, 2014 | April 15, 2024 | ||
Jingbo Wang |
| * |
| 34.74 | May 5, 2015 | May 5, 2025 | ||
Zhe Yin |
| * |
| 34.74 | May 5, 2015 | May 5, 2025 | ||
Chia-Yue Chang |
| * |
| 34.74 | May 5, 2015 | May 5, 2025 | ||
Yi Zhao |
| * |
| 34.74 | May 5, 2015 | May 5, 2025 | ||
Yang Gao |
| * |
| 34.74 | May 5, 2015 | May 5, 2025 | ||
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * |
| 34.74 | May 5, 2015 | May 5, 2025 | ||
Jingbo Wang |
| * |
| 38.72 | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2026 | ||
Zhe Yin |
| * |
| 38.72 | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2026 | ||
Chia-Yue Chang |
| * |
| 38.72 | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2026 | ||
Yi Zhao |
| * |
| 38.72 | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2026 | ||
Yang Gao |
| * |
| 38.72 | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2026 | ||
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * |
| 38.72 | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2026 | ||
Jingbo Wang |
| * |
| 45.84 | July 1, 2017 | July 1, 2027 | ||
Zhe Yin |
| * |
| 45.84 | July 1, 2017 | July 1, 2027 | ||
Chia-Yue Chang |
| * |
| 45.84 | July 1, 2017 | July 1, 2027 | ||
Yi Zhao |
| * |
| 45.84 | July 1, 2017 | July 1, 2027 | ||
Qing Pan | * | 45.84 | April 20, 2017 | April 20, 2027 | ||||
Yang Gao |
| * |
| 45.84 | July 1, 2017 | July 1, 2027 | ||
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * |
| 45.84 | July 1, 2017 | July 1, 2027 |
Notes:
* | Less than 1% of our total outstanding share capital. |
The following table summarizes, as of March 31, 2020, the outstanding restricted shares issued to our executive officers, directors, and other individuals as a group under the 2010 plan.
Restricted | ||||
Name |
| Shares |
| Date of Issuance |
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * | July 1, 2016 | |
Jingbo Wang |
| * | July 1, 2017 | |
Zhe Yin |
| * | July 1, 2017 | |
Chia-Yue Chang |
| * | July 1, 2017 | |
Yang Gao |
| * | July 1, 2017 | |
Yi Zhao |
| * | July 1, 2017 | |
Qing Pan |
| * | April 20, 2017 | |
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * | July 1, 2017 |
Notes:
* | Less than 1% of our total outstanding share capital. |
117
The 2008 Plan
Although the 2008 Plan has been terminated, the outstanding awards previously granted under that plan remain effective and will continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of the 2008 Plan. As of March 31, 2020 options to purchase an aggregate number of 8,444 Class A ordinary shares have been granted and were outstanding, and no restricted shares were issued and outstanding under the 2008 Plan.
The following table summarizes, as of March 31, 2020, the outstanding options granted to our executive officers, directors, and other individuals as a group under the 2008 plan.
Class A | ||||||||
Ordinary | ||||||||
Shares | ||||||||
Underlying | Exercise | |||||||
Options | Price | |||||||
Name |
| Awarded |
| (US$/Share) |
| Date of Grant |
| Date of Expiration |
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * |
| 7.38 | July 20, 2010 |
| July 20, 2020 | |
Other Individuals as a Group |
| * |
| 12.12 | ** | October 18, 2010 |
| October 18, 2020 |
Notes:
*Less than 1% of our total outstanding share capital.
**On January 16, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a modification of the exercise price from US$19.00 to US$12.12 per ordinary share with other terms and conditions unchanged.
C. | Board Practices |
Board of Directors
Our board of directors consists of nine directors. A director is not required to hold any shares in our company to qualify to serve as a director. A director who is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, interested in a contract or proposed contract with our company is required to declare the nature of his interest at a meeting of our directors and may vote with respect to any contract, proposed contract or arrangement notwithstanding that he is interested therein, and if he does so his vote shall be counted and he may be counted in the quorum at any meeting of our directors at which such contract or proposed contract or arrangement is considered. Our board of directors may exercise all the powers of our company to borrow money and to mortgage or charge its undertaking, property and uncalled capital or any part thereof, and to issue debentures, debenture stock and other securities whenever money is borrowed or as security for any debt, liability or obligation of our company or of any third party. The remuneration to be paid to the directors is determined by the board of directors. There is no age limit requirement for directors.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a corporate governance and nominating committee under the board of directors in November 2010. We adopted a charter for each of the three committees. Each committee’s members and functions are described below.
118
Audit Committee. Our audit committee consists of Mr. Tze-Kaing Yang, Mr. Zhiwu Chen and Ms. May Yihong Wu, and is chaired by Mr. Tze-Kaing Yang. Each member of our audit committee satisfies the “independence” requirements of Section 303A of the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE and meet the independence standards under Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. We have determined that each member of our audit committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.” The audit committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the financial statements of our company. The audit committee is responsible for, among other things:
● | selecting the independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approving all auditing and non-auditing services permitted to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm; |
● | reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response; |
● | discussing the annual audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm; |
● | reviewing major issues as to the adequacy of our internal controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies; |
● | annually reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of our audit committee charter; |
● | meeting separately and periodically with management and the independent registered public accounting firm; |
● | reporting regularly to the board. |
● | reviewing and approving certain proposed related party transactions, as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. |
Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee consists of Ms. May Yihong Wu, Mr. Tze-Kaing Yang and Mr. Boquan He, and is chaired by Ms. May Yihong Wu. Each member of our compensation committee satisfies the “independence” requirements of Section 303A of the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE. The compensation committee assists the board in reviewing and approving the compensation structure, including all forms of compensation, relating to our directors and executive officers. Our chief executive officer may not be present at any committee meeting during which her compensation is deliberated upon. The compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:
● | reviewing the total compensation package for our most senior executives and making recommendations to the board with respect to it; |
● | approving and overseeing the total compensation package for our executives other than the three most senior executives; |
● | reviewing the compensation of our directors and making recommendations to the board with respect to it; and |
● | periodically reviewing and approving any long-term incentive compensation or equity plans, programs or similar arrangements, annual bonuses, and employee pension and welfare benefit plans. |
119
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Our corporate governance and nominating committee consists of Ms. May Yihong Wu, Mr. Jinbo Yao and Mr. Zhiwu Chen, and is chaired by Mr. Zhiwu Chen. Each member of our corporate governance and nominating committee satisfies the “independence” requirements of Section 303A of the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE. The corporate governance and nominating committee assists the board of directors in identifying individuals qualified to become our directors and in determining the composition of the board and its committees. The corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for, among other things:
● | identifying and recommending to the board nominees for election or re-election to the board, or for appointment to fill any vacancy; |
● | reviewing annually with the board the current composition of the board in light of the characteristics of independence, age, skills, experience and availability of service to us; |
● | identifying and recommending to the board the directors to serve as members of the board’s committees; |
● | advising the board periodically with respect to significant developments in the law and practice of corporate governance as well as our compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and making recommendations to the board on all matters of corporate governance and on any corrective action to be taken; and |
● | monitoring compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics, including reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our procedures to ensure proper compliance. |
Duties of Directors
Under Cayman Islands law, our directors owe to us fiduciary duties, including a duty of loyalty, a duty to act honestly and a duty to act in what they consider in good faith to be in our best interests. Our directors also have a duty to exercise the skill they actually possess and such care and diligence that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. In fulfilling their duty of care to us, our directors must ensure compliance with our memorandum and articles of association. Our company has the right to seek damages if a duty owed by our directors, or any of them, is breached.
Terms of Directors and Officers
Our officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the board of directors. Our directors are not subject to a term of office and hold office until their resignation, death or incapacity or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified in accordance with our articles of association. A director may be removed from office at any time by an ordinary resolution of our shareholders. A director’s office will be vacated if the director (i) dies, becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors; (ii) is found to be or becomes of unsound mind; (iii) resigns his office by notice in writing to our company; or (iv) is removed from office pursuant to our memorandum and articles of association or the laws of Cayman Islands.
We have no service contracts with any of our directors that provide benefits to them upon termination.
120
D. | Employees |
We had 3,441 and 2,992 employees as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively, including 1,577 and 1,288 relationship managers during the same periods, respectively. The following table sets forth the number of our employees by business segments as of December 31, 2019:
Number of | |||||
Business Segments |
| Employees |
| % of Total |
|
Wealth management |
| 2,038 |
| 68.1 | |
Relationship managers |
| 1,288 |
| 43.0 | |
Asset management |
| 270 |
| 9.0 | |
Lending and other businesses |
| 142 |
| 4.7 | |
Overseas business |
| 184 |
| 6.1 | |
Administrative Support |
| 358 |
| 12.0 | |
Total |
| 2,992 |
| 100.0 | % |
As required by regulations in China, we participate in various employee social security plans that are organized by municipal and provincial governments, including pension, unemployment insurance, childbirth insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance and housing insurance. We are required under Chinese law to make contributions to employee benefit plans at specified percentages of the salaries, bonuses and certain allowances of our employees, up to a maximum amount specified by the local government from time to time.
We believe that we maintain a good working relationship with our employees and we have not experienced any significant labor disputes.
E. | Share Ownership |
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Class A ordinary shares, as of March 31, 2020, by:
● | each of our directors and executive officers; and |
● | each person known to us to own beneficially more than 5.0% of our ordinary shares. |
121
As of March 31, 2020, we had 30,817,640 ordinary shares outstanding on an as-converted basis, assuming all issued and outstanding Class B ordinary shares are converted into the same number of Class A ordinary shares. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we have included shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of this report, including through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right or the conversion of any other security. These shares, however, are not included in the computation of the percentage ownership of any other person.
Shares Beneficially | ||||||||||
Owned | ||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||
ordinary | % of | |||||||||
| Class A |
| Class B |
| shares an |
| aggregate | |||
ordinary | ordinary |
| as converted |
| voting | |||||
| shares |
| shares |
| basis |
| % |
| power | |
Directors and Executive Officers: | ||||||||||
Jingbo Wang(1) |
| 99,179 | 6,730,000 | 6,829,179 |
| 22.2 | 48.5 | |||
Zhe Yin(2) |
| 126,443 | 1,585,000 | 1,711,443 |
| 5.5 | 11.6 | |||
Boquan He(3) |
| 1,639,872 | — | 1,639,872 |
| 5.3 | 2.9 | |||
Chia-Yue Chang(4) |
| 2,060,351 | — | 2,060,351 |
| 6.7 | 3.7 | |||
Neil Nanpeng Shen(5) |
| 1,852,261 | — | 1,852,261 |
| 6.0 | 3.3 | |||
May Yihong Wu |
| * | — | * |
| * | * | |||
Tze-Kaing Yang |
| * | — | * |
| * | * | |||
Jinbo Yao |
| * | — | * |
| * | * | |||
Zhiwu Chen |
| * | — | * |
| * | * | |||
Yi Zhao |
| * | — | * |
| * | * | |||
Qing Pan |
| * | — | * |
| * | * | |||
Yang Gao |
| * | — | * |
| * | * | |||
All Directors and Officers as a Group |
| 5,995,908 | 8,315,000 | 14,310,908 |
| 46.4 | 70.4 | |||
Principal Shareholders: | ||||||||||
Jing Investors Co., Ltd.(6) |
| 99,179 | 6,730,000 | 6,829,179 |
| 22.2 | 48.5 | |||
Yiheng Capital Partners, L.P. (7) | 2,960,593 | — | 2,960,593 | 9.6 | 5.3 | |||||
Jia Investment Co., Ltd.(8) |
| 2,060,351 | — | 2,060,351 |
| 6.7 | 3.7 | |||
FIL Limited(9) | 1,946,120 | — | 1,946,120 | 6.3 | 3.5 | |||||
Investment funds affiliated with Sequoia Capital China(10) |
| 1,857,898 | — | 1,857,898 |
| 6.0 | 3.3 | |||
Yin Investment Co., Ltd.(11) |
| 126,443 | 1,585,000 | 1,711,443 |
| 5.5 | 11.6 | |||
Quan Investment Co., Ltd.(12) |
| 1,639,872 | — | 1,639,872 |
| 5.3 | 2.9 |
Notes:
* Less than 1% of our total outstanding ordinary shares.
(1) | Represents 6,813,108 ordinary shares and options to acquire ordinary shares owned by Jing Investors Co., Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned and controlled by Ms. Jingbo Wang. |
(2) | Represents 1,704,230 ordinary shares and options to acquire ordinary shares owned by Yin Investment Co., Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned and controlled by Mr. Zhe Yin. |
(3) | Represents 1,639,872 ordinary shares held by Quan Investment Co., Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned and controlled by Mr. Boquan He. |
(4) | Represents 2,053,730 ordinary shares and options to acquire ordinary shares owned by Jia Investment Co., Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned and controlled by Ms. Chia-Yue Chang |
(5) | Includes certain shares held by investment funds affiliated with Sequoia Capital China. See footnote 11 below. |
122
(6) | Jing Investors Co., Ltd. (“Jing Investors”) is a British Virgin Islands company indirectly wholly owned by Ark Trust (Hong Kong) Limited (“Ark Trust”) in its capacity as trustee of the Jing Family Trust (the “Trust”) constituted under the laws of Hong Kong, with Ms. Wang as the settlor and Ms. Wang and her family members as the beneficiaries. The Trust was established for the purposes of Ms. Wang’s wealth management and family succession planning. Jing Investors is directly wholly owned by Magic Beams Enterprises Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company, which is in turn wholly owned by Art Trust, a professional trustee company. Ark Trust as trustee of the Trust has no power to dispose of the ordinary shares held by Jing Investors except upon written instruction by Ms. Wang, or to avoid adverse impact on the reputation of Ark Trust or any of its associates. Jing Investors is the record owner of 6,813,108 ordinary shares. Ms. Wang is the sole director of Jing Investors and as such has power to vote and dispose of the ordinary shares held by Jing Investors. Ms. Wang is the beneficial owner of all the ordinary shares held by Jing Investors. The registered address of Jing Investors Co., Ltd. is Drake Chambers, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. |
(7) | Yiheng Capital Partners, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership managed by Yiheng Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Yuanshan Guo is the managing member of Yiheng Capital, LLC. The registered address of Yiheng Capital Partners, L.P. is 101 California Street, Suite 2880, San Francisco, CA 94111. |
(8) | Jia Investment Co., Ltd. is a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned and controlled by Ms. Chia-Yue Chang. The registered address of Jia Investment Co., Ltd. is Drake Chambers, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. |
(9) | Represents 1,946,120 ordinary shares beneficially owned by FIL Limited (“FIL”) and its direct and indirect subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019, according to the 13G filing made by FIL on February 7, 2020. FIL is a Bermuda incorporated company and its registered address is Pembroke Hall, 42 Crow Lane, Hamilton, Bermuda, HM19. |
(10) | Represents 1,857,898 ordinary shares in the form of ADSs held by Sequoia Capital China I, L.P., Sequoia Capital China Partners Fund I, L.P., Sequoia Capital China Principals Fund I, L.P. and other affiliates of Sequoia Capital China. The general partner of each of the three Sequoia Capital China funds is Sequoia Capital China Management I, L.P., whose general partner is SC China Holding Limited, a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. SC China Holding Limited is wholly owned by SNP China Enterprises Limited, a company wholly owned by Mr. Neil Nanpeng Shen. Mr. Shen is a managing partner of Sequoia Capital China, an affiliate of the Sequoia Capital China funds. |
(11) | Yin Investment Co., Ltd. is a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned and controlled by Mr. Zhe Yin. The registered address of Yin Investment Co., Ltd. is Drake Chambers, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. |
(12) | Quan Investment Co., Ltd. is a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned and controlled by Mr. Boquan He. The registered address of Quan Investment Co., Ltd. is Drake Chambers, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. |
To our knowledge, as of March 31, 2020, 18,022,420 of our Class A ordinary shares were held by one record holder in the United States, which is Citibank, N. A., the depositary of our ADS program. The number of beneficial owners of our ADSs in the United States is much larger than the number of record holders of our Class A ordinary shares in the United States.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. | Major Shareholders |
Please refer to “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.”
B. | Related Party Transactions |
Contractual Arrangements
As to our contractual arrangements with Noah Investment and its shareholders, please see Item 4. “Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure” for a description of these contractual arrangements.
123
Loan Agreements
In October 2007, each shareholder of Noah Investment entered into a loan agreement with Noah Group. The principal amounts of the loans to these shareholders were RMB27.0 million (US$4.3 million) in aggregate. The loans were solely for their respective investment in the equity interests in Noah Investment. These loans were subsequently restructured in June 2009 through loans funded by Noah Group and then granted to such shareholders by an intermediary bank. In December 2013, these loans were further restructured and each shareholder of Noah Investment re-entered into a new no-interest loan agreement with Noah Group. The principal amounts of such no-interest loans to these shareholders were the same as that of the initial loans. The loan agreements will expire in December 2023 and will automatically renew unless terminated in writing by either party.
Transactions with Shareholders and Affiliates
Since May 2010, we started our fund of fund business by forming fund of private equity funds under our management. In the second half of 2012, we began raising and managing real estate fund products. We serve as the general partner for these funds. For all the funds we serve as general partners, we are required by the limited partnership agreements to also hold equity interests in those funds. We manage contractual funds as fund manager and earn management fee and/or carried interest from the second half of 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2019, significant related party transactions related to these funds were as follows:
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, related party transactions were as follows:
| Years Ended December 31 | |||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
One-time commissions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| 558,543 |
| 294,984 |
| 240,808 |
| 34,590 |
One-time commissions earned from funds subscribed by shareholders |
| 2,517 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Total one-time commissions |
| 561,060 |
| 294,984 |
| 240,808 |
| 34,590 |
Recurring service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| 617,374 |
| 929,911 |
| 1,009,568 |
| 145,015 |
Wanjia Win-Win |
| 1,079 |
| — |
| 688 |
| 99 |
Sequoia Capital Investment Management (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. |
| 42,128 |
| 33,009 |
| 15,759 |
| 2,264 |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| 200,149 |
| 252,782 |
| 313,612 |
| 45,047 |
Wuhu Bona |
| — |
| 8,491 |
| — |
| — |
Recurring services fee earned from funds subscribed by shareholders |
| — |
| 2,868 |
| — |
| — |
Total recurring service fees |
| 860,730 |
| 1,227,061 |
| 1,339,627 |
| 192,425 |
Performance-based income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| 44,580 |
| 92,128 |
| 34,248 |
| 4,919 |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| 9,922 |
| 8,405 |
| 36,800 |
| 5,286 |
Zhejiang Vanke |
| — |
| — |
| 18,600 |
| 2,672 |
Total performance-based income |
| 54,502 |
| 100,533 |
| 89,648 |
| 12,877 |
Other service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other services subscribed by shareholders |
| 23,313 |
| 29,227 |
| 3,899 |
| 560 |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd., |
| 1 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Total other service fees |
| 23,314 |
| 29,227 |
| 3,899 |
| 560 |
Total |
| 1,499,606 |
| 1,651,805 |
| 1,673,982 |
| 240,452 |
124
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, amounts due from related parties associated with the above transactions were comprised of the following:
| As of December 31, | |||||
2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
Wanjia Win-Win |
| 277 |
| — |
| — |
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| 470,481 |
| 428,724 |
| 61,583 |
Investee funds of Kunshan Jingzhao Equity Investment Management Co., Ltd. |
| 110 |
| — |
| — |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| 55,556 |
| 70,247 |
| 10,090 |
Total |
| 526,424 |
| 498,971 |
| 71,673 |
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, amounts due from related parties associated with loan distributed were comprised of the following:
| As of December 31, | |||||
2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB’000 |
| RMB’000 |
| US$’000 | |
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| 32,007 |
| 42,170 |
| 6,057 |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| 13,770 |
| 7,564 |
| 1,087 |
Total |
| 45,777 |
| 49,734 |
| 7,144 |
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, deferred revenues related to the recurring management fee received in advance from related parties were comprised of the following:
| As of December 31, | |||||
| 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||
RMB’000 | RMB’000 | US$’000 | ||||
Investee funds of Gopher Assets | 88,158 | 74,664 | 10,725 | |||
Wanjia Win-Win | 1,006 | — | — | |||
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. | 10,311 | 1,402 | 201 | |||
Total | 99,475 | 76,066 | 10,926 |
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, donations made to Shanghai Noah Foundation were RMB2.7 million, RMB1.2 million and RMB1.2 million (US$0.2 million), respectively.
Employment Agreements
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Employment Agreements.”
Share Incentives
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation—Share Incentive Plans.”
C. | Interests of Experts and Counsel |
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A. | Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information |
We have appended consolidated financial statements filed as part of this annual report. See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
125
Legal Proceedings
In connection with certain credit funds managed by an affiliate of Gopher Shanghai, providing supply chain financing involving companies related to Camsing International Holding Limited, which were later suspected to commit fraudulent activities, Gopher Shanghai has received notices from a court and an arbitration tribunal in 2020 concerning claims initiated by individual clients against Gopher Shanghai as the fund manager.
Although Gopher Shanghai was not involved in any of the suspected fraudulent activities, we have been proactively assessing the potential legal risks and implications associated with this claim, which is currently at a preliminary stage, and other potential legal proceedings, to protect the best interests of us and our shareholders.
Other than the matters mentioned above, we are currently not a party to, and we are not aware of any threat of, any judicial, arbitration or administrative proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, are likely to have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may from time to time be involved in litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of our business. Our businesses are also subject to extensive regulations, which may result in regulatory proceedings against us, See “Item 3D. Risk Factors” above. Litigation or any other legal or administrative proceedings, regardless of the outcome, may result in substantial cost and diversion of our recourses, including our management’s time and attention.
Dividend Policy
Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to our articles of association and Cayman Islands law. In addition, our shareholders by ordinary resolution may declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend on its shares out of either profit or share premium amount, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant. If we pay any dividends, our ADS holders will be paid to the same extent as holders of our ordinary shares, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement, including the fees and expenses payable thereunder. See “Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities—D. American Depository Shares.”
For undistributed profits earned from our China subsidiaries, we have both the intent and ability to permanently reinvest these undistributed profits.
B. | Significant Changes |
Except as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we have not experienced any significant changes since the date of our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
Offering and Listing Details
See “—C. Markets.”
B. | Plan of Distribution |
Not applicable.
126
C. | Markets |
Our ADSs have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since November 10, 2010 under the symbol “NOAH.” Two ADSs represent one of our ordinary shares. We have a dual-class common share structure in which Class A ordinary shares have different voting rights from Class B ordinary shares. Class B shares are each entitled to four votes, whereas Class A ordinary shares are each entitled to one vote. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risk Related to Our ADSs—Our dual-class voting structure will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.”
D. | Selling Shareholders |
Not applicable.
E. | Dilution |
Not applicable.
F. | Expenses of the Issue |
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
A. | Share Capital |
Not applicable.
B. | Memorandum and Articles of Association |
The following are summaries of material provisions of our memorandum and articles of association, as well as the Companies Law (2020 Revision) of the Cayman Islands (the “Companies Law”), insofar as they relate to the material terms of our ordinary shares.
Registered Office and Objects
The registered office of our company is located at the offices of Maples Corporate Services Limited, P.O. Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman KY1-1104, Cayman Islands as of the date of this annual report, and may be relocated to such other place as our board of directors may from time to time decide. The objects for which our company is established are unrestricted and we have full power and authority to carry out any object not prohibited by the Companies Law or any other law of the Cayman Islands.
Board of Directors
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board practices—Board of Directors.”
Ordinary Shares
General. All of our outstanding Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares are fully paid. Our ordinary shares are issued in registered form, and are issued when registered in our register of shareholders. Our shareholders who are non-residents of the Cayman Islands may freely hold and vote their Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares.
127
Dividends. The holders of our Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors, subject to Cayman Islands law and our articles of association. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our directors. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend on its shares out of either profit or share premium amount, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
Voting Rights. Each Class A ordinary share is entitled to one vote and each Class B ordinary share is entitled to four votes on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote. Voting at any shareholders’ meeting is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded. A poll may be demanded by any one or more shareholders present in person or by proxy entitled to vote and who together hold not less than 10% of the paid up voting share capital of our company. Shareholders may attend any shareholders’ meeting in person or by proxy, or if a corporation or other non-natural person, by its duly authorized representative or proxy; we currently do not allow shareholders to vote electronically.
A quorum required for a meeting of shareholders consists of at least one shareholder present in person or by proxy or, if a corporation or other non-natural person, by its duly authorized representative, who hold not less than an aggregate of one-third of our voting share capital. Shareholders’ meetings may be held annually and may be convened by our board of directors. Advance notice of at least seven calendar days is required for the convening of shareholders’ meetings, subject to exceptions in certain circumstances as set out in our articles of association.
An ordinary resolution to be passed by the shareholders requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, in a general meeting, while a special resolution requires the affirmative vote of no less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, in a general meeting. A special resolution is required for important matters such as a change of name or amendments to our memorandum or articles of association. Holders of the ordinary shares may effect certain changes by ordinary resolution, including increasing the amount of our authorized share capital, consolidating and dividing all or any of our share capital into shares of larger amounts than our existing shares, and canceling any authorized but unissued shares.
Transfer of Shares. Subject to the restrictions set out in our memorandum and articles of association, our shareholders may transfer all or any of their ordinary shares by an instrument of transfer in writing and executed by or on behalf of the transferor (and if our board of directors require, the transferee).
Our board of directors may decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share which is not fully paid up or on which we have a lien. Our board may also decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share unless (a) the instrument of transfer is lodged with us, accompanied by the certificate for the ordinary shares to which it relates and such other evidence as our board may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer; and (b) a fee of such maximum sum as the NYSE may determine to be payable, or such lesser sum as our board may from time to time require, is paid to us in respect thereof.
If our board of directors refuses to register a transfer it shall, within two months after the date on which the instrument of transfer was lodged, send to each of the transferor and the transferee notice of such refusal. The registration of transfers may be suspended on 14 days’ notice being given by advertisement in such one or more newspapers or by electronic means and the register closed at such times and for such periods as our board may from time to time determine.
Liquidation. On a return of capital on winding up or otherwise (other than on conversion, redemption or purchase of shares), assets available for distribution shall be distributed among the holders of the ordinary shares on a pro rata basis, and the liquidator may with the sanction of an ordinary resolution of the shareholders divide amongst the shareholders in specie or in kind the whole or any part of the assets of our company, and may for such purpose set such value as he deems fair upon any property to be divided as aforesaid, and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between our shareholders or different classes of shareholder.
128
Redemption, Repurchase and Surrender of Shares. We may issue shares on terms that are subject to redemption, at our option or at the option of the holders, on such terms and in such manner as may, before the issue of such shares, be determined by our board of directors. Our company may also repurchase any of our shares provided that our shareholders shall have approved the manner of purchase by ordinary resolution or the manner of purchase is in accordance with the provisions of Articles 17 and 17A of our articles of association. Under the Companies Law, the redemption or repurchase of any share may be paid out of our company’s profits or out of the proceeds of a fresh issue of shares made for the purpose of such redemption or repurchase, or out of capital (including share premium account and capital redemption reserve) if our company can, immediately following such payment, pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. In addition, under the Companies Law no such share may be redeemed or repurchased (a) unless it is fully paid up, (b) if such redemption or repurchase would result in there being no shares outstanding, or (c) if the company has commenced liquidation. In addition, our company may accept the surrender of any fully paid share for no consideration.
Calls on Shares and Forfeiture of Shares. Our board of directors may from time to time make calls upon shareholders for any amounts unpaid on their shares in a notice served to such shareholders at least 14 calendar days prior to the specified time of payment. Shares that have been called upon and remain unpaid on the specified time are subject to forfeiture.
Variations of Rights of Shares. If at any time our share capital is divided into different classes or series of shares, all or any of the special rights attached to any class or series of shares may be varied either with the written consent of the holders of a majority of the issued shares of that class or series or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a general meeting of the holders of the shares of that class or series.
In addition to any other applicable consent or approval requirements set forth in our articles of association and pursuant to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, for so long as the total issued and outstanding Class B ordinary shares constitute a majority of the aggregate voting power of our company, any amendment of the rights attached to our Class B ordinary shares requires approval by (i) holders of a majority of the total issued and outstanding Class A ordinary shares as well as (ii) holders of a majority of the aggregate voting power of our company.
For so long as any of our Class A ordinary shares are outstanding, our company shall not, without the affirmative vote of at least a majority of our Class A ordinary shares, voting as a single class, amend, alter or repeal any provision setting forth the terms of our Class A ordinary shares.
Inspection of Books and Records. Holders of our ordinary shares have no general right under Cayman Islands law to inspect or obtain copies of our list of shareholders or our corporate records, subject to certain limited exceptions. However, we will provide our shareholders with annual audited financial statements. See “—H. Documents on Display.”
Anti-Takeover Provisions. Some provisions of our memorandum and articles of association have the potential to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or management that shareholders may consider favorable, including provisions that:
● | provide holders of our Class B ordinary shares four votes per share and holders of our Class A ordinary shares one vote per share on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote; |
● | authorize our board of directors to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to designate the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such preferred shares without any further vote or action by our shareholders; and |
● | limit the ability of shareholders to call general meetings of shareholders. |
However, under Cayman Islands law, our directors may only exercise the rights and powers granted to them under our memorandum and articles of association for a proper purpose and for what they believe in good faith to be in the best interests of our company.
129
General Meetings of Shareholders. Shareholders’ meetings may be convened by our board of directors. Advance notice of at least seven calendar days is required for the convening of our annual general shareholders’ meeting and any other general meeting of our shareholders, subject to exceptions in certain circumstances as set out in our articles of association. A quorum for a meeting of shareholders consists of members holding not less than an aggregate of one-third of all voting share capital of our company present in person or by proxy.
C. | Material Contracts |
We have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described in “Item 4. Information on the Company” or elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F.
D. | Exchange Controls |
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Foreign Exchange.”
E. | Taxation |
The following summary of certain material Cayman Islands, PRC and U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in our ADSs or ordinary shares is based upon laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this annual report, all of which are subject to change. This summary does not deal with all possible tax consequences relating to an investment in our ADSs or ordinary shares, such as the tax consequences under state, local and other tax laws.
Cayman Islands Taxation
The Cayman Islands currently levies no taxes on individuals or corporations based upon profits, income, gains or appreciation and there is no taxation in the nature of inheritance tax or estate duty and there are no other taxes likely to be material to us levied by the Government of the Cayman Islands except for stamp duties which may be applicable on instruments executed in, or brought within the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands. Although it is unlikely that we will be subject to material taxes, there is no assurance that the Cayman Islands government will not impose taxes in the future, which could be material to us. In addition, there may be tax consequences if we are, for example, involved in any transfer or conveyance of immovable property in the Cayman Islands. The Cayman Islands is not party to any double tax treaties that are applicable to any payments made to or by us and there are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
People’s Republic of China Taxation
The PRC enterprise income tax is calculated based on the taxable income determined under the PRC laws and accounting standards. Under the EIT Law and the EIT Implementation Rules, all domestic and foreign-invested companies in China are subject to a uniform enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% and dividends from a PRC subsidiary to its foreign parent company are subject to a withholding tax at the rate of 10%, unless such foreign parent company’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a reduced rate of withholding tax, or the tax is otherwise exempted or reduced pursuant to the PRC tax laws. Zhong Lun Law Firm advises us that since there is currently no such tax treaty between China and the Cayman Islands, dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries will be subject to a 10% withholding tax; in addition, we may be able to enjoy the 5% preferential withholding tax treatment for the dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiaries through Noah Insurance, according to Tax Arrangement between mainland China and Hong Kong, if they satisfy the conditions prescribed under relevant tax rules and regulations, and obtain the approvals as required under those rules and regulations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Tax.”
130
Under the EIT Law, enterprises organized under the laws of jurisdictions outside China with their “de facto management bodies” located within China may be considered PRC resident enterprises and therefore subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide income. The EIT Implementation Rules define the term “de facto management body” as the management body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In addition, according to a circular issued by the SAT in April 2009, a foreign enterprise controlled by a PRC company or a PRC company group will be classified as a “resident enterprise” with its “de facto management bodies” located within China if the following requirements are satisfied: (i) the senior management and core management departments in charge of its daily operations function mainly in the PRC; (ii) its financial and human resources decisions are subject to determination or approval by persons or bodies in the PRC; (iii) its major assets, accounting books, company seals, and minutes and files of its board and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in the PRC; and (iv) more than half of the enterprise’s directors or senior management with voting rights reside in the PRC. We have evaluated whether we are a PRC resident enterprise and we believe that we are not a PRC resident enterprise for the year ended December 31, 2019.
However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management bodies”. If we are deemed to be a PRC resident enterprise, we will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on our global income. In that case, however, dividend income we receive from our PRC subsidiaries may be exempt from PRC enterprise income tax because the EIT Law and the EIT Implementation Rules generally provide that dividends received from a PRC resident enterprise from its directly invested entity that is also a PRC resident enterprise is exempt from PRC enterprise income tax. However, as there is still uncertainty as to how the EIT Law and the EIT Implementation Rules will be interpreted and implemented, we cannot assure investors in our ADSs or ordinary shares that we are eligible for such PRC enterprise income tax exemptions or reductions for any subsequent taxable year.
Provided that our Cayman Islands holding company, Noah Holdings Limited, is not deemed to be a PRC resident enterprise, holders of our ADSs and ordinary shares who are not PRC residents will not be subject to PRC income tax on dividends distributed by us or gains realized from the sale or other disposition of our shares or ADSs. SAT Circular 7 further clarifies that, if a non-resident enterprise derives income by acquiring and selling shares in an offshore listed enterprise in the public market, such income will not be subject to PRC tax under SAT Circular 7. However, because there is uncertainty as to the application of SAT Circular 7, we and our non-PRC resident investors may be at risk of being required to file a return and being taxed under SAT Circular 7 and we may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with SAT Circular 7 or to establish that we should not be taxed under and SAT Circular 7. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—We face uncertainties with respect to the application of the Circular on Strengthening the Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises.”
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ADSs or ordinary shares by a U.S. Holder (as defined below) that holds our ADSs or ordinary shares as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment) within the meaning of Section 1221 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
This summary is based upon the federal income tax laws of the United States as of the date of this annual report, including the Code, existing and proposed U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative pronouncements of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, and judicial decisions, all as in effect as of the date of this annual report, and all of which may be replaced, revoked, or modified, possibly with retroactive effect, and which replacement, revocation, or modification could significantly affect the tax consequences described below. We have not sought any ruling from the IRS with respect to the statements made and the conclusions reached in the following discussion and there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court will agree with our statements and conclusions.
131
This summary does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to particular investors in light of their individual circumstances, including investors subject to special tax rules such as financial institutions; insurance companies; brokers or dealers in stocks, securities, commodities or currencies; persons who use or are required to use a mark-to-market method of accounting; pension plans; regulated investment companies; real estate investment trusts; cooperatives; tax-exempt entities (including private foundations)); persons who own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) ADSs or ordinary shares representing 10% or more of our voting power or value; investors that will hold their ADSs or ordinary shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion, constructive sale, or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes; U.S. expatriates; entities subject to the U.S. anti-inversion rules; persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code; persons who acquired ADSs or ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of an employee equity grant or otherwise as compensation; persons required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect to our ADSs or ordinary shares as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement; or investors that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, all of whom may be subject to tax rules that differ significantly from those summarized below.
In addition, this summary does not address any U.S. federal estate, gift, Medicare, or alternative minimum tax considerations, or any state, local or non-U.S. tax considerations, relating to the ownership or disposition of our ADSs or ordinary shares. Except as specifically described below, this discussion does not address any tax consequences or reporting obligations that may be applicable to persons holding ADSs or ordinary shares through a bank, financial institution or other entity, or a branch thereof, located, organized or resident outside the United States.
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR CAREFUL TAX PLANNING AND ADVICE. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS, AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS OR THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE TAX TREATY.
General
For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our ADSs or ordinary shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created in, or organized under the laws of, the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust (A) the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more U.S. persons who have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (B) that has otherwise elected to be treated as a U.S. person under the Code.
If a partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of our ADSs or ordinary shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships or partners in a partnership holding our ADSs or ordinary shares are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of acquiring, owning or disposing of our ADSs or ordinary shares.
ADSs
The discussion below assumes that the representations contained in the deposit agreement are true and that the obligations in the deposit agreement and any related agreement have been and will be complied with in accordance with their terms. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder of ADSs should be treated as the beneficial owner of the underlying shares represented by such ADSs. Accordingly, deposits or withdrawal of shares for ADSs should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
132
Passive Foreign Investment Company
We will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of our gross income for such year is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the value of our assets (generally based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, certain types of rents and royalties, annuities, net gains from the sale or exchange of property producing such income, net gains from commodity transactions, net foreign currency gains and net income from notional principal contracts. In addition, cash, cash equivalents, securities held for investment purposes, and certain other similar assets are generally categorized as passive assets.
We will be treated as owning a proportionate share of the assets and earning a proportionate share of the income of any other corporation in which we own, directly or indirectly, at least 25% (by value) of the stock. Although the law in this regard is unclear, we treat our variable interest entities as being owned by us for U.S. federal income tax purposes because we control their management decisions and because we are entitled to substantially all of the economic benefits associated with them, and, as a result, we consolidate their operating results in our consolidated GAAP financial statements. If it were determined, however, that we are not the owner of such entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then the composition of our income and assets would change and we would likely be treated as a PFIC.
Although the application of these rules is unclear in many important respects and the required calculations yield results very close to the line, based on the market price of our ADSs, the value of our assets, and the composition of our income and assets for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019, we believe that we were not a PFIC for that year, but there can be no assurances in this regard. The IRS does not issue rulings with respect to PFIC status, and we cannot assure you that the IRS, or a court, will agree with any determination we make. For example, because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules, it is possible that the IRS may successfully challenge our classification of certain income and assets as non-passive, which may result in our being a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019.
We must make a separate determination after the close of each taxable year as to whether we were a PFIC for that year. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will not be or become a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year. The determination of whether we will be a PFIC for any taxable year may depend in part upon the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles not reflected on our balance sheet (which may depend upon the market price of the ADSs or ordinary shares from time to time, which may fluctuate significantly) and also may be affected by how, and how quickly, we spend our liquid assets and the cash we generate from our operations and raise in any offering. Under circumstances where we determine not to deploy significant amounts of cash for active purposes or where the market price of our ADSs or ordinary shares declines, our risk of being or becoming a PFIC may substantially increase because our liquid assets and cash (which are for this purpose considered assets that produce passive income) may then represent a greater percentage of our overall assets. In addition, changes in the composition of our income and assets may cause us to be or become a PFIC for the current or future taxable years.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of a Shareholder of a PFIC
If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds our ADSs or ordinary shares, then, absent certain elections (including a mark-to-market election and a qualified electing fund election, each as described below), the U.S. Holder will generally be subject to adverse tax rules, regardless of whether we remain a PFIC in subsequent taxable years, on (i) any “excess distribution” that we make to the U.S. Holder (which generally means any distribution paid during a taxable year to a U.S. Holder that is greater than 125% of the average annual distributions paid in the three preceding taxable years to the U.S. Holder or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ADSs or ordinary shares), and (ii) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition, including, under certain circumstances, a pledge, of ADSs or ordinary shares. Under the PFIC rules:
● | the excess distribution and/or gain will be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our ADSs or ordinary shares; |
133
● | the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable years in the U.S. Holder’s holding period prior to the first taxable year in which we are treated as a PFIC (each such year, a pre-PFIC year) will be taxable as ordinary income; and |
● | the amount allocated to each prior taxable year other than a pre-PFIC year will be subject to tax at the highest tax rate in effect applicable to the U.S. Holder for that year, and will be increased by an additional tax equal to interest on the resulting tax deemed deferred with respect to each such year. |
If we are a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year during which the U.S. Holder holds our ADSs or ordinary shares and any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries that are corporations (or other corporations in which we own equity interests) is also a PFIC, such U.S. Holder would generally be treated as owning a proportionate amount (by value) of the shares of each such non-U.S. entity that is a PFIC (each such corporation, a lower tier PFIC) for purposes of the application of these rules. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to any of our lower tier PFICs,
Mark-to-Market Election
If we are a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year during which the U.S. Holder holds our ADSs or ordinary shares, then in lieu of being subject to the tax and interest charge rules discussed above, the U.S. Holder may make an election to include gain on our ADSs or ordinary shares as ordinary income under a mark-to-market method, provided that the ADSs or ordinary shares constitute “marketable stock.” Marketable stock is stock that is regularly traded on a qualified exchange or other market, as defined in applicable Treasury regulations. Our ADSs, but not our ordinary shares, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, which is a qualified exchange or other market for these purposes. Consequently, if the ADSs remain listed on the New York Stock Exchange and are regularly traded, we expect that a mark-to-market election would be available to a U.S. Holder of ADSs if we became a PFIC, but no assurances are given in this regard. If a U.S. Holder makes a valid mark-to-market election, the U.S. Holder will generally (i) include in gross income as ordinary income for each taxable year that we are a PFIC the excess, if any, of the fair market value of ADSs held at the end of the taxable year over the adjusted tax basis of such ADSs and (ii) deduct as an ordinary loss the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of the ADSs over the fair market value of such ADSs held at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election. The U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ADSs would be adjusted to reflect any income or loss resulting from the mark-to-market election. If a U.S. Holder makes a valid mark-to-market election, any gain such U.S. Holder recognizes upon the sale or other disposition of our ADSs in a year when we are a PFIC will be treated as ordinary income and any loss will be treated as ordinary loss, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election. If a U.S. Holder makes a valid mark-to-market election and we cease to be treated as a PFIC, the U.S. Holder will not be required to take into account the mark-to-market gain or loss described above during any period that we are not a PFIC.
Because a mark-to-market election cannot be made for any lower-tier PFICs that we may own, if we were a PFIC for any taxable year a U.S. Holder that makes the mark-to-market election may continue to be subject to the PFIC rules described above with respect to such U.S. Holder’s indirect interest in any investments held by us that are treated as an equity interest in a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of, the procedure for, and the effect of making, a mark-to-market election, as well as whether making the election would be advisable, including in light of their particular circumstances.
134
Qualified Electing Fund Election
In certain circumstances, a shareholder in a PFIC may to avoid some of the disadvantageous tax treatment described above by making a “qualified electing fund” election to be taxed currently on its share of the PFIC’s undistributed income. However, a U.S. Holder may make a qualified electing fund election with respect to the ADSs or ordinary shares only if we agree to furnish the U.S. Holder annually with a PFIC annual information statement as specified in the applicable Treasury regulations. We do not currently intend to prepare or provide the information necessary for U.S. Holders to make qualified electing fund elections if we are a PFIC.
Deemed Sale Election
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds ADSs or ordinary shares, we generally (unless such U.S. Holder makes a valid mark-to-market election with respect to its ADSs, as discussed above) will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder for all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder holds ADSs or ordinary shares, unless we cease to be a PFIC and the U.S. Holder makes a “deemed sale” election with respect to the ADSs or ordinary shares, as applicable. If a U.S. Holder makes such an election, such U.S. Holder will be deemed to have sold its ADSs or ordinary shares at their fair market value, and any gain from such deemed sale would be taxed as an “excess distribution” as described above. Any loss from the deemed sale is not recognized. After the deemed sale election, the U.S. Holder’s ADSs or ordinary shares with respect to which such election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC unless we subsequently become a PFIC. U.S. Holders are strongly urged to consult their tax advisors as to the possibility and consequences of making a deemed sale election if we are and then cease to be a PFIC and such an election becomes available.
Reporting Requirements
For any taxable year that we are treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, such U.S. Holder will generally be required to file an annual information return on IRS Form 8621 regarding distributions received on our ADSs or ordinary shares and any gain realized on the disposition of our ADSs or ordinary shares, and certain U.S. Holders will be required to file an annual information return (also on IRS Form 8621) relating to their ownership of our ADSs or ordinary shares. Significant penalties are imposed for failure to file such form.
Each U.S. Holder is urged to consult its tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, holding, and disposing of our ADSs or ordinary shares, including our possible status as a PFIC and the possibility of making certain elections and related reporting requirements.
The discussion below under “Dividends and Other Distributions on the ADSs or Ordinary Shares” and “Sale or Other Disposition of the ADSs or Ordinary Shares” assumes that we will not be a PFIC, nor treated as such with respect to U.S. Holders, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Dividends and Other Distributions on the ADSs or Ordinary Shares
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, the gross amount of any cash distributions (including the amount of any PRC or other tax withheld) paid with respect to our ADSs or ordinary shares out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, will be includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as dividend income on the day actually or constructively received by the U.S. Holder, in the case of ordinary shares, or by the depositary, in the case of ADSs. However, because we do not intend to determine our earnings and profits on the basis of U.S. federal income tax principles, U.S. Holders should assume that any distribution paid will generally constitute a “dividend” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally available to U.S. corporations under the Code.
135
A non-corporate U.S. Holder generally will be subject to tax on dividends received from a “qualified foreign corporation” at the reduced U.S. federal tax rate applicable to “qualified dividend income,” rather than the marginal tax rates applicable to ordinary income, provided that certain holding period requirements are met. Assuming that we are neither a PFIC nor treated as such with respect to U.S. Holders (as discussed above) for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or the preceding taxable year, we will be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to any dividends paid on our ADSs or ordinary shares, provided that (i) the ADSs or ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, or (ii) we are eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive tax treaty with the United States that the Secretary of Treasury of the United States determines is satisfactory for this purpose and includes an exchange of information program.
Our ADSs (but not our ordinary shares) are currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange. We believe, though no assurances may be given in this regard, that our ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, and that, assuming that we are not a PFIC nor treated as such with respect to U.S. Holders (as discussed above) for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or the preceding taxable year, we will therefore be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to any dividends paid on our ADSs, but not with respect to dividends paid on our ordinary shares. In the event we are deemed to be a resident enterprise under the EIT Law (see “—People’s Republic of China Taxation” above), we may be eligible for the benefits under the U.S.-PRC income tax treaty (the “Treaty”) (which the U.S. Treasury Department has determined is satisfactory for this purpose). If we are eligible for such benefits, and again assuming that we are not a PFIC nor treated as such with respect to U.S. Holders for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or the preceding taxable year, then we would be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on both our ADSs and ordinary shares.
Even if dividends would be treated as paid by a qualified foreign corporation, a non-corporate U.S. Holder will not be eligible for reduced rates of taxation if it does not hold our ADSs or ordinary shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date or if the U.S. Holder elects to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends of a qualified foreign corporation if the non-corporate U.S. Holder receiving the dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of the reduced tax rate on any dividends that we pay with respect to the ADSs or ordinary shares in their particular circumstances.
The amount of any dividend income paid in foreign currency will be the U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the spot rate in effect on the date of receipt, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars on such date. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the amount received. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt.
Dividends will be treated as foreign-source income, and generally will constitute passive income or in certain cases, general category income, for foreign tax credit purposes. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend income will include any amounts withheld in respect of PRC withholding tax, if applicable. See “—People’s Republic of China Taxation” above. Subject to applicable limitations, which vary depending upon the U.S. Holder’s circumstances, if PRC taxes are withheld from dividend payments (at a rate not exceeding the applicable rate provided in the Treaty in the case of a U.S. Holder that is eligible for Treaty benefits), such withheld PRC taxes generally will be creditable against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the creditability of foreign taxes in their particular circumstances. In lieu of claiming a credit, a U.S. Holder may elect to deduct any such withheld PRC taxes in computing its taxable income, subject to applicable limitations. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all foreign taxes paid or accrued in the relevant taxable year.
136
Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of the ADSs or Ordinary Shares
A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss on a sale or exchange of the ADSs or ordinary shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the ADSs or ordinary shares. Subject to the discussion under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company” above, such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss. Capital gains of a non-corporate U.S. Holder, including an individual, that has held the ADSs or ordinary shares for more than one year currently are eligible for reduced tax rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Any gain or loss that a U.S. Holder recognizes on a disposition of the ADSs or ordinary shares generally will be treated as U.S.-source income or loss for foreign tax credit limitation purposes, which could limit the availability of foreign tax credits. However, if we are treated as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes and PRC tax is imposed on gain from the disposition of the ADSs or ordinary shares (see “—People’s Republic of China Taxation” above), then a U.S. Holder that is eligible for the benefits of the Treaty may elect to treat the gain as PRC-source income for foreign tax credit purposes. If such an election is made, the gain so treated will be treated as a separate class or “basket” of income for foreign tax credit purposes. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the proper treatment of gain or loss, as well as the availability of a foreign tax credit, in their particular circumstances.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Dividend payments with respect to our ADSs or ordinary shares and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our ADSs or ordinary shares will generally be subject to information reporting to the IRS and U.S. backup withholding. Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a U.S. Holder who furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and makes any other required certification, or who otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the U.S. information reporting and backup withholding rules.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, and a U.S. Holder may be entitled to obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS in a timely manner and furnishing any required information.
Specified Foreign Financial Assets
Individual U.S. Holders and certain domestic entities generally will be required to submit certain information to the IRS with respect to their beneficial ownership of our ADSs or ordinary shares as is necessary to identify the class or issue of which the ADSs or ordinary shares are a part. These requirements are subject to exceptions, including an exception for ADSs or ordinary shares held in accounts maintained by certain financial institutions and an exception applicable if the aggregate value of all “specified foreign financial assets” (as defined in the Code) does not exceed US$50,000. This law also imposes penalties if a U.S. Holder is required to submit such information to the IRS and fails to do so. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the potential reporting requirements that may be imposed with respect to ownership of ADSs or ordinary shares.
F. | Dividends and Paying Agents |
Not applicable.
G. | Statement by Experts |
Not applicable.
137
H. | Documents on Display |
We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Under the Exchange Act, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually a Form 20-F no later than four months after the close of each fiscal year, which is December 31. Copies of reports and other information, when so filed, may be inspected without charge and may be obtained at prescribed rates at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the regional office of the SEC located at Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661. The public may obtain information regarding the Washington, D.C. Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a web site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC using its EDGAR system.
Our Internet website is ir.noahgroup.com. We make available on our website our annual reports on Form 20-F and any amendments to such reports as soon as reasonably practicable following the electronic filing of such report with the SEC, all free of charge. In addition, we provide electronic or paper copies of our filings free of charge upon request. The information contained on our website is not part of this or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.
We will furnish our shareholders with annual reports, which will include a review of operations and annual audited consolidated financial statements prepared in conformity with GAAP.
I. | Subsidiary Information |
For a listing of our subsidiaries, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.”
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
Our financial statements are expressed in Renminbi, which is our reporting currency. We earn the majority of our revenues and incur the majority of our expenses in Renminbi, and the majority of our sales contracts are denominated in Renminbi. We do not believe that we currently have any significant direct foreign exchange risk and have not used any derivative financial instruments to hedge our exposure to such risk. Although in general, our exposure to foreign exchange risks should be limited, the value of your investment in our ADSs will be affected by the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Renminbi because the value of our business is effectively denominated in Renminbi, while the ADSs will be traded in U.S. dollars.
The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by changes in China’s political and economic conditions and by China’s foreign exchange policies, among other things. In July 2005, the PRC government changed its decades-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar, and the Renminbi appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. After June 2010, the Renminbi began to appreciate against the U.S. dollar again, although starting from June 2015, the trend of appreciation changed and the Renminbi started to depreciate against the U.S. dollar gradually. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future. There still remains significant international pressure on the Chinese government to adopt a substantial liberalization of its currency policy, which could result in further appreciation in the value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar.
138
To the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we received from overseas offering into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi amount we receive from the conversion. As of December 31, 2019, we had an Renminbi or Hong Kong dollar or other non-U.S. dollar denominated cash balance of US$338.9 million and a U.S. dollar denominated cash balance of US$291.3 million. Assuming we had converted the U.S. dollar denominated cash balance of US$291.3 million as of December 31, 2019 into RMB at the exchange rate of US$1.00 for RMB6.9618 as of December 31, 2019, this cash balance would have been RMB2,028.0 million. Conversely, if we decide to convert our RMB into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the RMB would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us. We have not used any forward contracts or currency borrowings to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.
Interest Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk primarily relates to interest income generated by excess cash, which is mostly held in interest bearing bank deposits.
As of December 31, 2019, we had RMB874.8 million invested in credit products with a weighted average duration of approximately 1.73 years.
We have not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. We have not been exposed to, nor do we anticipate being exposed to, material risks due to changes in market interest rates. However, our future interest income may fall short of expectations due to changes in market interest rates.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
A. | Debt Securities |
Not applicable.
B. | Warrants and Rights |
Not applicable.
C. | Other Securities |
Not applicable.
D. | American Depositary Shares |
139
Fees and Charges Our ADS holders May Have to Pay
ADS holders will be required to pay the following service fees to the depository:
Service |
| Fees |
• Issuance of ADSs |
| Up to US$0.05 per ADS issued |
• Cancelation of ADSs |
| Up to US$0.05 per ADS canceled |
• Distribution of cash dividends or other cash distributions |
| Up to US$0.05 per ADS held |
• Distribution of ADSs pursuant to stock dividends, free stock distributions or exercise of rights |
| Up to US$0.05 per ADS held |
• Distribution of securities other than ADSs or rights to purchase additional ADSs |
| Up to US$0.05 per ADS held |
• Depositary services |
| Up to US$0.05 per ADS held on the applicable record date(s) established by the depositary |
• Transfer of ADSs |
| US$1.50 per certificate presented for transfer |
Citibank, N.A., the depositary of our ADS program, collects fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid. Citibank’s principal executive office is located at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, 10013. The depositary bank typically appoints a custodian to safekeep the securities on deposit. In this case, the custodian is Citibank Hong Kong, located at 10/F, Harbor Front (II), 22, Tak Fung Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. ADS holders will also be responsible to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the depositary and certain taxes and governmental charges such as:
● | fees for the transfer and registration of ordinary shares charged by the registrar and transfer agent for the ordinary shares in the Cayman Islands (i.e., upon deposit and withdrawal of ordinary shares); |
● | expenses incurred for converting foreign currency into U.S. dollars; |
● | expenses for cable, telex and fax transmissions and for delivery of securities; |
● | taxes and duties upon the transfer of securities (i.e., when ordinary shares are deposited or withdrawn from deposit); and |
● | fees and expenses incurred in connection with the delivery or servicing of ordinary shares on deposit. |
Depositary fees payable upon the issuance and cancelation of ADSs are typically paid to the depositary by the brokers (on behalf of their clients) receiving the newly issued ADSs from the depositary and by the brokers (on behalf of their clients) delivering the ADSs to the depositary for cancelation. The brokers in turn charge these fees to their clients. Depositary fees payable in connection with distributions of cash or securities to ADS holders and the depositary services fee are charged by the depositary to the holders of record of ADSs as of the applicable ADS record date.
140
The depositary fees payable for cash distributions are generally deducted from the cash being distributed. In the case of distributions other than cash (such as stock dividends and rights distributions), the depositary charges the applicable fee to the ADS record date holders concurrent with the distribution. In the case of ADSs registered in the name of the investor (whether certificated or uncertificated in direct registration), the depositary sends invoices to the applicable record date ADS holders. In the case of ADSs held in brokerage and custodian accounts (via DTC), the depositary generally collects its fees through the systems provided by DTC (whose nominee is the registered holder of the ADSs held in DTC) from the brokers and custodians holding ADSs in their DTC accounts. The brokers and custodians who hold their clients’ ADSs in DTC accounts in turn charge their clients’ accounts the amount of the fees paid to the depositary.
In the event of refusal to pay the depositary fees, the depositary may, under the terms of the deposit agreement, refuse the requested service until payment is received or may offset the amount of the depositary fees from any distribution to be made to the ADS holder.
The fees and charges that ADS holders may be required to pay may vary over time and may be changed by us and by the depositary.
The depositary may reimburse us for certain expenses incurred by us in respect of the ADR program established pursuant to the deposit agreement, by making available a portion of the depositary fees charged in respect of the ADR program or otherwise, upon such terms and conditions as we and the depositary may agree from time to time. As described in the deposit agreement, we or the depositary may withhold or deduct from any distributions made in respect of ordinary shares and may sell for the account of a holder any or all of the ordinary shares and apply such distributions and sale proceeds in payment of any taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) or charges that are or may be payable by holders in respect of the ADSs.
Fees and Other Payments Made by the Depositary to Us
Our depositary has agreed to reimburse us for certain expenses we incur that are related to establishment and maintenance of the ADS program, including investor relations expenses and exchange application and listing fees. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse us, but the amount of reimbursement available to us is not related to the amounts of fees the depositary collects from investors. Reimbursement paid by the depositary was RMB4.8 million (US$686.9 thousand) in 2019.
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
On January 29, 2016, our shareholders voted in favor of a proposal to adopt a dual-class share structure, pursuant to which our authorized share capital was reclassified and re-designated into Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, with each Class A ordinary share being entitled to one vote and each Class B ordinary share being entitled to four votes on all matters that are subject to shareholder vote.
See “Item 10. Additional Information” for a description of the rights of securities holders.
141
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures within the meaning of Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon this evaluation, our management has concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our existing disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file with, or submit to, the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in by the SEC’s rules and regulations.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, for our company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of a company’s assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that a company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of a company’s management and directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of a company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to consolidated financial statement preparation and presentation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 using criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.
Based on this assessment, management concluded that the our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019 based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.
The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who has also audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Noah Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
142
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 of the Group and our report dated April 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included explanatory paragraphs regarding the Company's adoption of ASU 2016-01 and the convenience translation.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
Shanghai, China
April 24, 2020
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
As required by Rule 13a-15(d), under the Exchange Act, our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, also conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the period covered by this report have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, it has been determined that there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
143
Item 16. Reserved
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Tze-Kaing Yang, Mr. Zhiwu Chen and Ms. May Yihong Wu, independent directors (under the standards set forth in Section 303A of the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act) and members of our audit committee, are audit committee financial experts.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a code of ethics that applies to our directors, officers, employees and agents, including certain provisions that specifically apply to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, chief technology officer, vice presidents and any other persons who perform similar functions for us. We have filed our code of business conduct and ethics as an exhibit to our registration statement on Form F-1 (No. 333-170055).
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees by categories specified below in connection with certain professional services rendered by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP, our principal external auditors, for the periods indicated. We did not pay any other fees to our auditors during the periods indicated below.
| For the Year Ended | |||
December 31, | ||||
2018 | 2019 | |||
(RMB’000) | ||||
Audit fees(1) | 6,876 | 8,354 | ||
Audit-related fees(2) |
| 962 |
| 930 |
Tax fees(3) |
| 974 |
| 764 |
Note:
(1) | “Audit fees” means the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal auditors for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our comparative interim financial statements. |
(2) | “Audit-related fees” represents aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for assurance and related services that are not reported under audit fees. |
(3) | “Tax fees” represents aggregate fees for professional services performed in connection with tax planning and tax compliance. |
The policy of our audit committee is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services as described above, other than those for de minimis services which are approved by the audit committee prior to the completion of the audit.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
On May 12, 2017, our board of directors approved an extension of our previously approved share repurchase program for one year from July 8, 2017 and authorized us to repurchase up to US$50 million worth of our issued and outstanding ADSs (“2017 Share Repurchase Program”). As of December 31, 2019, we had repurchased no ADSs under the 2017 Share Repurchase Program.
144
Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. For example, neither the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands nor our memorandum and articles of association requires a majority of our directors to be independent and we could include non-independent directors as members of our compensation committee, and our independent directors would not necessarily hold regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present. As a result, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. Currently, we do not plan to rely on home country practice with respect to our corporate governance. However, if we choose to follow home country practice in the future, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards applicable to domestic issuers.
Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
We have elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 18.
Item 18. Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of Noah Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries and consolidated entities are included at the end of this annual report.
Item 19. Exhibits
Exhibit |
| Description of Document |
---|---|---|
1.1 | ||
2.1 | ||
2.2 | ||
2.3 | ||
145
Exhibit |
| Description of Document |
---|---|---|
2.4 | ||
2.5 | ||
2.6* | ||
4.1 | ||
4.2 | ||
4.3 | ||
4.4 | ||
4.5 | ||
4.6 | ||
4.7 | ||
4.8 | ||
4.9 |
146
Exhibit |
| Description of Document |
---|---|---|
4.10 |
| |
8.1* |
| |
11.1 |
| |
12.1* |
| Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
12.2* |
| Principal Accounting Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
13.1** |
| Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
13.2** |
| Principal Accounting Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
15.1* |
| |
15.2* |
| |
15.3* |
| |
101.INS* |
| XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH* |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL* |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF* |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB* |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE* |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
104* |
| Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) |
* Filed with this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
** Furnished with this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
147
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
NOAH HOLDINGS LIMITED | ||
By: | /s/ Jingbo Wang | |
Name: | Jingbo Wang | |
Title: | Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: April 24, 2020
148
Noah Holdings Limited
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Noah Holdings Limited
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Noah Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the criteria established in Internal Control —Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for certain investments in equity securities upon modified retrospective adoption of ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments, on January 1, 2018.
Convenience Translation
Our audits also comprehended the translation of Renminbi amounts into United States dollar amounts and, in our opinion, such translation has been made in conformity with the basis stated in Note 2(t) to the financial statements. Such United States dollar amounts are presented solely for the convenience of readers in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F-2
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Fair Value Measurement — Level 3 Investments — Refer to Notes 5 and 6 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures certain investments in private equity funds accounted for at fair value using significant unobservable pricing inputs and as such are within Level 3 measurement category in accordance with ASC 820. The balance of these investments amounted to RMB219.6 million as of December 31, 2019. Since there is limited observable market activity, the inputs used in the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.
We identified fair value measurement of these investments as a critical audit matter because of the subjective process in determining significant inputs, assumptions and judgments used to estimate the fair value. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including obtaining audit evidence of the data source used to estimate fair value, understanding the assumptions applied and evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation method.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the fair value measurement of the equity investments included the following, among others:
● | We obtained an understanding of management's process and controls over the determination of fair value measurement for these investments, including the significant inputs and assumptions, and tested the effectiveness of the relevant controls. |
● | We evaluated the appropriateness and consistency of management's methodology, and significant inputs, assumptions and judgments used in applying the fair value measurement for these equity investments. The following procedures were undertaken: (i) considered whether the assumptions, taken individually and as a whole, are realistic and consistent with the investee’s specific industry and the economic circumstances, (ii) agreed information used in developing the significant assumptions to appropriate supporting documentation and (iii) compared previous estimates of fair value to market transactions. |
● | We performed retrospective reviews and evaluated contradictory evidence pertaining to the fair value measurement of these investments. |
● | COVID-19 has resulted in disruptions to many businesses since January 2020, and while this may have an impact on these investments’ businesses in the future, and related fair value measurements in the future. We considered this a post balance sheet event. |
/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
Shanghai, China
April 24, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.
F-3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Noah Holdings Limited
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Noah Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 of the Company and our report dated April 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included explanatory paragraphs regarding the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-01 and the convenience translation.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
Shanghai, China
April 24, 2020
F-4
Noah Holdings Limited
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amount in Thousands, Except Shares Data)
| As of December 31, | |||||
| 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
| |
| |
| |
Restricted cash |
| |
| |
| |
Short-term investments (including short-term investments measured at fair value of RMB |
| |
| |
| |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of |
| |
| |
| |
Amounts due from related parties |
| |
| |
| |
Loan receivables, net of allowance for loan losses of RMB |
| |
| |
| |
Loan receivables from factoring business, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of |
| |
| — |
| — |
Other current assets |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets |
| |
| |
| |
Long-term investments (including long-term investments measured at fair value of RMB |
| |
| |
| |
Investment in affiliates |
| |
| |
| |
Property and equipment, net |
| |
| |
| |
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | — | | | |||
Deferred tax assets |
| |
| |
| |
Other non-current assets |
| |
| |
| |
Total Assets |
| |
| |
| |
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: (including amounts of the consolidated VIEs without recourse to Noah Holdings Ltd. See Note 2(b)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and welfare expenses |
| |
| |
| |
Income tax payable |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred revenues |
| |
| |
| |
Other current liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred tax liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Operating lease liabilities, non-current | — | | | |||
Other non-current liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Convertible notes |
| |
| — |
| — |
Total Liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Contingencies (Note 20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A ordinary shares (US$ |
| |
| |
| |
Class B ordinary shares (US$ |
| |
| |
| |
Treasury stock ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
Additional paid-in capital |
| |
| |
| |
Retained earnings |
| |
| |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
| |
| |
| |
Total Noah Holdings Limited shareholders’ equity |
| |
| |
| |
Non-controlling interests |
| |
| |
| |
Total Shareholders’ Equity |
| |
| |
| |
Total Liabilities and Equity |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Noah Holdings Limited
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Amount in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues from others |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Revenues from funds Gopher manages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Less:VAT related surcharges |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Net revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship manager compensation |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Performance fee compensation |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Other compensations |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Total compensation and benefits |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Selling expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
General and administrative expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Provision for doubtful accounts | ( |
| | ( |
| ( | ||
Other operating expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Government subsidies |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating cost and expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Income from operations |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Interest expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Investment income (loss) |
| |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
Other income (expense) |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Total other income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before taxes and income from equity in affiliates |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income tax expense |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Income from equity in affiliates |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Less: net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
Less: net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Less: effect on retained earnings caused by termination of redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Net income attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Weighted average number of shares used in computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Noah Holdings Limited
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Amount in Thousands)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Net income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Fair value fluctuation of available-for-sale investment, net of tax of |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Fair value fluctuation of available-for-sale investment held by affiliates, net of tax of |
| |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
Other comprehensive income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Comprehensive income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Less: comprehensive (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
Less: income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Less: effect on retained earnings caused by termination of redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Comprehensive income attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Noah Holdings Limited
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Amount in Thousands, Except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Noah |
|
| |||||||||
Accumulated | Holdings | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | other | Limited | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Paid-in | Retained | comprehensive | Shareholders’ | Noncontrolling | Shareholders’ | |||||||||||||||||
ordinary shares | ordinary shares | Treasury Stock | Capital | earnings | (loss)/income | Equity | Interest | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares |
| RMB1 |
| Shares |
| RMB |
| Shares |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB | |
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Net Income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| ( |
| |
Termination of redeemable non-controlling interest of a subsidiary |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
Share-based compensation |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Vesting of restricted shares |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Repurchase of ordinary shares (Note 14) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
Other comprehensive income—foreign currency translation adjustments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Other comprehensive income—change in fair value of available-for-sale investments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Non-controlling Interest capital injection |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
Non-controlling Interest capital divestment |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
Conversion of convertible notes |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Transfer of Class B shares to Class A shares |
| |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Retirement of treasury stock |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net Income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| ( |
| |
Impact of ASU 2016-01 (Note 2(j)) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Share-based compensation |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Vesting of restricted shares |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Other comprehensive income—foreign currency translation adjustments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| ( |
| |
Other comprehensive income—change in fair value of available-for-sale investments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
Non-controlling Interest capital injection |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
Impact of acquisition |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
Disposal of a subsidiary |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Conversion of convertible notes |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Transfer of Class B shares to Class A shares |
| |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net Income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
Share-based compensation |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Vesting of restricted shares |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Conversion of convertible notes |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
Other comprehensive income—foreign currency translation adjustments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| ( |
| |
Other comprehensive income—change in fair value of available-for-sale investments |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
Non-controlling Interest capital injection |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
Impact of acquisition | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | | | ||||||||||||
Distribution to non-controlling interests |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Disposal of a subsidiary | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ( |
| ( | |||||||||||
Retirement of treasury stock | ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| ( | — | — | — | — | |||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1 | The amount less than RMB 1 is rounded to zero. |
F-8
Noah Holdings Limited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amount in Thousands)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loss from disposal of property and equipment |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Depreciation and amortization |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Noncash lease expenses | — | — | | | ||||
Share-based compensation |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from equity in affiliates, net of dividends |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Income from disposal of subsidiaries |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| |
| ( |
| |
| |
Amortization of unearned lease income |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Impairment of long-term investments | — | — | | | ||||
Changes in investment fair value in the consolidated funds |
| |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Fair value changes of equity investments measured by fair value |
| — |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
| |
| ( |
| |
| |
Amounts due from related parties |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
Other current assets |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Other non-current assets |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Accrued payroll and welfare expenses |
| |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
Income taxes payable |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred revenues |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Other current liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other non-current liabilities |
| |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Amounts due to related parties |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
Changes in lease assets and liabilities |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Acquisitions and sales of financial products |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Other operating cash flows |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of property and equipment |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Purchase of held-to-maturity investments |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Proceeds from redemption of held-to-maturity investments |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Proceeds from sale or redemption of available-for-sale investments |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Purchase of other long-term investments |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Proceeds from sale of other long-term investments |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Purchase of investments held by consolidated funds |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Proceeds from investments held by consolidated funds | — | — | | | ||||
Loans to related parties |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Principal collection of loans to related parties |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Loans disbursement to third parties |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Principal collection of loans originated to third parties |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Increase in investment in affiliates |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Capital return from investment in affiliates |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Proceeds from disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash deconsolidated |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
Acquisition, net of cash acquired |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Purchase of loan receivables from factoring business |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
Collection of loan receivables from factoring business |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
Net cash used in investing activities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Noah Holdings Limited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amount in Thousands)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of stock options |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Contribution from non-controlling shareholders of subsidiaries |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Decrease in Mezzanine Equity – Redeemable non-controlling Interest of a Subsidiary |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Return of non-controlling interests of subsidiaries |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Prepayment from an investor to acquire interest in one subsidiary |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Payments related to transfer of rights to the loan receivables from factoring business |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
Proceeds related to transfer of rights to the loan receivables from factoring business |
| ( |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
Payment for repurchase of ordinary shares |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Effect of exchange rate changes |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Net (decrease) increases in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—beginning of the period |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—end of the period |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash paid for interest expenses |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment in accounts payable |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Conversion of convertible notes |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities | — | — | | | ||||
Reconciliation to amounts on consolidated balance sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Restricted cash |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-10
Noah Holdings Limited
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(In Thousands Renminbi, except for share and per share data, or otherwise stated)
1. Organization and Principal Activities
Noah Holdings Limited (“Company”) was incorporated on June 29, 2007 in the Cayman Islands by six individuals (the “Founders”). The Company, through its subsidiaries and consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) (collectively, the “Group”), is a comprehensive integrated financial services group with wealth management, asset management and lending and other businesses in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). The Group began offering services in 2005 through Shanghai Noah Investment Management Co., Ltd. (“Noah Investment”), a consolidated variable interest entity, founded in the PRC in August 2005.
The Company’s significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 include the following:
|
|
| Percentage |
| |||
Place of | of | ||||||
| Date of Incorporation |
| Incorporation |
| Ownership | ||
Noah Upright Fund Distribution Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Noah Upright (Shanghai) Fund Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.) |
|
|
| | % | ||
Shanghai Noah Investment (Group) Co., Ltd (formerly known as Shanghai Noah Rongyao Investment Consulting Co., Ltd) |
|
|
| | % | ||
Shanghai Noah Financial Services Corp. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Noah Insurance (Hong Kong) Limited |
|
|
| | % | ||
Shanghai Rongyao Information Technology Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Kunshan Noah Xingguang Investment Management Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Noah Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited |
|
|
| | % | ||
Gopher Capital GP Limited |
|
|
| | % | ||
Zigong Noah Financial Service Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Gopher CCM Limited |
|
|
| | % | ||
Noah Rongyitong (Wuhu) Microfinance Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
ARK Trust (Hongkong) Limited |
|
|
| | % | ||
Noah (Shanghai) Financial Leasing Co., Ltd |
|
|
| | % | ||
Noah International (Hong Kong) Limited |
|
|
| | % | ||
Kunshan Noah Rongyao Investment Management Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Shanghai Noah Chuangying Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Gopher International Investment Management (Shanghai) Limited |
|
|
| | % | ||
Noah Insurance Services LLC |
|
|
| | % | ||
Wuhu Noah Financial Services Co., Ltd. |
|
| | % | |||
Joy Triple Star Holdings Limited |
|
| | % | |||
Elivisa Consulting Pte Limited |
|
| | % |
Noah Investment’s significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 include the following:
|
|
| Percentage |
| |||
Place of | of | ||||||
| Date of Incorporation |
| Incorporation |
| Ownership | ||
Tianjin Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Wuhu Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Shanghai Gopher Asset Management Co. Ltd. |
|
|
| | % | ||
Shanghai Mengkuan Asset Management Co., Ltd | | % | |||||
Gopher Nuobao (Shanghai) Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
|
|
| | % |
F-11
2. Summary of Principal Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
(b) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company, its subsidiaries and consolidated VIEs. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.
A consolidated subsidiary is an entity in which the Company, directly or indirectly, controls more than one half of the voting power or has the power to: appoint or remove the majority of the members of the board of directors; cast a majority of votes at the meeting of the board of directors; or govern the financial and operating policies of the investee under a statute or agreement among the shareholders or equity holders.
U.S. GAAP provides guidance on the identification and financial reporting for entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting interests. The Group evaluates each of its interests in private companies to determine whether or not the investee is a VIE and, if so, whether the Group is the primary beneficiary of such VIE. In determining whether the Group is the primary beneficiary, the Group considers if the Group (1) has power to direct the activities that most significantly affects the economic performance of the VIE, and (2) receives the economic benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. If deemed the primary beneficiary, the Group consolidates the VIE.
Consolidation through contractual arrangements
The Company had been engaged in the fund distribution business through contractual arrangements among its PRC subsidiary, Shanghai Noah Investment (Group) Co., Ltd (formerly known as Shanghai Noah Rongyao Investment Consulting Co., Ltd). (“Noah Rongyao”), its PRC variable interest entity, Noah Investment, and Noah Investment’s shareholders because it was difficult for foreign invested enterprises and subsidiaries of foreign invested enterprise to apply for a fund distribution license. Noah Upright, a subsidiary of Noah Investment before March 2016, holds the licenses and permits necessary to conduct fund distribution and distribution of asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies in China. However, as the license and permit approval authorities relaxed their requirements for invested enterprise to apply for fund distribution license, Noah Upright was restructured to be a subsidiary of Shanghai Noah Financial Services Corp., or Noah Financial Services, through equity transfer in March 2016.
F-12
Since the Company does not have any equity interests in Noah Investment, in order to exercise effective control over its operations, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Noah Rongyao, entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Noah Investment and its shareholders, pursuant to which the Company is entitled to receive effectively all economic benefits generated from Noah Investment shareholders’ equity interests in it. These contractual arrangements include: (i) a Power of Attorney Agreement under which each shareholder of Noah Investment has executed a power of attorney to grant Noah Rongyao or its designee the power of attorney to act on his or her behalf on all matters pertaining to Noah Investment and to exercise all of his or her rights as a shareholder of the Company, (ii) an Exclusive Option Agreement under which the shareholders granted Noah Investment or its third-party designee an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase their equity interests in Noah Investment when and to the extent permitted by PRC law, (iii) an Exclusive Support Service Agreement under which Noah Investment engages Noah Rongyao as its exclusive technical and operational consultant and under which Noah Rongyao agrees to assist in arranging the financial support necessary to conduct Noah Investment’s operational activities, (iv) a Share Pledge Agreement under which the shareholders pledged all of their equity interests in Noah Investment to Noah Rongyao as collateral to secure their obligations under the agreement, and (v) a Free-Interest Loan Agreement under which each shareholder of Noah Investment entered into a loan agreement with Noah Rongyao for their respective investment in the equity interests in Noah Investment. The total amount of interest-free loans extended to the Founders is RMB
The Exclusive Option Agreement and Power of Attorney Agreements provide the Company effective control over the VIE and its subsidiaries, while the equity pledge agreements secure the equity owners’ obligations under the relevant agreements. Because the Company, through Noah Rongyao, has (i) the power to direct the activities of Noah Investment that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the right to receive substantially all of the benefits from Noah Investment, the Company is deemed the primary beneficiary of Noah Investment. Accordingly, the Group has consolidated the financial statements of Noah Investment since its inception. The aforementioned contractual agreements are effective agreements between a parent and a consolidated subsidiary, neither of which is accounted for in the consolidated financial statements (i.e. a call option on subsidiary shares under the Exclusive Option Agreement or a guarantee of subsidiary performance under the Share Pledge Agreement) or are ultimately eliminated upon consolidation (i.e. service fees under the Exclusive Support Service Agreement or loans payable/receivable under the Loan Agreement).
The Company believes that these contractual arrangements are in compliance with PRC laws and regulations and are legally enforceable. The restructure of fund distribution business from Noah Investment to Noah Financial Service in 2016 and the transfer of Tianjin Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd and Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd from Noah Rongyao to Noah Investment in 2012 do not impact the legal effectiveness of these contractual arrangements and do not impact the conclusion that the Company is the primary beneficiary of Noah Investment and its subsidiaries.
However, the aforementioned contractual arrangements with Noah Investment and its shareholders are subject to risks and uncertainties, including:
● | Noah Investment and its shareholders may have or develop interests that conflict with the Group’s interests, which may lead them to pursue opportunities in violation of the aforementioned contractual arrangements. |
F-13
● | Noah Investment and its shareholders could fail to obtain the proper operating licenses or fail to comply with other regulatory requirements. As a result, the PRC government could impose fines, new requirements or other penalties on the VIE or the Group, mandate a change in ownership structure or operations for the VIE or the Group, restrict the VIE or the Group’s use of financing sources or otherwise restrict the VIE or the Group’s ability to conduct business. |
● | The aforementioned contractual agreements may be unenforceable or difficult to enforce. The equity interests under the Share Pledge Agreement have been registered by the shareholders of Noah Investment with the relevant office of the administration of industry and commerce, however, the VIE or the Group may fail to meet other requirements. Even if the agreements are enforceable, they may be difficult to enforce given the uncertainties in the PRC legal system. |
● | The PRC government may declare the aforementioned contractual arrangements invalid. They may modify the relevant regulations, have a different interpretation of such regulations, or otherwise determine that the Group or the VIE have failed to comply with the legal obligations required to effectuate such contractual arrangements. |
● | It may be difficult to finance Noah Investment by means of loans or capital contributions. Loans from the offshore parent company to the VIE must be approved by the relevant PRC government body and such approval may be difficult or impossible to obtain. |
Consolidation of investment funds
In evaluating whether the investment funds in the legal form of limited partnership the Group manages as general partner are VIEs or not, the Group firstly assesses whether a simple majority or lower threshold of limited partnership interests, excluding interests held by the general partner, parties under common control of the general partner, or parties acting on behalf of the general partner, have substantive kick-out rights or participating rights. If such rights exist, the limited partnership is not deemed as a VIE and no further analysis will be performed. If it’s assessed to be a VIE, the Group further assesses whether there is any interest it has constitutes a variable interest. The Group concludes that the service fees it earns, including carried interest earned in the capacity of general partner, are commensurate with the level of effort required to provide such services and are at arm’s length and therefore are not deemed as variable interests. Before 2015, all limited partnerships the Group managed as general partner had substantive kick-out rights exercisable by a simple-majority of non-related limited partners and therefore were not deemed as VIEs. Since 2015, not all the newly formed limited partnerships the Group manages as general partners have substantive kick-out rights exercisable by a simple-majority of non-related limited partners and therefore constitute VIEs. As a result, such limited partnerships are deemed as VIEs not consolidated by the Group due to the fact that the general partner interest to absorb losses or receive benefits is not potentially significant to the VIEs.
The Group determines whether it is a primary beneficiary of a VIE when it initially involves with a VIE and reconsiders that conclusion when facts and circumstances change. As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, two investment funds were consolidated by the Group.
The Group also manages the contractual funds which it manages as fund manager and earns management fee and/or carried interest. The contractual funds are VIEs as the fund investors do not have substantive kick-out rights or participating rights. The Group from time to time invested in the contractual funds it manages for investment income. Such investments constitute variable interests to the contractual funds which are believed to be VIEs. The Group performed a quantitative analysis to determine if its interest could absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIEs and concluded it's not the primary beneficiary.
F-14
The following amounts of Noah Investment and its subsidiaries and the consolidated funds were included in the Group’s consolidated financial statements and are presented before the elimination of intercompany transactions with the non-VIE subsidiaries of the Group.
| As of December 31 | |||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Cash and cash equivalents |
| |
| |
| |
Restricted cash |
| |
| |
| |
Short-term investments |
| |
| |
| |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
| |
| |
| |
Amounts due from related parties |
| |
| |
| |
Other current assets |
| |
| |
| |
Long-term investments |
| |
| |
| |
Investment in affiliates |
| |
| |
| |
Property and equipment, net |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred tax assets |
| |
| |
| |
Other non-current assets |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets |
| |
| |
| |
Accrued payroll and welfare expenses |
| |
| |
| |
Income tax payable |
| |
| |
| |
Amounts due to the Group’s subsidiaries |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred revenue |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred tax liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Other current liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
|
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 |
| RMB | RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| — |
Other service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues from others |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Revenues from funds Gopher manages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Net revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating cost and expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Total other income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income attributable to Noah Holding Limited shareholders |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash flows provided by operating activities* |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash flows used in investing activities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Cash flows provided by financing activities |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-15
* | Cash flows provided by operating activities in 2017, 2018 and 2019 include amounts due to the Group’s subsidiaries of RMB |
The VIEs contributed an aggregate of
There are
Relevant PRC laws and regulations restrict the VIEs from transferring a portion of their net assets, equivalent to the balance of its statutory reserve and its share capital, to the Group in the form of loans and advances or cash dividends. Please refer to Note 17 for disclosure of restricted net assets.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, the Group had some variable interests in various investment funds and contractual funds that were VIEs but were not consolidated by the Group as the Group was not determined to be the primary beneficiary of the funds. The maximum potential financial statement loss the Group could incur if the investment funds and contractual funds were to default on all of their obligations is (i) the loss of value of the interests in such investments that the Group holds, including equity investments recorded in investment in affiliates as well as debt securities investments recorded in short-term investments and long-term investments in the consolidated balance sheet, and (ii) any management fee and/or carried interest receivables recorded in amounts due from related parties.
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 |
RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Amounts due from related parties |
| |
| |
| |
Investments |
| |
| |
| |
Maximum exposure to loss in non-consolidated VIEs |
| |
| |
| |
The Group has not provided financial support to these nonconsolidated VIEs during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, and had
(c) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from such estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Group’s consolidated financial statements include assumptions used to determine valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, allowance for loan losses, fair value measurement of underlying investment portfolios of the funds that the Group invests, fair value of equity investments, assumptions related to the consolidation of entities in which the Group holds variable interests, assumptions related to the valuation of share-based compensation, impairment of long-term investments and the determination of the incremental borrowing rate used for operating lease liabilities.
F-16
(d) Concentration of Credit Risk
The Group is subject to potential significant concentrations of credit risk consisting principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due from related parties, loan receivables and investments. All of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents and more than half of investments are held at financial institutions, Group’s management believes, to be high credit quality. The Group also invests in equity securities of private companies, of which no single equity security accounted for 1% of total assets for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019. In addition, the Group’s investment policy limits its exposure to concentrations of credit risk.
Substantially all revenues were generated mainland of China and Hong Kong.
There were no financial product providers which accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
Credit of lending business is controlled by the application of credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. To minimize credit risk, the Group requires collateral in form of right to securities. The Group identifies credit risk on a customer by customer basis. The information is monitored regularly by management.
(e) Investments in Affiliates
Affiliated companies are entities over which the Group has significant influence, but which it does not control. The Group generally considers an ownership interest of
The Group also considers it has significant influence over the funds that it serves as general partner or fund manager. For funds that the Group is not deemed the primary beneficiary of these funds, the equity method of accounting is accordingly used for investments by the Group in these funds. In addition, the investee funds meet the definition of an Investment Company and are required to report their investment assets at fair value. The Group records its equity pick-up based on its percentage ownership of the investee funds’ operating result.
(f) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Group records certain of its financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value reflects the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Group considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
F-17
The Group applies a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical asset or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
As a practical expedient, the Group uses Net Asset Value ("NAV") or its equivalent to measure the fair value of certain investments. NAV is primarily determined based on information provided by external fund administrators. The Group’s investments valued at NAV as a practical expedient are certain private equity funds.
(g) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, demand deposits and money market funds, which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use, and which have original maturities of three months or less when purchased.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, cash and cash equivalents of RMB
(h) Restricted Cash
The Group’s restricted cash primarily represents cash legally set aside for a specified purpose and cash deposits required by China Insurance Regulatory Commission for entities engaging in insurance agency or brokering activities in China. Such cash cannot be withdrawn without the written approval of the China Insurance Regulatory Commission.
(i) Investments
The Group invests in debt securities and equity securities and accounts for the investments based on the nature of the products invested, and the Group’s intent and ability to hold the investments to maturity.
The Group’s investments in debt securities include marketable bond fund securities, trust products, asset management plans, contractual funds and real estate funds those have a stated maturity and normally pay a prospective fixed rate of return and secondary market equity fund products, the underlying assets of which are portfolios of equity investments in listed enterprises. The Group classifies the investments in debt securities as held-to-maturity when it has both the positive intent and ability to hold them until maturity. Held-to-maturity investments are recorded at amortized cost and are classified as long-term or short-term according to their contractual maturity. Long-term investments are reclassified as short-term when their contractual maturity date is less than one year. Investments that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Investments that do not meet the criteria of held-to-maturity or trading securities are classified as available-for-sale, and are reported at fair value with changes in fair value deferred in other comprehensive income.
F-18
On January 1, 2018, the Group adopted ASU 2016-01 Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. According to the guidance, the Group started to record equity investments at fair value, with gains and losses recorded through net earnings. In accordance with ASC 321, the Group elects the measurement alternative and records certain equity investments without readily determinable fair value at cost, less impairments, plus or minus observable price changes . The Group continues to apply the alternative measurement guidance until the investments have readily determinable fair values or become eligible for the NAV practical expedient. The Group may subsequently elect to measure such investments at fair value and the election of changing measurement approach is irrevocable. The accounting standard also includes a transition requirement on presentation that requires the amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income for equity securities that exist as of the date of adoption previously classified as available-for-sale to be reclassified to retained earnings. As a result, upon adoption of ASU 2016-01, the Group recorded a cumulative effect adjustment from other comprehensive income to retained earnings of RMB
Equity investments the Group elects to use measurement alternative are evaluated for impairment qualitatively at each reporting date based on various factors, including projected and historical financial performance, cash flow forecasts and financing needs, the regulatory and economic environment of the investee and overall health of the investee's industry. If impairment indicators of the investment are noted, the Group has to estimate the fair value of the investment in accordance with ASC 820. An impairment loss in net income will be recognized equal to the difference between the carrying value and fair value if the fair value is less than the investment’s carrying value.
The Group reviews its investments in debt except for those classified as trading securities for other-than-temporary impairment based on the specific identification method and considers available quantitative and qualitative evidence in evaluating potential impairment. If the cost of an investment exceeds the investment’s fair value, the Group considers, among other factors, general market conditions, government economic plans, the duration and the extent to which the fair value of the investment is less than cost and the Group’s intent and ability to hold the investment to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred.
The Group recognizes other-than-temporary impairment in earnings if it has the intent to sell the debt security or if it is more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Additionally, the Group evaluates expected cash flows to be received and determines if credit-related losses on debt securities exist, which are considered to be other-than-temporary, should be recognized in earnings.
(j) Non-controlling interests
A non-controlling interest in a subsidiary of the Group represents the portion of the equity (net assets) in the subsidiary not directly or indirectly attributable to the Group. Non-controlling interests are presented as a separate component of equity in the consolidated balance sheet, earnings and other comprehensive income are attributed to controlling and non-controlling interests. The non-controlling interest was RMB
F-19
The following schedule shows the effects of changes in the Company’s ownership interest in less than wholly owned subsidiaries on equity attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
|
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 |
| RMB | RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Net income attributable to Noah Holdings Limited shareholders |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Transfers from the non-controlling interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Noah’s equity by partial disposal of subsidiaries |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Increase in Noah’s capital from contribution of non-controlling interest | — |
| — | | | |||
Net transfers from non-controlling interest |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
Change from net income attributable to Noah and transfers from non-controlling interest |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(k) Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, and is depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
| Estimated Useful Lives in Years |
Leasehold improvements |
| |
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment |
| |
Motor Vehicles |
| |
Software |
| |
Building |
|
Gains and losses from the disposal of property and equipment are included in income from operations.
(l) Revenue Recognition
On January 1, 2018, the Group adopted ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. Accordingly, revenue for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019 was presented under ASC 606, while comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.
Those types of revenues are accounted for as contracts with customers. Under the guidance of ASC 606, the Group is required to (a) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (b) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (c) determine the transaction price, (d) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (e) recognize revenue when (or as) the Group satisfies its performance obligation. In determining the transaction price, the Group has included variable consideration only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized would not occur. Revenues are recorded, net of sales related taxes and surcharges.
The adoption of ASC 606 did not significantly change (i) the timing and pattern of revenue recognition for all of the Group’s revenue streams, and (ii) the presentation of revenue as gross versus net. Therefore, the adoption of ASC 606 did not have a significant impact on the Group’s financial position, results of operations, equity or cash flows as of the adoption date and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019.
F-20
The following table summarizes the Group’s main revenues streams from contracts with its customers:
Revenue Streams |
| Performance Obligation Point In Time |
| Payment Terms |
| Variable or Fixed |
Fund distribution services | Point in time | Typically paid within a month after financial product established | Fixed | |||
Insurance brokerage services | Point in time | Typically monthly in arrears | Fixed | |||
Recurring service fees | Over time | Typically quarterly, semi-annually or annually | Variable | |||
Performance-based income | Point in time | Typically paid shortly after the income has been determined | Variable | |||
Lending services | Over time | Typically monthly in arrears | Fixed | |||
Investor education services | Point in time | Typically paid at the beginning of each course | Fixed |
Disaggregation of revenue
The Group derives revenue primarily from one-time commissions, recurring service fees and performance-based income paid by clients or financial product providers.
The following tables show, by segment, revenue from contracts with customers disaggregated by service lines for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019:
Year Ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | Lending and Other | ||||||
| Business |
| Business |
| Businesses |
| Total | |
| RMB | RMB | RMB | RMB | ||||
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Other service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Lending services |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
Investor education services |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
Other services(1) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(1) | The Group also provides other services including financial leasing, family trust and payment technology services. |
Year Ended December 31, 2018 | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| Other Financial |
| |||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | Service | ||||||
| Business |
| Business |
| Business |
| Total | |
| RMB | RMB | RMB | RMB | ||||
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Other service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Lending services |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
Investor education services |
| |
| — |
| — |
| |
Other services |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
For the Group's revenues generated by the different geographic location, please see note 18 segment information.
F-21
One-time commissions
The Group earns one-time commissions from fund raising services provided to clients or financial product providers. The Group enters into one-time commission agreements with clients or financial product providers which specifies the key terms and conditions of the arrangement. One-time commissions are separately negotiated for each transaction and generally do not include rights of return, credits or discounts, rebates, price protection or other similar privileges, and typically paid on or shortly after the transaction is completed. Upon establishment of a financial product, the Group earns a one-time commission from clients or financial product providers, calculated as a percentage of the financial products purchased by its clients. The Group defines the “establishment of a financial product” for its revenue recognition purpose as the time when both of the following two criteria are met: (1) the investor referred by the Group has entered into a purchase or subscription contract with the relevant product provider and, if required, the investor has transferred a deposit to an escrow account designated by the product provider and (2) the product provider has issued a formal notice to confirm the establishment of a financial product. After the contract is established, there are no significant judgments made when determining the one-time commission price. Therefore one-time commissions is recorded at point of time when the financial product is established. For certain contracts that require a portion of the payment be deferred until the end of the financial products’ life or other specified contingency, the Group evaluates each variable consideration and recognizes revenue only when the Group concludes that it is probable that changes in its estimate of such consideration will not result in significant reversals of revenue in subsequent periods.
The Group also earns one-time commissions from insurance companies by referring clients to purchase the insurance products from them, and recognizes revenues when the underlying insurance contracts become effective.
Recurring service fees
The Group also provides investment management services to investment funds and other vehicles in exchange for recurring service fees. Recurring service fees are determined based on the types of financial products the Group distributes and/or manages and are calculated as either (i) a percentage of the total capital commitments of investments made by the investors or (ii) as a percentage of the fair value of the total investment in the financial products, calculated daily. These customer contracts require the Group to provide investment management services, which represents a performance obligation that the Group satisfies over time. After the contract is established, there are no significant judgments made when determining the transaction price. As the Group provides these services throughout the contract term, for either method of calculating recurring service fees, revenue is calculated on a daily basis over the contract term. Recurring service agreements do not include rights of return, credits or discounts, rebates, price protection or other similar privileges. Payment of recurring service fees are normally on a regular basis (typically quarterly or annually) and are not subject to clawback once determined.
Performance-based income
In a typical arrangement in which the Group serves as fund manager, and in some cases in which the Group serves as distributor, the Group is entitled to a performance-based fee based on the extent by which the fund’s investment performance exceeds a certain threshold based on the contract term. Such performance-based fees earned based on the performance of the underlying fund are a form of variable consideration in its contracts with customers to provide investment management services. Those performance-based income is typically calculated and distributed when the cumulative return of the fund can be determined. Performance-based income will not be recognized as revenue until (a) it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur, or (b) the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. At each reporting date, the Group updates its estimate of the transaction price and concludes that it cannot include its estimate of performance-based income in the transaction price because performance-based income has various possible consideration amounts and the experience that the Group has with similar contracts is of little predictive value in determining the future performance of the funds, thus the Group cannot conclude that it is probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative amount of revenue recognized would not occur.
F-22
Other service fees
The Group mainly derived other service fees from lending services, investor education services and other services.
Revenue from lending services represents interest income from loan origination services, and is recognized monthly in accordance with their contractual terms and recorded as part of other service fees in the consolidated statement of operations. The Group does not charge prepayment penalties from its customers.
The Group also provides investor education services, offering various types of training programs to high net worth individuals and their families. Such programs normally last several days. The service fees charged to the attendees are not refundable. The revenues are recognized at point of time when the service is completed considering the course lasts only for a few days.
Transaction price allocation
For certain contracts that the Group provides both fund raising and investment management services involving two separate performance obligations which belong to two major stream (i.e., one time and recurring services), the Group needs to allocate transaction price between these two performance obligations at the relative stand-alone selling price (“SSP”). Judgment is required to determine the SSP for each distinct performance obligation. As the service fee rate for each service contained in the contract is typically negotiated separately, the Group determines that those fee rates are generally consistent with SSP, and can be deemed as the transaction price allocated to each performance obligation.
Accounts receivable
Timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. Amounts due from related parties (receivables from funds that Gopher manages) and accounts receivable represent amounts invoiced, and revenue recognized prior to invoicing when the Group has satisfied its performance obligations and has the unconditional right to consideration. As the Group is entitled to unconditional right to consideration in exchange for services when the Group transferred to customers, the Group therefore does not recognize any contract asset. The balances of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 were substantially within
Contract liability
Contract liability (deferred revenue) relates to unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of each reporting period and consists of cash payment received in advance for recurring service fees, from customers of investment management services. Due to the prepayment was normally paid on a quarterly basis, the majority of the performance obligations are satisfied within one year. The amount of revenue recognized in 2018 and 2019 that was included in deferred revenue balance at the beginning of the year was RMB
Practical expedients
The Group has used the following practical expedients as allowed under ASC 606:
The Group expenses sales commissions as incurred when the amortization period is one year or less. Sales commission expenses are recorded within “Relationship manager compensation” in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Group assessed and concluded that there is no significant
F-23
The Group has also applied the practical expedient for certain revenue streams to exclude the value of
(m) VAT Related Surcharges
The Group is subject to Value-added Tax (“VAT”) and its related education surtax, urban maintenance and construction tax, on the services provided in the PRC. VAT and related surcharges are primarily levied based on revenues concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction. The applicable VAT rates include
(n) Compensation and benefits
Compensation and benefits mainly include salaries and commissions for relationship managers, share-based compensation expenses, bonus related to performance based income, and salaries and bonuses for middle office and back office employees.
(o) Income Taxes
Current income taxes are provided for in accordance with the relevant statutory tax laws and regulations.
The Group accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Group recognizes net deferred tax assets to the extent that it believes these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, it considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. If the Group determines that its deferred tax assets are realizable in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Group would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
The Group records uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process whereby (1) the Group determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Group recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The liability associated with unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law developments and new or emerging legislation. Such adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are identified. The effective tax rate for the Group includes the net impact of changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and subsequent adjustments as considered appropriate by management. The Group recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
F-24
(p) Share-Based Compensation
The Group recognizes share-based compensation based on the fair value of equity awards on the date of the grant, with compensation expense recognized using a straight-line vesting method over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. The Group estimates the fair value of share options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected term represents the period that share-based awards are expected to be outstanding, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the share-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee exercise behavior. The computation of expected volatility is based on the fluctuation of the historical share price. Amortization of share-based compensation is presented in the same line item in the consolidated statements of operations as the cash compensation of those employees receiving the award.
The Group treated a modification of the terms or conditions of an equity award as an exchange of the original award for a new award. The incremental compensation cost as an effect of a modification is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before its terms are modified, measured based on the share price and other pertinent factors at that date. Total recognized compensation cost for an equity award shall at least equal the fair value of the award at the grant date unless at the date of the modification the performance or service conditions of the original award are not expected to be satisfied. Thus, the total compensation cost measured at the date of a modification shall be the sum of the portion of the grant-date fair value of the original award for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered (or has already been rendered) at that date, and the incremental cost resulting from the modification. The Group records the incremental fair value of the modified award, as compensation cost on the date of modification for vested awards, or over the remaining service period for unvested awards.
(q) Government Subsidies
Government subsidies include cash subsidies received by the Group’s entities in the PRC from local governments as incentives for investing in certain local districts, and are typically granted based on the amount of investment made by the Group in form of registered capital or taxable income generated by the Group in these local districts. Such subsidies allow the Group full discretion in utilizing the funds and are used by the Group for general corporate purposes. The local governments have final discretion as to whether the Group has met all criteria to be entitled to the subsidies. The Group does not in all instances receive written confirmation from local governments indicating the approval of the cash subsidy before cash is received. Cash subsidies are RMB
(r) Net Income per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue ordinary shares were exercised into ordinary shares. Common share equivalents are excluded from the computation of the diluted net income per share in years when their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Diluted net income per share is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive shares, including non-vested restricted shares and share options.
F-25
(s) Leases
The Group as a lessee
In the first quarter of 2019, the Group adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes the lease accounting guidance under Topic 840, and generally requires lessees to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use (ROU) assets on the balance sheet and to provide enhanced disclosures surrounding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leasing arrangements. The Group adopted the new guidance using the modified retrospective transition approach by applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application and not restating comparative periods. The Group also elected the
The Group has operating leases primarily for office space. The determination of whether an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease is made at inception by evaluating whether the arrangement conveys the right to use an identified asset and whether the Group obtains substantially all of the economic benefits from and has the ability to direct the use of the asset. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities on the Group’s consolidated balance sheets and operating lease liabilities - short-term are recorded within other current liabilities. Operating lease assets represent the Group’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Group’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. The Group uses its estimated incremental borrowing rate as of the commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term at the lease commencement date. To determine the incremental borrowing rate used to calculate the present value of future lease payments, the Group uses information including the Group’s credit rating, interest rates of similar debt instruments of entities with comparable credit ratings, as applicable. Variable components of the lease payments such as utilities, maintenance costs are expensed as incurred and not included in determining the present value. The lease terms include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Group will exercise that option. The Group considers these options, which may be elected at the Group’s sole discretion, in determining the lease term on a lease-by-lease basis. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Group as a lessor
The Group enters into operating lease agreements for vehicles where the Group acts as the lessor, the Group keeps the underlying assets on the consolidated balance sheet and continues to depreciate the assets over its useful life. The lease income is recognized in other revenues on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Group also enters into sale and leaseback agreements as a buyer-lessor with a third party (seller-lessee) for motor vehicles. The seller-lessee has repurchase obligations to acquire these motor vehicles at the end of the lease terms, consequently under ASC 842 the transfers of the vehicles are determined to be failed sales and are treated as financing agreements. The Group records financing receivables from these transactions in other current assets and other non-current assets according to the remaining contract period. The difference between the gross investment in the lease and the present value of lease receivables is recorded as unearned income which is amortized to income over the lease term as finance lease interest income to produce a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment in the lease. Unearned income is recognized as other income and is included in "Net revenue - revenue from others - other service fees".
(t) Foreign Currency Translation
The Company’s reporting currency is Renminbi (“RMB”). The Company’s functional currency is the United States dollar (“U.S. dollar or US$”). The Company’s operations are principally conducted through the subsidiaries and VIEs located in the PRC where the local currency is the functional currency. For those subsidiaries and VIEs which are not located in the PRC and have the functional currency other than RMB, the financial statements are translated from their respective functional currencies into RMB.
F-26
Assets and liabilities of the Group’s overseas entities denominated in currencies other than the RMB are translated into RMB at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates and revenues, expenses, gains and losses are translated using the average rate for the year. Translation adjustments are reported as foreign currency translation adjustment and are shown as a separate component of other comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Translations of amounts from RMB into US$ are included solely for the convenience of the reader and have been made at the rate of US$1 = RMB
(u) Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. For the years presented, total comprehensive income included net income, change in fair value of available-for-sale investments and foreign currency translation adjustments.
(v) Loan receivables, net
Loan receivables represent loans offered to the clients in the lending business. Loan receivables are initially recognized at fair value which is the cash disbursed to originate loans, measured subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest method, net of allowance that reflects the Group’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected. The Group also transfers some of the loan receivables to unrelated third parties. The Group accounts for the transfer of loan receivables in accordance with ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing. Please refer to note 2(y) for the Group’s accounting policy for sale accounting.
(w) Allowance for loan losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed to be reasonable by management to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio as of each balance sheet date. Net changes in the allowance for loan losses are recorded as part of other operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. The allowance is based on factors such as the size and current risk characteristics of the individual loans and actual loss, delinquency, and/or risk rating experience of the loans. Generally the period of the loans last for no more than 1 year, and are considered to be a homogenous population of similar credit quality. In addition, the Group also considers the loan allowance benchmarks periodically published by regulators for financial institutions in the PRC for loans with similar risks as a proxy for macroeconomic conditions that could have an impact on the performance of loans prospectively. Specific reserves are provided when and to the extent a credit event occurs with respect to an individual loan. The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges to income and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries). The Group charges off uncollectible loans against the allowance account once it is determined the full amount is not collectible. Any amounts collected after a charge off is deemed a recovery of loan losses. The Group evaluates its allowances for loan losses on a quarterly basis or more often as deemed necessary. The Group has followed the same methodology for estimating the loan losses since inception. The provision rate for loans outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 were
The Group performed a “back test” of the allowance for loan losses estimate by comparing the actual loan losses in 2019 to the estimated loan losses as of December 31, 2018. No significant difference was identified. In case significant variance is identified through the back test, the estimate methodology will be modified to reflect expected loan losses.
F-27
(x) Sale accounting
The Group developed a new business model in 2016 through one of its subsidiaries, whereby the Group issues loans to unrelated third parties which are collateralized by trade receivables resulting from normal business transactions between the original creditor and their debtors. Legally, the Group has acquired the underlying trade receivables. However, given the nature of the recourse retained by the original creditor, the purchase of trade receivables does not meet the criteria in ASC 860, and is therefore accounted for as a secured lending arrangement. Upon origination, the loans are immediately transferred to individual investors on the Group’s other financial service platform. The Group accounts for the transfer of the loans in accordance with ASC 860. Such business through the Group’s online platform was terminated from the third quarter of 2017.
Transfers that do not qualify for sale accounting in accordance with ASC 860 are accounted for as secured borrowings with the proceeds received from the individual investors as “loan payables from the factoring business” on the consolidated balance sheets, and the advancements to the original holders of the accounts receivables as “loan receivables from the factoring business” on the consolidated balance sheets. The cash flows related to purchases and collections of the loan receivables from the factoring business are included within the cash flows from investing activities category, and the proceeds and payments related to the transfer of the rights to the loan receivables from the factoring business are included within the cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
For transfers that qualify for sale accounting in accordance with ASC 860, cash receipts and cash payments resulting from their acquisition and sale are classified as operating cash flows. As the loans are sold at par value, no gain or loss is recorded as a result. The Group’s continuing involvement subsequent to the transfer is limited to the services performed as a collection agent to collect and disburse cash flows received from the underlying receivables to the individual investors, and does not provide guarantee on the return of the receivables. The Group has no retained interests, servicing assets, or servicing liabilities related to the loans sold. From the second quarter of 2019, such transactions related to loan receivables from factoring business were terminated.
In 2017, the Group extended such business model to receivables from other business. The transfers of receivables from other business also qualify for sale accounting in accordance with ASC 860. As a result, the Group adopted the same accounting policy as described in the preceding paragraph.
(y) Allowances for doubtful accounts
Amount due from related parties, accounts receivable, loan receivables from factoring business and other receivables recognized in other current assets are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Group assesses the collectability of these receivables periodically and makes provisions case by case considering the factors including, but not limited to (i) the length of time the receivables overdue; (ii) any changes in creditability of the counterparties; and (iii) any changes in the business or the industry of the counterparty, or any changes in economic environment that may impact the collection. The facts and circumstances of each account may require the Group to use substantial judgment in assessing its collectability. The Group writes off these receivables against the allowance for doubtful accounts when a balance is determined to be uncollectible.
F-28
The following table summarizes the changes in the Group’s reserve for allowances for doubtful accounts, which is included in amount due from related parties, accounts receivable, loan receivables from factoring business and other receivables:
Year ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||
Amount due | Accounts | Loan receivables | Other | |||||
from related parties | receivable | from factoring business | receivables | |||||
| RMB | RMB | RMB | RMB | ||||
Balance at beginning of the year |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Provisions |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Write off |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Balance at end of the year |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018,
(z) Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Implemented
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Credit Losses, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments , which has subsequently been amended by ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05, ASU 2019-10. ASU 2019-11 and ASU 2020-03. This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today’s incurred loss approach with an expected loss model for instruments measured at amortized cost. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. This ASU is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. The Group will adopt the guidance on January 1, 2020 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 eliminate the requirements to disclose the amount and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements, and policy for timing of transfers between levels. ASU 2018-13 also provides clarification in the measurement uncertainty disclosure by explaining that the disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. In addition, ASU 2018-13 added the following requirements: changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period; and range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements. Finally, ASU 2018-13 updated language to further encourage entities to apply materiality when considering de minimus for disclosure requirements. The guidance will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with the exception of amendments to changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used for Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty which will be applied prospectively. The Group will adopt the guidance on January 1, 2020 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, a new accounting standard update to simplify the accounting for income taxes. The new guidance removes certain exceptions for recognizing deferred taxes for investments, performing intra period allocation and calculating income taxes in interim periods. It also adds guidance to reduce complexity in certain areas, including recognizing deferred taxes for tax goodwill and allocating taxes to members of a consolidated group. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2021. The Group is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
F-29
3. Net Income per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share attributable to ordinary shareholders:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands, Except Shares Data) | ||||||||
|
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 |
| Class A and Class B | Class A and Class B | Class A and Class B | Class A and Class B | ||||
| RMB | RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Net income attributable to Class A and Class B ordinary shareholders—basic |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Plus: interest expense for convertible notes |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income attributable to Class A and Class B ordinary shareholders—diluted |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Weighted average number of Class A and Class B ordinary shares outstanding—basic |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Plus: share options |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Plus: non-vested restricted shares |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Plus: shares outstanding for convertible notes |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Weighted average number of Class A and Class B ordinary shares outstanding—diluted |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Basic net income per share |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted net income per share |
| |
| |
| |
| |
In January 2016, the Company’s shareholders voted in favor of a proposal to adopt a dual-class share structure, pursuant to which authorized share capital was reclassified and re-designated into Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, with each Class A ordinary share being entitled to
Diluted net income per share does not include the following instruments as their inclusion would be antidilutive:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
Share options |
| |
| |
| |
Non-vested restricted shares |
| — |
| |
| |
Total |
| |
| |
| |
F-30
4. Other Current Assets
Components of other current assets are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 |
| RMB | RMB | US$ | |||
Receivables from financial leasing service |
| |
| |
| |
Advance to vendors |
| |
| |
| |
Deposits for lending service |
| |
| |
| |
Receivables from equity transfer |
| — |
| | | |
VAT receivable | | | | |||
Others |
| |
| |
| |
Total |
| |
| |
| |
Receivables from financial leasing service relates to financial leasing business the Group started in 2017. The receivables are initially recognized as long-term receivables as the underlying leases typically have a term of
F-31
5. Investments
The following table summarizes the Group’s investment balances:
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 |
| RMB | RMB | US$ | |||
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Held-to-maturity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Fixed income products |
| |
| |
| |
Total held-to-maturity investments |
| |
| |
| |
- Available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Fixed income products |
| |
| — |
| — |
Total available-for-sale investments |
| |
| — |
| — |
Total Investments held by consolidated investment funds |
| |
| |
| |
Total short-term investments |
| |
| |
| |
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Held-to-maturity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Fixed income products |
| |
| |
| |
Total held-to-maturity investments |
| |
| |
| |
- Available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Fixed income product |
| |
| |
| |
Total available-for-sale investments |
| |
| |
| |
- Other long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Investments measured at fair value |
| |
| |
| |
- Investments measured at cost less impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Private equity funds products |
| |
| |
| |
- Other investments measured at cost less impairment |
| |
| |
| |
Total other long-term investments |
| |
| |
| |
Total Investments held by consolidated investment funds |
| |
| |
| |
Total long-term investments |
| |
| |
| |
Total investments |
| |
| |
| |
Held-to-maturity investments consist of investments in fixed income products managed by the Group that have stated maturity and normally pay a prospective fixed rate of return, carried at amortized cost. The Group recorded investment income on these products of RMB
Available-for-sale investments consist of investments in fixed income products and other products that have stated maturity and normally pay a prospective fixed rate of return, carried at fair value. On January 1, 2018, upon adoption of ASU 2016-01, the Group recorded a cumulative effect adjustment from other comprehensive income to retained earnings of RMB
F-32
The consolidated investment funds are, for GAAP purposes, investment companies and reflect their investments at fair value. The Group has retained this specialized accounting for the consolidated funds in consolidation. Accordingly, the unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of the investments held by the consolidated investment funds are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as investment income.
Other long-term investments consist of investments in several private equity funds as a limited partner with insignificant equity interest, equity investments of common shares of several companies with less than
6. Fair Value Measurement
As of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2019, information about (i) inputs into the fair value measurements of the Group’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition and (ii) investments measured at NAV or its equivalent as a practical expedient is as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
|
| Quoted Prices |
|
| ||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||
As of | Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||
December 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||
Description | 2018 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||
| RMB | RMB | RMB | RMB | ||||
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
Investments held by consolidated investment fund |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
Investments held by consolidated investment fund |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
Other long-term investments measured at fair value |
| |
| |
| |
| — |
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||||
|
| Quoted Prices |
|
| ||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||
As of | Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||
December 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | NAV | ||||||
Description | 2019 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||
| RMB | RMB | RMB | RMB | RMB | |||||
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investments held by consolidated investment funds |
| |
| — |
| |
| — | — | |
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Available-for-sale investments |
| |
| — |
| |
| — | — | |
Investments held by consolidated investment fund |
| |
| — |
| |
| — | — | |
Other long-term investments measured at fair value |
| |
| |
| — |
| | |
Available-for-sale investments in debt securities consist of investments in trust products, asset management plans, contractual funds and real estate funds that have stated maturity and normally pay a prospective fixed rate of return. These investments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value is measured either using discounted cash flow model based on contractual cash flow and a discount rate of prevailing market yield for products with similar terms as of the measurement date, as such, it is classified within Level 2 measurement.
F-33
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, the Group has
Other long-term investments measured at fair value are (i) equity investments in listed companies whose fair value can be obtained through active markets which is classified within Level 1 measurement, (ii) private equity funds categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and (iii) private equity funds measured at NAV.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the investments measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2019, presented as follows:
| RMB |
| US$ | |
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||
Beginning balance of investments, at fair value |
| — |
| — |
Transfer of investments in fair value hierarchy from Level 2 to Level 3 |
| |
| |
Measurement approach change from measurement alternative to fair value measurement | | | ||
Disposal of portfolio investments |
| ( |
| ( |
Changes in gains included in investment income (loss) |
| |
| |
Ending balance of investments, at fair value |
| |
| |
Changes in net unrealized gains included in investment income (loss) related to Level 3 investments still held as of December 31, 2019 | | |
Total realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for Level 3 investments are reported in investment income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations.
The private equity funds were previously valued based on recent observable transaction prices, classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. However as no observable transactions of the investments occurred since middle of 2018, the Group’s valuation methodology in 2019 for these investments involved significant unobservable inputs that required significant judgment or estimation. Hence such investments were classified within Level 3 measurement at the beginning of the period. In 2019, the Group also elected to measure a single investment at fair value, which was previously measured using the measurement alternative at cost, less impairment.
With respect to the private equity funds within Level 3 measurement, the Group generally uses a market comparable analysis. The valuation methodology requires a subjective process in determining significant inputs and making assumptions and judgments, for which the Group considers and evaluates including, but not limited to, (1) comparable data wherever possible to quantify or adjust the fair value, (2) quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used by the third party and (3) prevailing market conditions.
The Group also has financial instruments that are not reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet but whose fair values are practicable to estimate. The Group believes the fair value of its financial instruments: principally cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, amount due from related parties, short-term held-to-maturity investments, loan receivables and other payables approximate their recorded values due to the short-term nature of the instruments.
F-34
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, information about inputs into the fair value measurements of the Group’s long-term financial instruments that are not reported at fair value on balance sheet is as following:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||
Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2018 | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||
Description | Carrying Value | Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||
|
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
Long-term investments – held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in fixed income products |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||
Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2019 | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||
Description | Carrying Value | Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||
|
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
Long-term investments – held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in fixed income products |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
Fair value measurement on a non-recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 included that used in impairment of held-to-maturity investment (see Note 5) which was classified as a level 3 fair value measurement, and the Group did not have assets or liabilities reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On January 1, 2018, the Group adopted ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments, and started to measure long-term equity investments, other than equity method investments, at fair value through earnings. For those investments without readily determinable fair value that the Group cannot estimate fair value without undue cost, the Group elected to record those investments at cost, less impairment, and plus or minus subsequent adjustments for observable price changes, which are generally not categorized in the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, the carrying value of equity investments without readily determinable fair value was RMB
The fair value of long-term investments in fixed income products is estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on contractual cash flows and a discount rate at the prevailing market yield on the measurement date for similar products, and is classified as a Level 2 fair value measurement.
F-35
7. Investment in Affiliates
The following table summarizes the Group’s balances of investment in affiliates:
As of December 31, | ||||||
| (Amount in Thousands) | |||||
2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Kunshan Jingzhao |
| |
| |
| |
Wanjia Win-Win |
| |
| |
| |
Wuhu Hongxing |
| |
| |
| |
Others |
| |
| |
| |
Funds that the Group serves as general partner |
| |
| |
| |
-Gopher Transform Private Fund |
| |
| |
| |
-Real estate funds and real estate funds of funds |
| |
| |
| |
-Private equity funds of funds |
| |
| |
| |
-Others |
| |
| |
| |
Total investment in affiliates |
| |
| |
| |
In May 2011, Tianjin Gopher injected RMB
In February 2013, Gopher Asset Management injected RMB
In April 2016, Shanghai Gopher Asset Management injected RMB
In the fourth quarter of 2016, Gopher Asset Management injected RMB
Gopher Asset Management and its subsidiaries invested in private equity funds of funds, real estate funds and real estate funds of funds, and other fixed income funds of funds that the Group serves as general partner or fund manager. Gopher Asset Management held less than
The Group recorded income from equity in affiliates of RMB
F-36
Summarized financial information
The following table shows summarized financial information relating to the statements of financial condition for the Group’s equity method investments assuming 100% ownership as of December 31, 2018 and 2019:
As of December 31 | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Balance sheet data: |
|
|
| |||
Current assets |
| |
| |
| |
Non-current assets |
| |
| |
| |
Current liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
Non-current liabilities |
| |
| |
| |
The following table shows summarized financial information relating to the statements of operations for the Group’s equity method investments assuming 100% ownership for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | RMB | US$ | |||||
Operating data: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenue |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (Loss) from operations |
| ( |
| |
| |
| |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain from investments |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
8. Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net consists of the following:
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Leasehold improvements | | | | |||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| |
| |
| |
Motor vehicles |
| |
| |
| |
Software |
| |
| |
| |
Property |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Accumulated depreciation |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| |
| |
| | |
Construction in progress |
| |
| |
| |
Property and equipment, net |
| |
| |
| |
Depreciation expense was RMB
F-37
9. Other Current Liabilities
Components of other current liabilities are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Accrued expenses | | | | |||
Advance from customers |
| |
| |
| |
Interest payable for convertible notes |
| |
| — |
| — |
Deposits from lending and other business |
| |
| |
| |
Other payables |
| |
| |
| |
Payable to individual investors of lending and other business |
| |
| |
| |
Payable for purchases of property and equipment |
| |
| |
| |
Other tax payable |
| |
| |
| |
Operating lease liability-current | — | | | |||
Payable to individual for trust service | — | | | |||
Total |
| |
| |
| |
Accrued expenses mainly consist of payables for marketing expenses and professional service fees.
Deposits from lending and other businesses mainly consists of the security deposits from individual borrowers for their loans.
Payable to individual investors of lending and other businesses consists of interests and principals payable to individual investors who purchased other financial products distributed by the Group.
Payable to individual for trust service consists of the proceeds of stock sold on behalf of individual trust client and would be remitted to such client in a short period.
10. Income Taxes
Cayman Islands
Under the current laws of the Cayman Islands, the Company is not subject to tax on its income or capital gains. In addition, the Cayman Islands do not impose withholding tax on dividend payments.
Hong Kong
Under the current Hong Kong Inland Revenue Ordinance, the Company’s subsidiaries established in Hong Kong are subject to
F-38
PRC
Under the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT Law”), domestically-owned enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises are subject to a uniform tax rate of
The tax expense (benefit) comprises:
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | RMB | US$ | |||||
Current Tax | | | | | ||||
Deferred Tax | | ( | ( | ( | ||||
Total | | | | |
Reconciliation between the statutory tax rate to income before income taxes and the actual provision for income taxes is as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| |
PRC income tax rate | | % | | % | | % | |
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | | % | | % | | % | |
Effect of tax-free investment income | ( | % | ( | % | ( | % | |
Effect of different tax rate of subsidiary in other jurisdiction | ( | % | ( | % | ( | % | |
Effect of deferred tax asset allowance | | % | | % | | % | |
Effect of tax holidays | ( | % | ( | % | ( | % | |
Effect of income from equity in Fund of Fund | | % | | % | | % | |
Effect of true-ups | | % | ( | % | ( | % | |
Effect of others | | % | | % | | % | |
| % | | % | | % |
The aggregate amount and per share effect of the tax holidays (including effect of timing difference reversed in the year with different rate) are as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
(Amount in Thousands Except Shares Data) | ||||||||
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | RMB | US$ | |||||
Aggregate | | | | | ||||
Per share effect-basic | | | | | ||||
Per share effect-diluted | | | | |
F-39
The principal components of the deferred income tax asset and liabilities are as follows:
| As of December 31, | |||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | US$ | ||||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
| |||
Accrued expenses | | | | |||
Tax loss carry forward | | | | |||
Unrealized other income | | | | |||
Others | | | | |||
Gross deferred tax assets | | | | |||
Valuation allowance | ( | ( | ( | |||
Net deferred tax assets | | | | |||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
| |||
Unrealized investment income | | | | |||
Net deferred tax liabilities (after offsetting) | | | |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset where the Group has a legally enforceable right to do so, and intends to settle on a net basis.
The Group considers positive and negative evidence to determine whether some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be more likely than not realized. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of recent losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry forward periods, the Group’s experience with tax attributes expiring unused and tax planning alternatives. These assumptions require significant judgment and the forecasts of future taxable income are consistent with the plans and estimates the Group is using to manage the underlying businesses. Valuation allowances are established for deferred tax assets based on a more likely than not threshold. The Group’s ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on its ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carry forward periods provided for in the tax law. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carry-forward period are reduced. As of December 31, 2019, operating loss carry forward amounted to RMB
In accordance with the EIT Law, dividends, which arise from profits of foreign invested enterprises (“FIEs”) earned after January 1, 2008, are subject to a
F-40
The Group did not record any uncertain tax positions during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019. The Group does not anticipate any significant increases or decreases to its liability for unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
According to PRC Tax Administration and Collection Law, the statute of limitations is
11. Loans Receivable, Net
Loans receivable as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 consist of the following:
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
Loans receivable: |
|
|
| |||
-Within credit term | | | | |||
-Past due | — | | | |||
Total loans receivable | | | | |||
Allowance for loan losses | ( | ( | ( | |||
Loans receivable, net | | | |
The loan interest rates range between
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019.
| RMB |
| US$ | |
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||
Loans receivable—December 31, 2017 |
| |
| |
Provisions |
| |
| |
Reversal of allowance provided |
| ( |
| ( |
Loans receivable—December 31, 2018 |
| |
| |
Provisions |
| |
| |
Reversal of allowance provided |
| ( |
| ( |
Write off | ( | ( | ||
Loans receivable—December 31, 2019 |
| |
| |
F-41
12. Convertible notes
On February 3, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate principal amount of US$
The Company recorded the Notes as a liability in their entirety, and neither conversion feature nor any other feature is required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately. In addition, as the effective conversion price is greater than the fair value of underlying ADS, there was no beneficial conversion feature to be recognized. US$
13. Lease
As a lessee:
Operating lease assets primarily represents various facilities under non-cancelable operating leases expiring within
Supplemental consolidated balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
Operating leases: | RMB | US$ | ||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||
Operating leases right-of-use assets |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Non-current portion of lease liabilities |
| |
| |
Total operating lease liabilities |
| |
| |
Weighted average remaining lease term (years) |
|
|
| |
Weighted average discount rate |
| | % |
|
F-42
Maturities of operating lease liabilities for the next five years are as follows:
Years Ending December 31 |
| RMB |
| US$ |
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||
2020 |
| |
| |
2021 |
| |
| |
2022 |
| |
| |
2023 |
| |
| |
2024 and after |
| |
| |
Total lease payment |
| |
| |
Less imputed interest |
| ( |
| ( |
Total |
| |
| |
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating lease agreements as of December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Years Ending December 31 |
| RMB | ||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||
2019 |
| | ||
2020 |
| | ||
2021 |
| | ||
2022 |
| | ||
2023 and after |
| | ||
Total |
| |
As a lessor:
The income recognized for sale and leaseback agreements was RMB
The following table sets out a maturity analysis of sale and leaseback financing receivables as well as a reconciliation to the total amount of receivables recognized in the consolidated balance sheet:
Years Ending December 31 |
| RMB |
| US$ |
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||
2020 |
| |
| |
2021 |
| |
| |
Total future minimum payments receivables |
| |
| |
Less: unearned income |
| ( |
| ( |
Total sale and leaseback financing receivables |
| |
| |
Amounts due within one year |
| |
| |
Amounts due beyond one year |
| |
| |
F-43
14. Share Repurchase
Treasury stock represents shares repurchased by the Company that are no longer outstanding and are held by the Company. Treasury stock is accounted for under the cost method. In 2017, the Company used US$
15. Share-Based Compensation
The following table presents the Company’s share-based compensation expense by type of award:
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2019 | |
RMB | RMB | RMB | US$ | |||||
Share options | | | | | ||||
Non-vested restricted shares | | | | | ||||
Total share-based compensation | | | | |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Group adopted its 2010 share incentive plan (the “2010 Plan”). Under the 2010 plan, the maximum number of shares in respect of which options, restricted shares, or restricted share units may be granted will be
Share Options:
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018 was RMB
The Group uses the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of the options granted or modified:
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| |
Average risk-free rate of return |
| | % | | % |
Weighted average expected option life |
| years | years | ||
Estimated volatility |
| | % | | % |
Average dividend yield |
|
|
|
F-44
The following table summarizes option activity during the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
| Weighted |
| ||||
Weighted | Average | Aggregate | ||||||
Average | Remaining | Intrinsic | ||||||
Number of | Exercise | Contractual | Value of | |||||
options | Price | Term | Options | |||||
|
| RMB |
|
| RMB | |||
Outstanding as of January 1, 2019 | | | ||||||
Granted | — | — |
|
| ||||
Exercised | ( | |
|
| ||||
Forfeited | ( | |
|
| ||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019 | | | | |||||
Exercisable as of December 31, 2019 | | | — |
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2019 was RMB
Non-vested Restricted Shares:
A summary of non-vested restricted share activity during the year ended December 31, 2019 is presented below:
|
| Weighted- | ||
| Number of |
| average | |
| non-vested |
| grant- | |
| restricted |
| date fair | |
Non-vested restricted shares | shares |
| value | |
| RMB | |||
Non-vested as of January 1, 2019 |
| |
| |
Granted |
| |
| |
Vested |
| ( |
| |
Forfeited |
| ( |
| |
Non-vested as of December 31, 2019 |
| |
| |
The total fair value of non-vested restricted shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2019 was RMB
16. Employee Benefit Plans
Full time employees of the Group in the PRC participate in a government-mandated multi-employer defined contribution plan pursuant to which certain pension benefits, medical care, unemployment insurance, employee housing fund and other welfare benefits are provided to employees. PRC labor regulations require the Group to accrue for these benefits based on a certain percentage of the employees’ salaries. The total contribution for such employee benefits were RMB
F-45
17. Restricted Assets
Pursuant to the relevant laws and regulations in the PRC applicable to foreign-investment corporations and the Articles of Association of the Group’s PRC subsidiaries and VIEs, the Group is required to maintain a statutory reserve (“PRC statutory reserve”): a general reserve fund, which is non-distributable. The Group’s PRC subsidiaries and VIEs are required to transfer
In addition, the share capital of the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIEs of RMB
As a result of these PRC laws and regulations, the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIEs are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets, including general reserve and registered capital, either in the form of dividends, loans or advances. Such restricted portion amounted to RMB
18. Segment Information
The Group uses the management approach to determine operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by the Group’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) for making decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance. The Group’s CODM has been identified as the chief executive officer, who reviews consolidated results when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Group.
The Group believes it operates in
F-46
Segment information of the Group’s business is as follow:
Year Ended December 31, 2017 (Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
Lending | ||||||||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | and Other | ||||||
Business | Business | Businesses | Total | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB | |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Other service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues from others |
| |
| |
| |
| |
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance –based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Net revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship Manager Compensation |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Performance Fee Compensation |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
Other Compensation |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Total compensation and benefits |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Selling expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
General and administrative expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Provision for doubtful accounts | — | — | ( | ( | ||||
Other operating expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Government subsidies |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating cost and expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Income (loss) from operations |
| |
| |
| ( |
| |
F-47
Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
Lending | ||||||||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | and Other | ||||||
Business | Business | Business | Total | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB | |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Other service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues from others |
| |
| |
| |
| |
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance –based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Net revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship Manager Compensation |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
| ( |
Performance Fee Compensation |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
Other Compensation |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Total compensation and benefits |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Selling expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
General and administrative expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Provision for doubtful accounts | — | — | | | ||||
Other operating expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Government subsidies |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating cost and expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Income (loss) from operations |
| |
| |
| ( |
| |
F-48
Year Ended December 31, 2019 (Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
Lending | ||||||||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | and Other | ||||||
Business | Business | Businesses | Total | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB | |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance-based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Other service fees |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues from others |
| |
| |
| |
| |
One-time commissions |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Recurring service fees |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Performance –based income |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues from funds Gopher manages |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Less: VAT related surcharges |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Net revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship Manager Compensation |
| ( |
| — |
| — |
| ( |
Performance Fee Compensation |
| — |
| ( |
| — |
| ( |
Other Compensation |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Total compensation and benefits |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Selling expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
General and administrative expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Provision for doubtful accounts | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||
Other operating expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Government subsidies |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating cost and expenses |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
Income from operations |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The following table summarizes the Group’s revenues generated by the different geographic location.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 (Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
Lending | ||||||||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | and Other | ||||||
Business | Business | Businesses | Total | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB | |
Mainland of China |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Hong Kong |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
Lending | ||||||||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | and Other | ||||||
Business | Business | Businesses | Total | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB | |
Mainland of China |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Hong Kong |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Others |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-49
Year Ended December 31, 2019 (Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
Lending | ||||||||
Wealth Management | Assets Management | and Other | ||||||
Business | Business | Businesses | Total | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB | |
Mainland of China |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Hong Kong |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Others |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
Total revenues |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Substantially all of the Group’s revenues are derived from, and its assets are located in the mainland of China and Hong Kong.
19. Related Party Transactions
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operational decisions. Parties are also considered to be related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities.
The table below sets forth major related parties and their relationships with the Group:
Company Name | Relationship with the Group | |
Sequoia Capital Investment Management (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. | Affiliate of shareholder of the Group | |
Wanjia Win-Win Assets Management Co., Ltd (“Wanjia Win-Win”) | Investee of Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. | |
Wuhu Bona Film Investment Management Co., Ltd (“Wuhu Bona”) | Investee of Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. | |
Investee funds of Kunshan Jingzhao Equity Investment Management Co., Ltd. | Investees of Kunshan Jingzhao Equity Investment Management Co., Ltd., an affiliate of the Group | |
Investee funds of Noah Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited | Investees of Noah Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited, a subsidiary of the Group | |
Investee funds of Gopher Assets | Investees of Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. (“Gopher Assets”), a consolidated VIE of the Group | |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. | Investees of Gopher Capital GP Ltd., a subsidiary of the Group | |
Shanghai Noah Charity Fund | A charity fund established by the Group | |
Zhejiang Vanke-Noah Asset Management Co., Ltd (“Zhejiang Vanke”) | Investee of Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
F-50
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, related party transactions were as follows:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
One-time commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| |
| |
| |
| |
One-time commissions earned from funds subscribed by shareholders |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Total one-time commissions |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Recurring services fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Wanjia Win-Win |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
Sequoia Capital Investment Management (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Wuhu Bona |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
Recurring services fee earned from funds subscribed by shareholders |
| — |
| |
| — |
| — |
Total recurring services fee |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Performance-based income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Zhejiang Vanke |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
Total performance-based income |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other service fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other services subscribed by shareholders |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| |
| — |
| — |
| — |
Total other service fee |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total |
| |
| |
| |
| |
As of December 31, 2018, and 2019, amounts due from related parties associated with the above transactions were comprised of the following:
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Wanjia Win-Win |
| |
| — |
| — |
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| |
| |
| |
Investee funds of Kunshan Jingzhao Equity Investment Management Co., Ltd. |
| |
| — |
| — |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| |
| |
| |
Total |
| |
| |
| |
As of December 31, 2018, and 2019, amounts due from related parties associated with loan distributed were comprised of the following:
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| |
| |
| |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| |
| |
| |
Total |
| |
| |
| |
The terms of the loans are due on demand and most of the loans are interest free.
F-51
As of December 31, 2018, and 2019, deferred revenues related to the recurring management fee received in advance from related parties were comprised of the following:
As of December 31, | ||||||
(Amount in Thousands) | ||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2019 | ||||
| RMB |
| RMB |
| US$ | |
Investee funds of Gopher Assets |
| |
| |
| |
Wanjia Win-Win |
| |
| — |
| — |
Investee funds of Gopher Capital GP Ltd. |
| |
| |
| |
Total |
| |
| |
| |
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, donation made to Shanghai Noah Foundation were RMB
20. Contingencies
The Group is subject to periodic legal or administrative proceedings in the ordinary course of business. The Group does not have any pending legal or administrative proceedings to which the Group is a party that will have a material effect on its business or financial condition.
21. Subsequent events
In connection with certain credit funds managed by an affiliate of Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. ("Gopher Shanghai") providing supply chain financing involving companies related to Camsing International Holding Limited, which were later suspected to commit fraudulent activities, Gopher Shanghai has received notices from a court and an arbitration tribunal in 2020 concerning claims initiated by individual clients against Gopher Shanghai as the fund manager. Although Gopher Shanghai was not involved in any of the suspected fraudulent activities, the Group has been proactively assessing the potential legal risks and implications associated with this claim, which is currently at a preliminary stage, and other potential legal proceedings, to protect the best interests of the Group and its shareholders. As of the reporting date, it is not reasonably possible to estimate the impact on the financial results of the Group.
Starting from January 2020, a novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, has spread worldwide. Since then, the resulting restrictions on travel and quarantines in China and other countries and regions have caused adverse impacts on the Group’s businesses and might also indirectly impact the value of the Group's investments in certain industries. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the business and financial results of the Group depends on future developments, which are uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and actions to contain COVID-19 or mitigate its impact, among others.
As of the reporting date, COVID-19 has not caused a material negative impact on the Group’s business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects. The future financial impact on the Group, if any, of COVID-19 cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, and the Group will continue to closely monitor the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak.
F-52
Exhibit 2.6
Description of Rights of Securities Registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
Two American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) representing one Class A ordinary share of Noah Holdings Limited, (“we,” “our,” “our company,” or “us”) are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange and, in connection with this listing (but not for trading), the Class A ordinary shares are registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act. This exhibit contains a description of the rights of (i) the holders of Class A ordinary shares and (ii) the holders of ADSs. Class A ordinary shares underlying the ADSs are held by Citibank, N. A., as depositary, and holders of ADSs will not be treated as holders of the Class A ordinary shares.
Description of Class A Ordinary Shares
The following is a summary of material provisions of our currently effective fifth amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (our “Memorandum and Articles of Association”), as well as the Companies Law (2020 Revision) of the Cayman Islands (the “Companies Law”) insofar as they relate to the material terms of our ordinary shares. Notwithstanding this, because it is a summary, it may not contain all the information that you may otherwise deem important. For more complete information, you should read the entire Memorandum and Articles of Association, which has been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our current report on Form 6-K (File No. 001-34936), as amended, initially filed with the Commission on January 29, 2016.
Type and Class of Securities (Item 9.A.5 of Form 20-F)
Each Class A ordinary share has US$0.0005 par value. The number of Class A ordinary shares that have been issued as of the last day of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 is provided on the cover of the annual report on Form 20-F filed on April 24, 2020 (the “2019 Form 20-F”). Our ordinary shares are issued in registered form and are issued when registered in our register of members. We may not issue shares to bearer.
Preemptive Rights (Item 9.A.3 of Form 20-F)
Our shareholders do not have preemptive rights.
Limitations or Qualifications (Item 9.A.6 of Form 20-F)
We have a dual-class voting structure such that our ordinary shares consist of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. Each Class A Ordinary Share shall entitle the holder thereof to one (1) vote on all matters subject to vote at our general meetings, and each Class B ordinary share shall entitle the holder thereof to four (4) votes on all matters subject to vote at our general meetings. Due to the super voting power of the holders of Class B ordinary shares, the voting power of the holders of Class A ordinary shares may be materially limited.
Rights of Other Types of Securities (Item 9.A.7 of Form 20-F)
Not applicable.
Rights of Ordinary Shares (Item 10.B.3 of Form 20-F)
General. All of our outstanding Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares are fully paid. Our ordinary shares are issued in registered form, and are issued when registered in our register of shareholders. Our shareholders who are non-residents of the Cayman Islands may freely hold and vote their Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares.
Dividends. The holders of our Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors, subject to Cayman Islands law and our Memorandum and Articles of Association. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our directors. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend on its shares out of either profit or share premium amount, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
Voting Rights. Each Class A ordinary share is entitled to one vote and each Class B ordinary share is entitled to four votes on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote. Voting at any shareholders’ meeting
is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded. A poll may be demanded by any one or more shareholders present in person or by proxy entitled to vote and who together hold not less than 10% of the paid up voting share capital of our company. Shareholders may attend any shareholders’ meeting in person or by proxy, or if a corporation or other non-natural person, by its duly authorized representative or proxy; we currently do not allow shareholders to vote electronically.
A quorum required for a meeting of shareholders consists of at least one shareholder present in person or by proxy or, if a corporation or other non-natural person, by its duly authorized representative, who hold not less than an aggregate of one-third of our voting share capital. Shareholders’ meetings may be held annually and may be convened by our board of directors. Advance notice of at least seven calendar days is required for the convening of shareholders’ meetings, subject to exceptions in certain circumstances as set out in our Memorandum and Articles of Association.
An ordinary resolution to be passed by the shareholders requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, in a general meeting, while a special resolution requires the affirmative vote of no less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, in a general meeting. A special resolution is required for important matters such as a change of name or amendments to our memorandum or articles of association. Holders of the ordinary shares may effect certain changes by ordinary resolution, including increasing the amount of our authorized share capital, consolidating and dividing all or any of our share capital into shares of larger amounts than our existing shares, and canceling any authorized but unissued shares.
Transfer of Shares. Subject to the restrictions set out in our Memorandum and Articles of Association, our shareholders may transfer all or any of their ordinary shares by an instrument of transfer in writing and executed by or on behalf of the transferor (and if our board of directors require, the transferee).
Our board of directors may decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share which is not fully paid up or on which we have a lien. Our board may also decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share unless (a) the instrument of transfer is lodged with us, accompanied by the certificate for the ordinary shares to which it relates and such other evidence as our board may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer; and (b) a fee of such maximum sum as the New York Stock Exchange may determine to be payable, or such lesser sum as our board may from time to time require, is paid to us in respect thereof.
If our board of directors refuses to register a transfer it shall, within two months after the date on which the instrument of transfer was lodged, send to each of the transferor and the transferee notice of such refusal. The registration of transfers may be suspended on 14 days’ notice being given by advertisement in such one or more newspapers or by electronic means and the register closed at such times and for such periods as our board may from time to time determine.
Liquidation. On a return of capital on winding up or otherwise (other than on conversion, redemption or purchase of shares), assets available for distribution shall be distributed among the holders of the ordinary shares on a pro rata basis, and the liquidator may with the sanction of an ordinary resolution of the shareholders divide amongst the shareholders in specie or in kind the whole or any part of the assets of our company, and may for such purpose set such value as he deems fair upon any property to be divided as aforesaid, and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between our shareholders or different classes of shareholder.
Redemption, Repurchase and Surrender of Shares. We may issue shares on terms that are subject to redemption, at our option or at the option of the holders, on such terms and in such manner as may, before the issue of such shares, be determined by our board of directors. Our company may also repurchase any of our shares provided that our shareholders shall have approved the manner of purchase by ordinary resolution or the manner of purchase is in accordance with the provisions of Articles 17 and 17A of our Memorandum and Articles of Association. Under the Companies Law, the redemption or repurchase of any share may be paid out of our company’s profits or out of the proceeds of a fresh issue of shares made for the purpose of such redemption or repurchase, or out of capital (including share premium account and capital redemption reserve) if our company can, immediately following such payment, pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. In addition, under the Companies Law no such share may be redeemed or repurchased (a) unless it is fully paid up, (b) if such redemption or repurchase would result in there being no shares outstanding, or (c) if the company has commenced liquidation. In addition, our company may accept the surrender of any fully paid share for no consideration.
Calls on Shares and Forfeiture of Shares. Our board of directors may from time to time make calls upon shareholders for any amounts unpaid on their shares in a notice served to such shareholders at least 14 calendar days prior to the specified time of payment. Shares that have been called upon and remain unpaid on the specified time are subject to forfeiture.
Inspection of Books and Records. Holders of our ordinary shares have no general right under Cayman Islands law to inspect or obtain copies of our list of shareholders or our corporate records, subject to certain limited
2
exceptions. However, we will provide our shareholders with annual audited financial statements. See “—H. Documents on Display.”
Requirements to Change the Rights of Holders of Class A Ordinary Shares (Item 10.B.4 of Form 20-F)
Variations of Rights of Shares. If at any time our share capital is divided into different classes or series of shares, all or any of the special rights attached to any class or series of shares may be varied either with the written consent of the holders of a majority of the issued shares of that class or series or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a general meeting of the holders of the shares of that class or series.
In addition to any other applicable consent or approval requirements set forth in our Memorandum and Articles of Association and pursuant to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, for so long as the total issued and outstanding Class B ordinary shares constitute a majority of the aggregate voting power of our company, any amendment of the rights attached to our Class B ordinary shares requires approval by (i) holders of a majority of the total issued and outstanding Class A ordinary shares as well as (ii) holders of a majority of the aggregate voting power of our company.
For so long as any of our Class A ordinary shares are outstanding, our company shall not, without the affirmative vote of at least a majority of our Class A ordinary shares, voting as a single class, amend, alter or repeal any provision setting forth the terms of our Class A ordinary shares.
Limitations on the Rights to Own Class A Ordinary Shares (Item 10.B.6 of Form 20-F)
There are no limitations under the laws of the Cayman Islands or under our Memorandum and Articles of Association that limit the right of non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote Class A ordinary shares.
Provisions Affecting Any Change of Control (Item 10.B.7 of Form 20-F)
Anti-Takeover Provisions. Some provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association have the potential to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or management that shareholders may consider favorable, including provisions that:
provide holders of our Class B ordinary shares four votes per share and holders of our Class A ordinary shares one vote per share on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote;
authorize our board of directors to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to designate the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such preferred shares without any further vote or action by our shareholders; and
limit the ability of shareholders to call general meetings of shareholders.
However, under Cayman Islands law, our directors may only exercise the rights and powers granted to them under our Memorandum and Articles of Association for a proper purpose and for what they believe in good faith to be in the best interests of our company.
Ownership Threshold (Item 10.B.8 of Form 20-F)
There are no provisions under Cayman Islands law applicable to our company, or under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, that require our company to disclose shareholder ownership above any particular ownership threshold.
Differences Between the Law of Different Jurisdictions (Item 10.B.9 of Form 20-F)
The Companies Law is modeled after that of England but does not follow recent English statutory enactments and differs from laws applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of the significant differences between the provisions of the Companies Law applicable to us and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders.
3
Mergers and Similar Arrangements. The Companies Law permits mergers and consolidations between Cayman Islands companies and between Cayman Islands companies and non-Cayman Islands companies. For these purposes, (a) “merger” means the merging of two or more constituent companies and the vesting of their undertaking, property and liabilities in one of such companies as the surviving company, and (b) a “consolidation” means the combination of two or more constituent companies into a consolidated company and the vesting of the undertaking, property and liabilities of such companies to the consolidated company. In order to effect such a merger or consolidation, the directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan of merger or consolidation, which must then be authorized by (a) a special resolution of the shareholders of each constituent company, and (b) such other authorization, if any, as may be specified in such constituent company’s articles of association. The plan must be filed with the Registrar of Companies of the Cayman Islands together with a declaration as to the solvency of the consolidated or surviving company, a list of the assets and liabilities of each constituent company and an undertaking that a copy of the certificate of merger or consolidation will be given to the members and creditors of each constituent company and that notification of the merger or consolidation will be published in the Cayman Islands Gazette. Court approval is not required for a merger or consolidation which is effected in compliance with these statutory procedures.
A merger between a Cayman parent company and its Cayman subsidiary or subsidiaries does not require authorization by a resolution of shareholders of that Cayman subsidiary if a copy of the plan of merger is given to every member of that Cayman subsidiary to be merged unless that member agrees otherwise. For this purpose a company is a “parent” of a subsidiary if it holds issued shares that together represent at least ninety percent (90%) of the votes at a general meeting of the subsidiary.
The consent of each holder of a fixed or floating security interest over a constituent company is required unless this requirement is waived by a court in the Cayman Islands.
Save in certain limited circumstances, a shareholder of a Cayman constituent company who dissents from the merger or consolidation is entitled to payment of the fair value of his shares (which, if not agreed between the parties, will be determined by the Cayman Islands court) upon dissenting to the merger or consolidation, provide the dissenting shareholder complies strictly with the procedures set out in the Companies Law. The exercise of dissenter rights will preclude the exercise by the dissenting shareholder of any other rights to which he or she might otherwise be entitled by virtue of holding shares, save for the right to seek relief on the grounds that the merger or consolidation is void or unlawful.
Separate from the statutory provisions relating to mergers and consolidations, the Companies Law also contains statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies by way of schemes of arrangement, provided that the arrangement is approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be made, and who must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each such class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be, that are present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting, or meetings, convened for that purpose. The convening of the meetings and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder has the right to express to the court the view that the transaction ought not to be approved, the court can be expected to approve the arrangement if it determines that:
the statutory provisions as to the required majority vote have been met;
the shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question and the statutory majority are acting bona fide without coercion of the minority to promote interests adverse to those of the class;
the arrangement is such that may be reasonably approved by an intelligent and honest man of that class acting in respect of his interest; and
the arrangement is not one that would more properly be sanctioned under some other provision of the Companies Law.
The Companies Law also contains a statutory power of compulsory acquisition which may facilitate the “squeeze out” of dissentient minority shareholder upon a tender offer. When a tender offer is made and accepted by holders of 90% of the shares affected within four months, the offeror may, within a two-month period commencing on the expiration of such four month period, require the holders of the remaining shares to transfer such shares to the offeror on the terms of the offer. An objection can be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands but this is unlikely to succeed in the case of an offer which has been so approved unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion.
4
If an arrangement and reconstruction by way of scheme of arrangement is thus approved and sanctioned, or if a tender offer is made and accepted, in accordance with the foregoing statutory procedures, a dissenting shareholder would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights, save that objectors to a takeover offer may apply to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands for various orders that the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has a broad discretion to make, which would otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of Delaware corporations, providing rights to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of the shares.
Shareholders’ Suits. In principle, we will normally be the proper plaintiff and as a general rule a derivative action may not be brought by a minority shareholder. However, based on English authorities, which would in all likelihood be of persuasive authority in the Cayman Islands, the Cayman Islands courts can be expected (and have had occasion) to follow and apply the common law principles (namely the rule in Foss v. Harbottle and the exceptions thereto) which permit a minority shareholder to commence a class action against, or derivative actions in the name of, our company to challenge:
an act which is ultra vires or illegal and is therefore incapable of ratification by the shareholders;
an act which constitutes a fraud against the minority where the wrongdoer are themselves in control of the company; and
an act which requires a resolution with a qualified (or special) majority (i.e. more than a simple majority) which has not been obtained.
Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers and Limitation of Liability. Cayman Islands law does not limit the extent to which a company’s memorandum and articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any such provision may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that that we shall indemnify our directors and officers, and their personal representatives, against all actions, proceedings, costs, charges, expenses, losses, damages or liabilities incurred or sustained by such persons, other than by reason of such person’s dishonesty, willful default or fraud, in or about the conduct of our company’s business or affairs (including as a result of any mistake of judgment) or in the execution or discharge of his duties, powers, authorities or discretions, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any costs, expenses, losses or liabilities incurred by such director or officer in defending (whether successfully or otherwise) any civil proceedings concerning our company or its affairs in any court whether in the Cayman Islands or elsewhere. This standard of conduct is generally the same as permitted under the Delaware General Corporation Law for a Delaware corporation.
In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers that provide such persons with additional indemnification beyond that provided in our Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling us under the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Directors’ Fiduciary Duties. Under Delaware corporate law, a director of a Delaware corporation has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders. This duty has two components: the duty of care and the duty of loyalty. The duty of care requires that a director act in good faith, with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances. Under this duty, a director must inform himself of, and disclose to shareholders, all material information reasonably available regarding a significant transaction. The duty of loyalty requires that a director acts in a manner he reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation. He must not use his corporate position for personal gain or advantage. This duty prohibits self-dealing by a director and mandates that the best interest of the corporation and its shareholders take precedence over any interest possessed by a director, officer or controlling shareholder and not shared by the shareholders generally. In general, actions of a director are presumed to have been made on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the corporation. However, this presumption may be rebutted by evidence of a breach of one of the fiduciary duties. Should such evidence be presented concerning a
5
transaction by a director, the director must prove the procedural fairness of the transaction, and that the transaction was of fair value to the corporation.
As a matter of Cayman Islands law, a director of a Cayman Islands company is in the position of a fiduciary with respect to the company and therefore it is considered that he owes the following duties to the company—a duty to act in good faith in the best interests of the company, a duty not to make a personal profit based on his position as director (unless the company permits him to do so), a duty not to put himself in a position where the interests of the company conflict with his personal interest or his duty to a third party and a duty to exercise powers for the purpose for which such powers were intended. A director of a Cayman Islands company owes to the company a duty to act with skill and care. It was previously considered that a director need not exhibit in the performance of his duties a greater degree of skill than may reasonably be expected from a person of his knowledge and experience. However, English and Commonwealth courts have moved towards an objective standard with regard to the required skill and care and these authorities are likely to be followed in the Cayman Islands.
Shareholder Action by Written Consent. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may eliminate the right of shareholders to act by written consent by amendment to its certificate of incorporation. Cayman Islands law and our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that shareholders may approve corporate matters by way of a unanimous written resolution signed by or on behalf of each shareholder who would have been entitled to vote on such matter at a general meeting without a meeting being held.
Shareholder Proposals. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a shareholder has the right to put any proposal before the annual meeting of shareholders, provided it complies with the notice provisions in the governing documents. A special meeting may be called by the board of directors or any other person authorized to do so in the governing documents, but shareholders may be precluded from calling special meetings.
The Companies Law provide shareholders with only limited rights to requisition a general meeting, and does not provide shareholders with any right to put any proposal before a general meeting. However, these rights may be provided in a company’s articles of association. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association allow our shareholders holding not less than one-third of the share capital of our company that carries the right of voting at general meetings to requisition an extraordinary general meeting of our shareholders, in which case our board is obliged to convene an extraordinary general meeting and to put the resolutions so requisitioned to a vote at such meeting. Other than this right to requisition a shareholders’ meeting, our Memorandum and Articles of Association do not provide our shareholders with any other right to put proposals before annual general meetings or extraordinary general meetings. As an exempted Cayman Islands company, we are not obliged by law to call shareholders’ annual general meetings.
Cumulative Voting. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, cumulative voting for elections of directors is not permitted unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation specifically provides for it. Cumulative voting potentially facilitates the representation of minority shareholders on a board of directors since it permits the minority shareholder to cast all the votes to which the shareholder is entitled on a single director, which increases the shareholder’s voting power with respect to electing such director. There are no prohibitions in relation to cumulative voting under the laws of the Cayman Islands but our Memorandum and Articles of Association do not provide for cumulative voting. As a result, our shareholders are not afforded any less protections or rights on this issue than shareholders of a Delaware corporation.
Removal of Directors. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a director of a corporation with a classified board may be removed only for cause with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, subject to certain restrictions as contained therein, directors may be removed with or without cause, by an ordinary resolution of our shareholders. A director’s office shall be vacated if the director (i) dies, becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors; (ii) is found to be or becomes of unsound mind; (iii) resigns his office by notice in writing to our company; or; (iv) is removed from office pursuant to any other provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association. Subject to the foregoing sentence, each director shall hold office until the expiration of his term and until his successor shall have been elected and qualified in accordance with our Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Transactions with Interested Shareholders. The Delaware General Corporation Law contains a business combination statute applicable to Delaware corporations whereby, unless the corporation has specifically elected not to be governed by such statute by amendment to its certificate of incorporation, it is prohibited from engaging in certain business combinations with an “interested shareholder” for three years following the date that such
6
person becomes an interested shareholder. An interested shareholder generally is a person or a group who or which owns or owned 15% or more of the target’s outstanding voting share within the past three years. This has the effect of limiting the ability of a potential acquirer to make a two-tiered bid for the target in which all shareholders would not be treated equally. The statute does not apply if, among other things, prior to the date on which such shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, the board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an interested shareholder. This encourages any potential acquirer of a Delaware corporation to negotiate the terms of any acquisition transaction with the target’s board of directors.
Cayman Islands law has no comparable statute. As a result, we cannot avail ourselves of the types of protections afforded by the Delaware business combination statute. However, although Cayman Islands law does not regulate transactions between a company and its significant shareholders, it does provide that such transactions must be entered into bona fide in the best interests of the company and not with the effect of constituting a fraud on the minority shareholders.
Dissolution; Winding up. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, unless the board of directors approves the proposal to dissolve, dissolution must be approved by shareholders holding 100% of the total voting power of the corporation. Only if the dissolution is initiated by the board of directors may it be approved by a simple majority of the corporation’s outstanding shares. Delaware law allows a Delaware corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation a supermajority voting requirement in connection with dissolutions initiated by the board.
Under Cayman Islands law, a company may be wound up by either an order of the courts of the Cayman Islands or by a special resolution of its members or, if the company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due, by an ordinary resolution of its members. The court has authority to order winding up in a number of specified circumstances including where it is, in the opinion of the court, just and equitable to do so.
Variation of Rights of Shares. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may vary the rights of a class of shares with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of such class, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, if our share capital is divided into different classes or series of shares, the rights attaching to any such class or series may (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class or series) be varied or abrogated with the consent in writing of a majority of the issued shares of that class or series or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class or series. The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class or series issued with preferred or other rights shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class or series, be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking in priority thereto or pari passu therewith.
Amendment of Governing Documents. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation’s governing documents may be amended with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Under Cayman Islands law, our Memorandum and Articles of Association may only be amended with a special resolution of our shareholders.
Rights of Non-resident or Foreign Shareholders. There are no limitations imposed by our Memorandum and Articles of Association on the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our shares.
Debt Securities (Item 12.A of Form 20-F)
Not applicable.
Warrants and Rights (Item 12.B of Form 20-F)
Not applicable.
Other Securities (Item 12.C of Form 20-F)
Not applicable.
Description of American Depositary Shares (Items 12.D.1 and 12.D.2 of Form 20-F)
Citibank, N.A., as depositary, registered and delivered the ADSs. Citibank’s depositary offices are located at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. ADSs represent ownership interests in securities that are on deposit with the depositary. ADSs may be represented by certificates that are commonly known as American Depositary Receipts or ADRs. The depositary typically appoints a custodian to safekeep the securities on deposit. In this case, the custodian is Citibank, N.A.—Hong Kong, located at 10/F, Harbour Front (II), 22 Tak Fung Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
7
As an owner of ADSs, you may hold your ADSs either by means of an ADR registered in your name, through a brokerage or safekeeping account, or through an account established by the depositary in your name reflecting the registration of uncertificated ADSs directly on the books of the depositary (commonly referred to as the direct registration system or DRS). The direct registration system reflects the uncertificated (book-entry) registration of ownership of ADSs by the depositary. Under the direct registration system, ownership of ADSs is evidenced by periodic statements issued by the depositary to the holders of the ADSs. The direct registration system includes automated transfers between the depositary and The Depository Trust Company, or DTC, the central book-entry clearing and settlement system for equity securities in the United States. If you decide to hold your ADSs through your brokerage or safekeeping account, you must rely on the procedures of your broker or bank to assert your rights as ADS owner. Banks and brokers typically hold securities such as the ADSs through clearing and settlement systems such as DTC.
This summary description assumes you have opted to own the ADSs directly by means of an ADS registered in your name and, as such, we will refer to you as the “holder.” For more complete information, you should read the entire deposit agreement and the form of American Depositary Receipt. The latest deposit agreement and form of ADR have been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to a Registration Statement on our F-6 registration statement (File No. 333- 170167), as amended, filed with the Commission on March 15, 2016) for our company .
Dividends and Distributions
As a holder, you generally have the right to receive the distributions we make on the securities deposited with the custodian. Your receipt of these distributions may be limited, however, by practical considerations and legal limitations. Holders will receive such distributions under the terms of the deposit agreement in proportion to the number of ADSs held as of a specified record date.
Distributions of Cash
Whenever we make a cash distribution for the securities on deposit with the custodian, we will deposit the funds with the custodian. Upon receipt of confirmation of the deposit of the requisite funds, the depositary will arrange for the funds to be converted into U.S. dollars and for the distribution of the U.S. dollars to the holders, subject to the laws and regulations of the Cayman Islands.
The conversion into U.S. dollars will take place only if practicable and if the U.S. dollars are transferable to the United States. The amounts distributed to holders will be net of the fees, expenses, taxes and governmental charges payable by holders under the terms of the deposit agreement. The depositary will apply the same method for distributing the proceeds of the sale of any property (such as undistributed rights) held by the custodian in respect of securities on deposit.
The distribution of cash will be made net of the fees, expenses, taxes and governmental charges payable by holders under the terms of the deposit agreement.
Distributions of Ordinary Shares
Whenever we make a free distribution of ordinary shares for the securities on deposit with the custodian, we will deposit the applicable number of ordinary shares with the custodian. Upon receipt of confirmation of such deposit, the depositary will either distribute to holders new ADSs representing the ordinary shares deposited or modify the ADS-to-ordinary share ratio, in which case each ADS you hold will represent rights and interests in the additional ordinary shares so deposited. Only whole new ADSs will be distributed. Fractional entitlements will be sold and the proceeds of such sale will be distributed as in the case of a cash distribution.
The distribution of new ADSs or the modification of the ADS-to-ordinary share ratio upon a distribution of ordinary shares will be made net of the fees, expenses, taxes and governmental charges payable by holders under the terms of the deposit agreement. In order to pay such taxes or governmental charges, the depositary may sell all or a portion of the new ordinary shares so distributed.
No such distribution of new ADSs will be made if it would violate a law (including U.S. securities laws) or if it is not operationally practicable. If the depositary does not distribute new ADSs as described above, it may sell the ordinary shares received upon the terms described in the deposit agreement and will distribute the proceeds of the sale as in the case of a distribution of cash.
8
Distributions of Rights
Whenever we intend to distribute rights to purchase additional ordinary shares, we will give prior notice to the depositary and we will assist the depositary in determining whether it is lawful and reasonably practicable to distribute rights to purchase additional ADSs to holders.
The depositary will establish procedures to distribute rights to purchase additional ADSs to holders and to enable such holders to exercise such rights if it is lawful and reasonably practicable to make the rights available to holders of ADSs, and if we provide all of the documentation contemplated in the deposit agreement (such as opinions to address the lawfulness of the transaction). You may have to pay fees, expenses, taxes and other governmental charges to subscribe for the new ADSs upon the exercise of your rights. The depositary is not obligated to establish procedures to facilitate the distribution and exercise by holders of rights to purchase new ordinary shares other than in the form of ADSs.
The depositary will not distribute the rights to you if:
we do not timely request that the rights be distributed to you or we request that the rights not be distributed to you; or
we fail to deliver satisfactory documents to the depositary; or
it is not reasonably practicable to distribute the rights.
The depositary will sell the rights that are not exercised or not distributed if such sale is lawful and reasonably practicable. The proceeds of such sale will be distributed to holders as in the case of a cash distribution. If the depositary is unable to sell the rights, it will allow the rights to lapse.
Elective Distributions
Whenever we intend to distribute a dividend payable at the election of shareholders either in cash or in additional shares, we will give prior notice thereof to the depositary and will indicate whether we wish the elective distribution to be made available to you. In such case, we will assist the depositary in determining whether such distribution is lawful and reasonably practicable.
The depositary will make the election available to you only if it is reasonably practicable and if we have provided all of the documentation contemplated in the deposit agreement. In such case, the depositary will establish procedures to enable you to elect to receive either cash or additional ADSs in each case as described in the deposit agreement.
If the election is not made available to you, you will receive either cash or additional ADSs, depending on what a holder of ordinary shares would receive upon failing to make an election.
Other Distributions
Whenever we intend to distribute property other than cash, ordinary shares or rights to purchase additional ordinary shares, we will notify the depositary in advance and will indicate whether we wish such distribution to be made to you. If so, we will assist the depositary in determining whether such distribution to holders is lawful and reasonably practicable.
If it is reasonably practicable to distribute such property to you and if we provide all of the documentation contemplated in the deposit agreement, the depositary will distribute the property to the holders in a manner it deems practicable.
The distribution will be made net of fees, expenses, taxes and governmental charges payable by holders under the terms of the deposit agreement. In order to pay such taxes and governmental charges, the depositary may sell all or a portion of the property received.
The depositary will not distribute the property to you and will sell the property if:
we do not request that the property be distributed to you or if we ask that the property not be distributed to you; or
we do not deliver satisfactory documents to the depositary; or
the depositary determines that all or a portion of the distribution to you is not reasonably practicable.
9
The proceeds of such a sale will be distributed to holders as in the case of a cash distribution.
Redemption
Whenever we decide to redeem any of the securities on deposit with the custodian, we will notify the depositary at least 45 days (or a fewer number of days if agreed upon with the depositary) in advance of such proposed redemption. If it is practicable and if we provide all of the documentation contemplated in the deposit agreement, the depositary will provide notice of the redemption to the holders.
The custodian will be instructed to surrender the shares being redeemed against payment of the applicable redemption price. The depositary will convert the redemption funds received into U.S. dollars upon the terms of the deposit agreement and will establish procedures to enable holders to receive the net proceeds from the redemption upon surrender of their ADSs to the depositary. You may have to pay fees, expenses, taxes and other governmental charges upon the redemption of your ADSs. If less than all ADSs are being redeemed, the ADSs to be retired will be selected by lot or on a pro rata basis, as the depositary may determine.
Changes Affecting Ordinary Shares
The ordinary shares held on deposit for your ADSs may change from time to time. For example, there may be a change in nominal or par value, a split-up, cancellation, consolidation or reclassification of such ordinary shares or a recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale of assets.
If any such change were to occur, your ADSs would, to the extent permitted by law, represent the right to receive the property received or exchanged in respect of the ordinary shares held on deposit. The depositary may in such circumstances deliver new ADSs to you, amend the deposit agreement, the ADRs and the applicable Registration Statement(s) on Form F-6, call for the exchange of your existing ADSs for new ADSs and take any other actions that are appropriate to reflect as to the ADSs the change affecting the ordinary shares. If the depositary may not lawfully distribute such property to you, the depositary may sell such property and distribute the net proceeds to you as in the case of a cash distribution.
Issuance of ADSs upon Deposit of Ordinary Shares
The depositary may create ADSs on your behalf if you or your broker deposit ordinary shares with the custodian. The depositary will deliver these ADSs to the person you indicate only after you pay any applicable issuance fees and any charges and taxes payable for the transfer of the ordinary shares to the custodian. Your ability to deposit ordinary shares and receive ADSs may be limited by U.S. and Cayman Islands legal considerations applicable at the time of deposit.
The issuance of ADSs may be delayed until the depositary or the custodian receives confirmation that all required approvals have been given and that the ordinary shares have been duly transferred to the custodian. The depositary will only issue ADSs in whole numbers.
When you make a deposit of ordinary shares, you will be responsible for transferring good and valid title to the depositary. As such, you will be deemed to represent and warrant that:
The ordinary shares are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid, non-assessable and legally obtained.
All preemptive (and similar) rights, if any, with respect to such ordinary shares have been validly waived or exercised.
You are duly authorized to deposit the ordinary shares.
The ordinary shares presented for deposit are free and clear of any lien, encumbrance, security interest, charge, mortgage or adverse claim, and are not, and the ADSs issuable upon such deposit will not be, “restricted securities” (as defined in the deposit agreement).
The ordinary shares presented for deposit have not been stripped of any rights or entitlements.
If any of the representations or warranties are incorrect in any way, we and the depositary may, at your cost and expense, take any and all actions necessary to correct the consequences of the misrepresentations.
10
Transfer, Combination and Split Up of ADRs
If you hold ADRs, you will be entitled to transfer, combine or split up your ADRs and the ADSs evidenced thereby. For transfers of ADRs, you will have to surrender the ADRs to be transferred to the depositary and also must:
ensure that the surrendered ADR certificate is properly endorsed or otherwise in proper form for transfer;
provide such proof of identity and genuineness of signatures as the depositary deems appropriate;
provide any transfer stamps required by the State of New York or the United States; and
pay all applicable fees, charges, expenses, taxes and other government charges payable by ADR holders pursuant to the terms of the deposit agreement, upon the transfer of ADRs.
To have your ADRs either combined or split up, you must surrender the ADRs in question to the depositary with your request to have them combined or split up, and you must pay all applicable fees, charges and expenses payable by ADR holders pursuant to the terms of the deposit agreement upon a combination or split up of ADRs.
Withdrawal of Ordinary Shares Upon Cancellation of ADSs
As a holder, you will be entitled to present your ADSs to the depositary for cancellation and then receive the corresponding number of underlying ordinary shares at the custodian’s offices. The depositary will not accept for surrender ADSs representing less than one share. In the case of the delivery to it of ADSs representing a number other than a whole number of our ordinary shares, the depositary will cause ownership of the appropriate whole number of shares to be delivered in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement, and will, at its discretion, either return to the person surrendering such ADSs the number of ADSs representing any remaining fractional share, or sell or cause to be sold the fractional share represented by the ADSs so surrendered and remit the proceeds of such sale (net of applicable fees and charges of, and expenses incurred by, the depositary and taxes withheld) to the person surrendering the ADSs. Your ability to withdraw the ordinary shares may be limited by U.S. and Cayman Islands legal considerations applicable at the time of withdrawal. In order to withdraw the ordinary shares represented by your ADSs, you will be required to pay to the depositary the fees for cancellation of ADSs and any charges and taxes payable upon the transfer of the ordinary shares being withdrawn. You assume the risk for delivery of all funds and securities upon withdrawal. Once canceled, the ADSs will not have any rights under the deposit agreement.
If you hold ADSs registered in your name, the depositary may ask you to provide proof of identity and genuineness of any signature and such other documents as the depositary may deem appropriate before it will cancel your ADSs. The withdrawal of the ordinary shares represented by your ADSs may be delayed until the depositary receives satisfactory evidence of compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Please keep in mind that the depositary will only accept ADSs for cancellation that represent a whole number of securities on deposit.
You will have the right to withdraw the securities represented by your ADSs at any time except for:
temporary delays that may arise because (i) the transfer books for the ordinary shares or ADSs are closed or (ii) ordinary shares are immobilized on account of a shareholders’ meeting or a payment of dividends;
obligations to pay fees, taxes and similar charges; and
restrictions imposed because of laws or regulations applicable to ADSs or the withdrawal of securities on deposit.
The deposit agreement may not be modified to impair your right to withdraw the securities represented by your ADSs except to comply with mandatory provisions of law.
Voting Rights
As a holder, you generally have the right under the deposit agreement to instruct the depositary to exercise the voting rights for the ordinary shares represented by your ADSs.
If we ask for your instructions in a timely manner pursuant to the deposit agreement, as soon as practicable after receiving notice of any meeting or solicitation of consents or proxies from us, the depositary will distribute to the registered ADS holders a notice stating such information as is contained in the voting materials received by
11
the depositary and describing how you may instruct the depositary to exercise the voting rights for the shares which underlie your ADSs, including circumstances under which a discretionary proxy may be given to a person designated by us. At our request, the depositary will distribute to you any notice of shareholders’ meeting received from us together with information explaining how to instruct the depositary to exercise the voting rights of the securities represented by ADSs.
Voting at our shareholders’ meetings is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded. A poll may be demanded by one or more of our registered shareholders present in person or by proxy entitled to vote and who together hold not less than 10 percent of the paid up voting share capital of our company. If the depositary bank timely receives voting instructions from a holder of ADSs, the depositary bank will endeavor to cause the ordinary shares on deposit to be voted as follows: (a) in the event voting takes place at a shareholders’ meeting by show of hands, the depositary bank will instruct the custodian to vote, directly or by proxy, all ordinary shares on deposit in accordance with the voting instructions received from a majority of the holders of ADSs who provided voting instructions; or (b) in the event voting takes place at a shareholders’ meeting by poll, the depositary bank will instruct the custodian to vote, directly or by proxy, the ordinary shares on deposit in accordance with the voting instructions received from holders of ADSs.
In the event of voting by poll, holders of ADSs in respect of which no timely voting instructions have been received shall be deemed to have instructed the depositary to give a discretionary proxy to a person designated by us to vote the ordinary shares represented by such holders’ ADSs; provided, that no such instruction shall be deemed given and no such discretionary proxy shall be given with respect to any matter as to which we inform the depositary that we do not wish such proxy to be given; provided, further, that no such discretionary proxy shall be given (x) with respect to any matter as to which we inform the depositary that (i) there exists substantial opposition, or (ii) the rights of holders of ADSs or the shareholders of the Company will be adversely affected and (y) in the event that the vote is on a show of hands.
Please note that the ability of the depositary to carry out voting instructions may be limited by practical and legal limitations and the terms of the securities on deposit. We cannot assure you that you will receive voting materials in time to enable you to return voting instructions to the depositary in a timely manner.
In order to give you a reasonable opportunity to instruct the depositary as to the exercise of voting rights relating to deposited securities, if we request the depositary to act, pursuant to the deposit agreement, we will give the depositary notice of any such meeting and details concerning the matters to be voted upon at least 30 days in advance of the meeting date, although our Memorandum and Articles of Association only require an advance notice of seven calendar days to be given for any general meeting.
Both shareholders and the depositary (or its proxy) acting on behalf of ADS holders have the option of voting in person or by proxy at a shareholders’ meeting.
Fees and Expenses
ADS holders will be required to pay the following service fees to the depository:
Service |
|
Fees |
Issuance of ADSs |
|
Up to US$0.05 per ADS issued |
|
|
|
Cancelation of ADSs |
|
Up to US$0.05 per ADS canceled |
|
|
|
Distribution of cash dividends or other cash distributions |
|
Up to US$0.05 per ADS held |
|
|
|
Distribution of ADSs pursuant to stock dividends, free stock distributions or exercise of rights |
|
Up to US$0.05 per ADS held |
|
|
|
Distribution of securities other than ADSs or rights to purchase additional ADSs |
|
Up to US$0.05 per ADS held |
|
|
|
Depositary services |
|
Up to US$0.05 per ADS held on the applicable record date(s) established by the depositary |
|
|
|
Transfer of ADSs |
|
US$1.50 per certificate presented for transfer |
12
Citibank, N.A., the depositary of our ADS program, collects fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid. Citibank’s principal executive office is located at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, 10013. The depositary bank typically appoints a custodian to safekeep the securities on deposit. In this case, the custodian is Citibank Hong Kong, located at 10/F, Harbor Front (II), 22, Tak Fung Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. ADS holders will also be responsible to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the depositary and certain taxes and governmental charges such as:
fees for the transfer and registration of ordinary shares charged by the registrar and transfer agent for the ordinary shares in the Cayman Islands (i.e., upon deposit and withdrawal of ordinary shares);
expenses incurred for converting foreign currency into U.S. dollars;
expenses for cable, telex and fax transmissions and for delivery of securities;
taxes and duties upon the transfer of securities (i.e., when ordinary shares are deposited or withdrawn from deposit); and
fees and expenses incurred in connection with the delivery or servicing of ordinary shares on deposit.
Depositary fees payable upon the issuance and cancelation of ADSs are typically paid to the depositary by the brokers (on behalf of their clients) receiving the newly issued ADSs from the depositary and by the brokers (on behalf of their clients) delivering the ADSs to the depositary for cancelation. The brokers in turn charge these fees to their clients. Depositary fees payable in connection with distributions of cash or securities to ADS holders and the depositary services fee are charged by the depositary to the holders of record of ADSs as of the applicable ADS record date.
The depositary fees payable for cash distributions are generally deducted from the cash being distributed. In the case of distributions other than cash (such as stock dividends and rights distributions), the depositary charges the applicable fee to the ADS record date holders concurrent with the distribution. In the case of ADSs registered in the name of the investor (whether certificated or uncertificated in direct registration), the depositary sends invoices to the applicable record date ADS holders. In the case of ADSs held in brokerage and custodian accounts (via DTC), the depositary generally collects its fees through the systems provided by DTC (whose nominee is the registered holder of the ADSs held in DTC) from the brokers and custodians holding ADSs in their DTC accounts. The brokers and custodians who hold their clients’ ADSs in DTC accounts in turn charge their clients’ accounts the amount of the fees paid to the depositary.
In the event of refusal to pay the depositary fees, the depositary may, under the terms of the deposit agreement, refuse the requested service until payment is received or may offset the amount of the depositary fees from any distribution to be made to the ADS holder.
The fees and charges that ADS holders may be required to pay may vary over time and may be changed by us and by the depositary.
The depositary may reimburse us for certain expenses incurred by us in respect of the ADR program established pursuant to the deposit agreement, by making available a portion of the depositary fees charged in respect of the ADR program or otherwise, upon such terms and conditions as we and the depositary may agree from time to time. As described in the deposit agreement, we or the depositary may withhold or deduct from any distributions made in respect of ordinary shares and may sell for the account of a holder any or all of the ordinary shares and apply such distributions and sale proceeds in payment of any taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) or charges that are or may be payable by holders in respect of the ADSs.
Amendments and Termination
We may agree with the depositary to modify the deposit agreement at any time without your consent. We undertake to give holders 30 days’ prior notice of any modifications that would materially prejudice any of their substantial rights under the deposit agreement. We will not consider to be materially prejudicial to your substantial rights any modifications or supplements that are reasonably necessary for the ADSs to be registered under the
13
Securities Act or to be eligible for book-entry settlement, in each case without imposing or increasing the fees and charges you are required to pay. In addition, we may not be able to provide you with prior notice of any modifications or supplements that are required to accommodate compliance with applicable provisions of law.
You will be bound by the modifications to the deposit agreement if you continue to hold your ADSs after the modifications to the deposit agreement become effective. The deposit agreement cannot be amended to prevent you from withdrawing the ordinary shares represented by your ADSs (except as permitted by law).
We have the right to direct the depositary to terminate the deposit agreement. Similarly, the depositary may in certain circumstances on its own initiative terminate the deposit agreement. In either case, the depositary must give notice to the holders at least 30 days before termination. Until termination, your rights under the deposit agreement will be unaffected.
After termination, the depositary will continue to collect distributions received (but will not distribute any such property until you request the cancellation of your ADSs) and may sell the securities held on deposit. After the sale, the depositary will hold the proceeds from such sale and any other funds then held for the holders of ADSs in a non-interest bearing account. At that point, the depositary will have no further obligations to holders other than to account for the funds then held for the holders of ADSs still outstanding (after deduction of applicable fees, taxes and expenses).
Books of Depositary
The depositary will maintain ADS holder records at its depositary office. You may inspect such records at such office during regular business hours but solely for the purpose of communicating with other holders in the interest of business matters relating to the ADSs and the deposit agreement.
The depositary will maintain facilities in New York to record and process the issuance, cancellation, combination, split-up and transfer of ADSs. These facilities may be closed from time to time, to the extent not prohibited by law.
Limitations on Obligations and Liabilities
The deposit agreement limits our obligations and the depositary’s obligations to you. It also limits our liability and the liability of the depositary. However, the limitations will not be effective to waive liabilities under the federal securities laws of the United States because any agreement to waive the requirements of the federal securities laws of the United States is void under Section 14 of the Securities Act. Please note the following:
We and the depositary are obligated only to take the actions specifically stated in the deposit agreement without negligence or bad faith.
The depositary disclaims any liability for any failure to carry out voting instructions, for any manner in which a vote is cast or for the effect of any vote, provided it acts in good faith and in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement.
The depositary disclaims any liability for any failure to determine the lawfulness or practicality of any action, for the content of any document forwarded to you on our behalf or for the accuracy of any translation of such a document, for the investment risks associated with investing in ordinary shares, for the validity or worth of the ordinary shares, for any tax consequences that result from the ownership of ADSs, for the credit-worthiness of any third party, for allowing any rights to lapse under the terms of the deposit agreement, for the timeliness of any of our notices or for any failure by us to give notice.
We and the depositary will not be obligated to perform any act that is inconsistent with the terms of the deposit agreement.
We and the depositary disclaim any liability if we or the depositary are prevented or forbidden from or subject to any civil or criminal penalty or restraint on account of, or delayed in, doing or performing any act or thing required by the terms of the deposit agreement, by reason of any provision, present or future of any law or regulation, or by reason of present or future provision of any provision of our articles of association, or any provision of or governing the securities on deposit, or by reason of any act of God or war or other circumstances beyond our control.
14
We and the depositary disclaim any liability by reason of any exercise of, or failure to exercise, any discretion provided for the deposit agreement or in our articles of association or in any provisions of or governing the securities on deposit.
We and the depositary further disclaim any liability for any action or inaction in reliance on the advice or information received from legal counsel, accountants, any person presenting ordinary shares for deposit, any holder of ADSs or authorized representatives thereof, or any other person believed by either of us in good faith to be competent to give such advice or information.
We and the depositary also disclaim liability for the inability of a holder to benefit from any distribution, offering, right or other benefit that is made available to holders of ordinary shares but is not, under the terms of the deposit agreement, made available to you.
We and the depositary may rely without any liability upon any written notice, request or other document believed to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper parties.
We and the depositary also disclaim liability for any consequential or punitive damages for any breach of the terms of the deposit agreement.
Pre-Release Transactions
Subject to the terms and conditions of the deposit agreement, the depositary may issue to broker/dealers ADSs before receiving a deposit of ordinary shares or release ordinary shares to broker/dealers before receiving ADSs for cancellation. These transactions are commonly referred to as “pre-release transactions,” and are entered into between the depositary and the applicable broker/dealer. The deposit agreement limits the aggregate size of pre-release transactions (not to exceed 30% of the shares or deposit in the aggregate) and imposes a number of conditions on such transactions (i.e., the need to receive collateral, the type of collateral required, the representations required from brokers, etc.). The depositary may retain the compensation received from the pre-release transactions.
Taxes
You will be responsible for the taxes and other governmental charges payable on the ADSs and the securities represented by the ADSs. We, the depositary and the custodian may deduct from any distribution the taxes and governmental charges payable by holders and may sell any and all property on deposit to pay the taxes and governmental charges payable by holders. You will be liable for any deficiency if the sale proceeds do not cover the taxes that are due.
15
Exhibit 8.1
List of Significant Consolidated Entities of Noah Holdings Limited*
Place of |
Percentage of |
|||||
Name |
Date of Incorporation |
Incorporation |
Ownership |
|||
Noah Upright Fund Distribution Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Noah Upright (Shanghai) Fund Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.) |
November 18, 2003 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Shanghai Noah Investment Management Co., Ltd. |
August 26, 2005 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Shanghai Noah Investment (Group) Co., Ltd (formerly known as Shanghai Noah Rongyao Investment Consulting Co., Ltd) |
August 24, 2007 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Shanghai Noah Financial Services Corp. |
April 18, 2008 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Tianjin Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
March 18, 2010 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Noah Insurance (Hong Kong) Limited |
January 3, 2011 |
Hong Kong |
100% | |||
Shanghai Rongyao Information Technology Co., Ltd. |
March 2, 2011 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Kunshan Noah Xingguang Investment Management Co., Ltd. |
August 12, 2011 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Noah Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited |
September 1, 2011 |
Hong Kong |
100% | |||
Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
February 9, 2012 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Gopher Capital GP Limited. |
May 11, 2012 |
Cayman Islands |
100% | |||
Wuhu Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
October 10, 2012 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Zigong Noah Financial Service Co., Ltd. |
October 22, 2012 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Shanghai Gopher Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
December 14, 2012 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Gopher Nuobao (Shanghai) Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
April 10, 2013 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Noah Rongyitong (Wuhu) Microfinance Co., Ltd. |
August 13, 2013 |
PRC |
100% | |||
ARK Trust (Hong Kong) Limited |
September 15, 2014 |
Hong Kong |
100% | |||
Noah (Shanghai) Financial Leasing Co., Ltd |
December 20, 2014 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Noah International (Hong Kong) Limited |
January 7, 2015 |
Hong Kong |
100% | |||
Shanghai Mengkuan Asset Management Co., Ltd. |
March 24, 2015 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Gopher CCM Limited |
August 17, 2015 |
Cayman Islands |
100% | |||
Kunshan Noah Rongyao Investment Management Co., Ltd. |
December 2, 2015 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Shanghai Noah Chuangying Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. |
December 14, 2015 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Gopher International Investment Management (Shanghai) Limited |
November 14, 2016 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Noah Insurance Services LLC |
February 10, 2017 |
USA |
100% | |||
Wuhu Noah Financial Services Co., Ltd. |
July 26, 2017 |
PRC |
100% | |||
Joy Triple Star Holdings Limited |
January 12, 2018 |
BVI |
100% | |||
Elivisa Consulting Pte Limited |
April 9, 2019 |
Singapore |
100% |
*Other consolidated entities of Noah Holdings Limited have been omitted from this list since, considered in the aggregate as a single entity, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
Exhibit 12.1
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Jingbo Wang, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Noah Holdings Limited (the “Company”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 24, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jingbo Wang |
|
Name: |
Jingbo Wang |
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Exhibit 12.2
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Qing Pan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Noah Holdings Limited (the “Company”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: |
April 24, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Qing Pan |
|
Name: |
Qing Pan |
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 13.1
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Noah Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jingbo Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: |
April 24, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jingbo Wang |
|
Name: |
Jingbo Wang |
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Exhibit 13.2
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Noah Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Qing Pan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: |
April 24, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Qing Pan |
|
Name: |
Qing Pan |
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 15.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 ( File No. 333-171541 and 333-222342) of our reports dated April 24, 2020, relating to the financial statements of Noah Holdings Limited (the "Company") and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019.
|
/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP |
|
Shanghai, China |
|
April 24, 2020 |
Exhibit 15.2
CONSENT LETTER
April 24, 2020
TO: Noah Holdings Limited
Building 2,
1687 Changyang Road
Shanghai 200090
People’s Republic of China
Dear Sirs,
We consent to the reference to our firm under the headings “Regulations” and “Organizational Structure” in Noah Holdings Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in April 2020, and further consent to the incorporation by reference of the summaries of our opinions under these headings into Noah Holdings Limited’s registration statement on Form S-8 (file No. 333-171541) that was filed on January 5, 2011, as well as Form S-8 (file No. 333-222342) that was filed on December 29, 2017. We also consent to the filing with the SEC of this consent letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019.
In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in each case, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.
|
Yours faithfully, |
|
/s/ Zhong Lun Law Firm |
|
Zhong Lun Law Firm |
北京 • 上海 • 深圳 • 广州 • 成都 • 武汉 • 重庆 • 青岛 • 杭州 • 南京 • 香港 • 东京 • 伦敦 • 纽约 • 洛杉矶 • 旧金山
Beijing • Shanghai • Shenzhen • Guangzhou • Chengdu • Wuhan • Chongqing • Qingdao • Hangzhou • Nanjing • Hong Kong • Tokyo • London • New York • Los Angeles • San Francisco
Exhibit 15.3
Our ref RDS/658613-000001/16466809v1
Direct tel +852 2971 3046
E-mail richard.spooner@maples.com
Noah Holdings Limited
Building 2, 1687 Changyang Road
Shanghai 200090
People's Republic of China
24 April 2020
Dear Sirs and Madams
Noah Holdings Limited
We have acted as legal advisers as to the laws of the Cayman Islands to Noah Holdings Limited, an exempted limited liability company incorporated in the Cayman Islands (the “Company”), in connection with the filing by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) of an annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2019 (“Form 20-F”).
We hereby consent to the reference of our name under the heading “Item 3.D Risk Factors” in the Form 20-F, and we further consent to the incorporation by reference of the summary of our opinions under this heading into the Company’s registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-171541) that was filed on 5 January 2011 and Form S-8 (File No. 333-222342) that was filed on 29 December 2017.
We consent to the filing with the SEC of this consent letter as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in each case, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.
Yours faithfully
/s/ Maples and Calder (Hong Kong) LLP |
|
Maples and Calder (Hong Kong) LLP |
|